Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - g💚jira

Pages: 1 ... 343536 3738 ... 65
1051
The Flood / Re: Thare are monsters among us
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:50:36 PM »
ayy

1052
The Flood / Re: I Don't Feel Loved
« on: December 03, 2014, 06:23:05 PM »
I

LOVE

YOU

<3

1053
Stop playing, Dark Souls is a terrible game

But it's just like Mass Effect

Dark Souls:

Third person
Video game
Large part of fanbase displeased with latest installment
Still some others who claim it is the greatest RPG of all time

See?!

1054
Gaming / Re: Your thoughts on "The Dark Below"?
« on: December 03, 2014, 05:21:39 PM »
I hate that it costs $15. I want to pay at least $45 for this.

1055
Gaming / Re: More No Man's Sky footage at the VGAs this Friday
« on: December 03, 2014, 04:12:03 PM »
Bungie's faces when Marty is sitting there, scoring the entire event
Bungie's faces when the only award Destiny wins is for best soundtrack

1056
*THE two most iconic superheroes

I still don't see it making Avengers level money. JL probably will but the audience just isn't established enough for DC to just BTFO of marvel.
I'm not saying it's going to BTFO AoU (you'd have to be based Jim to pull that off). It will however, be pretty fucking close. These are of course people's childhood heroes that will be appearing together on the big screen for the first time, not a green rage monster or the star spangled HELP ME TONY.



It's not an A. In my country it means Assistance.

I CANT HOLD ON MUCH LONGER TONY

EEUUUURRRRGHHH

1057
*THE two most iconic superheroes

I still don't see it making Avengers level money. JL probably will but the audience just isn't established enough for DC to just BTFO of marvel.
I'm not saying it's going to BTFO AoU (you'd have to be based Jim to pull that off). It will however, be pretty fucking close. These are of course people's childhood heroes that will be appearing together on the big screen for the first time, not a green rage monster or the star spangled HELP ME TONY.



It's not an A. In my country it means Assistance.

1058
Quote
I have zero doubt in my mind that Batman v Superman will outgross Avengers and Age of Ultron.

I have zero doubt in my mind that this guy is insane.
MoS made half a billion dude. Combine that with the fact that two of the most iconic superheroes are going to be duking it out on the big screen for the first time could definitely give the MCU a run for its money, quite literally.

*THE two most iconic superheroes

I still don't see it making Avengers level money. JL probably will but the audience just isn't established enough for DC to just BTFO of marvel.

Quote
I have zero doubt in my mind that Batman v Superman will outgross Avengers and Age of Ultron.

I have zero doubt in my mind that this guy is insane.
MoS made half a billion dude.

In total, or at the Box Office?

Because here...

#3: The Avengers with $623,279,547

#51: Man of Steel with $291,021,565


Yeah, the Dark Night is up there, but as are individual Marvel Movies.

You're looking at domestic box office. MoS was the first film in the DCCU, got a mixed reception, and STILL managed to get around 670 million worldwide I believe. No doubt in my mind that BvS is going to be a financial success at least on the level of TDK.

1059
Just a little example of how fantastic DC's screenwriters can be.
YouTube


Did not know you were into DC! COTE was spectacular.

1060
Quote
I have zero doubt in my mind that Batman v Superman will outgross Avengers and Age of Ultron.

I have zero doubt in my mind that this guy is insane.

Quote
Man of Steel says hi.

Hey!

Quote
I don't agree with the OP at all. Did Batman kick Marvel's ass? Yeah, it did. But Superman and Batman are DC's only real heavyweights. Audiences don't give a shit about Green Lantern, Wonder Woman, Shazam, and fucking Aquaman.

Not yet.

Quote
DC is clearly playing catch up with Marvel,

In what sense?

Quote
and this rapid-fire list of movies

... what's so rapid about it?

Quote
that will be coming out every year pretty soon looks extremely rushed and I have doubts about how they can weave the story together.

How and why?

1061
The Flood / Re: GOJI LIKES HALO 4
« on: December 03, 2014, 03:15:48 PM »
:P

Brings back memories of the #­gaming days. Interesting how Onyx, Chronarch, Anton, Grey, and the other lore giants all think positively of Halo 4, no?

1062
The Flood / Re: Thoughts on Sand?
« on: December 03, 2014, 01:54:51 PM »
Guys... can we not instigate an argument about how it seems to some people that others are trying to instigate arguments?

1063
Serious / Re: The concept of non-existence
« on: December 03, 2014, 01:13:22 PM »
@Everyone who replied: This isn't a topic a short message rebuttal does justice to. Trying to condense this just makes you inherently come off as overly hedonistic or an absolute nihilist. That's just mathematically how a deductive post can be set up [statement -> contained premises -> restatement]. I shy away from this kind of stuff aside from dedicated philosophy forums for that very reason... "short" arguments against nihilism are always inherently unconvincing it seems. And, well, it brings up the topic of religion which is never fun to talk about online :P

tl;dr: Much of your arguments won't be convincing to any person fascinated with the concept of nonexistence. Just sayin' right now, I've seen too many people get pissed off by this discussion.

OT: If you really want to fight nihilism, you should read some more Camus XD
understood, it's a hard concept to articulate as it is. Trying to do so over a forum doesn't exactly help matters.

omg, just to be clear: I didn't mean to insinuate that your arguments were bad, invalid, or unsound, just that most of the time the other party probably won't be convinced! Or do I sound like more of a jerk now

sldkjf

ignore me

1064
Serious / Re: The concept of non-existence
« on: December 03, 2014, 01:01:24 PM »
@Everyone who replied: This isn't a topic a short message rebuttal does justice to. Trying to condense this just makes you inherently come off as overly hedonistic or an absolute nihilist. That's just mathematically how a deductive post can be set up [statement -> contained premises -> restatement]. I shy away from this kind of stuff aside from dedicated philosophy forums for that very reason... "short" arguments against nihilism are always inherently unconvincing it seems. And, well, it brings up the topic of religion which is never fun to talk about online :P

tl;dr: Much of your arguments won't be convincing to any person fascinated with the concept of nonexistence. Just sayin' right now, I've seen too many people get pissed off by this discussion.

OT: If you really want to fight nihilism, you should read some more Camus XD
Camus kept me from offing myself a while back.

Spoiler
Did the same thing for ex Ms. Goji

He has that effect on people XD

1065
The Flood / Re: Thoughts on Sand?
« on: December 03, 2014, 12:39:08 PM »
I'm expressing surprise over the fact that people aren't getting all bent out of shape over my rare opinions like they usually are. Freak the fuck out over it.

Hey man, if I can openly like Halo 4 on here without being swarmed, you can certainly like Star Wars prequels openly on here. Being in the minority becomes more comforting when you're good friends with the majority XD

1067
The Flood / Re: Thoughts on Sand?
« on: December 03, 2014, 12:19:39 PM »
Like, I'm not joking.

Usually I have at least three people trying to rip me apart by now.

It's a piece of entertainment, opinions can run wild. As much in the minority as they are :P

1068
The Flood / Thoughts on Sand?
« on: December 03, 2014, 12:09:24 PM »


"Not like here"

1069
Serious / Re: The concept of non-existence
« on: December 03, 2014, 12:05:23 PM »
@Everyone who replied: This isn't a topic a short message rebuttal does justice to. Trying to condense this just makes you inherently come off as overly hedonistic or an absolute nihilist. That's just mathematically how a deductive post can be set up [statement -> contained premises -> restatement]. I shy away from this kind of stuff aside from dedicated philosophy forums for that very reason... "short" arguments against nihilism are always inherently unconvincing it seems. And, well, it brings up the topic of religion which is never fun to talk about online :P

tl;dr: Much of your arguments won't be convincing to any person fascinated with the concept of nonexistence. Just sayin' right now, I've seen too many people get pissed off by this discussion.

OT: If you really want to fight nihilism, you should read some more Camus XD

1070
The Flood / Re: The end of the canon wars
« on: December 03, 2014, 11:54:36 AM »
Wow, and here I was thinking it was Kodak

1071
The Flood / Re: A communications disruption can only mean one thing
« on: December 03, 2014, 11:52:23 AM »
Get off of /tv/ Mr. Mordo

Spoiler
I DON'T LIKE SAND

1072
Gaming / Re: Mass Effect vs. Fallout vs. Dark Souls
« on: December 03, 2014, 10:49:03 AM »
Mass Effect: 12
Dark Souls: 9

We are surrounded by casual scrubs, my friends.





>mfw Dark Souls isn't winning.
MFW



Amateurs


1073
The Flood / Re: Suicide Squad Revealed
« on: December 02, 2014, 05:31:59 PM »

1075
Gaming / Re: Mass Effect vs. Fallout vs. Dark Souls
« on: December 02, 2014, 02:38:10 PM »
Oh the correct answer is Deus Ex BTW, if you truly weren't casuals you'd have complained about its exclusion by now

1076
Mitochondrion was hilarious

1077
The Flood / Re: >When you wake up to your fucking cat meowing in your face
« on: December 02, 2014, 12:49:49 PM »
I WANT A KITTEN

SO

BADLY

1078
Serious / Re: Long list of sex acts was just banned in UK
« on: December 02, 2014, 12:49:19 PM »
Dude what

1079
The Flood / Re: Canadian Food >>>>
« on: December 02, 2014, 11:26:18 AM »
Aside from the darn Lays Ketchup, OP is 100% correct

1080
Gaming / Re: Mass Effect vs. Fallout vs. Dark Souls
« on: December 02, 2014, 12:56:58 AM »
Fallout getting rekt

Pages: 1 ... 343536 3738 ... 65