Who would win a gender war?

FatherlyNick - fuck putin · March 02, 2017, 10:38:26 AM

No weapons, fists only.

eggsalad · March 02, 2017, 11:02:40 AM

I mean a few alphas would inevitably realize they have everything to win and nothing to lose from turncoating.

Also which side to trannies fight for.

DAS B00T x2 · March 02, 2017, 11:16:20 AM

Quote from: eggsalad on March 02, 2017, 11:02:40 AM

Also which side to trannies fight for.

Depends on if they suffer from a lack of internalized misogyny or not.

eggsalad · March 02, 2017, 11:19:18 AM

Men win. They can't gestate a babby. Men lose.

Women win. Use frozen sperm to inseminate.

But wait. Babby is man.

Women lose.

DAS B00T x2 · March 02, 2017, 11:22:00 AM

Quote from: eggsalad on March 02, 2017, 11:19:18 AM

Men win. They can't gestate a babby. Men lose.

Women win. Use frozen sperm to inseminate.

But wait. Babby is man.

Women lose.

we have frozen eggs and test tubes.
And Walt Disney's frozen head to guide us. Man will live long after women perish.

Super Irish · March 02, 2017, 11:33:51 AM

Men. The physical extremes of men > the physical extremes of women, if we're not factoring in weapons. Even if tactics like swarming the strongest guy first and then focusing on the next, you'd leave the rest open to attack at will and succumb to the same problem.

Ironically though, whoever won would "lose" with no way to reproduce without some form of IVF, eugenics mayhem, and some other sciences that I don't believe we have capable yet..

Aether · March 02, 2017, 11:43:51 AM

Considering that men have dominated warfare for thousands of years, I would assume they would win. Women trained in combat exist but they are still outnumbered by men trained in combat.

Turkey · March 02, 2017, 11:50:11 AM

Women would dominate with their superior intellect and hygiene.

DAS B00T x2 · March 02, 2017, 11:55:51 AM

Quote from: Töqi on March 02, 2017, 11:50:11 AM

Women would dominate with their superior intellect and hygiene.

I take it that you've never had the misfortune of cleaning a female barracks...

Solonoid · March 02, 2017, 02:44:49 PM

Quote from: Töqi on March 02, 2017, 11:50:11 AM

Women would dominate with their superior intellect and hygiene.

>superior hygiene

Aren't you married?
Don't you know better?

Batch · March 02, 2017, 03:23:17 PM

Quote from: Töqi on March 02, 2017, 11:50:11 AM

Women would dominate with their superior intellect and hygiene.

You're joking right?

Desty · March 02, 2017, 03:30:39 PM

Lol, didn't know the fish here take the bait so easily

Jono · March 02, 2017, 03:34:08 PM

Females have Cyborg... if Cyborg counts as a female

But males have John Cena and nobody can see him so females get out reeeee

challengerX · March 02, 2017, 04:25:20 PM

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

DAS B00T x2 · March 02, 2017, 04:31:30 PM

You can hack deez nuts

FatherlyNick - fuck putin · March 02, 2017, 04:52:52 PM

Quote from: DAS B00T x2 on March 02, 2017, 04:31:30 PM

You can hack deez nuts

Dietrich Six · March 02, 2017, 05:02:52 PM

Men all day, I've been privy to the average woman in a fight, they can't.

Solonoid · March 02, 2017, 05:51:06 PM

Quote from: challengerX on March 02, 2017, 04:25:20 PM

Quote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on March 02, 2017, 02:44:49 PM
Quote from: Töqi on March 02, 2017, 11:50:11 AM
Women would dominate with their superior intellect and hygiene.
>superior hygiene

Aren't you married?
Don't you know better?
Quote from: Batch on March 02, 2017, 03:23:17 PM
Quote from: Töqi on March 02, 2017, 11:50:11 AM
Women would dominate with their superior intellect and hygiene.
You're joking right?
Quote from: DAS B00T x2 on March 02, 2017, 11:55:51 AM
Quote from: Töqi on March 02, 2017, 11:50:11 AM
Women would dominate with their superior intellect and hygiene.
I take it that you've never had the misfortune of cleaning a female barracks...
Did Deci hack your accounts?

I was always Deci

March 02, 2017, 08:10:14 PM

easily women

Luciana · March 02, 2017, 08:28:49 PM

Considering one side is quite literally stronger than the other on a physical level due in part by having larger skeleton size and bone/muscle mass? Men easily.

Batch · March 02, 2017, 08:30:21 PM

Quote from: Luciana on March 02, 2017, 08:28:49 PM

Considering one side is quite literally stronger than the other on a physical level, and have larger skeleton size and bone mass? Men easily.

Watch Class try and refute this

Verbatim · March 02, 2017, 08:31:54 PM

Quote from: Batch on March 02, 2017, 08:30:21 PM

Quote from: Luciana on March 02, 2017, 08:28:49 PM
Considering one side is quite literally stronger than the other on a physical level, and have larger skeleton size and bone mass? Men easily.
What Class try and refute this

He won't. He realizes that men are stronger; he just considers physical strength to be a negative thing.

And he has a point. The fact that women generally can't defend themselves against men is probably a bad thing.

Luciana · March 02, 2017, 08:32:20 PM

I'm not saying one gender is better than the other as a whole. Just that men are physically more capable due in part by the things I listed. It's not a matter of opinion, that's biological fact. There is a reason our ancestors hunting and running after animals were men and not women.

Luciana · March 02, 2017, 08:32:59 PM

Quote from: Verbatim on March 02, 2017, 08:31:54 PM

Quote from: Batch on March 02, 2017, 08:30:21 PM
Quote from: Luciana on March 02, 2017, 08:28:49 PM
Considering one side is quite literally stronger than the other on a physical level, and have larger skeleton size and bone mass? Men easily.
What Class try and refute this
He won't. He realizes that men are stronger; he just considers physical strength to be a negative thing.

And he has a point. The fact that women generally can't defend themselves against men is probably a bad thing.

In today's world they can now more than ever. Look at it from a glass half full perspective.

Solonoid · March 02, 2017, 08:33:49 PM

Quote from: Verbatim on March 02, 2017, 08:31:54 PM

Quote from: Batch on March 02, 2017, 08:30:21 PM
Quote from: Luciana on March 02, 2017, 08:28:49 PM
Considering one side is quite literally stronger than the other on a physical level, and have larger skeleton size and bone mass? Men easily.
What Class try and refute this
He won't. He realizes that men are stronger; he just considers physical strength to be a negative thing.

And he has a point. The fact that women generally can't defend themselves against men is probably a bad thing.

So why don't they just get good?

Luciana · March 02, 2017, 08:33:50 PM

Also sorry, but physical strength is not a weakness if you consider how our species came to be and not from a cultural stance. I wouldn't want an entire race being weak ass bitches who can't stand up to predators. Hell in that regard, even women are capable.

March 02, 2017, 08:34:40 PM

The fact that you have to exclude anything BUT physical strength (weapons, tactics, subterfuge, etc) from being a factor in this war shows how one-sided an actual gender war would be.

March 02, 2017, 08:36:10 PM

Quote from: Luciana on March 02, 2017, 08:33:50 PM

Also sorry, but physical strength is not a weakness if you consider how our species came to be and not from a cultural stance. I wouldn't want an entire race being weak ass bitches who can't stand up to predators. Hell in that regard, even women are capable.

Power is meaningless. Look at my jesus on the cross example from the other thread.

A society that's completely pure and moral, and is so innocent that it has no army isn't "lesser" than the society that pillages and destroys it. It's still better than the warmongering society, even after its destruction.

Luciana · March 02, 2017, 08:37:04 PM

Quote from: SecondClass on March 02, 2017, 08:34:40 PM

The fact that you have to exclude anything BUT physical strength (weapons, tactics, subterfuge, etc) from being a factor in this war shows how one-sided an actual gender war would be.

I'm only going on what the OP presented. If we're going into weapons and tactics and all that stuff, that's about as muddled as you can get. Women are smart, they've invented a lot of smart shit, and they know how to shoot guns and form tactics. Just because they're not present on the battlefield or in leadership roles due to the cultural bit I was trying to avoid, doesn't mean they're not mentally capable of such things. Women have led some of the most powerful nations in history at a time.

But that's an entirely different can of worms and will get as murky and subjective as you could possibly think.

Verbatim · March 02, 2017, 08:37:15 PM

Quote from: Luciana on March 02, 2017, 08:33:50 PM

Also sorry, but physical strength is not a weakness if you consider how our species came to be and not from a cultural stance. I wouldn't want an entire race being weak ass bitches who can't stand up to predators. Hell in that regard, even women are capable.

"Negative thing" does not mean weakness.

You could just as easily argue that the necessity for physical strength in the first place is also a negative thing, and that the physical strength that men typically possess is symbolic of the shit we probably wouldn't need if the world were a fairer, better place. It's more nuanced than you think.

Poll

Men vs Women

Who would win a gender war?