This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Dustin
Pages: 1 ... 162163164 165166 ... 194
4891
« on: September 13, 2014, 03:22:20 AM »
Ugh, to think people actually think this way.
4892
« on: September 13, 2014, 01:19:39 AM »
Bottom and top roles are automatically decided based on the size of the participants. I'm not gay but that's how it works.
4893
« on: September 12, 2014, 11:31:21 PM »
By diagnostic criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, a pedophile is an individual who fantasizes about, is sexually aroused by, or experiences sexual urges toward prepubescent children (generally <13 years) for a period of at least 6 months. Pedophiles are either severely distressed by these sexual urges, experience interpersonal difficulties because of them, or act on them
http://focus.psychiatryonline.org/article.aspx?articleid=53036
For those (Dustinbin) who don't know what pedophilia is.
Legal pedophilia includes anyone under 18, with exceptions for relationships within five years time of each other. Nice try, but you still fail.
4894
« on: September 12, 2014, 11:22:28 PM »
Looks like I get to stay for a little longer guys.
The FBI threat I can hold onto for another time. For now, any of you faggots who continue to defend culturally acceptable pedophilia and child pornography can pray the FBI isn't already looking through your history and writing you on their shit list. If there's one thing conservatives can do well, it's beating the living shit out of scumbags like you and making sure the whole of society and everyone you ever fucking knew is aware that you're a sex offender. Goodbye and goodnight, faggots.
4895
« on: September 12, 2014, 11:07:32 PM »
I don't think this very well represents the butthurt, bad attitude culture of this forum.
4896
« on: September 12, 2014, 06:43:27 PM »
i would ask you something but frankly i don't give a shit
What is it that upsets you? I can help you decipher which of my posts are sincere and which are not.
4897
« on: September 12, 2014, 06:39:17 PM »
And I will give legit answers. No more bullshit.
4898
« on: September 12, 2014, 05:58:11 PM »
inb4 butthurt
SoporificSlash
Meta Cognition
Mr Psychologist
Yutaka
Ossku
True Turquoise
Mad Max
SecondClass
Nuka
Verbatim
Trussing Door
challengerX
ABIGCOWPIE
Focnr
Madman Mordo
I love that I'm not on there
OT: I only have Comms
Wouldn't want you to come to my house and kill me now would I?
4899
« on: September 12, 2014, 05:53:16 PM »
lol this fucking thread
4900
« on: September 12, 2014, 05:25:32 PM »
inb4 butthurt
SoporificSlash
Meta Cognition
Mr Psychologist
Yutaka
Ossku
True Turquoise
Mad Max
SecondClass
Nuka
Verbatim
Trussing Door
challengerX
ABIGCOWPIE
Focnr
Madman Mordo
4901
« on: September 12, 2014, 02:38:19 PM »
There's always this flock of geese on my campus that shits all over the sidewalk all the time.
4902
« on: September 11, 2014, 06:55:14 PM »
What the fuck is even going on here.
Pedophiles and pedophile supports upset that I'm going to report them to the FBI and kids crying that I'm trolling for standing against pedophilia.
What? There aren't any pedos here.
Seriously what the fuck is going on?
The whole forum reeks of pedophile culture.
Yeah that isn't going to hold up well with the Feds.
Dustbin: "GUYS THERES THIS FORUM WHERE THEY HAVE DIFFERING VIEWS ON AGE OF CONSENT"
Feds: "Are they distributing child porn or promoting it?"
Dustbin: "WELL NO BUT"
Feds: "Are they doing anything illegal?"
Dustbin: "NO BUT IT REEKS OF PEDO CULTURE"
Feds: "Shut the fuck up Dustbin."
Funny, because the FBI totally doesn't arrest members of NAMBLA and other political organizations that support low AoC laws.
You're damn right it's funny bitch.
If 4chan doesn't get shut down by the FBI we're not getting shut down because a few members have some opinions on age of consent.
4Chan isn't shutdown because the FBI uses it to help track down child porn distributors and other dimensions of people who support pedophilia.
LOL I'm sure.
But say you're right, what exactly is the FBI going to shut us down for? A discussion on the age of consent where nobody has said anything that makes them look like pedos?
Why do you think anyone is talking about shutting the place down?
4903
« on: September 11, 2014, 06:16:04 PM »
What the fuck is even going on here.
Pedophiles and pedophile supports upset that I'm going to report them to the FBI and kids crying that I'm trolling for standing against pedophilia.
What? There aren't any pedos here.
Seriously what the fuck is going on?
The whole forum reeks of pedophile culture.
Yeah that isn't going to hold up well with the Feds.
Dustbin: "GUYS THERES THIS FORUM WHERE THEY HAVE DIFFERING VIEWS ON AGE OF CONSENT"
Feds: "Are they distributing child porn or promoting it?"
Dustbin: "WELL NO BUT"
Feds: "Are they doing anything illegal?"
Dustbin: "NO BUT IT REEKS OF PEDO CULTURE"
Feds: "Shut the fuck up Dustbin."
Funny, because the FBI totally doesn't arrest members of NAMBLA and other political organizations that support low AoC laws.
You're damn right it's funny bitch.
If 4chan doesn't get shut down by the FBI we're not getting shut down because a few members have some opinions on age of consent.
4Chan isn't shutdown because the FBI uses it to help track down child porn distributors and other dimensions of people who support pedophilia.
4904
« on: September 11, 2014, 06:11:54 PM »
...In your fucked up opinion.
You're not seriously going to sit there and tell me that a 15-year-old consenting to publicly nude pictures of him/herself isn't a fucking retard.
That isn't what you said. You said that it would be okay for them to do it.
No. . .
I didn't.
A 15-year-old, under the AoC, cannot - or shouldn't - be able to own such property. I'm saying if it gets distributed because of his/her own stupidity, I won't shed any tears over the magistrates who ignore it.
In the same way it'd be illegal for somebody to distribute somebody else's property without consent, it would be an -probably minor - offence for somebody under the AoC to distribute their own "property". If they can't legally consent, I don't see how they can truly be considered in such ownership of this property.
Regardless, how do you propose we enforce this? Have you ever fucking used kik?
The core of your argument places responsibility on emotional, stupid, and manipulable kids to not fall prey to the amount of social pressure people can place on them to take nude pictures of themselves. Which is in and of itself horribly unethical and disgusting.
4905
« on: September 11, 2014, 06:02:56 PM »
What the fuck is even going on here.
Pedophiles and pedophile supports upset that I'm going to report them to the FBI and kids crying that I'm trolling for standing against pedophilia.
What? There aren't any pedos here.
Seriously what the fuck is going on?
The whole forum reeks of pedophile culture.
Yeah that isn't going to hold up well with the Feds.
Dustbin: "GUYS THERES THIS FORUM WHERE THEY HAVE DIFFERING VIEWS ON AGE OF CONSENT"
Feds: "Are they distributing child porn or promoting it?"
Dustbin: "WELL NO BUT"
Feds: "Are they doing anything illegal?"
Dustbin: "NO BUT IT REEKS OF PEDO CULTURE"
Feds: "Shut the fuck up Dustbin."
Funny, because the FBI totally doesn't arrest members of NAMBLA and other political organizations that support low AoC laws.
4906
« on: September 11, 2014, 05:57:20 PM »
...In your fucked up opinion.
You're not seriously going to sit there and tell me that a 15-year-old consenting to publicly nude pictures of him/herself isn't a fucking retard.
That isn't what you said. You said that it would be okay for them to do it.
4907
« on: September 11, 2014, 05:52:20 PM »
What the fuck is even going on here.
Pedophiles and pedophile supports upset that I'm going to report them to the FBI and kids crying that I'm trolling for standing against pedophilia.
What? There aren't any pedos here.
Seriously what the fuck is going on?
The whole forum reeks of pedophile culture.
4908
« on: September 11, 2014, 05:51:19 PM »
That's entirely besides the point. You literally just told me that you're okay with nude pictures of kids circulating the internet if they gave it their consent even though kids cannot give consent like that because they do not understand the larger implication that doing things like that ruins lives.
Kids can't give consent, therefore they cannot properly be in possession of property.
We're still discussing the case of somebody 15-years-old, which isn't so black-and-white.
...In your fucked up opinion.
4909
« on: September 11, 2014, 05:46:44 PM »
What the fuck is even going on here.
Pedophiles and pedophile supports upset that I'm going to report them to the FBI and kids crying that I'm trolling for standing against pedophilia.
4910
« on: September 11, 2014, 05:44:45 PM »
Yeah, you're fucking sick.
No, dude, I don't know what the fuck you mean.
I don't know what you mean by "if that weren't an issue for me". You're essentially saying "If we remove what's wrong with an action from the equation, is the action okay?"
The answer is necessarily yes.
That's entirely besides the point. You literally just told me that you're okay with nude pictures of kids circulating the internet if they gave it their consent even though kids cannot give consent like that because they do not understand the larger implication that doing things like that ruins lives.
4911
« on: September 11, 2014, 05:34:10 PM »
And assuming that wasn't an issue for you, you would be okay with it?
What?
If we assume it isn't an issue with me, then surely the conclusion would be that I'm okay with it.
Yeah, you're fucking sick.
4912
« on: September 11, 2014, 05:31:05 PM »
In any sense, I'm sure you wouldn't say that those pictures should circulate, legally, as a punishment for their irresponsibility.
No, for the same reason it'd be illegal for somebody to circulate a manuscript for a new Harry Potter novel.
It isn't their property.
And assuming that wasn't an issue for you, you would be okay with it?
4913
« on: September 11, 2014, 05:26:35 PM »
Teenagers are almost less responsible considering the amount of emotional distress they (we) go through.
Bull. Shit.
I've seen you say, on at least one occasion, that depression, one of the greatest emotional distresses a person can endure, isn't a big deal.
We don't give people aged 15 mortgages or the legal capacity to consume alcohol, with good reason. But there are a number of responsibilities that they're also close to, including driving a car and, in some places, voting.
15-year-olds know that taking a naked picture has its risks. The sense of immediacy diminishes the ability to perform a cost-benefit analysis in everybody, not just teens, but it's just bollocks to imply it somehow reduces responsibility.
In any sense, I'm sure you wouldn't say that those pictures should circulate, legally, as a punishment for their irresponsibility. Also I don't think I've ever said that depression was okay.
4914
« on: September 11, 2014, 05:14:24 PM »
That's utterly a non-sequitur.
First of all, kid=/=15 year old. Paedophilia is only paedophilia with somebody pre-pubescent, which is usually classed as somebody 13 or under.
Second of all, 15 year olds are, to a degree, responsible. They, mostly, understand the nature of social media and the internet. Should they be criminally liable for distributing such pictures? No, but they bear a moral responsibility for it. Like walking through Detroit at midnight shining a torch on the fat wad of 50s in your hand.
Teenagers are almost less responsible considering the amount of emotional distress they (we) go through.
4915
« on: September 11, 2014, 05:07:52 PM »
Did you not realize I was being sarcastic?
I did.
You were implying that was the consequence of Verbatim's logic.
Which I, in turn, called absolutely fucking retarded.
>Verbatim: kids are responsible for taking nude pictures of themselves >Me: kids aren't responsible [with the same reasoning, AoC laws are in place because they assume that kids aren't responsible] and thus child porn shouldn't circulate throughout the internet; if you believe kids are responsible then you must also be against AoC laws
4916
« on: September 11, 2014, 04:45:03 PM »
Are you not being sarcastic?
. . .
NO.
What in the name of all that is fucking right and proper made you think, of all the cunting fucking things to think, that I somehow think children are responsible enough to engage in fucking relationships?
When you quoted this post: Then I guess pedophilia laws shouldn't exist because kids are completely responsible for their actions. Did you not realize I was being sarcastic?
4917
« on: September 11, 2014, 04:36:10 PM »
This has to be one of the poorest attempts at trolling ever. You must be desperate, Dustbin.
Okay this is just getting annoying. If I'm trolling, and yeah I admit I do it time to time, I will indicate it at the end or in some way let them know. And for the past week all you've done is call me a troll. And for what now? Being offended that pedophilia is acceptable here? Yeah nice try.
Lol
Go fuck yourself. Or tempt to leave earlier before I even get to view the results here, I don't care.
Lol
Cool. I'll make sure to not back down on my threat to tip off the FBI when I leave this shithole.
4918
« on: September 11, 2014, 04:35:23 PM »
If kids are responsible then it wouldn't illegal for kids to have relationships with older men and women.
That's why it isn't.
Because they fucking aren't.
What.
The.
Fuck.
Are.
You.
Talking.
About.
You.
Whacky.
Cunt.
Are you not being sarcastic?
4919
« on: September 11, 2014, 04:34:22 PM »
This has to be one of the poorest attempts at trolling ever. You must be desperate, Dustbin.
Okay this is just getting annoying. If I'm trolling, and yeah I admit I do it time to time, I will indicate it at the end or in some way let them know. And for the past week all you've done is call me a troll. And for what now? Being offended that pedophilia is acceptable here? Yeah nice try.
Lol
Go fuck yourself. Or tempt to leave earlier before I even get to view the results here, I don't care.
4920
« on: September 11, 2014, 04:32:13 PM »
Nobody here thinks supporting age of consent laws is trolling.
Then you have a contradictory argument by saying that kids aren't responsible.
. . .
What the fuck are you talking about? Kids aren't responsible!
If kids are responsible then it wouldn't illegal for kids to have relationships with older men and women.
Pages: 1 ... 162163164 165166 ... 194
|
Show Posts