Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Dustin

Pages: 1 ... 444546 4748 ... 194
1351
Okay then, what else should we ban because the only reason to keep it legal is for aesthetic reasons? Hair dye? Razor blades? Spray tans?
lol, didn't I already explain how those aren't comparable?
"It's not comparable" is a one all end all copy and paste argument I've seen be used for everything. All you've been able to accomplish here is saying that circumcision should be banned because it's not natural, which is honestly quite hypocritical coming from a homosexual.

1352
unjustifiable in the Western world.
>acting like circumcision is some kind of horrible evil thing
>acting like it's really that big of a deal

Just because there are few reasons (aesthetic, minor health issues) to keep it legal does not mean it should be made illegal.
Yes, yes, and yes it does.
Okay then, what else should we ban because the only reason to keep it legal is for aesthetic reasons? Hair dye? Razor blades? Spray tans?

1353
Jealous because masturbation is not as pleasurable for you.
It isn't?
Thousands more nerve endings still intact bro.
This hasn't been proven to mean anything beyond the negligible.

There are tens of millions of nerve endings on the entire body--and those are just nerve endings. A few thousand isn't gonna mean shit, guy.
It still doesn't change the fact that as a whole, it makes the act of sex less stimulating to the male partner. And besides, the main problem here is the psychological impact that circumcision does to the child. See the link I posted about the correlation of ASD  and circumcision. I also recall Daz posting some good info about the adverse side affects of circumcision as well.
Mentality wise, you're not going to notice a fucking difference. It's like drinking chocolate milk. If you drink something super chocolately before drinking chocolate milk, it's going to taste like shit. But if you don't have something really chocolately before having your chocolate milk, it'll taste fucking fine.

1354
unjustifiable in the Western world.
>acting like circumcision is some kind of horrible evil thing
>acting like it's really that big of a deal

Just because there are few reasons (aesthetic, minor health issues) to keep it legal does not mean it should be made illegal.

1355
>Being upset about the Human anatomy.
Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?
So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?
No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.
Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?

Great job butchering that poor code.

Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.
Unless your dick was the size of an arm or leg when you were young, circumcision is no where near comparable to an amputation.
Circumcision is an amputation by definition, pretty much.

Same with ear piercings, faggot
>equating an ear piercing with outright removal of the ear

wat

this is bad logic even for you
Except a circumcision is not a big procedure, in fact it takes less than a minute.

Okay, here's a hypothetical for you. A child is born with 6 fingers on one hand. The extra finger isn't harmful for the child, but he thinks he would look better if he only had five. By your logic, he shouldn't be allowed to have the surgery solely because it's an amputation for an aesthetic reason on a child.
A normal part of the human anatomy is hardly comparable to a deformity.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-nature
1)https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/the-fallacy-fallacy
2) that's hardly applicable here anyway
You're saying we should ban circumcision because it's not natural, so yes it does apply.

1356
Except a circumcision is not a big procedure, in fact it takes less than a minute.
It takes up to half an hour of a baby being strapped down to a table while a part of its penis is being cut off. Something that, unsurprisingly, hurts like a mofo.
Babies aren't even conscious out of the womb. Do you remember anything past the age of two or three?

1357
>Being upset about the Human anatomy.
Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?
So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?
No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.
Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?

Great job butchering that poor code.

Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.
Unless your dick was the size of an arm or leg when you were young, circumcision is no where near comparable to an amputation.
Circumcision is an amputation by definition, pretty much.

Same with ear piercings, faggot
>equating an ear piercing with outright removal of the ear

wat

this is bad logic even for you
Except a circumcision is not a big procedure, in fact it takes less than a minute.

Okay, here's a hypothetical for you. A child is born with 6 fingers on one hand. The extra finger isn't harmful for the child, but he thinks he would look better if he only had five. By your logic, he shouldn't be allowed to have the surgery solely because it's an amputation for an aesthetic reason on a child.
A normal part of the human anatomy is hardly comparable to a deformity.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-nature

1358
>Being upset about the Human anatomy.
Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?
So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?
No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.
Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?

Great job butchering that poor code.

Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.
Unless your dick was the size of an arm or leg when you were young, circumcision is no where near comparable to an amputation.
Circumcision is an amputation by definition, pretty much.

Same with ear piercings, faggot
>equating an ear piercing with outright removal of the ear

wat

this is bad logic even for you
Except a circumcision is not a big procedure, in fact it takes less than a minute.

Okay, here's a hypothetical for you. A child is born with 6 fingers on one hand. The extra finger isn't harmful for the child, but he thinks he would look better if he only had five. By your logic, he shouldn't be allowed to have the surgery solely because it's an amputation for an aesthetic reason on a child.

1359
ITT: Dick Discussion
Truly the best kind of discussion. We should get Icy in here, he's probably quite knowledgable.
steamy
Bump an old thread, get insecure people mad. What a lovely way to start the morning!
>implying I'm insecure
>implying you shouldn't be insecure about your squid dick

1360
>Being upset about the Human anatomy.
Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?
So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?
No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.
Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?

Great job butchering that poor code.

Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.
Unless your dick was the size of an arm or leg when you were young, circumcision is no where near comparable to an amputation.
Circumcision is an amputation by definition, pretty much.

Same with ear piercings, faggot

1361
Also, why am I taking le dustroll ex dee bait?
I'm baiting but you're trying to ban my penis? Nice trolling bro.

1362
>Being upset about the Human anatomy.
Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?
So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?
No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.
Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?

Great job butchering that poor code.

Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.
Unless your dick was the size of an arm or leg when you were young, circumcision is no where near comparable to an amputation.

1363
>Being upset about the Human anatomy.
Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?
So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?
No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.
Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?

1364
Jealous because masturbation is not as pleasurable for you.
It isn't?

1365
>Being upset about the Human anatomy.
Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?
So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?

1366
Septagon / Re: Not sure if this is a problem..
« on: January 12, 2015, 04:56:17 AM »
I'm getting it too

1367
The Flood / Re: does this site even have signitures?
« on: January 12, 2015, 04:52:13 AM »
Drop down arrow hides the signatures, like B.old.
i was never on b.old. I always thought that was like a bio or some shit. Other forums Ive been on its always at the bottom of every post
Signatures are fucking loud and annoying
Quote
loud

Spoiler
symbolism


1368
The Flood / Re: does this site even have signitures?
« on: January 12, 2015, 04:24:44 AM »
Drop down arrow hides the signatures, like B.old.
i was never on b.old. I always thought that was like a bio or some shit. Other forums Ive been on its always at the bottom of every post
Signatures are fucking loud and annoying

1369
The Flood / Re: MENENDEZ!!!!!!
« on: January 12, 2015, 02:08:28 AM »
Go to fucking bed you fucking skrub
I will once I find another reference, sperglord.
Press F to shut the fuck up
*Alt + F4

1370
The Flood / Re: What is another term for
« on: January 12, 2015, 01:48:06 AM »
oh i got it, spaghetti o's

1372
The Flood / Re: What is another term for
« on: January 12, 2015, 01:30:59 AM »
piss

1373
The Flood / Re: >tfw someone talks shit about you
« on: January 12, 2015, 01:14:55 AM »
I've won plenty of those kinds of fights, but those really aren't the ones you should bother with.

1374
The Flood / Tin foil hats are government propaganda
« on: January 12, 2015, 01:01:14 AM »
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/09/tin-foil-hats-actually-make-it-easier-for-the-government-to-track-your-thoughts/262998/

Firstly because tin foils hats actually make it easier for the government to read your mind. But secondly because the government would want you to think that so called conspiracy theorists are crazy nut jobs... for simply having a different opinion. Just don't buy into this crap.

1375
Gaming / Re: GUYS HELP ME
« on: January 11, 2015, 11:59:42 PM »
It's just a game, you should sell it for some money instead

1376
The Flood / Re: I Have Returned!
« on: January 11, 2015, 11:47:32 PM »
So much butthurt in this thread

We need to play Halo 4 again sometime!
yes I'm always open to play (except when college starts back up)

1377
The Flood / Re: I Have Returned!
« on: January 11, 2015, 11:36:57 PM »
So much butthurt in this thread

1378
The Flood / Re: I found the perfect girl for Zen
« on: January 11, 2015, 11:31:19 PM »
We shouldn't encourage the pedophiles on the forum.

As far as horse fucking goes, the vegetarians should be dealing with them.

1379
The Flood / Re: This is why I despise fat people
« on: January 11, 2015, 12:23:02 PM »
I'm almost positive Digger is fat

1380
The Flood / Re: Why are guns so expensive?
« on: January 11, 2015, 12:06:11 PM »
Obama bought a billion bullets for homeland security which cleaned out most gun warehouses of supplies.

He needed it just in case there's a billion terrorists within US borders some time within the next two to three decades or however long the shelf life is for ammunition.

Pages: 1 ... 444546 4748 ... 194