Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - g💚jira

Pages: 1 ... 232425 2627 ... 65
721
Gaming / Re: HEY
« on: January 03, 2015, 12:34:29 AM »
One day I will watch something related to League

But today is not that day

722
The Flood / Re: Holy Shit!
« on: January 03, 2015, 12:26:35 AM »

723
Gaming / Re: World War 2 game?
« on: January 02, 2015, 06:42:32 PM »
I remember a time when everyone would hate on the WWII setting for being overdone. It's why CoD4 did nearly as well as it did.

724
The Flood / Re: Ben Kenobi was an asshole
« on: January 02, 2015, 06:32:54 PM »
And he was a good friend

725
Gaming / Re: ITT: What was your first FPS game
« on: January 02, 2015, 04:01:38 PM »
Turok 2, which still remains the best game ever made of all time.

European Assault was made in 2005, Lemy. Halo predates it by 4 years. Hell, Halo 2 predates it by a year.

Spoiler
PS it added ADS into MoH, "Halo mode" after getting a few headshots, and wasn't even close to the best shooter of 2005.


Mmmm. Now there's a MoH game.

726
Gaming / Re: Halo 5 MP First Impressions/Suggestions
« on: January 02, 2015, 02:01:52 PM »
YouTube


YouTube


Solid gameplay videos

Someone tweet the second one to Josh Holmes or Quinn DelHoyo

I swear all it would take to fix this is to make sprint require full shields to initialize

727
Gaming / Re: Halo 5 Today?
« on: January 02, 2015, 01:00:02 PM »
HAHAAAAAAAAAAA THE LR SCOPED IN IS A 3 SHOT [This is a good thing provided the aim assists are low, which they supposedly are]
Light Rifle's hard to use though.

Music to my ears!
It's got a low rate of fire. But yeah, the Smart Scope mode is a kick in the nuts when you're hit with it. Glad it's a power weapon. Hydra is good too. Surprisingly balanced.

It's a power weapon?! Well there go my hopes of it being CE 0.25. Though maybe we'll have LR starts in the future XD

That being saaaaaid I've been looking at BR start gameplay on Twitch and it looks ridiculously good. Beta's finally fully impressed me. Eden and Regret both look like fantastic maps as opposed to the cluttered likes of Truth and Empire and the new abilities flow beautifully with a mid range starting weapon. Almost seems like the the game was designed around BRs and made to accommodate autos later.
Actually, Regret and Eden seem more cluttered than their counterparts.

Really? The maps are much smoother both visually and gameplay wise from the streams I'm watching. Then again, I am only watching so...

728
Flee I'm coming to take your job from you

729
Gaming / Re: Halo 5 Today?
« on: January 02, 2015, 12:19:38 PM »
HAHAAAAAAAAAAA THE LR SCOPED IN IS A 3 SHOT [This is a good thing provided the aim assists are low, which they supposedly are]
Light Rifle's hard to use though.

Music to my ears!
It's got a low rate of fire. But yeah, the Smart Scope mode is a kick in the nuts when you're hit with it. Glad it's a power weapon. Hydra is good too. Surprisingly balanced.

It's a power weapon?! Well there go my hopes of it being CE 0.25. Though maybe we'll have LR starts in the future XD

That being saaaaaid I've been looking at BR start gameplay on Twitch and it looks ridiculously good. Beta's finally fully impressed me. Eden and Regret both look like fantastic maps as opposed to the cluttered likes of Truth and Empire and the new abilities flow beautifully with a mid range starting weapon. Almost seems like the the game was designed around BRs and made to accommodate autos later.

730
Gaming / Re: Halo 5 Today?
« on: January 02, 2015, 12:15:03 PM »
HAHAAAAAAAAAAA THE LR SCOPED IN IS A 3 SHOT [This is a good thing provided the aim assists are low, which they supposedly are]
Light Rifle's hard to use though.

Music to my ears!

731
Gaming / Re: Halo 5 Today?
« on: January 02, 2015, 12:10:17 PM »
HAHAAAAAAAAAAA THE LR SCOPED IN IS A 3 SHOT [This is a good thing provided the aim assists are low, which they supposedly are]

732
The Flood / Re: Dear Lemy
« on: January 02, 2015, 12:14:58 AM »
Lemy is amazing, what are you talking about

733
The Flood / Re: Why does it take 13 years to make a sequel?
« on: January 01, 2015, 10:24:59 PM »
I don't know, Gearbox, why did it take ~13 [okay, 12] years to make a sequel?

734
Serious / Re: Democracy/Republic v Theocracy
« on: January 01, 2015, 10:19:26 PM »
Also the two smartest people on the forum believe in god (Turkey anf Goji), so there's definitely some truth to behind creationism

dusty pls

First of all, there are many smarter people here, I just know how to Google stuff really well.

Second, even if I was, I'd hope nobody would convert simply because someone smarter than them did it.

Third, while I do believe in a type of creationism (as anyone following ostensibly any deism must), I don't believe in the modern anti-scientific rhetoric of fundamentalist creationists.

OT: I don't really see why anyone would choose a representative government over one ruled directly by a benevolent, omniscient, and omnipotent deity, though there were a lot of assumptions in those qualifiers.

735
The Flood / Re: So
« on: January 01, 2015, 10:11:05 PM »
I can't look at Anarchy for more than 11 seconds at a time without having my head melt, so I'm constantly moving to another board

736
The Flood / Re: You can have one augmetic, what would it be?
« on: January 01, 2015, 10:09:37 PM »
That depends on whoever it's made by. Gift from God scenario? Advanced memory would rock, as you've said. Increased reaction time with some mods to the nervous system would be nice but I imagine that would require some ridiculous level of modification. And of course the built in wi fi thing would come in handy as well, but I don't exactly trust that either.

737
The Flood / Re: Something I have to admit
« on: January 01, 2015, 08:55:30 PM »
Shoot it

738
The Flood / Re: I'm coming out.
« on: January 01, 2015, 08:41:48 PM »

739
The Flood / Re: where the fuck is anarchy
« on: January 01, 2015, 08:20:24 PM »
You're better off not knowing, seriously

741
The Flood / Re: Hello
« on: January 01, 2015, 05:03:17 PM »
OMG do you still have that video where you got banned at B.Net and insulted N***** Obama? "If you think I threaten people you should kill yourself" or something along those lines?

That still makes me laugh

742
The Flood / Re: Is Anarchy up?
« on: January 01, 2015, 04:10:24 PM »
Requested... It asked for a reason. I was like do I need one?

Just trap them in a paradox. "To find the reason."

Trust me, it worked for HAL, and the way I see it, Mr. Psy can't be much different from that

743

744
The Flood / Re: Is Anarchy up?
« on: January 01, 2015, 03:49:36 PM »
It's up, I've been hovering there for a good 2-3 minutes now.

Spoiler
It's like a really gory scene in a poorly made horror movie- it's so bad, but you still keep looking at it for some reason.

745
Serious / Re: Yes, objective morality exists
« on: January 01, 2015, 03:46:10 PM »

746
The Flood / Re: Woo, analarchy
« on: January 01, 2015, 03:40:13 PM »
I've been on that board for around 45 seconds and it feels like I've been killed

747
Serious / Re: Yes, objective morality exists
« on: January 01, 2015, 03:27:21 PM »
I remember reading something from him where he lists off philosophical words and characterizes them as "boredom inducing" before he makes his points. I was like "yeah w/e"
hue

What's the book?

The Moral Landscape?

Spoiler
Ayy, while searching for it I found that RWTUG is unsurprisingly against him

[This guy is totally nuts, but he brings up some super good points from time to time. You might wanna check the rest of his blog out too Meta]

"... I am convinced that every appearance of terms like "metaethics," "deontology," "noncognitivism," "anti-realism," "emotivism," and the like, directly increases the amount of boredom in the universe."

lmao

748
Serious / Re: Yes, objective morality exists
« on: January 01, 2015, 03:16:22 PM »
Quote
The basis of his consequentialist utilitarianism (loosely defined) is that there is no other position to operate from when considering morality, first and foremost because nobody would sanely advocate a system of morality which resulted in abject destitution.

I'll have to look into it more sometime, sounds interesting.


I remember reading something from him where he lists off philosophical words and characterizes them as "boredom inducing" before he makes his points. I was like "yeah w/e"

749
The Flood / Re: I HAVE POWER
« on: January 01, 2015, 02:39:30 PM »
FROM MY POINT OF VIEW THE POWER IS SHEEVIL

A SITH LORD?

750
Serious / Re: Yes, objective morality exists
« on: January 01, 2015, 02:38:25 PM »
This is that same video that has been refuted by every relativist on every corner of the planet, summarizing the book that has been refuted by every relativist on every corner of the planet, made by the person that has often been refuted by every relativist on every corner of the planet. Unfortunately I'm not exactly a relativist myself, but I've spent enough time around them to remember their baseline argument [or at least kinda extrapolate and think in the "mode" of a relativist XD]:

IIRC the two second rebuttal is that his entire argument boils down to making comparative sentences into boolean expressions, which clearly have definite answers:

(Action_Wellness_Quant > Action'_Wellness_Quant) => (Action_Wellness_Quant ==  Good)

This assumes that

A) Utilitarianism is the proper way of handling an ethical situation, which is another debate entirely and therefore not exactly a fully factual premise. Luckily for him I agree, so his argument works so far.

B) Quantifying the "wellness" of an action is possible. The problems with this should be kind of completely obvious.

So yeah. I'm not saying he's wrong [I personally haven't really paid much attention to him- the first few sentences of his book where he acts like he's too good for philosophy turned me off anyways] but this TED talk gives me that impression.

Pages: 1 ... 232425 2627 ... 65