I retook the test, pretending to be the goodiest goody-two-shoes that I could be, and I still managed only to get 94% good, 61% lawful.

Retaking the test as myself again, picking slightly different options. This time, I got:
72.2% (+22.2%) good, 43.6% (+28.2%) lawful (lawful good)

I didn't think I chose that different of options... Well, we'll call this one, "Verb on a good day," and the last one, "Verb on a shitty day."

nope

What'd you get?

I posted it already, but neutral good. I was talking to Erives, 'cause he was saying it was long, but I was saying it wasn't that long.

It wasn't bad.

Longer than she said it'd be!

But not bad.

Questions #1 and #3 sucked. None of the options really did justice to what I'd actually do. To help the old lady get her cat back, I'd probably climb the three and "coax" the cat over (knowing full well that it's not going to respond at all), then jump down and be like, "I'm sorry, I tried my best." Then tell her to bring out the cat's food dish and place it under the tree, or something like that. I ended up going with "call the fire department," because it fell closest to my line of reasoning--after expressing your desire to help (despite utterly lacking the ability to do so), call a third party and see to it that the deed is done.

Question #3 was tough, too, because of the weak options and the completely unrelatable subject matter (I don't watch TV at all, my dad only watches football (and even then, he doesn't care that much about it), and we tend to work out compomises pretty well). Four of the five options were geared towards selfishness, and only one of the options said, "let him watch his game." The fuck? In reality, I would've been like, "Hey dad, looks like my show is on at the same time that the game is on." He'd probably be like, "Oh, really? Haha, that sucks. You can watch your show if you want, it doesn't matter." "Are you sure? Looks like a pretty big game." "Nah, yeah, it's fine." Because I'd probably work it in my father's favor, however, I selected the "let him watch his game" option.

I like how the first three options of question #17 (lemonade stand) are all psychotic.

In question #19 (music theft), I wouldn't do a damn thing--not because it's "not my problem," but because I just wouldn't want to embarrass the guy or make a ruckus. The question described him as "shabby-looking," which makes me think that he's poor, so I sympathize with him right away. I wouldn't do anything just because I'd feel bad for him. But because of the way the question sets up the answers, I'm probably gonna get a little evil karma for that. But I mean, the other options make me out to be an even bigger asshole, from my point of view...

I do appreciate quizzes like this, though, because it forces you to really weigh your options. It sucks not being able to relate with the subject matter, but that's what critical thinking is for. I just wish it was a tad longer.

My favorite questions were #23, the one with the worm, and #26, the secret journal dilemma. Best slew of options, very relatable and intense scenarios (for me, anyway) Question #27 (the sleepy driver scenario) was pretty intense, too. I hope I'm never ever in that situation. Question #33 (soliciting in traffic) was pretty dumb. It's hard to envision a scenario where a little girl is going to beg for money in traffic, and how I'd realistically react to such a thing.

You are 50% Good.
You are 15.4% Lawful.
Alignment: Neutral Good


      You do the best good that a person could be expected to do. You are devoted to helping others. You are willing to work with authority figures, but you do not feel any particular allegiance to them.
      You are the stereotypical “Benefactor.” You believe in doing good without any particular bias for or against order.
      Examples of charactersand people who fit into the same alignment as you include Mother Theresa, Ghandi, Gandalf, Indiana Jones, O-Bi-Wan Kenobi, Luke Skywalker, Harry Potter, Frodo Baggins, and the Dalai Lama.

I did expect to be at least 60% good, but I'm content with my results.

You're like, #45 on the most frequent posters. That's the only reason.

Isara is not included?

she didn't post

she also isn't anywhere near the top 50 most frequent posters (not that post count matters but that's what i was going off of at the time)

i NEED to be on this list

you're not half bad, bud

Quote from: Verbatim on December 28, 2014, 09:48:25 PM

0 inches. It's staying that way.

I just traced your IP and triangulated you global position.

You've got eight inches coming your way.

Can you give me a time as to when that's supposed to happen?

'Cause I wanna know when to gloat when it doesn't.

0 inches. It's staying that way.

he looks constantly troubled about something

Non existent tier eh? Ah word.

adding

post more faggot

pichuuuuuuu is the SMASH MASTER 

I could beat him with Ganon. Unless he plays Jiggs or Sheik.

Could you give examples of these alleged "preposterous things"?

I can't be fucked.

Alternatively, being a loathsome cunt also lands you in the E-tier.

I bet I could beat him in Smash.