Quote from: Auld Lang Turkey on January 02, 2016, 07:14:49 PMQuote from: Fuddy Duddy II on January 02, 2016, 07:03:54 PMQuote from: Auld Lang Turkey on January 02, 2016, 06:44:30 PMHey Turkey, go fuck yourself.?Give me a second to find the post where you say this series contains no sex.
Quote from: Fuddy Duddy II on January 02, 2016, 07:03:54 PMQuote from: Auld Lang Turkey on January 02, 2016, 06:44:30 PMHey Turkey, go fuck yourself.?
Quote from: Auld Lang Turkey on January 02, 2016, 06:44:30 PMHey Turkey, go fuck yourself.
I never said that. I said they're few and far between, and none of them are gory or particularly graphic.
none of that was grisly.
"But it's just one line"You find one ant in your house--there's a whole colony nearby.Also, those are the two most poorly-written lines of text I have ever read.
"Every stool was looser than the one before, and smelled fouler. By the time the moon came up she was shitting brown water. The more she drank the more she shat but the more she shat, the thirstier she grew".
Quote from: † on January 02, 2016, 07:00:33 PM"Every stool was looser than the one before, and smelled fouler. By the time the moon came up she was shitting brown water. The more she drank the more she shat but the more she shat, the thirstier she grew".I actually just read this today, and that line is kinda important in depicting the deterioration of Daenerys in the Dothraki Sea, showing how she was essentially wasting away to nothing.
Quote from: Auld Lang Turkey on January 02, 2016, 07:49:07 PMI never said that. I said they're few and far between, and none of them are gory or particularly graphic.Except, you know, the one that was just posted. And it was just a fragment.Quotenone of that was grisly.Fucking how.
It's just not grisly or particularly graphic. I'm not sure what you want me to say. Is 'cunt' the offending word? Because you say it all the time.
Is it the sopping wet part? That's just feminine arousal.
That bothers you, and nothing I can say will change that.
Reminder that The Accursed Kings did the game of thrones better than ASOIAF fourty years earlier.
Well if feminine arousal and vaginas cause you intense horror and distress, I can't tell you otherwise.ASoIaF doesn't pull punches, but it's sure as shit not the fuckfest you seem to think it is. You haven't even read a single one of the books, and you're calling it pornography based on the existence of the rare sex scene. It's just silly.
Quote from: Prime Megaten on January 02, 2016, 08:03:18 PMReminder that The Accursed Kings did the game of thrones better than ASOIAF fourty years earlier.Shakespeare did them all better centuries earlier. It's all just derivative retellings of Shakespeare with increasingly boundary-pushing themes. All crap.
UhThe Accursed Kings is based on the French monarchy leading up to the Hundred Years War. Fiction based on nonfiction.
Shakespeare pretty much told every story worth telling before everyone.
Quote from: Fuddy Duddy II on January 02, 2016, 08:10:42 PMShakespeare pretty much told every story worth telling before everyone.
Quote from: Azumarill on January 02, 2016, 08:11:52 PMQuote from: Fuddy Duddy II on January 02, 2016, 08:10:42 PMShakespeare pretty much told every story worth telling before everyone.Get less cringy reaction images.Also, I'm not wrong.
Quote from: Prime Megaten on January 02, 2016, 08:08:47 PMUhThe Accursed Kings is based on the French monarchy leading up to the Hundred Years War. Fiction based on nonfiction.That doesn't mean Shakespeare didn't tell the same essential story being told.Shakespeare pretty much told every story worth telling before everyone.
Everything's the same if you generalize enough. It's not even a fair example in the first place. That's like dismissing Star Wars, not for its simple nature, but because The Hero With a Thousand Faces did it first.
Quote from: Prime Megaten on January 02, 2016, 08:16:54 PMQuote from: Fuddy Duddy II on January 02, 2016, 08:10:42 PMQuote from: Prime Megaten on January 02, 2016, 08:08:47 PMUhThe Accursed Kings is based on the French monarchy leading up to the Hundred Years War. Fiction based on nonfiction.That doesn't mean Shakespeare didn't tell the same essential story being told.Shakespeare pretty much told every story worth telling before everyone.Everything's the same if you generalize enough. It's not even a fair example in the first place. That's like dismissing Star Wars, not for its simple nature, but because The Hero With a Thousand Faces did it first.I already dismiss Star Wars...
Quote from: Fuddy Duddy II on January 02, 2016, 08:10:42 PMQuote from: Prime Megaten on January 02, 2016, 08:08:47 PMUhThe Accursed Kings is based on the French monarchy leading up to the Hundred Years War. Fiction based on nonfiction.That doesn't mean Shakespeare didn't tell the same essential story being told.Shakespeare pretty much told every story worth telling before everyone.Everything's the same if you generalize enough. It's not even a fair example in the first place. That's like dismissing Star Wars, not for its simple nature, but because The Hero With a Thousand Faces did it first.
ITT: Verb get's buttblasted over a series of books he's never read.
Quote from: Zizzy on January 02, 2016, 07:56:21 PMQuote from: † on January 02, 2016, 07:00:33 PM"Every stool was looser than the one before, and smelled fouler. By the time the moon came up she was shitting brown water. The more she drank the more she shat but the more she shat, the thirstier she grew".I actually just read this today, and that line is kinda important in depicting the deterioration of Daenerys in the Dothraki Sea, showing how she was essentially wasting away to nothing.i'm afraid if i roll my eyes back any further, they'll pop out
Highlighted for convenience, I addressed that.
Quote from: Prime Megaten on January 02, 2016, 08:19:34 PMHighlighted for convenience, I addressed that.Well, I'm just saying. I was adding to your initial point there, but simply taking it further. Everything is derivative, so it just seemed like a redundant point to make.
Which is why I never stated how original or not ASOIAF is. GRRM cited it as an inspiration for his books, and he self-admittedly thinks that TAK is far and away superior.I was just pointing out a better alternative to ASOIAF.
Quote from: Prime Megaten on January 02, 2016, 08:26:09 PMWhich is why I never stated how original or not ASOIAF is. GRRM cited it as an inspiration for his books, and he self-admittedly thinks that TAK is far and away superior.I was just pointing out a better alternative to ASOIAF.In what way is it better? just curious
Besides it lacking GRRM's love of shitting and food? More intriguing factions that play off of each other more often than shooting off one liners within their ranks.In George's words, "believe me, the Starks and the Lannisters have nothing on the Capets and Plantagenets."