Why would they be designed to taste bad?
Quote from: Mount And Do Me on December 10, 2015, 01:41:33 PMWhy would they be designed to taste bad?They aren't.Not designing them to taste good != designed to taste badThey taste like raw chemicals.
pop
QuotepopS T O PT OO TP O T S
Quote from: Luis on December 10, 2015, 03:12:31 PMQuotepopS T O PT OO TP O T Sfizzy pop
There's no evidence artificial sweeteners are dangerous in any reasonable dosage, and regular soda has more sugar than you should have in two days.
Quote from: Leymon's term on December 10, 2015, 03:13:26 PMQuote from: Luis on December 10, 2015, 03:12:31 PMQuotepopS T O PT OO TP O T Sfizzy popare you a fucking year 1 primary school teacher?drown yourself in fizzy pop
Quote from: Simseoh on December 10, 2015, 03:17:06 PMQuote from: Leymon's term on December 10, 2015, 03:13:26 PMQuote from: Luis on December 10, 2015, 03:12:31 PMQuotepopS T O PT OO TP O T Sfizzy popare you a fucking year 1 primary school teacher?drown yourself in fizzy popbut sir
At least you didn't call it "fountain drink"
Quote from: Chicken Endies on December 10, 2015, 12:37:17 PMQuote from: Septy on December 10, 2015, 12:21:25 PMWhy are you in the hospitalI'm notThen you must be at a fat camprip ender
Quote from: Septy on December 10, 2015, 12:21:25 PMWhy are you in the hospitalI'm not
Why are you in the hospital
Quote from: Have A Holly Jolly Turkey on December 10, 2015, 12:54:34 PMThere's no evidence artificial sweeteners are dangerous in any reasonable dosage, and regular soda has more sugar than you should have in two days.Neither is Mercury at a reasonable dosage.
There's no evidence artificial sweeteners are dangerous in any reasonable dosage
Quote from: Have A Holly Jolly Turkey on December 10, 2015, 12:54:34 PMThere's no evidence artificial sweeteners are dangerous in any reasonable dosageFuck off. Aspartame is literally a carcinogen.
Quote from: SecondClass on December 10, 2015, 05:12:51 PMQuote from: Have A Holly Jolly Turkey on December 10, 2015, 12:54:34 PMThere's no evidence artificial sweeteners are dangerous in any reasonable dosageFuck off. Aspartame is literally a carcinogen.Quite a lot of carcinogens exist in natural foods like meat and fruit. The poison is in the dosage, not the substance. That said, aspartame isn't on any list of known carcinogens.
Diet coke may just be the worst thing ever invented by man
Quote from: Have A Holly Jolly Turkey on December 10, 2015, 05:14:17 PMQuote from: SecondClass on December 10, 2015, 05:12:51 PMQuote from: Have A Holly Jolly Turkey on December 10, 2015, 12:54:34 PMThere's no evidence artificial sweeteners are dangerous in any reasonable dosageFuck off. Aspartame is literally a carcinogen.Quite a lot of carcinogens exist in natural foods like meat and fruit. The poison is in the dosage, not the substance. That said, aspartame isn't on any list of known carcinogens.One would still question using it in the first place.
Ender like my post.
Quote from: Essessen on December 10, 2015, 10:22:04 PMQuote from: Have A Holly Jolly Turkey on December 10, 2015, 05:14:17 PMQuote from: SecondClass on December 10, 2015, 05:12:51 PMQuote from: Have A Holly Jolly Turkey on December 10, 2015, 12:54:34 PMThere's no evidence artificial sweeteners are dangerous in any reasonable dosageFuck off. Aspartame is literally a carcinogen.Quite a lot of carcinogens exist in natural foods like meat and fruit. The poison is in the dosage, not the substance. That said, aspartame isn't on any list of known carcinogens.One would still question using it in the first place.Seeing as heart disease caused by excessive sugars and fats in our diet is the leading cause of death in the U.S., one probably wouldn't question too hard the use of a proven harmless substance. Aspartame use is arguably a more thoroughly researched science than GMOs at this point. It is literally just a basic composition of two amino acids that break down exactly the same way as protein, and is 200 times sweeter than sugar.
Quote from: Have A Holly Jolly Turkey on December 10, 2015, 10:27:47 PMQuote from: Essessen on December 10, 2015, 10:22:04 PMQuote from: Have A Holly Jolly Turkey on December 10, 2015, 05:14:17 PMQuote from: SecondClass on December 10, 2015, 05:12:51 PMQuote from: Have A Holly Jolly Turkey on December 10, 2015, 12:54:34 PMThere's no evidence artificial sweeteners are dangerous in any reasonable dosageFuck off. Aspartame is literally a carcinogen.Quite a lot of carcinogens exist in natural foods like meat and fruit. The poison is in the dosage, not the substance. That said, aspartame isn't on any list of known carcinogens.One would still question using it in the first place.Seeing as heart disease caused by excessive sugars and fats in our diet is the leading cause of death in the U.S., one probably wouldn't question too hard the use of a proven harmless substance. Aspartame use is arguably a more thoroughly researched science than GMOs at this point. It is literally just a basic composition of two amino acids that break down exactly the same way as protein, and is 200 times sweeter than sugar.>Not eating less sugary things instead of relying on a crutch
Quote from: Essessen on December 10, 2015, 10:34:35 PMQuote from: Have A Holly Jolly Turkey on December 10, 2015, 10:27:47 PMQuote from: Essessen on December 10, 2015, 10:22:04 PMQuote from: Have A Holly Jolly Turkey on December 10, 2015, 05:14:17 PMQuote from: SecondClass on December 10, 2015, 05:12:51 PMQuote from: Have A Holly Jolly Turkey on December 10, 2015, 12:54:34 PMThere's no evidence artificial sweeteners are dangerous in any reasonable dosageFuck off. Aspartame is literally a carcinogen.Quite a lot of carcinogens exist in natural foods like meat and fruit. The poison is in the dosage, not the substance. That said, aspartame isn't on any list of known carcinogens.One would still question using it in the first place.Seeing as heart disease caused by excessive sugars and fats in our diet is the leading cause of death in the U.S., one probably wouldn't question too hard the use of a proven harmless substance. Aspartame use is arguably a more thoroughly researched science than GMOs at this point. It is literally just a basic composition of two amino acids that break down exactly the same way as protein, and is 200 times sweeter than sugar.>Not eating less sugary things instead of relying on a crutchIt is less sugary though, unless you meant sweet, at which point you're just arbitrarily vilifying a flavor.
I can't into words, but it sounds dumb to start taking a bunch of artificial sugar just because you can't take as much real sugar anymore.
Quote from: Essessen on December 10, 2015, 10:40:40 PMI can't into words, but it sounds dumb to start taking a bunch of artificial sugar just because you can't take as much real sugar anymore.Yeah, to some extent I think we've gone too far with being used to sweet and fatty foods, and I think everyone would benefit from making their diet less reliant on sweeteners, but replacing 300 calories of pure sugar in a widely available soft drink with a fairly decent, zero calorie substitute seems like a middle ground. Kind of like banning trans fats and stuff like that.
Why do hospitals only sell diet pop?
