Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Sandtrap

Pages: 1 ... 201202203 204205 ... 390
6061
The Flood / Re: Are you high?
« on: May 31, 2015, 11:32:32 PM »
i'm on that ethical high ground
You can call it dumb if you want, but implying that putting something into your own body is somehow unethical is retarded.
...what are you talking about, you crazy fuck

i'm speaking in general
i never implied anything about drugs
This is....a thread about doing drugs

what

Sure thing partner. But, context is a wonderful thing.

Spoiler
FUCK THE RULES.

6062
The Flood / Re: Are you high?
« on: May 31, 2015, 11:22:57 PM »
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O

You could say that I'm rather low! Or, tired. I've not had a single day off this week! I shall not be starting monday off with a spring in step.


6063
Serious / Re: Which user are you closest to politically?
« on: May 31, 2015, 10:57:24 PM »
Oh lordy. Asking for names. I can't rightfully pin it down. I'll just say I'm in my own little corner. I keep an eye out on things loosely to get a basic grasp of the way things are going.

And I disagree with a fair few outstanding failures in regards to my own country's government. While keeping an eye out a bit for US politics because what happens over there will cause some big ripples over here.

Overall it's a big train wreck that I don't care to put much thought into and it's not like I certainly couldn't make things any better either.

Dunno if anybody else here thinks along those lines. But there you go. I'm likely far, far away from the people who have raging government boners and still, far away from those who are somewhat knowledgeable on the subject.

6064
The Flood / Re: It's Happening
« on: May 31, 2015, 09:35:50 PM »
As if the Warf- you know what, im not even mentioning it

But these monsters? Jesus christ...

So says a supposed "weeb" as the trends say today.

To be fair I don't know how you can say monsters when you yourself watch wobbly distortions of human anatomy in motion on a most likely, daily basis.
Uhhh, did i hit a nerve or something?

What Tru said and i just find this whole SFM thing very silly.

Na. I'm just pushing some buttons. Hitting some switches. Saying hello to my sense of humor again. Not calling you out or nothing.

Just poking fun that you, most likely, also have a pension for "monsters" and "very silly," considering that you're supposedly a "weeb."

In essence, I'm having a giggle there, m8.

6065
The Flood / Re: It's Happening
« on: May 31, 2015, 09:31:18 PM »
As if the Warf- you know what, im not even mentioning it

But these monsters? Jesus christ...

So says a supposed "weeb" as the trends say today.

To be fair I don't know how you can say monsters when you yourself watch wobbly distortions of human anatomy in motion on a most likely, daily basis.
hes saying monster because thats a monster.

But of course!

Which is why I also said wobbly distortions of human anatomy!

6066
The Flood / Re: It's Happening
« on: May 31, 2015, 09:28:26 PM »
As if the Warf- you know what, im not even mentioning it

But these monsters? Jesus christ...

So says a supposed "weeb" as the trends say today.

To be fair I don't know how you can say monsters when you yourself watch wobbly distortions of human anatomy in motion on a most likely, daily basis.

6067
The Flood / Re: Ideas for a new TV.
« on: May 31, 2015, 09:24:34 PM »
Oh did I tell you guys?

I found this TV at the dump and it looked nice so I took it home to see if it worked and it did so now I have a 42 inch HDTV lol

And I recommend Samsung

Never owned one but the one my friend has is sweet

The fact that I have a Samsung TV from 1998 that still functions in pristine condition is a testament to quality.

6068
The Flood / Re: It's Happening
« on: May 31, 2015, 09:22:29 PM »
Now where the fuck are my Titanfall models? The damn game is already in Source, and they already ported them to L4D
(inb4 lemmon ranting about mechs taking muh freedums)

You talking the mechs? Cause they've got the mech guns. They've got the people sized robots. They've got the people. No dice on the mechs apparently.

6069
The Flood / Re: It's Happening
« on: May 31, 2015, 09:17:17 PM »
It's only a matter of time these days

Place your bets potato. I give it two days.

6070
The Flood / Re: It's Happening
« on: May 31, 2015, 09:16:53 PM »
So the one week wonder is actually getting some attention?

It certainly will now. As the supposed quote says.

"The only good thing that came out of Evolve was the wraith's hips."

6071
The Flood / Re: It's Happening
« on: May 31, 2015, 09:12:19 PM »
porn?

What part of



did you not understand?


Joke's on you the colourful ones make a better target.

6072
The Flood / Re: It's Happening
« on: May 31, 2015, 09:10:32 PM »
porn?

What part of



did you not understand?

6073
The Flood / Re: hey guess what
« on: May 31, 2015, 09:09:32 PM »
BasedLove apparently gave a huge fuck when he posted pictures of his girlfriend on Bungle.Net and everybody called her anorexic.

6074
The Flood / It's Happening
« on: May 31, 2015, 09:07:44 PM »


Most likely, none of you know what this means. So I'll spell it out. A bunch of Evolve's models got ported over to the sfm community recently.

Now then.

Spoiler


Wink wink nudge nudge

6075
Gaming / Re: What's the most interesting game universe to you?
« on: May 31, 2015, 06:50:59 PM »
Let's see here.

Obligatory Galo.
Obligatory Mass Erect.
Obligatory Elder Scrolls/Fallout

Dishonoured
Alan Wake
Demon's/Dark Souls/Bloodborne
Dead Space

6076
The Flood / Re: Thar be Beavers: Update 2
« on: May 31, 2015, 04:55:27 PM »
Here's hopin' shit works.

6077
The Flood / Re: Post Here
« on: May 31, 2015, 04:39:50 PM »


When you pull out after she's had chipotle.

6078
The Flood / Re: Fox thread
« on: May 31, 2015, 03:50:19 PM »


Here's a fat fuck beaver instead since I'm currently puzzling on how to live trap one for relocation.

6079
The Flood / Re: Fox thread
« on: May 31, 2015, 03:41:16 PM »
Not with you.
Why not?



Because you're a horrible person.
-_- a horrible person because I was too busy to help you with Halo? Grow up kid.

No. A horrible person because of the shit you say.

"All Americans should die!"

Fuck you.
Kiyo's not wrong, they should.

Woah woah woah now. Hold the phone here.

Mcdonald's already has it covered.

6080
Serious / Re: Women should be in infantry
« on: May 31, 2015, 03:39:39 PM »
They'll keep pushing the issue.
So will al-Qaeda. Capitulation out of convenience is never an option.

If they want to fight, I'll buy them a one-way plane ticket to Syria.

You heard it here first folks. Meta's a taxi service.

Signed and dated. Legal contract made.

Congratulations Meta. You're now a shill for tumblreistas and feminazis everywhere.


6081
Serious / Re: Women should be in infantry
« on: May 31, 2015, 03:10:42 PM »
Fair and square.
Soldiers are not atomistic.

Having women on the front-line would threaten the cohesion of whatever units are in the field; evidence from Israel suggests that male IDF soldiers go into a kind of "frenzy" when their female comrades are wounded.

What the fuck else are you expecting? It's war for fuck's sake. Not a calm match of fucking chess. Even without the presence of a woman in a unit people still have that chance of essentially going beserk when they see somebody close to them go down. That's not to say of course that a woman wouldn't raise the chances.

Regardless of our conclusions, either of ours, the people who want to fight, are going to fight. The military isn't neccessarily needed to throw yourself into a war. There's always fringe parties out there that decide to go off and do things by themselves. Mercenaries or just random fighters. Not exactly legal, I imagine.

But the point being, you and me aren't the ones tossing ourselves into the meat grinder. If somebody wants to fight, then they will.

And obviously, apparently some portion of women, for some reason, feel like fighting. They'll keep pushing the issue. Regardless of your statistics or others.




6082
Serious / Re: Women should be in infantry
« on: May 31, 2015, 12:29:40 PM »
Or you could get a grip and realize they have no place on the frontline.

Na. Not my call to make. Not my decision to judge. And it's not my field to take much of interest in. I'm never going to vote on a decision that explicity states, "should women be allowed on the front lines?"

After all this is just banter. I'm not required to get a grip. If somebody wants to do something, you won't stop them. If a woman wants to serve and can meet the manly man standard?

Well, there you have it. Fair and square.

6083
Gaming / Re: Skyrim zombies not working?
« on: May 31, 2015, 12:24:06 PM »
But seriously. I don't have a clue. Part of me says there's a reference to some shit here that I'm not picking up. Other part says I don't know how to help.

This is a bethesda game after all.

6084
Gaming / Re: Skyrim zombies not working?
« on: May 31, 2015, 12:22:09 PM »
I feel like I'm missing something here.
?

No. Really. I really, really do think that I'm missing something. Wait. I got it.

Spoiler


6085
Gaming / Re: Skyrim zombies not working?
« on: May 31, 2015, 12:17:55 PM »
I feel like I'm missing something here.

6086
Serious / Re: Women should be in infantry
« on: May 31, 2015, 12:11:22 PM »
Nope. I would not trust a woman on the front lines of any war. There's nothing sexist about it.
There is everything sexist about it without providing some logic behind it.

"I can't trust black people on the front lines of any war. There's nothing racist about it."
Nothing's wrong with black folks though. I'm not being racist.

Women don't have the killer instinct, stamina, physical and mental strength etc.
I'm well aware women aren't as physical strong as males. That's just common sense and biology.
And that's extremely important if you need to carry your buddy out of the shit so he doesn't get captured.

Quote
But killer instinct and mental strength? You're sounding little sexist. You say this like a woman can't fight or kill as like a man, but they easily can.
LOL

Sorry, but no. That's how this species is. The females would stay back and the males would go out and kill for food. Now that we're a little more civilized, a lot of males don't really have that killer instinct anymore and females sure as hell aren't tough enough to be on the frontline.

Quote
Lots of women could easily kick anyone's asses here. Stop being so ignorant, mang.
Because everybody here is a fucking dweeb excluding like 3 or 4 people.

Kicking someone's ass =/= Killing someone

Taking a life is not easy. It's even less easy for a female. I don't trust a female to not be tricked by a little kid crying then turning out to have a grenade because her motherly instincts kick in and she let her guard down.


"I don't trust a female to not be tricked by a little kid crying then turning out to have a grenade because her motherly instincts kick in and she let her guard down."

That's the shittiest example you could've given, conisering the fact that the military is male dominated already and people still fall for it all the time.
A woman would fall for it easier than a man.

That's one example out of hundreds where women come up short, apart from how physically inferior they are.

Most likely, yes. But, I did just think of something. Suppose that there are women that could qualify for the physical standard of military. How would you feel about if if they were organized all together. As in, not mixed units of men and women, but cohesive units, men and men, women and women?

You can't actually really say that some of them aren't fighters, because some of them have to be. For example, Kurdish soldiers. In the first and second world wars, there were women fighters. On the frontier plains of the US and Canada, there were women fighters.

They're a rarity. And, although they may be less apt at physical gritty things then guys, it does not excuse the fact that some of them possess fighting ability. And some of them, especially, really, really don't fuck around, as much as guys.
It's such a rarity I wouldn't have women on the frontline.

Well, tough shit partner!

It's not your call to make. You wouldn't have them on the frontlines. But history says otherwise despite the supposed rarity of good women fighters. And the people in charge who are still all up and deciding about things. It's, like, your opinion man.

And you know what we do with opinions?

Spoiler
"Well it's not your decision LOL so it doesn't matter if I'm wrong"

Sick rebuttal. Whether or not it's anybody's decision here is irrelevant. We're discussing whether it's a good idea or not.

In my opinion, it isn't. Judging from the statistics in the OP, it isn't. Women can't cope. Deal with it.

Isn't my place to care chally. I don't have to deal with it because I don't live in a country that enjoys sending troops into the meat grinder at such a phenominal rate. In my own opinion the current way the military is used is rather unjust, and if you take a look at the history of it, rather poorly.

However, if somebody wants to sign up, and can meet the standards? Who am I, or you, to stop them?

Regardless of either of our opinions, things will move onwards anyway. And, I'll make a wager with you. At some point, women will show up on the front lines. At which point, I expect a thread from you bitching about it so I can call you an old outdated dinosaur.

And if they don't? You can send me a pair of sunglasses in the mail.

6087
The Flood / Re: All too easy
« on: May 31, 2015, 12:03:39 PM »


I will, in fact, LOL. That's not getting offended over something on the internet, true, but the fact that you've got a stick up your ass about some supposed bullshit philosophies cements that there's some irritation rattling around in your head.
Uh

No. It means I have things I like and dislike. Buddhist philosophy and ones like it disgust me.

Quote
Otherwise you wouldn't fucking say it now would you? You don't drop such an insulting tone and then pull your bullshit card up, "lol I ain't even mad. It's a joke guise. I don't care."
I have to be angry to say something insulting? LOL

Quote
Jeses
LOOOOOOOOL

Quote
fuck you call Demonic out for supposedly not caring when all you do is shit like that?
wat

Quote
Right, I forgot, because you're a fedora tipping internet warrior who doesn't care about anybody or anything, my bad. Yes, I will laugh, and I'll have a damn good one since you're about as comedic gold as fucking Dustbin.
Boy I really got to you in that thread where I made fun of you. You've been on my dick ever since.

Oh you sure did rustle my jim jams indeed. Maybe it was a good thing though. It's a nice little wake up call to some things I'd forgotten about. Mainly, fuck people and their inconsistencies. Like yours.
Zero inconsistencies here buddy boy.

Quote
Also, most sane people that dislike things, tend to, well, not like them. What happens when you don't like something? You get annoyed. Irritated. Angry.
Not really, no. I don't have to get angry to express my dislike for that life philosophy.

Quote
All of those are a form of caring about something, enough to let it bug you. So you're a total damn hypocrite through and through in regards to your stance on things.
I've never said I don't care about things, so what are you talking about? God you're such a simpleton.

Quote
In which case I can thank you for that because now I know that I can't take you seriously and at best, you're a source of internet comedy gold.
More like I'm a source of extreme anger for you. Holy shit what a manchild.

Quote
I hope you like sarcasm chally because you're a walking source of free laughs to me. Can't say it's a bad thing right?
What? What does this even mean?

Quote
After all you don't care. Except, only when it bugs you.
Yo farmer bob, I said I don't get offended. Not that I don't care. Go get yourself an edumacation and learn how to read.

Quote
Cheers!
>Canadian hillbilly talking like a Brit

LOL

I do enjoy your need to split everything up. Makes it easy to skip to the good parts. But, I did take your advice and seek out education!

And, Canada right?

We've got the Queen on our money. You know, there's bound to be a few little leftovers of a bonger's pattern of speech. You know what some farmers like up here?

Tea!

6088
Serious / Re: Women should be in infantry
« on: May 31, 2015, 11:54:35 AM »
Nope. I would not trust a woman on the front lines of any war. There's nothing sexist about it.
There is everything sexist about it without providing some logic behind it.

"I can't trust black people on the front lines of any war. There's nothing racist about it."
Nothing's wrong with black folks though. I'm not being racist.

Women don't have the killer instinct, stamina, physical and mental strength etc.
I'm well aware women aren't as physical strong as males. That's just common sense and biology.
And that's extremely important if you need to carry your buddy out of the shit so he doesn't get captured.

Quote
But killer instinct and mental strength? You're sounding little sexist. You say this like a woman can't fight or kill as like a man, but they easily can.
LOL

Sorry, but no. That's how this species is. The females would stay back and the males would go out and kill for food. Now that we're a little more civilized, a lot of males don't really have that killer instinct anymore and females sure as hell aren't tough enough to be on the frontline.

Quote
Lots of women could easily kick anyone's asses here. Stop being so ignorant, mang.
Because everybody here is a fucking dweeb excluding like 3 or 4 people.

Kicking someone's ass =/= Killing someone

Taking a life is not easy. It's even less easy for a female. I don't trust a female to not be tricked by a little kid crying then turning out to have a grenade because her motherly instincts kick in and she let her guard down.


"I don't trust a female to not be tricked by a little kid crying then turning out to have a grenade because her motherly instincts kick in and she let her guard down."

That's the shittiest example you could've given, conisering the fact that the military is male dominated already and people still fall for it all the time.
A woman would fall for it easier than a man.

That's one example out of hundreds where women come up short, apart from how physically inferior they are.

Most likely, yes. But, I did just think of something. Suppose that there are women that could qualify for the physical standard of military. How would you feel about if if they were organized all together. As in, not mixed units of men and women, but cohesive units, men and men, women and women?

You can't actually really say that some of them aren't fighters, because some of them have to be. For example, Kurdish soldiers. In the first and second world wars, there were women fighters. On the frontier plains of the US and Canada, there were women fighters.

They're a rarity. And, although they may be less apt at physical gritty things then guys, it does not excuse the fact that some of them possess fighting ability. And some of them, especially, really, really don't fuck around, as much as guys.
It's such a rarity I wouldn't have women on the frontline.

Well, tough shit partner!

It's not your call to make. You wouldn't have them on the frontlines. But history says otherwise despite the supposed rarity of good women fighters. And the people in charge who are still all up and deciding about things. It's, like, your opinion man.

And you know what we do with opinions?

Spoiler

6089
The Flood / Re: All too easy
« on: May 31, 2015, 11:45:57 AM »


I will, in fact, LOL. That's not getting offended over something on the internet, true, but the fact that you've got a stick up your ass about some supposed bullshit philosophies cements that there's some irritation rattling around in your head.
Uh

No. It means I have things I like and dislike. Buddhist philosophy and ones like it disgust me.

Quote
Otherwise you wouldn't fucking say it now would you? You don't drop such an insulting tone and then pull your bullshit card up, "lol I ain't even mad. It's a joke guise. I don't care."
I have to be angry to say something insulting? LOL

Quote
Jeses
LOOOOOOOOL

Quote
fuck you call Demonic out for supposedly not caring when all you do is shit like that?
wat

Quote
Right, I forgot, because you're a fedora tipping internet warrior who doesn't care about anybody or anything, my bad. Yes, I will laugh, and I'll have a damn good one since you're about as comedic gold as fucking Dustbin.
Boy I really got to you in that thread where I made fun of you. You've been on my dick ever since.

Oh you sure did rustle my jim jams indeed. Maybe it was a good thing though. It's a nice little wake up call to some things I'd forgotten about. Mainly, fuck people and their inconsistencies. Like yours.

Also, most sane people that dislike things, tend to, well, not like them. What happens when you don't like something? You get annoyed. Irritated. Angry.

All of those are a form of caring about something, enough to let it bug you. So you're a total damn hypocrite through and through in regards to your stance on things. In which case I can thank you for that because now I know that I can't take you seriously and at best, you're a source of internet comedy gold.

I hope you like sarcasm chally because you're a walking source of free laughs to me. Can't say it's a bad thing right?

After all you don't care. Except, only when it bugs you.

Cheers!

6090
Serious / Re: Women should be in infantry
« on: May 31, 2015, 11:37:28 AM »
Nope. I would not trust a woman on the front lines of any war. There's nothing sexist about it.
There is everything sexist about it without providing some logic behind it.

"I can't trust black people on the front lines of any war. There's nothing racist about it."
Nothing's wrong with black folks though. I'm not being racist.

Women don't have the killer instinct, stamina, physical and mental strength etc.
I'm well aware women aren't as physical strong as males. That's just common sense and biology.
And that's extremely important if you need to carry your buddy out of the shit so he doesn't get captured.

Quote
But killer instinct and mental strength? You're sounding little sexist. You say this like a woman can't fight or kill as like a man, but they easily can.
LOL

Sorry, but no. That's how this species is. The females would stay back and the males would go out and kill for food. Now that we're a little more civilized, a lot of males don't really have that killer instinct anymore and females sure as hell aren't tough enough to be on the frontline.

Quote
Lots of women could easily kick anyone's asses here. Stop being so ignorant, mang.
Because everybody here is a fucking dweeb excluding like 3 or 4 people.

Kicking someone's ass =/= Killing someone

Taking a life is not easy. It's even less easy for a female. I don't trust a female to not be tricked by a little kid crying then turning out to have a grenade because her motherly instincts kick in and she let her guard down.


"I don't trust a female to not be tricked by a little kid crying then turning out to have a grenade because her motherly instincts kick in and she let her guard down."

That's the shittiest example you could've given, conisering the fact that the military is male dominated already and people still fall for it all the time.
A woman would fall for it easier than a man.

That's one example out of hundreds where women come up short, apart from how physically inferior they are.

Most likely, yes. But, I did just think of something. Suppose that there are women that could qualify for the physical standard of military. How would you feel about if if they were organized all together. As in, not mixed units of men and women, but cohesive units, men and men, women and women?

You can't actually really say that some of them aren't fighters, because some of them have to be. For example, Kurdish soldiers. In the first and second world wars, there were women fighters. On the frontier plains of the US and Canada, there were women fighters.

They're a rarity. And, although they may be less apt at physical gritty things then guys, it does not excuse the fact that some of them possess fighting ability. And some of them, especially, really, really don't fuck around, as much as guys.

Pages: 1 ... 201202203 204205 ... 390