Quote from: Ian on November 25, 2016, 08:44:56 PMAssad did nothing wrong. The only reason the US intervened is because Russia is involved. Quote from: Azumarill on November 25, 2016, 08:42:39 PMhow does that kool aid taste?yes assad is a wonderful benevolent leader who has never been responsible for anyone's suffering. praise be unto him!
Assad did nothing wrong. The only reason the US intervened is because Russia is involved. Quote from: Azumarill on November 25, 2016, 08:42:39 PMhow does that kool aid taste?
how does that kool aid taste?
Quote from: Azendac on November 26, 2016, 05:27:38 PMQuote from: challengerX on November 25, 2016, 08:10:43 PMQuote from: Ian on November 25, 2016, 07:06:13 PMis simply out of not wanting to go to war with us, which she would have caused.lmaoEven CNN admitted a new war was probable, NATO even put 300,000 troops on high alert, there's no other reason why they'd do that, especially after Russia relocated it's nukes to Kaliningrad..http://edition.cnn.com/2016/10/28/politics/us-troops-poland-cold-war-front/>CNN
Quote from: challengerX on November 25, 2016, 08:10:43 PMQuote from: Ian on November 25, 2016, 07:06:13 PMis simply out of not wanting to go to war with us, which she would have caused.lmaoEven CNN admitted a new war was probable, NATO even put 300,000 troops on high alert, there's no other reason why they'd do that, especially after Russia relocated it's nukes to Kaliningrad..http://edition.cnn.com/2016/10/28/politics/us-troops-poland-cold-war-front/
Quote from: Ian on November 25, 2016, 07:06:13 PMis simply out of not wanting to go to war with us, which she would have caused.lmao
is simply out of not wanting to go to war with us, which she would have caused.
Quote from: Ian on November 26, 2016, 05:56:44 AMI'm very Pro-American because an allied US with Russia will help with the Anglo-Sphere along with the UK and a slumbering Germany/France/Scandinavia that must wake up. However Obama/Clinton and the current administration is determined to prevent this from occurring at all costs. Including triggering an international military conflict and trying to scapegoat Russia who has been pushed back repeatedly simply for existing. Didn't want Crimea to happen? Maybe NATO shouldn't have gone back on their word of "We wont move missile defenses an inch closer to your border. :^)"Quote from: DAS B00T x2 on November 26, 2016, 05:52:20 AMWow, didn't think Ian was one of the "Russia did nothing wrong" crowdYes, the answer to a defensive missile grid is to invade a sovereign nation.
I'm very Pro-American because an allied US with Russia will help with the Anglo-Sphere along with the UK and a slumbering Germany/France/Scandinavia that must wake up. However Obama/Clinton and the current administration is determined to prevent this from occurring at all costs. Including triggering an international military conflict and trying to scapegoat Russia who has been pushed back repeatedly simply for existing. Didn't want Crimea to happen? Maybe NATO shouldn't have gone back on their word of "We wont move missile defenses an inch closer to your border. :^)"Quote from: DAS B00T x2 on November 26, 2016, 05:52:20 AMWow, didn't think Ian was one of the "Russia did nothing wrong" crowd
Wow, didn't think Ian was one of the "Russia did nothing wrong" crowd
If Assad's an evil dictator then America has always been one as well.
Quote from: Azendac on November 26, 2016, 05:30:17 PMIf Assad's an evil dictator then America has always been one as well.Yes. America has proven itself time and time again to be incapable of espousing the egalitarian ideass it was ostensibly founded upon. Also, I feel like you're projecting your own thoughts into what you believe is my opinion on this matter and formulating your "argument" around that. Where did I make any mention of supporting of the Iraq war you fucking cretin? I'll ask you one time to fuck all the way off with that shit. Keep doing it and I will stop humoring you.
Quote from: DAS B00T x2 on November 26, 2016, 06:00:45 AMQuote from: Ian on November 26, 2016, 05:56:44 AMI'm very Pro-American because an allied US with Russia will help with the Anglo-Sphere along with the UK and a slumbering Germany/France/Scandinavia that must wake up. However Obama/Clinton and the current administration is determined to prevent this from occurring at all costs. Including triggering an international military conflict and trying to scapegoat Russia who has been pushed back repeatedly simply for existing. Didn't want Crimea to happen? Maybe NATO shouldn't have gone back on their word of "We wont move missile defenses an inch closer to your border. :^)"Quote from: DAS B00T x2 on November 26, 2016, 05:52:20 AMWow, didn't think Ian was one of the "Russia did nothing wrong" crowdYes, the answer to a defensive missile grid is to invade a sovereign nation.If we're going to play that game, Ukraine until a few decades ago had been a part of the Russian empire for several centuries. It's populated by mostly ethnic Russians who speak Russian in addition to Ukrainian. Crimea in particular has been home to the black sea fleet for several centuries, in exchange for closer diplomatic relations with Moscow.So we have a Russian country annexing an ostensibly Russian territory (notice that the "invasion" never moved beyond Crimea) full of Russians, in order to advance Russian geopolitical interests. How is Russia the bad guy again?
Quote from: Azendac on November 26, 2016, 05:30:17 PMQuote from: Azumarill on November 25, 2016, 08:56:43 PMQuote from: Ian on November 25, 2016, 08:44:56 PMAssad did nothing wrong. The only reason the US intervened is because Russia is involved. Quote from: Azumarill on November 25, 2016, 08:42:39 PMhow does that kool aid taste?yes assad is a wonderful benevolent leader who has never been responsible for anyone's suffering. praise be unto him!Assad was democratically elected with both a turnout and victory margin several points higher than and US presidential election in history. If Assad's an evil dictator then America has always been one as well.By they way, how many weapons of mass destruction were in Iraq? Please remind me of how Saddam was on the verge of nuking New York until he was "replaced"LMAOOOOOOOOAssad was the only person Syrians could vote for. It's not exactly an election when there's no opponent.
Quote from: Azumarill on November 25, 2016, 08:56:43 PMQuote from: Ian on November 25, 2016, 08:44:56 PMAssad did nothing wrong. The only reason the US intervened is because Russia is involved. Quote from: Azumarill on November 25, 2016, 08:42:39 PMhow does that kool aid taste?yes assad is a wonderful benevolent leader who has never been responsible for anyone's suffering. praise be unto him!Assad was democratically elected with both a turnout and victory margin several points higher than and US presidential election in history. If Assad's an evil dictator then America has always been one as well.By they way, how many weapons of mass destruction were in Iraq? Please remind me of how Saddam was on the verge of nuking New York until he was "replaced"
Quote from: Azendac on November 26, 2016, 05:33:05 PMQuote from: challengerX on November 26, 2016, 05:28:36 PMQuote from: Azendac on November 26, 2016, 05:27:38 PMQuote from: challengerX on November 25, 2016, 08:10:43 PMQuote from: Ian on November 25, 2016, 07:06:13 PMis simply out of not wanting to go to war with us, which she would have caused.lmaoEven CNN admitted a new war was probable, NATO even put 300,000 troops on high alert, there's no other reason why they'd do that, especially after Russia relocated it's nukes to Kaliningrad..http://edition.cnn.com/2016/10/28/politics/us-troops-poland-cold-war-front/>CNNIf a pro clinton news network openly admits that she was going to probably cause a war, then you really don't have a leg to stand on when you laugh it off. Clinton was a war hawk, she had been aggressive to Russia the entire campaign, and Putin is not some kind of pushover who would just sit by as the US did everything but declare war against them. Did you forget that the US already declared a cyberwar with Russia over Clinton's baseless allegations of Russian hacking?I really couldn't care less what CNN says about anything. Neither Hillary nor Trump have the power and leeway to start WW3, cool your jets. Cyber warfare has been going on for a long while now with China and Russia being the main enemies. It didn't start because of Hillary's comments. You're really naive if you believe that.
Quote from: challengerX on November 26, 2016, 05:28:36 PMQuote from: Azendac on November 26, 2016, 05:27:38 PMQuote from: challengerX on November 25, 2016, 08:10:43 PMQuote from: Ian on November 25, 2016, 07:06:13 PMis simply out of not wanting to go to war with us, which she would have caused.lmaoEven CNN admitted a new war was probable, NATO even put 300,000 troops on high alert, there's no other reason why they'd do that, especially after Russia relocated it's nukes to Kaliningrad..http://edition.cnn.com/2016/10/28/politics/us-troops-poland-cold-war-front/>CNNIf a pro clinton news network openly admits that she was going to probably cause a war, then you really don't have a leg to stand on when you laugh it off. Clinton was a war hawk, she had been aggressive to Russia the entire campaign, and Putin is not some kind of pushover who would just sit by as the US did everything but declare war against them. Did you forget that the US already declared a cyberwar with Russia over Clinton's baseless allegations of Russian hacking?
Quote from: Azendac on November 26, 2016, 05:44:12 PMQuote from: DAS B00T x2 on November 26, 2016, 06:00:45 AMQuote from: Ian on November 26, 2016, 05:56:44 AMI'm very Pro-American because an allied US with Russia will help with the Anglo-Sphere along with the UK and a slumbering Germany/France/Scandinavia that must wake up. However Obama/Clinton and the current administration is determined to prevent this from occurring at all costs. Including triggering an international military conflict and trying to scapegoat Russia who has been pushed back repeatedly simply for existing. Didn't want Crimea to happen? Maybe NATO shouldn't have gone back on their word of "We wont move missile defenses an inch closer to your border. :^)"Quote from: DAS B00T x2 on November 26, 2016, 05:52:20 AMWow, didn't think Ian was one of the "Russia did nothing wrong" crowdYes, the answer to a defensive missile grid is to invade a sovereign nation.If we're going to play that game, Ukraine until a few decades ago had been a part of the Russian empire for several centuries. It's populated by mostly ethnic Russians who speak Russian in addition to Ukrainian. Crimea in particular has been home to the black sea fleet for several centuries, in exchange for closer diplomatic relations with Moscow.So we have a Russian country annexing an ostensibly Russian territory (notice that the "invasion" never moved beyond Crimea) full of Russians, in order to advance Russian geopolitical interests. How is Russia the bad guy again?So if Mexico wanted to annex SoCal (a traditionally Spanish territory that was a part of the Mexican Empire) to advance Mexican global economic interests...
Quote from: Azumarill on November 26, 2016, 05:44:49 PMQuote from: Azendac on November 26, 2016, 05:30:17 PMIf Assad's an evil dictator then America has always been one as well.Yes. America has proven itself time and time again to be incapable of espousing the egalitarian ideass it was ostensibly founded upon. Also, I feel like you're projecting your own thoughts into what you believe is my opinion on this matter and formulating your "argument" around that. Where did I make any mention of supporting of the Iraq war you fucking cretin? I'll ask you one time to fuck all the way off with that shit. Keep doing it and I will stop humoring you.I hope you can see the picture here, that America has consistently failed to be an egalitarian state for the past 240 years.
Quote from: Azendac on November 26, 2016, 05:57:13 PMQuote from: Azumarill on November 26, 2016, 05:44:49 PMQuote from: Azendac on November 26, 2016, 05:30:17 PMIf Assad's an evil dictator then America has always been one as well.Yes. America has proven itself time and time again to be incapable of espousing the egalitarian ideass it was ostensibly founded upon. Also, I feel like you're projecting your own thoughts into what you believe is my opinion on this matter and formulating your "argument" around that. Where did I make any mention of supporting of the Iraq war you fucking cretin? I'll ask you one time to fuck all the way off with that shit. Keep doing it and I will stop humoring you.I hope you can see the picture here, that America has consistently failed to be an egalitarian state for the past 240 years.You're so dense it's actually funny. Go read the first sentence of the post you replied to, actually read it, and you'll find that all you just did was support what I said. Seems like you don't know what the word "ostensibly" means or why I used it in that context.
Quote from: Azendac on November 26, 2016, 05:40:02 PMRiddle me this, why did the war start in the first place? Accusations of war crimes and chemical weapons only started several years after the war began, so why did it start in the first place? I'm inclined to believe it's a mix of regime change and Saudi Arabia wanting to build their European oil pipeline through Syria, while blocking Iran.Russia from doing the same.Atrocity propaganda is the US's favorite tactic for drumming up support for toppling enemies and "bringing democracy" to otherwise stable countries.There's no doubt this is a CIA operation. That doesn't mean Russia, Assad and co are the good guys.
Riddle me this, why did the war start in the first place? Accusations of war crimes and chemical weapons only started several years after the war began, so why did it start in the first place? I'm inclined to believe it's a mix of regime change and Saudi Arabia wanting to build their European oil pipeline through Syria, while blocking Iran.Russia from doing the same.Atrocity propaganda is the US's favorite tactic for drumming up support for toppling enemies and "bringing democracy" to otherwise stable countries.
Quote from: Hargbeast on November 26, 2016, 04:34:27 PMQuote from: Azumarill on November 25, 2016, 08:56:43 PMQuote from: Ian on November 25, 2016, 08:44:56 PMAssad did nothing wrong. The only reason the US intervened is because Russia is involved. Quote from: Azumarill on November 25, 2016, 08:42:39 PMhow does that kool aid taste?yes assad is a wonderful benevolent leader who has never been responsible for anyone's suffering. praise be unto him!We're talking in shades of grey here. A dictator who uses chemical weapons and other inhumane measures is much superior to a power vacuum that can bring about even worse kinds of shit.oh now it's shades of gray? i could have sworn i was responding to someone who said "assad did nothing wrong." weird how that works.inb4 "its just memes bro xDDDD"
Quote from: Azumarill on November 25, 2016, 08:56:43 PMQuote from: Ian on November 25, 2016, 08:44:56 PMAssad did nothing wrong. The only reason the US intervened is because Russia is involved. Quote from: Azumarill on November 25, 2016, 08:42:39 PMhow does that kool aid taste?yes assad is a wonderful benevolent leader who has never been responsible for anyone's suffering. praise be unto him!We're talking in shades of grey here. A dictator who uses chemical weapons and other inhumane measures is much superior to a power vacuum that can bring about even worse kinds of shit.
Quote from: Azumarill on November 26, 2016, 04:43:26 PMQuote from: Hargbeast on November 26, 2016, 04:34:27 PMQuote from: Azumarill on November 25, 2016, 08:56:43 PMQuote from: Ian on November 25, 2016, 08:44:56 PMAssad did nothing wrong. The only reason the US intervened is because Russia is involved. Quote from: Azumarill on November 25, 2016, 08:42:39 PMhow does that kool aid taste?yes assad is a wonderful benevolent leader who has never been responsible for anyone's suffering. praise be unto him!We're talking in shades of grey here. A dictator who uses chemical weapons and other inhumane measures is much superior to a power vacuum that can bring about even worse kinds of shit.oh now it's shades of gray? i could have sworn i was responding to someone who said "assad did nothing wrong." weird how that works.inb4 "its just memes bro xDDDD"I'm not Ian. I'm Hargbeast.
Quote from: Hargbeast on November 26, 2016, 06:18:41 PMQuote from: Azumarill on November 26, 2016, 04:43:26 PMQuote from: Hargbeast on November 26, 2016, 04:34:27 PMQuote from: Azumarill on November 25, 2016, 08:56:43 PMQuote from: Ian on November 25, 2016, 08:44:56 PMAssad did nothing wrong. The only reason the US intervened is because Russia is involved. Quote from: Azumarill on November 25, 2016, 08:42:39 PMhow does that kool aid taste?yes assad is a wonderful benevolent leader who has never been responsible for anyone's suffering. praise be unto him!We're talking in shades of grey here. A dictator who uses chemical weapons and other inhumane measures is much superior to a power vacuum that can bring about even worse kinds of shit.oh now it's shades of gray? i could have sworn i was responding to someone who said "assad did nothing wrong." weird how that works.inb4 "its just memes bro xDDDD"I'm not Ian. I'm Hargbeast.did i ever say you were ian? no? wow! whoah! incredible! good job hargbeast you really got me!listen up dipshit. the conversation you entered involved ian specifically stating that "assad did nothing wrong." appending the "shades of gray" aspect to his argument is paradoxical. you understand what im saying? it seems like a pretty simple concept.
Quote from: Azumarill on November 26, 2016, 06:24:57 PMQuote from: Hargbeast on November 26, 2016, 06:18:41 PMQuote from: Azumarill on November 26, 2016, 04:43:26 PMQuote from: Hargbeast on November 26, 2016, 04:34:27 PMQuote from: Azumarill on November 25, 2016, 08:56:43 PMQuote from: Ian on November 25, 2016, 08:44:56 PMAssad did nothing wrong. The only reason the US intervened is because Russia is involved. Quote from: Azumarill on November 25, 2016, 08:42:39 PMhow does that kool aid taste?yes assad is a wonderful benevolent leader who has never been responsible for anyone's suffering. praise be unto him!We're talking in shades of grey here. A dictator who uses chemical weapons and other inhumane measures is much superior to a power vacuum that can bring about even worse kinds of shit.oh now it's shades of gray? i could have sworn i was responding to someone who said "assad did nothing wrong." weird how that works.inb4 "its just memes bro xDDDD"I'm not Ian. I'm Hargbeast.did i ever say you were ian? no? wow! whoah! incredible! good job hargbeast you really got me!listen up dipshit. the conversation you entered involved ian specifically stating that "assad did nothing wrong." appending the "shades of gray" aspect to his argument is paradoxical. you understand what im saying? it seems like a pretty simple concept.> i could have sworn i was responding to someone who said "assad did nothing wrong." >responds to someone who did not in fact say thatYou're really bad at this.
your reading comprehension fails you yet again. good luck with whatever learning disability caused you to be this way.
the fuck are you lovers quarreling about now?
Quote from: DAS B00T x2 on November 26, 2016, 06:41:16 PMthe fuck are you lovers quarreling about now?Whether we should name the child after you, or just make you the godfather. It's a tough choice but I think you deserve to play doctor with the girls.
Russia for President 2020Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
inb4 "its just memes bro xDDDD"
Now you're getting it. Quote from: Azumarill on November 25, 2016, 08:56:43 PMyes assad is a wonderful benevolent leader who has never been responsible for anyone's suffering. praise be unto him!
yes assad is a wonderful benevolent leader who has never been responsible for anyone's suffering. praise be unto him!
What happens if Russia actually did steal the election for Trump?
