Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Girl of Mystery

Pages: 1 ... 727728729 730731 ... 778
21841
The Flood / Re: "The lightsaber in the trailer is impractical"
« on: November 29, 2014, 07:55:30 AM »
I thought disney axed all the lore upon purchase?
Irrelevant
Completely relevant since it would make the wiki irrelevant >:]
My point is that more impractical saber weapons exist that nobody threw a hissy fit over.
How? They're all practical instead of the claymore version of the lightsaber.
A lightsaber whip is anything but practical.
I disagree.
Even though the chances of accidentally removing a limb is infinitely higher than the claymoresaber from the trailer?
The whip is literally the epitome of impractical.
Nah there are a lot of uses for it. Makes for a great weapon.
But a crossguard is impractical? K

21842
The Flood / Re: Americlaps get shit for our accents
« on: November 29, 2014, 07:54:21 AM »
Chavs aren't people

21843
The Flood / Re: "The lightsaber in the trailer is impractical"
« on: November 29, 2014, 07:52:23 AM »
I thought disney axed all the lore upon purchase?
Irrelevant
Completely relevant since it would make the wiki irrelevant >:]
My point is that more impractical saber weapons exist that nobody threw a hissy fit over.
How? They're all practical instead of the claymore version of the lightsaber.
A lightsaber whip is anything but practical.
I disagree.
Even though the chances of accidentally removing a limb is infinitely higher than the claymoresaber from the trailer?
The whip is literally the epitome of impractical.

21844
The Flood / Re: "The lightsaber in the trailer is impractical"
« on: November 29, 2014, 06:52:26 AM »
I thought disney axed all the lore upon purchase?
Irrelevant
Completely relevant since it would make the wiki irrelevant >:]
My point is that more impractical saber weapons exist that nobody threw a hissy fit over.
How? They're all practical instead of the claymore version of the lightsaber.
A lightsaber whip is anything but practical.

21845
The Flood / Re: "The lightsaber in the trailer is impractical"
« on: November 29, 2014, 06:47:02 AM »
I thought disney axed all the lore upon purchase?
Irrelevant
Completely relevant since it would make the wiki irrelevant >:]
My point is that more impractical saber weapons exist that nobody threw a hissy fit over.

21846
The Flood / Re: "The lightsaber in the trailer is impractical"
« on: November 29, 2014, 06:43:51 AM »
I thought disney axed all the lore upon purchase?
Irrelevant

21847
Gaming / Re: What should I do with my 360?
« on: November 29, 2014, 06:43:27 AM »
Feed it to people in Ethiopia.

21849
The Flood / Re: That lightsaber in the boring Star Wars trailer.
« on: November 29, 2014, 05:46:53 AM »
It's impractical
Because Star Wars is all about practicality, right?

21850
The Flood / Re: The first trailer for Star Wars Episode VII is here
« on: November 29, 2014, 05:42:19 AM »

Your whole side of this boils down to "waaahhh a black guy that doesn't do something cool or some shit like lando in the trailer. he obviously has no character and is only there because tokenism".

 

21851
Gaming / Re: "Guilty pleasures" in gaming?
« on: November 29, 2014, 05:29:24 AM »
I always am evil in any game that gives you the option. Always.
Because they're always written better.
Renegade femshep > any other Shepard
Paragon Femshep > ren fenshep
Less action-girl troupey.
>Being Paragon in ME
What are you, gay?

21852
Gaming / Re: "Guilty pleasures" in gaming?
« on: November 29, 2014, 04:20:03 AM »
I always am evil in any game that gives you the option. Always.
Because they're always written better.
Renegade femshep > any other Shepard

21853
The Flood / Re: Eckhart Tolle is really ugly
« on: November 29, 2014, 04:18:38 AM »
Someone stole his chin.

21854
The Flood / Re: FOR THE EMPIRE!
« on: November 29, 2014, 04:16:14 AM »
Disney can never erase thirty years of established canon
No, but they can make it non-canon.

21855
Gaming / Re: Lasky is such a fanboy
« on: November 29, 2014, 04:12:02 AM »

So would I be correct in assuming you like Michael Bay movies because "BOOM EXPLOSION"?
Thom was undeveloped, and made absolutely no impact.

I can appreciate well developed characters when they're done well.

Those last four words are key.

On the other hand, I can appreciate undeveloped characters when they do something legitimately entertaining.

Like Thom did.
Entertaining and pretty badass? Sure.
Impactful actions and more developed and interesting than anyone else in the Haloverse? Most definitely not.

Never said he was more developed. Just more interesting.
Like, how? He's nobody that's done nothing.

 single-handed
Sure. Totally didn't have people on the ground that made it possible for him to even get close to the ship.

It's not like Kat's impotent yet finely-shaped ass was helping him any. He had to clean up the rest of his team's mess while they stood by wishing they could be half as amazing as him.
Apparently you have low standards for what constitutes as interesting.

A supersoldier hand-delivering a nuclear weapon to an alien ship isn't interesting?
An undeveloped character with no impact on anything from a trailer created entirely for hype and le c00l factor isn't interesting.

21856
The Flood / Re: The first trailer for Star Wars Episode VII is here
« on: November 29, 2014, 04:09:26 AM »
this is a character who seems to only be skin deep while previous characters that happened to be black actually had a character that didn't revolve around their ethnicity.
I'm the one who's starting shit even though you're the one complaining that there's a black guy and a woman in the trailer? Okay.

Yes, because a character we know literally nothing about who appeared for all of 5 seconds in an 88 second trailer is only skin deep and only for the sake of diversity.
Congrats, Mr Super Sleuth.

21857
The Flood / Re: The first trailer for Star Wars Episode VII is here
« on: November 29, 2014, 03:53:56 AM »
It may be shit, but it's still better than Forced Diversity: The Cast, Progressive Pandering edition,
Are you purposely being a retard?
"hurr movie trailer has a woman and a black guy in it. obvious forced diversity."

The way he's introduced screams tokenism.

Lando Calrission
Introduced in his trailer as being a suave rouge similar to Han Solo. Seems to be an interesting character with actual depth.

New Guy
HEY LOOK I'M A BLACK MAN
"black man is the first character in the trailer. obviously tokenism"
Are you done being a moron yet? It's pretty sad that you're actually complaining about the race of a person.

21858
Gaming / Re: Lasky is such a fanboy
« on: November 29, 2014, 03:50:09 AM »

So would I be correct in assuming you like Michael Bay movies because "BOOM EXPLOSION"?
Thom was undeveloped, and made absolutely no impact.

I can appreciate well developed characters when they're done well.

Those last four words are key.

On the other hand, I can appreciate undeveloped characters when they do something legitimately entertaining.

Like Thom did.
Entertaining and pretty badass? Sure.
Impactful actions and more developed and interesting than anyone else in the Haloverse? Most definitely not.

Never said he was more developed. Just more interesting.
Like, how? He's nobody that's done nothing.

 single-handed
Sure. Totally didn't have people on the ground that made it possible for him to even get close to the ship.

It's not like Kat's impotent yet finely-shaped ass was helping him any. He had to clean up the rest of his team's mess while they stood by wishing they could be half as amazing as him.
Apparently you have low standards for what constitutes as interesting.

21859
The Flood / Re: The first trailer for Star Wars Episode VII is here
« on: November 29, 2014, 03:38:37 AM »
It may be shit, but it's still better than Forced Diversity: The Cast, Progressive Pandering edition,
Are you purposely being a retard?
"hurr movie trailer has a woman and a black guy in it. obvious forced diversity."

21860
Gaming / Re: Lasky is such a fanboy
« on: November 29, 2014, 03:34:03 AM »

So would I be correct in assuming you like Michael Bay movies because "BOOM EXPLOSION"?
Thom was undeveloped, and made absolutely no impact.

I can appreciate well developed characters when they're done well.

Those last four words are key.

On the other hand, I can appreciate undeveloped characters when they do something legitimately entertaining.

Like Thom did.
Entertaining and pretty badass? Sure.
Impactful actions and more developed and interesting than anyone else in the Haloverse? Most definitely not.

Never said he was more developed. Just more interesting.
Like, how? He's nobody that's done nothing.

 single-handed
Sure. Totally didn't have people on the ground that made it possible for him to even get close to the ship.

21861
Gaming / Re: Steam is the worst thing ever invented
« on: November 29, 2014, 02:41:42 AM »

21862
Gaming / Re: Lasky is such a fanboy
« on: November 29, 2014, 02:40:23 AM »

So would I be correct in assuming you like Michael Bay movies because "BOOM EXPLOSION"?
Thom was undeveloped, and made absolutely no impact.

I can appreciate well developed characters when they're done well.

Those last four words are key.

On the other hand, I can appreciate undeveloped characters when they do something legitimately entertaining.

Like Thom did.
Entertaining and pretty badass? Sure.
Impactful actions and more developed and interesting than anyone else in the Haloverse? Most definitely not.

Never said he was more developed. Just more interesting.
Like, how? He's nobody that's done nothing.

21863
Gaming / Re: "Guilty pleasures" in gaming?
« on: November 29, 2014, 02:38:23 AM »
Halo: Reach, Battalion Wars 2, CoD Black Ops II Wii U and Advanced Warfare. (They're legitimately good though)
>Reach
>Legitimately good

Go back to crying about how Respawn entertainment killed your family
Stay mad faggot

21864
Gaming / Re: "Guilty pleasures" in gaming?
« on: November 29, 2014, 12:41:09 AM »
Halo: Reach, Battalion Wars 2, CoD Black Ops II Wii U and Advanced Warfare. (They're legitimately good though)
>Reach
>Legitimately good
>Lemon
>>legitimately fgt
Fucking weeb

21865
Gaming / Re: Lasky is such a fanboy
« on: November 29, 2014, 12:40:38 AM »

So would I be correct in assuming you like Michael Bay movies because "BOOM EXPLOSION"?
Thom was undeveloped, and made absolutely no impact.

I can appreciate well developed characters when they're done well.

Those last four words are key.

On the other hand, I can appreciate undeveloped characters when they do something legitimately entertaining.

Like Thom did.
Entertaining and pretty badass? Sure.
Impactful actions and more developed and interesting than anyone else in the Haloverse? Most definitely not.

21866
The Flood / Re: The first trailer for Star Wars Episode VII is here
« on: November 29, 2014, 12:38:20 AM »
The edge is strong in these ones.

21867
Gaming / Re: "Guilty pleasures" in gaming?
« on: November 29, 2014, 12:18:54 AM »
Halo: Reach, Battalion Wars 2, CoD Black Ops II Wii U and Advanced Warfare. (They're legitimately good though)
>Reach
>Legitimately good

21868
Gaming / Re: Lasky is such a fanboy
« on: November 29, 2014, 12:17:17 AM »

So would I be correct in assuming you like Michael Bay movies because "BOOM EXPLOSION"?
Thom was undeveloped, and made absolutely no impact.

21869
Gaming / Re: Lasky is such a fanboy
« on: November 28, 2014, 10:51:38 PM »
Who the hell is Lasky?
Chief's dudebro.

You meet him in Infinity. He's a main character in Halo 4. He's also the main character of Forward Unto Dawn.
Were people actually supposed to remember any of the boring characters from Halo 4?
As opposed to the badly done characters in the original trilogy?

I can understand this, but the Arbiter would like to have a word with you.
Aside from a small amount of characters like Thel, everyone else is badly done. Even Chief is badly done.

In the five seconds we saw of him in a commercial, Thom was a more interesting character than anybody in either trilogy. Or all of Halo, for that matter.
Nah

21870
Gaming / Re: Just bought Injustice for $5 AMA
« on: November 28, 2014, 10:48:56 PM »
It's free on PS+ in December.

gg
I love rentals
>yfw you need XBL to play the free games you get from GwG on Xbone

gg

A "rental" with no return date is as good as anything.

Pages: 1 ... 727728729 730731 ... 778