This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Solonoid
Pages: 1 ... 192193194 195196 ... 449
5791
« on: March 28, 2016, 09:23:48 PM »
Now can we fuck?
5792
« on: March 28, 2016, 09:06:02 PM »
I'd like to remind everyone that Michael Keaton killed pretty much everybody he fought.
He blew them up and lit them on fire with rockets and threw them off of tall buildings, or he ran them over with his car.
I like that they didn't use the watered down Wonder Woman who only uses her lasso of truth, she's best as a warrior who's not afraid to cut her opponents down, and I guarantee that after Superman drove that African warlord through a concrete wall he did not survive.
In all this is a Justice League who is willing to kill their enemies, though I have strong suspicion that the Flash will have qualms with it.
5793
« on: March 28, 2016, 05:54:14 PM »
Watch this shit
czech'd family
5794
« on: March 28, 2016, 05:53:17 PM »
My memes are more dank.
5795
« on: March 28, 2016, 05:48:20 PM »
Doomsday, in my theory, was a gargantuan monster because human cells are not as robust as Kryptonian cells.
Then why was the creation of another Doomsday banned by the High Council of Krypton?
They actually just said that genetic abominations were outlawed, which could mean anything, but more than likely the Doomsday knockoff we saw is going to stay dead and the real Doomsday is out there somewhere, wandering the universe in search of Brainiac. He'll have a different appearance and set of powers than the one we saw in BvS
5796
« on: March 28, 2016, 05:40:52 PM »
Doomsday is some sort of Kryptonian-genetic engineered experiment gone wrong. When he gets killed, he comes back to life and is resistant to whatever killed him.
The original story is that a group of Kryptonian cultists foresaw Brainiac's arrival on Krypton, and engineered a mutant soldier to stop him. The Krytonian government dismissed Brainiac as hogwash, but the Doomsday Cultists knew their prophecy would come true, and proceeded in secret without adequate funding or professional help from the Guild of Scientists. They were unable to control the monster they created, the Doomsday Monster, and it was destroyed by General Zod, and the remains were disposed of off planet. Brainiac did come to Krypton and they were defenseless, General Zod managed to evacuate the aristocracy of the capitol city, Kandor, before Brainiac stole it and shrunk I down to keep as a trophy. Then, so that he would have the only access to Kryptonian culture and knowledge in the universe, he set off the chain of events that would ultimately destroy the planet. You would think after the council had been wrong about Brainiac they might listen to Non and Jor El, but they instead had Non lobotomized and you know the rest. Doomsday came to Earth, I believe pursuing his original purpose, to kill Brainiac, who was being held prisoner by Superman for trying to repeat the events of Krypton in Earth. Of course, Doomsday was just going to kill everything, because he has no concept of discretion, so Superman had to stop him.
5797
« on: March 28, 2016, 05:22:33 PM »
Yes, the Armored Man was the Flash, if the lightning bolt on his chest wasn't enough proof, you'll note he was played by Ezra Miller, the actor cast to portray the Flash in 2018's "The Flash", and also the blur in the convenience store footage.
Doomsday, in my theory, was a gargantuan monster because human cells are not as robust as Kryptonian cells.
Consider Doomsday a human body trying to contain all of the power of a Kryptonian.
This doesn't really explain why he was able to absorb all forms of energy, not just radiation.
5798
« on: March 28, 2016, 05:05:04 PM »
God Bless Assad ;-;7
Can't mossad the Assad.
5799
« on: March 28, 2016, 04:33:50 PM »
Muhammad was a warlord, Jesus was a jewish hippy. Pretty sure this is a no contest.
Jesus was also a god.
Jesus was just a man.
nah, we're going with the versions of them from their respective canons
5800
« on: March 28, 2016, 04:12:18 PM »
Neither has any prep time, and all semblance of conscience has been removed.
One must kill the other, and both are trying.
Neither has access to disciples, both are unarmed, and the arena is a completely flat, very wide space.
Who wins?
5801
« on: March 28, 2016, 03:18:32 PM »
Ocean Master a shit.
5802
« on: March 28, 2016, 02:50:49 PM »
Poverty is no excuse for theft.
Being hungry does not remove a man's moral agency and capacity to differentiate between right and wrong (on a cultural or religious level).
Survival is more important than living without sin. If you disagree then you're just a Jew.
5803
« on: March 28, 2016, 02:44:02 PM »
How are we going to mend the current state of the universe?
Bruce's visions are bound to come true, to the point that the Flash was trying to reach back in time to have him fix it.
One reviewer I read was being critical of Bruce's reasoning for assembling the other Metahumans at the end of the film.
"Just a feeling."
They were raving about how nonsensical this was, because they failed to identify that the Knightmare sequence was the world's most blatant foreshadowing.
Seriously, they're hitting you over the head with it.
Do you think the universe will progress to that point, or will the Flash successfully return to save Lois from whatever fate awaits her and prevent Superman from becoming an warlord in a storyline that pays homage to Injustice?
5804
« on: March 28, 2016, 02:35:55 PM »
I'm watching it now for the first time. Clark's father just died.
Man of Steel, in my opinion, is the definitive Superman film. The Reeve movies were full of inconsistencies and convenient plot happenstances, not to mention unexplainable actions and ridiculous all around bullshit. And don't even get me started on Superman Returns. The only reproachable thing about Man of Steel is its very much Elseworlds, but that shouldn't be considers a bad thing.
5805
« on: March 28, 2016, 03:55:19 AM »
Phone homescreen 
5806
« on: March 28, 2016, 02:35:03 AM »
5807
« on: March 28, 2016, 01:41:49 AM »
In other news, water is wet.
5808
« on: March 28, 2016, 01:40:14 AM »
spoopler I think the superman who comes back is going to be very different from the superman they put in the ground.
5809
« on: March 28, 2016, 01:18:23 AM »
Just an album dump for anyone who hasn't seen this nostalgic mash up yet.  Moar4U
5810
« on: March 28, 2016, 12:29:28 AM »
Snyder's dream sequences in Man of Steel and BvS are just not done well
I thought they were fucking 10/10 in BvS. Bruce's dreams, or rather, visions, foreshadow an impossibly tall conflict coming, and puts Superman right in the middle of it. Probably the most effective storytelling in the series to date.
5811
« on: March 28, 2016, 12:21:14 AM »
The flaw in BvS was definitely a complete lack of logic behind the villain's motives. Spoiler Why would Lex make Doomsday to kill Superman, when Doomsday would just turn around and destroy the world?
Like, seriously, Lex was a cheap TDK Joker knockoff.
Nobody seemed to be motivated by anything.
I absolutely love The Flash though.
I give the film a perfect 5/7 just on that.
5812
« on: March 28, 2016, 12:12:18 AM »
Commit suicide.
I'll slit my throat with your edge.
"Edge" jokes are so 2014.
So is being edgy.
There is no such thing.
Nobu, 2016
5813
« on: March 27, 2016, 11:11:21 PM »
That's neat, me and the boys used to shine up honey mixed with water instead of corn mash and let me tell you that shit would kick you in the dick, steal your wallet, and your shoes, and then you'd say thank you.
My father works at a local distillery and returns with 196 proof, neutral spirits. It either derives from cane sugar or high wine.
Mix that shit with egg nog. I call it an evernog.
5814
« on: March 27, 2016, 11:09:42 PM »
If you look at a drug addict, and immediately look down on him and judge him, that's a character flaw on your part.
Why is it a flaw to be intelligent, and to be aware of your own intelligence?
You will always be wrong on this.
It's called hubris, ya dip.
It's called hubris isn't actually a flaw, you dip.
Hubris is the original flaw.
5815
« on: March 27, 2016, 11:08:58 PM »
That's neat, me and the boys used to shine up honey mixed with water instead of corn mash and let me tell you that shit would kick you in the dick, steal your wallet, and your shoes, and then you'd say thank you.
5816
« on: March 27, 2016, 11:06:29 PM »
If you look at a drug addict, and immediately look down on him and judge him, that's a character flaw on your part.
Why is it a flaw to be intelligent, and to be aware of your own intelligence?
You will always be wrong on this.
It's called hubris, ya dip.
5817
« on: March 27, 2016, 11:05:25 PM »
Of course not, judging others means that you're insecure about yourself. Then it's good to be insecure about yourself.
Being insecure about yourself isn't good or bad, it affects no one.
Judging people, while making you look insecure, is also just a bad thing itself.
but here's the thing. just because you judge someone on something doesn't mean you're insecure about that particular thing.
like for example. i see someone smoking crack. i think they're a lousy crackhead. i'm not gonna have an inner debate with myself about if i'm not good enough because i dont smoke crack.
Not about that particular thing, just in general. A stable, content person would look at the person smoking crack and feel sympathy. Someone down on their luck, who is in a bad place. They wouldn't make any character assumptions or look down on him. And they certainly wouldn't hate him, or think of him as a "lousy crackhead".
If you look at a drug addict, and immediately look down on him and judge him, that's a character flaw on your part.
Damn Daniel, back at it again with the deep shit.
5818
« on: March 27, 2016, 11:00:31 PM »
How has this thread progressed this far and nobody has mentioned prion diseases yet?
5819
« on: March 27, 2016, 10:41:11 PM »
MEDIOCRE SOLONOID MEDIOCRE
I was expecting this reply if I didn't roll dubs, but come on.
5820
« on: March 27, 2016, 10:31:51 PM »
Shit like this is the reason why kids these days are going to grow up being easily offended.
Thanks a lot parents.
I can understand their outrage. The film is extremely graphic.
Picture the following scenario:
It's late afternoon on Easter Sunday at a family gathering. Most of the festivities have ended; the parents are winding down and talking amongst themselves, and have called the children inside, seeing as they're too tired to watch them play outside. To keep the children occupied, they tell them to turn on the television and watch something; there's probably a children's Easter special airing at the moment. The children turn on the television, and are greeted by extremely graphic and disturbing scenes portraying rabbits being slaughtered in extremely gruesome ways. These children, who could be of any age, are of course scared by this. That's why parents are angry, it's not a case of people being overly-sensitive, at least not in my opinion.
I say good that this got aired either way. Children need the early introduction to grim reality before its too late.
I've seen Watership Down when I was young, really sad and disturbing yes, but in the long run it pretty much shows the grim side of life, not everything is all happy and colorful.
Slow down there, buster. Sure kids don't need to be illusioned, but there's no reason to show them graphic materials. Would you justify showing young girls rape pornography to scare them away from stepping out of their homes at night?
Pages: 1 ... 192193194 195196 ... 449
|
Show Posts