This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Dustin
Pages: 1 ... 159160161 162163 ... 194
4801
« on: September 13, 2014, 08:19:28 PM »
But you're not explaining to me why you're arguing against me when my ONLY claim is that child abuse is wrong.
No, fuck you.
You accused this forum and at least a large chunk of its users for defending the exploitation and molestation of children.
Because many members did, and a larger amount are arguing against me for arguing against those who support it.
4804
« on: September 13, 2014, 08:15:15 PM »
That doesn't answer the question as to why you were so emotionally hating on me. If you simply thought I was overreacting, you wouldn't have that kind of response.
You dense fuck!
You're supposed to be clever! You're supposed to be one of the rational ones. Mr Psych and I have some sense of expectation for you based on prior experience. We're "hating" on you because you're a huge fucking irritant at the moment.
But you're not explaining to me why you're arguing against me when my ONLY claim is that child abuse is wrong.
4806
« on: September 13, 2014, 08:13:05 PM »
exploitation
Adults having sex with 14 year olds is exploitation. I'm well aware of the word and how it's used.
Some old man trying to get into a 14 year old's pants? Not really exploitation, but certainly creepy. Though that's just as creepy as if an old man is trying to have sex with an 18 year old, or a 16 year old.
But a 16-18 year old dating a 14 year old? A teenager dating a teenager? No, the older kid shouldn't be branded a sex offender for the rest of his life for that.
It's exploitation because they're too young to be making decisions that may ultimately ruin their life. I wouldn't support the AoC if it was only in place because I found it creepy.
I don't know what secluded Catholic village you were raised in, but 14 year olds have sex all the time. And it's not the sex that ruins their lives, it's the extreme AoC laws. If a 16 year old has sex with a 14 year old in a state where the AoC is 16, that 16 year old is considered a pedophile and a sex criminal, and will have a lifelong mark of shame on his record. Is that seriously something you support?
AoCs laws aren't a simple number. In the United States they give a five year age difference when it comes to relationships that overlap.
4807
« on: September 13, 2014, 08:10:26 PM »
exploitation
Adults having sex with 14 year olds is exploitation. I'm well aware of the word and how it's used.
Some old man trying to get into a 14 year old's pants? Not really exploitation, but certainly creepy. Though that's just as creepy as if an old man is trying to have sex with an 18 year old, or a 16 year old.
But a 16-18 year old dating a 14 year old? A teenager dating a teenager? No, the older kid shouldn't be branded a sex offender for the rest of his life for that.
It's exploitation because they're too young to be making decisions that may ultimately ruin their life. I wouldn't support the AoC if it was only in place because I found it creepy.
Do you think that Europe is an immoral shithole then? There are only a couple of European countries with AoC over 16 and they for the most part laugh at how prudish Americans are.
Except that isn't true. It's not hard to fact check while on the internet.
4808
« on: September 13, 2014, 08:08:08 PM »
Hmm, how about no?
You didn't do me the courtesy of clarifying your stance, so why the fuck should I be bothered to play along with any more of this crap?
So you can look it up in the thread that got locked if you like, or you can take it to PMs, or you can continue to shitpost in my shitposting thread and get this video linked ad nauseum.
I told you my only stance was that I was concerned that there were members who were in favor of child exploitation, and you agreed that it was bad as well. You didn't make it clear to me why you were still arguing with me, other than that you don't like me.
Jesus christ marie, you nitwit.
I never said that I didn't like you, infact I quite liked you up until this recent shitfest. Where it's moved from 'like' to 'uncertain' because I'm still not sure if you are trolling or genuinely this dense. Despite all the shitflinging that I've been doing, I'm still surprised that you've gone this incoherent. You seemed like one of the more intelligent members on the flood when you weren't baiting, but hey, I've been wrong before.
That's what so fucking irritating about all of this bollocks, from the first thread about the teacher's union until this one, I don't actually disagree with you. I just don't agree completely or as strongly, and I do object to unnecessary demonisation which is what you've been pulling in the latest run of threads.
Demonisation? Is that not what you're doing when you call me an SJW and say I'm a troll?
*sigh*
I guess I was wrong then, you are this dense.
That doesn't answer the question as to why you were so emotionally hating on me. If you simply thought I was overreacting, you wouldn't have that kind of response.
4809
« on: September 13, 2014, 08:04:50 PM »
Hmm, how about no?
You didn't do me the courtesy of clarifying your stance, so why the fuck should I be bothered to play along with any more of this crap?
So you can look it up in the thread that got locked if you like, or you can take it to PMs, or you can continue to shitpost in my shitposting thread and get this video linked ad nauseum.
I told you my only stance was that I was concerned that there were members who were in favor of child exploitation, and you agreed that it was bad as well. You didn't make it clear to me why you were still arguing with me, other than that you don't like me.
Jesus christ marie, you nitwit.
I never said that I didn't like you, infact I quite liked you up until this recent shitfest. Where it's moved from 'like' to 'uncertain' because I'm still not sure if you are trolling or genuinely this dense. Despite all the shitflinging that I've been doing, I'm still surprised that you've gone this incoherent. You seemed like one of the more intelligent members on the flood when you weren't baiting, but hey, I've been wrong before.
That's what so fucking irritating about all of this bollocks, from the first thread about the teacher's union until this one, I don't actually disagree with you. I just don't agree completely or as strongly, and I do object to unnecessary demonisation which is what you've been pulling in the latest run of threads.
Demonisation? Is that not what you're doing when you call me an SJW and say I'm a troll?
4810
« on: September 13, 2014, 08:01:26 PM »
exploitation
Adults having sex with 14 year olds is exploitation. I'm well aware of the word and how it's used.
Some old man trying to get into a 14 year old's pants? Not really exploitation, but certainly creepy. Though that's just as creepy as if an old man is trying to have sex with an 18 year old, or a 16 year old.
But a 16-18 year old dating a 14 year old? A teenager dating a teenager? No, the older kid shouldn't be branded a sex offender for the rest of his life for that.
It's exploitation because they're too young to be making decisions that may ultimately ruin their life. I wouldn't support the AoC if it was only in place because I found it creepy.
4811
« on: September 13, 2014, 07:57:57 PM »
Leave it to Le Dustin to ruin somebody else's thread.
Mr. P said this wasn't a serious thread, so it's fine.
4812
« on: September 13, 2014, 07:55:57 PM »
Hmm, how about no?
You didn't do me the courtesy of clarifying your stance, so why the fuck should I be bothered to play along with any more of this crap?
So you can look it up in the thread that got locked if you like, or you can take it to PMs, or you can continue to shitpost in my shitposting thread and get this video linked ad nauseum.
I told you my only stance was that I was concerned that there were members who were in favor of child exploitation, and you agreed that it was bad as well. You didn't make it clear to me why you were still arguing with me, other than that you don't like me.
4813
« on: September 13, 2014, 07:54:07 PM »
A shitpost for a shitpost mein freund.
So every time I confront you as to why you're defending them you can't give me a straight answer? Am I supposed to be in the wrong for getting offended that there are people on this forum who think it's okay to exploit children? Please address the problem here and tell me why you're even bothering to get at me if you're not disagreeing with me that child exploitation is a problem.
dustbin pls
I'd like an answer from you too.
You already got an answer, like you did from many others. Not our fault you choose to ignore them.
Now please remember to check your privilege at least 3 times a day.
Is it that you just don't like me? Also Cheat explicitly told you to stop the harassment.
4814
« on: September 13, 2014, 07:51:12 PM »
A shitpost for a shitpost mein freund.
So every time I confront you as to why you're defending them you can't give me a straight answer? Am I supposed to be in the wrong for getting offended that there are people on this forum who think it's okay to exploit children? Please address the problem here and tell me why you're even bothering to get at me if you're not disagreeing with me that child exploitation is a problem.
SHITPOST
H
I
T
P
O
S
T
Spoiler I gave you a straight answer several times in the previous thread.
Then give it again because I must have missed it.
4815
« on: September 13, 2014, 07:50:24 PM »
A shitpost for a shitpost mein freund.
So every time I confront you as to why you're defending them you can't give me a straight answer? Am I supposed to be in the wrong for getting offended that there are people on this forum who think it's okay to exploit children? Please address the problem here and tell me why you're even bothering to get at me if you're not disagreeing with me that child exploitation is a problem.
dustbin pls
I'd like an answer from you too.
4816
« on: September 13, 2014, 07:49:52 PM »
exploitation
Adults having sex with 14 year olds is exploitation. I'm well aware of the word and how it's used.
4817
« on: September 13, 2014, 07:49:03 PM »
Explain how the self defense mechanism manifests itself on the internet
I present exhibit A, please read from this page until the end of the thread. The self defence mechanism, or more commonly known as the damage control mode, is in full display. I draw your attention to the points raised by a Mister Byrne, and the subsequent 'conversations'.
Spoiler Welcome to the mute list.
Funny. I thought self defense was when someone would defend their reputation, not throw it out the window to help fix the community from stepping too close to the law.
And people say I take things too seriously.
You didn't throw your reputation out of the window in some noble act to save the cornmunity, you simply went full retard and embarrassed yourself thoroughly. If you honestly think that this place is turning into some kind of paedophile group, then I suggest you find a much more qualified psych to talk to.
We can all see the poll I made. Plenty of votes in favor of child exploitation. You're not still defending them are you?
There were 19 votes against that 5.
*7 Is that not a lot?
4818
« on: September 13, 2014, 07:48:09 PM »
A shitpost for a shitpost mein freund.
So every time I confront you as to why you're defending them you can't give me a straight answer? Am I supposed to be in the wrong for getting offended that there are people on this forum who think it's okay to exploit children? Please address the problem here and tell me why you're even bothering to get at me if you're not disagreeing with me that child exploitation is a problem.
4819
« on: September 13, 2014, 07:44:45 PM »
Explain how the self defense mechanism manifests itself on the internet
I present exhibit A, please read from this page until the end of the thread. The self defence mechanism, or more commonly known as the damage control mode, is in full display. I draw your attention to the points raised by a Mister Byrne, and the subsequent 'conversations'.
Spoiler Welcome to the mute list.
Funny. I thought self defense was when someone would defend their reputation, not throw it out the window to help fix the community from stepping too close to the law.
And people say I take things too seriously.
You didn't throw your reputation out of the window in some noble act to save the cornmunity, you simply went full retard and embarrassed yourself thoroughly. If you honestly think that this place is turning into some kind of paedophile group, then I suggest you find a much more qualified psych to talk to.
We can all see the poll I made. Plenty of votes in favor of child exploitation. You're not still defending them are you?
4820
« on: September 13, 2014, 07:38:40 PM »
Explain how the self defense mechanism manifests itself on the internet
I present exhibit A, please read from this page until the end of the thread. The self defence mechanism, or more commonly known as the damage control mode, is in full display. I draw your attention to the points raised by a Mister Byrne, and the subsequent 'conversations'.
Spoiler Welcome to the mute list.
Funny. I thought self defense was when someone would defend their reputation, not throw it out the window to help fix the community from stepping too close to the law.
4821
« on: September 13, 2014, 07:29:03 PM »
Explain how the self defense mechanism manifests itself on the internet
4822
« on: September 13, 2014, 07:06:05 PM »
Dustin logic:
If you disagree with me then you are defending pedophiles.
If you disagree that exploiting children is bad, then yes, you are enabling pedophilia and child abuse. It has nothing to do with my stake in the matter, though I'm just glad the majority of society is against child exploitation.
You're not even trying anymore.
Silly little SJW.
Oh and you must be putting some effort into this? Pulling together arguments against me for no reason other than the fact that you don't like me? If you don't disagree with me, that children should not be exploited, then you're arguing with me for nothing. So just stop.
Maybe you should take your own advice.
Also you didn't answer my question. Do you make sure to check your privilege every day?
This is probably bannable, save it for anarchy if you don't like me personally. If you're only here to make fun of me, you're breaking the rules.
I'm not breaking any rules here.
Now please answer the question like a good little SJW.
Make a thread about social justice and SJW and I will give you my opinion on the topic. I'm not here to derail the thread. Btw, reported for harassment. As I said, save it for anarchy.
4823
« on: September 13, 2014, 07:01:58 PM »
Dustin logic:
If you disagree with me then you are defending pedophiles.
If you disagree that exploiting children is bad, then yes, you are enabling pedophilia and child abuse. It has nothing to do with my stake in the matter, though I'm just glad the majority of society is against child exploitation.
You're not even trying anymore.
Silly little SJW.
Oh and you must be putting some effort into this? Pulling together arguments against me for no reason other than the fact that you don't like me? If you don't disagree with me, that children should not be exploited, then you're arguing with me for nothing. So just stop.
Maybe you should take your own advice.
Also you didn't answer my question. Do you make sure to check your privilege every day?
This is probably bannable, save it for anarchy if you don't like me personally. If you're only here to make fun of me, you're breaking the rules.
4824
« on: September 13, 2014, 07:00:47 PM »
He's still butthurt from when Harlow posted screen ape of him begging to get into Sapphire.
inb4 crying and denial
Someone should really find that and post it.
Too bad it doesn't exist. I've received bans while I was in the group but when I finally left I just stopped posting. If you want to lie about it further go ahead, I guess I'm powerless to stop you aren't I?
4825
« on: September 13, 2014, 06:59:07 PM »
Dustin logic:
If you disagree with me then you are defending pedophiles.
If you disagree that exploiting children is bad, then yes, you are enabling pedophilia and child abuse. It has nothing to do with my stake in the matter, though I'm just glad the majority of society is against child exploitation.
You're not even trying anymore.
Silly little SJW.
Oh and you must be putting some effort into this? Pulling together arguments against me for no reason other than the fact that you don't like me? If you don't disagree with me, that children should not be exploited, then you're arguing with me for nothing. So just stop.
4826
« on: September 13, 2014, 06:49:38 PM »
Dustin logic:
If you disagree with me then you are defending pedophiles.
If you disagree that exploiting children is bad, then yes, you are enabling pedophilia and child abuse. It has nothing to do with my stake in the matter, though I'm just glad the majority of society is against child exploitation.
4827
« on: September 13, 2014, 06:47:21 PM »
What's even better, I remember Harlow laughing at messages from him, begging to be let back in.
Unfortunately I don't have screencaps.
At the time, I didn't think Dustin was that bad and never understood the bad rep he had.
Although now...
Wow, this is just pathetic lying on your part. Seriously? Like where the hell do you get this shit from? I was never banned when I left, I just stopped posting out of boredom.
4828
« on: September 13, 2014, 06:46:29 PM »
Um...
You do know that Dustin was laughed out of Sapphire because no one took him seriously?
Actually, you wouldn't. Dustin wouldn't let thatfact out and Sapphire doesn't talk to anyone outside their Super Special Awesome Club.
I left Sapphire and I wasn't laughed out, liar.
4829
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:39:01 PM »
I'm not making a claim here. I said twice in this thread already that I made the poll to figure out what the forum really believed on the subject, nothing more and nothing less.
Fucking what?
The claim you're making is that the poll is truly representative of what we "really believe".
You could say the same for any opinion poll out there, even scientific, that people are just making shit up and lying about their opinion. It's a moot point and it doesn't mean much in a practical way of trying to understand things.
4830
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:37:24 PM »
I'm really going to believe that I'm overreacting when it seems as if everyone on this forum is defending those who want to exploit children. My only fault is that I've gone to lengths to change those opinions rather than just sit back and not care. But I still don't understand why people who don't agree with exploiting children are defending those that do agree with it. It boggles my mind.
NO ONE is defending any exploit of children
*views poll*
Pages: 1 ... 159160161 162163 ... 194
|
Show Posts
