This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - g💚jira
Pages: 1 ... 252627 2829 ... 65
781
« on: December 29, 2014, 12:45:36 PM »
PSA 2: Unlike the preview build you can turn off auto stabilizers here.
782
« on: December 29, 2014, 12:40:07 PM »
PSA: "Flinch" is apparently just an animation bug that's going to be fixed for launch.
Linkerino? I really hate flinch.
Heeere ya go
783
« on: December 29, 2014, 12:37:44 PM »
What? How? I have literally 0 games for it but sometimes I use it to browse the internet and it seems intuitive enough...
784
« on: December 29, 2014, 12:27:23 PM »
PSA: "Flinch" is apparently just an animation bug that's going to be fixed for launch.
785
« on: December 29, 2014, 12:23:29 PM »
One of the songs is tooootally a Captain America 2 reference. But yeah, it sounds pretty great. There's one choral piece that reminds me of Ghosts of Reach kinda.
OH and can't forget the To Galaxy remix in the Sprint Vidocs. That sounds stellar.
786
« on: December 29, 2014, 12:21:53 PM »
Peace is shattered when colony worlds are unexpectedly attacked. This premise immediately makes me nervous for the future of Halo
787
« on: December 28, 2014, 11:42:09 PM »
Uhhhhh too many votes for me in Math
Turkey and Piranha vastly outpace me in that field
788
« on: December 28, 2014, 11:32:17 PM »
Been following for a while, looks super cool.
789
« on: December 28, 2014, 11:31:52 PM »
SDILUWEJRLKSDJF
790
« on: December 28, 2014, 11:07:12 PM »
Because I will never figure out Comet's actual birthday, here is my PREEMPTIVE/BELATED HAPPY BIRTHDAY COMET <3
:^)
... well now I'm realizing that if this is Comet's actual birthday I'm wrong
791
« on: December 28, 2014, 11:00:27 PM »
Because I will never figure out Comet's actual birthday, here is my PREEMPTIVE/BELATED HAPPY BIRTHDAY COMET <3
792
« on: December 28, 2014, 12:47:26 PM »
Age old dilemma: Are those lowercase "L"s or uppercase "i"s?
793
« on: December 28, 2014, 12:45:10 PM »
Halo PC still best Halo
Well it's not exactly CE, but close enough 9/10 opinion you have there Assassin Holy shit. I'm never playing that level again.
You're a super-soldier wearing the finest equipment made by man, you can strike fear into your alien enemies and get knee deep into parasitic scum with nothing but your wits and shotgun shells...and you fear a stick-bodied fuck?
Only if it's two stick bodies. Two stick bodies and a rock for the whole level.
794
« on: December 28, 2014, 12:41:16 PM »
DXHR [need to play DX soon]
ME1 [on another playthrough rn actually]
Halo CE [only campaign though]
FEAR [still playing through it, god tier gunplay]
Dino Crisis [fun to speedrun through, I think I have it down to around 1.5 hours now]
Literally zero games from after 2011, what do you know
And I haven't played Turok 2 the best game ever made of all time at all this year, I need to repent
795
« on: December 28, 2014, 01:38:39 AM »
796
« on: December 28, 2014, 12:02:26 AM »
But after Halo 2, precision weapons behave the way I described.
No? Well in Reach, sure, but certainly not in Halo 3. Like I said, the zoom doesn't make you more accurate aside from increasing your auto aim/bullet magnetism and slightly decreasing your recoil. See that video I posted [the one where I was calling Halo 3's BR total garbage]. Spread is every bit as random scoped in as it is scoped out.
797
« on: December 27, 2014, 11:28:38 PM »
I always thought there was an accuracy change when using the scope on precision weapons. Because your reticle stayed proportionate when zooming in. If it stayed the same, wouldn't you expect it to appear larger when scoped in to represent the true accuracy?
Never. Precision weapons were designed so that if you're in the correct range, it doesn't matter whether or not you're scoped in.
CE- Didn't matter [test it yourself, spread doesn't change at all]
2 w/TU- No spread
3- Didn't matter, but lead to the infamous H3 BR spread dilemma [range was too short, this meant that sometimes even with red reticule you would have shots running haywire]
Reach- Bloom, because I don't even know
Now that you mention it, this might be the case in H2A though. I haven't seen any tests on BR spread in that game, so I'm not the best judge. Regardless it's something that I hope will be removed from the game.
Right now it doesn't seem to have that much of an effect so I doubt it'll be anything as jarring as BR spread or DMR bloom on precision weapons... but, well, there it is.
It may have been that way in Halo CE, but that stopped in Halo 2.
What stopped in Halo 2? Halo 2 didn't have spread at all. And base, non TU Halo 2 works the same as Halo 3 [i.e. zooming in doesn't change accuracy].
*since Halo 2
The Halo 2 BR did have spread, it was just so minuscule you couldn't notice it unless you did a test standing still. The Carbine also had it.
Errr... no. Spread was entirely removed as of Autoupdate 1.1. There was still controlled recoil, but that was pretty much constant. Halo 2 BR has no spread, only microscopic recoilHalo 3 BR is garbage in every sense of the word, scoped in or notOr was it? Now that you mention it while I've always heard of spread being completely removed I haven't really seen an official log for Autoupdate 1.1. Do you have a source stating that it was only a miniscule spread? And even then, it would be the same mechanics as Halo 3 so the effect on the argument is inconsequential. [Sorry for this damn near schizophrenic set of edits, I'm doing other stuff too  ]
798
« on: December 27, 2014, 11:20:58 PM »
I always thought there was an accuracy change when using the scope on precision weapons. Because your reticle stayed proportionate when zooming in. If it stayed the same, wouldn't you expect it to appear larger when scoped in to represent the true accuracy?
Never. Precision weapons were designed so that if you're in the correct range, it doesn't matter whether or not you're scoped in.
CE- Didn't matter [test it yourself, spread doesn't change at all]
2 w/TU- No spread
3- Didn't matter, but lead to the infamous H3 BR spread dilemma [range was too short, this meant that sometimes even with red reticule you would have shots running haywire]
Reach- Bloom, because I don't even know
Now that you mention it, this might be the case in H2A though. I haven't seen any tests on BR spread in that game, so I'm not the best judge. Regardless it's something that I hope will be removed from the game.
Right now it doesn't seem to have that much of an effect so I doubt it'll be anything as jarring as BR spread or DMR bloom on precision weapons... but, well, there it is.
It may have been that way in Halo CE, but that stopped in Halo 2.
What stopped in Halo 2? Halo 2 didn't have spread at all. And base, non TU Halo 2 works the same as Halo 3 [i.e. zooming in doesn't change accuracy]. Though actually now that I think about it, Halo 3's BR recoil was based on the reticule. So there would be a very very slight, extremely marginal increase in accuracy after zooming in.
799
« on: December 27, 2014, 10:47:05 PM »
 OH MY GOD TONY HE'S GOT A KNIFE
800
« on: December 27, 2014, 10:40:07 PM »
I always thought there was an accuracy change when using the scope on precision weapons. Because your reticle stayed proportionate when zooming in. If it stayed the same, wouldn't you expect it to appear larger when scoped in to represent the true accuracy?
Never. Precision weapons were designed so that if you're in the correct range, it doesn't matter whether or not you're scoped in. CE- Didn't matter [test it yourself, spread doesn't change at all] 2 w/TU- No spread 3- Didn't matter, but lead to the infamous H3 BR spread dilemma [range was too short, this meant that sometimes even with red reticule you would have shots running haywire] Reach- Bloom, because I don't even know Now that you mention it, this might be the case in H2A though. I haven't seen any tests on BR spread in that game, so I'm not the best judge. Regardless it's something that I hope will be removed from the game. Right now it doesn't seem to have that much of an effect so I doubt it'll be anything as jarring as BR spread or DMR bloom on precision weapons... but, well, there it is.
801
« on: December 27, 2014, 03:54:05 PM »
I got to play a little of it through the Xbox Preview program. Its basically Halo 4 on steroids with a couple of small twists.
Doesn't have perks
doesn't have ordinance drops
doesn't have jetpack
It mainly comes down to ADS and sprint. Everything else is fairly minor.
The "ADS" is literally a fancy animation for scoping in. It functions the exact same way.
This has been a thing in Halo games for years, and that's not going to make any difference at all.
You could increase precision of automatic weapons by zooming in the other Halo's?
In the Halo games which had zoom on automatics, yeah. Meaning H2A and nothing else, but still. Regardless considering automatics have always operated on a bloom-ish system, it makes sense that a zoom feature would have made said automatics more accurate at ranges [reticule size stays the same but covers a smaller area of the screen than hip fire]. Now the question is: Are automatics with zoom features a good addition to Halo in the first place? Ayy that shows a very slight spread tightening on the BR too, now that's not good
802
« on: December 26, 2014, 11:44:53 PM »
Because that's probably not the SPNKR.
It is
Interesting [still might be the G4H-DuSH though, but regardless it's the new RL]. Wonder if the in lore it has something to do with the SPNKR having two tubes. I'd be surprised if the change was due to gameplay [maybe it's to slow down the ROF, but that seems like a silly reason].
803
« on: December 26, 2014, 11:29:21 PM »
Because that's probably not the SPNKR.
804
« on: December 26, 2014, 11:25:33 PM »
As Arbiter, my first action is to broadcast myself committing suicide with Rtas Vadum on national television
Thank you and goodnight
805
« on: December 26, 2014, 11:23:31 PM »
OH CAN I BE THEL
You want the Separatists?
YEAH
806
« on: December 26, 2014, 11:22:51 PM »
OH CAN I BE THEL
807
« on: December 26, 2014, 11:18:37 PM »
Record time: I broke out laughing right when I saw the guy's channel name
808
« on: December 26, 2014, 11:17:05 PM »
B.Net's private groups
/tv/
/v/
/co/
/lit/
superherohype
jplegacy
rationalskepticism
More than a few paleontology boards
Youtube
There are still more sites I lurk on regularly but there are far too many of those to count [mainly for math and phl]
809
« on: December 26, 2014, 11:07:45 PM »
wow... so this... is the power... of amphicoelitis
810
« on: December 26, 2014, 10:53:45 PM »
Gender is not biological. Biological means biology. Please dissect someone and the lines of their brain and show me how biological it is.
Please sample the CSF , endocrine system, etc and show me how "biological" it is.
If it was biological you would see it shared amongst other creatures across the animal kingdom. I think you've given this poor man brain damage
Pages: 1 ... 252627 2829 ... 65
|
Show Posts