I've found 30-45 to be the sweet spot.

But lately it's been around the 20-30 mark, which is fine in all honesty.

You can make things last by practicing edging and changing positions frequently. Has a huge impact at the end if you do it right

According to statistics, women don't prefer the single all night session. Better to focus on reducing the refractory period and going several 15 minute sessions instead of the two hour marathons.

Reminds me. I promised Al Baghdadi I'd get them waxed. Gotta call that place

The average penis size is 5.6 inches

Women on average have 4 sexual partners throughout their lifetime, men average 7.

The average time elapsed during penatrative sex (not foreplay) is 7.3 minutes. Women, when polled anonymously, said ideal is 5-10 minutes.

On average for both men and women, virginity is lost at 17.

Hope this clears up any angst some of you have.

Decide it's fate

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


*posts an article from infowars about a cop shooting a dog*

TBPH, I do have a problem with sport hunters. The assholes who kill an animal just for the thrill of killing it. My grandfather went moose hunting one year, and guess what we ate exclusively for 6 months? Fucking moose meat. If you plan to hunt, bring it home and eat it, not just the head or rack.

oh my GOD I have zero respect for you now, Charlie

This is NOT funny.

Why so serious? The raccoon thread? TBPH, the only thing he did that was callous was to stop and post about it. That's if he was being serious. The rough truth is that all life isn't sacred. I'm doing a sarcastic thread on people's reactions. If my thread offends you, then oh well.

Meh. Don't know why I bothered with the poll. I decided to beat it senseless with a brick before beheading it with a shovel.

Quote from: MyNameIsCharlie on June 03, 2016, 11:11:12 PM

So what if he shot a wild raccoon? Why all this drama over it. It's not like it was a domestic pet that relied on someone to survive. They're pests. They bite kids and aren't really afraid of humans. They also carry a host of diseases and parasites. Unless he drove the thing miles away, it would have come back. My only criticism is taking 5 shots when one or two would have been sufficient. You had a rifle, didn't you? Just put the barrel in the cage and right to center mass and pull the trigger. Headshots are really hard with these things. Too small a head. If you really wanted to kill it instantly, you should have had some one almost let it out, just so it's head is out, pin it by the neck with the cage, and crushed its head with a big rock. Or just threw the cage (if it's closed on the bottom, in a lake or river and then fished it out so you could use the cage again. Why waste ammo at all?

It's also a joke and he didn't actually do it.

Wait wut?

This is bull?

Oh fuck all y'all. 

So what if he shot a wild raccoon? Why all this drama over it. It's not like it was a domestic pet that relied on someone to survive. They're pests. They bite kids and aren't really afraid of humans. They also carry a host of diseases and parasites. Unless he drove the thing miles away, it would have come back. My only criticism is taking 5 shots when one or two would have been sufficient. You had a rifle, didn't you? Just put the barrel in the cage and right to center mass and pull the trigger. Headshots are really hard with these things. Too small a head. If you really wanted to kill it instantly, you should have had some one almost let it out, just so it's head is out, pin it by the neck with the cage, and crushed its head with a big rock. Or just threw the cage (if it's closed on the bottom, in a lake or river and then fished it out so you could use the cage again. Why waste ammo at all?

A coworker today maintained it is not. I said it was.

Baby boom yo, capitalism makes the babies happen

Well, historically speaking, communist countries had more sex, because there were less men (highest casualties in WWII) and they had more babies

Under which system would there be the most amount of casual sex?

Is it possible that we're discussing the wrong benefit to an economic system. Maybe we should use the lowest standard score. Take the member least likely to leave his mom's basement and put his penis in a women's vagina.

Apply both economic systems and rate his ability to get laid. The highest scoring one is the best system.

And remove the livelihoods and jobs of the thousands of cheese grater labourers?

That's anti-opportunity, that's anti-American.

Yet the cheese grating industry only hires Canadian cheese migrants, who are here illegally, and bring their inferior language (no one should say eh)

Banning shredding kicks these workers out!

Make America grate again!











This thread has been paid for by the Shitposters United! coalition to keep shitposting relevant.