Quote from: deaaa on November 02, 2015, 11:37:03 AMQuote from: Destiny is BANE? on November 02, 2015, 11:34:22 AMQuote from: deaaa on November 02, 2015, 11:32:39 AMQuote from: Destiny is BANE? on November 02, 2015, 11:31:41 AMI think that you should read the Halo 5 thread before posting things that we're already discussingI think I can do whatever the fuck I want.u fuckin wot m8?1v1 me in CAH bitch1v1 me in SWAT you MLP fgt
Quote from: Destiny is BANE? on November 02, 2015, 11:34:22 AMQuote from: deaaa on November 02, 2015, 11:32:39 AMQuote from: Destiny is BANE? on November 02, 2015, 11:31:41 AMI think that you should read the Halo 5 thread before posting things that we're already discussingI think I can do whatever the fuck I want.u fuckin wot m8?1v1 me in CAH bitch
Quote from: deaaa on November 02, 2015, 11:32:39 AMQuote from: Destiny is BANE? on November 02, 2015, 11:31:41 AMI think that you should read the Halo 5 thread before posting things that we're already discussingI think I can do whatever the fuck I want.u fuckin wot m8?
Quote from: Destiny is BANE? on November 02, 2015, 11:31:41 AMI think that you should read the Halo 5 thread before posting things that we're already discussingI think I can do whatever the fuck I want.
I think that you should read the Halo 5 thread before posting things that we're already discussing
Already discussed in the general. The only valid point he makes is something that everyone and their mother said a week ago once again proving that he can't do anything except for scream like an angry retard unless he has material to steal from other people.Also the unwarranted sense of self importance is real in this video.
Quote from: LC on November 02, 2015, 12:29:39 PMAlso going to point out that Joe says "If you do good you'll get maybe 900 points per match". I guess Joe's definition of doing good is a .2 k/d because that's what shows up in the background. A normal warzone round for me nets about 2k req points.Players that are pulling in 1k/2k a match will still need to clock in 400 odd hours required to complete every cosmetic. Joe explicitly takes a caveat to his playing ability and the capacity to earn req points later in the video. The system is deliberately implemented to have you spend more money than required, which was his entire point. It's predatory, and it's bullshit.I'm not sure why you come crashing into these threads unapologetically slogging the corporate phallus and their bullshit business practices. I've seen you do it for Battlefront, and it's honestly just laughable. I wouldn't be surprised if EA kept you on their payroll.But go ahead and continue to hand wave off legitimate grievances with "hurr he's just a bumbling retard that has no idea how the industry works" if you actually want to continue reciprocating the standards that us as consumers shouldn't have to put up with.
Also going to point out that Joe says "If you do good you'll get maybe 900 points per match". I guess Joe's definition of doing good is a .2 k/d because that's what shows up in the background. A normal warzone round for me nets about 2k req points.
There's only 3 missions for the Chief? ....wha?
Quote from: LC on November 02, 2015, 11:34:18 AMAlready discussed in the general. The only valid point he makes is something that everyone and their mother said a week ago once again proving that he can't do anything except for scream like an angry retard unless he has material to steal from other people.Also the unwarranted sense of self importance is real in this video.Which valid point is that, because there's plenty of things he's not wrong about.
"Master Chief Boss Battle"I'm done with this moron, his channel has really gone down the toilet, fucking idiot, a Spartan II vs a SPARTAN FUCKING IV?!?!!??!!?!?!
Quote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 02, 2015, 04:35:33 PMQuote from: LC on November 02, 2015, 11:34:18 AMAlready discussed in the general. The only valid point he makes is something that everyone and their mother said a week ago once again proving that he can't do anything except for scream like an angry retard unless he has material to steal from other people.Also the unwarranted sense of self importance is real in this video.Which valid point is that, because there's plenty of things he's not wrong about.The only correct thing he said was the shitty AI and repetitive boss battles.
Quote from: Deathstroke on November 02, 2015, 05:02:55 PM"Master Chief Boss Battle"I'm done with this moron, his channel has really gone down the toilet, fucking idiot, a Spartan II vs a SPARTAN FUCKING IV?!?!!??!!?!?!Well....it was kinda advertised as this big conflict.....which apparently doesn't happen....thats kinda disappointing.
But still, how would a spartan IV beat a spartan II, I didn't need a boss fight because I know that Master Chief will kick Lockes ass.
Quote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 02, 2015, 05:23:06 PMDon't bother. For some reason LC has this terrible bias against AJ. How someone could harbour such disgust for a random person making video game reviews on the internet is beyond me.
Quote from: Préhistorique on November 02, 2015, 05:32:02 PMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 02, 2015, 05:23:06 PMDon't bother. For some reason LC has this terrible bias against AJ. How someone could harbour such disgust for a random person making video game reviews on the internet is beyond me.If I'm going to waste my time talking with idiots that aren't likely to change their opinion about things at all, or until well after the argument, they might as well be someone other than myself.
Quote from: Deathstroke on November 02, 2015, 05:23:36 PMBut still, how would a spartan IV beat a spartan II, I didn't need a boss fight because I know that Master Chief will kick Lockes ass.S4s and S2s are mostly equals. Hence why the gameplay stays consistent regardless of which team you're playing on.I mean, the fight ended in a near draw between the two. Locke literally had a pistol locked on Chief.Even if the canon somehow details how wrong I am, the entire game leads you to believe that these two protagonists are on even grounds.
Nah, they're pretty much equal minus the experience and training the S2's have.
Quote from: Nick McIntyre on November 02, 2015, 05:37:20 PMI agree with many of the criticisms against Joe, don't get me wrong. It's just that LC is so adamantly against this guy like he fucked his wife while wearing his Corporate Commander outfit and laughing like an a deranged racoon.And I mean at the end of the day, clearly Joe isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He's just a guy you play video games with. I'd probably be friends with him IRL tbh.
Quote from: Préhistorique on November 02, 2015, 05:40:40 PMQuote from: Nick McIntyre on November 02, 2015, 05:37:20 PMI agree with many of the criticisms against Joe, don't get me wrong. It's just that LC is so adamantly against this guy like he fucked his wife while wearing his Corporate Commander outfit and laughing like an a deranged racoon.And I mean at the end of the day, clearly Joe isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He's just a guy you play video games with. I'd probably be friends with him IRL tbh.And I particularly enjoy the intros with him dressed up as characters with Other Joe and tries to reenact things that happen in the game. His Rambo, Ride to Hell, and Godzilla reviews are hilarious.
And I particularly enjoy the intros with him dressed up as characters with Other Joe and tries to reenact things that happen in the game. His Rambo, Ride to Hell, and Godzilla reviews are hilarious.
Quote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 02, 2015, 05:38:53 PMNah, they're pretty much equal minus the experience and training the S2's have.That's what I have been lead to believe.See, Deathstroke? It's not unreasonable to expect some sort of confrontation between these two "equals".
Quote from: Préhistorique on November 02, 2015, 05:42:12 PMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 02, 2015, 05:38:53 PMNah, they're pretty much equal minus the experience and training the S2's have.That's what I have been lead to believe.See, Deathstroke? It's not unreasonable to expect some sort of confrontation between these two "equals".I can see where you're coming from, but still. A rookie (Osiris Team) vs Someone who has experience (Blue Team), I just don't see how Locke can take on someone like Master Chief.
A rookie (Osiris Team) vs Someone who has experience (Blue Team), I just don't see how Locke can take on someone like Master Chief.
Quote from: Deathstroke on November 02, 2015, 05:58:18 PMQuote from: Préhistorique on November 02, 2015, 05:42:12 PMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 02, 2015, 05:38:53 PMNah, they're pretty much equal minus the experience and training the S2's have.That's what I have been lead to believe.See, Deathstroke? It's not unreasonable to expect some sort of confrontation between these two "equals".I can see where you're coming from, but still. A rookie (Osiris Team) vs Someone who has experience (Blue Team), I just don't see how Locke can take on someone like Master Chief.>Buck>Rookiekys
A rookie (Osiris Team)
I never said you did, however Reach is another widely played Halo game that had a similar level of character customization that had to be unlocked through play time. Therefore it is an apt comparison when discussing Halo 5s cosmetic content and how much time must be sunk into the game to complete the cosmetic armory.
The fact remains that in a game with a paid short cut you can complete your much larger cosmetic armory in less than half the time without paying a single dime than another game in the same franchise without the option for a paid short cut. This is not at all predatory.
This fact alone shows that the games economy was not in any way altered to make the paid option most viable option to receive content.
You meant he same CD Projekt Red that's selling season passes and charging 25 USD individually for their expansions? Great double standard there m8.
Quote from: LC on November 02, 2015, 04:10:46 PMI never said you did, however Reach is another widely played Halo game that had a similar level of character customization that had to be unlocked through play time. Therefore it is an apt comparison when discussing Halo 5s cosmetic content and how much time must be sunk into the game to complete the cosmetic armory.Okay sure, it's an apt comparison, but I'm not sure what the comparison achieves intellectually. Both are horrendously designed systems that require virtually no skill. A chimpanzee playing Reach could get to Inheritor provided he had enough time, and likewise, a rich chimpanzee could unlock all of Halo 5's cosmetics.What exactly is your point here? That bullshit designs like this should be acceptable?QuoteThe fact remains that in a game with a paid short cut you can complete your much larger cosmetic armory in less than half the time without paying a single dime than another game in the same franchise without the option for a paid short cut. This is not at all predatory.Haha what? "You can get to level X in this bullshit system faster than this other bullshit system provided you have the money to pay for it. This is not at all predatory."Are you even listening to yourself right now? You are comparing dogshit to cowshit my friend. You still haven't addressed my points on why we should have micro-transactions as consumers. Reach had a shitty system. We know. Again, why does adding micro-transactions to the shit heap aid anything?QuoteThis fact alone shows that the games economy was not in any way altered to make the paid option most viable option to receive content.I'm not even sure what this sentence is trying to convey. The pay-to-receive content option was implemented because consumers such as yourself and the Halo community in general became apathetic to the notion for some reason.QuoteYou meant he same CD Projekt Red that's selling season passes and charging 25 USD individually for their expansions? Great double standard there m8.My contention doesn't lie with season passes or expansions m9, provided they are supplied with enough content, which TW3 most certainly has. Straw-manning my argument doesn't achieve much.
A new review coming in from Angry Joe, for Halo 5.
