I think that the mods should only intervene when it's truly necesarry. Calling someone a fag isn't a situation where it is necesarry, though.
Quote from: CommsOfficer on July 29, 2014, 01:25:45 AMI think that the mods should only intervene when it's truly necesarry. Calling someone a fag isn't a situation where it is necesarry, though.
Quote from: Kiyo on July 29, 2014, 07:09:35 AMQuote from: CommsOfficer on July 29, 2014, 01:25:45 AMI think that the mods should only intervene when it's truly necesarry. Calling someone a fag isn't a situation where it is necesarry, though.fagsee how it feels?lulz
Quote from: IcyWind on July 29, 2014, 01:26:33 AMQuote from: CommsOfficer on July 29, 2014, 01:25:45 AMI think that the mods should only intervene when it's truly necesarry. Calling someone a fag isn't a situation where it is necesarry, though.Disagree. I find that rather offensive in most scenarios.Many people find many things offensive. That's life. Unless it's true harassment, just ignore it.
Quote from: CommsOfficer on July 29, 2014, 01:25:45 AMI think that the mods should only intervene when it's truly necesarry. Calling someone a fag isn't a situation where it is necesarry, though.Disagree. I find that rather offensive in most scenarios.
Quote from: Crouton on July 29, 2014, 07:11:02 AMQuote from: Kiyo on July 29, 2014, 07:09:35 AMQuote from: CommsOfficer on July 29, 2014, 01:25:45 AMI think that the mods should only intervene when it's truly necesarry. Calling someone a fag isn't a situation where it is necesarry, though.fagsee how it feels?lulz Was that supposed to make me feel something?
So I want to hear what you guys want out of the mod team here. Give me your concerns, frustrations, questions, etc.
Quote from: Kiyo on July 29, 2014, 07:30:29 AMQuote from: Crouton on July 29, 2014, 07:11:02 AMQuote from: Kiyo on July 29, 2014, 07:09:35 AMQuote from: CommsOfficer on July 29, 2014, 01:25:45 AMI think that the mods should only intervene when it's truly necesarry. Calling someone a fag isn't a situation where it is necesarry, though.fagsee how it feels?lulz Was that supposed to make me feel something?negative, just trollin' around
Quote from: Crouton on July 29, 2014, 08:13:18 AMQuote from: Kiyo on July 29, 2014, 07:30:29 AMQuote from: Crouton on July 29, 2014, 07:11:02 AMQuote from: Kiyo on July 29, 2014, 07:09:35 AMQuote from: CommsOfficer on July 29, 2014, 01:25:45 AMI think that the mods should only intervene when it's truly necesarry. Calling someone a fag isn't a situation where it is necesarry, though.fagsee how it feels?lulz Was that supposed to make me feel something?negative, just trollin' aroundYou're not very good at it.
Quote from: MattyFez on July 29, 2014, 07:25:34 AMAre we going to have a place where the moderation is relaxed? Like you can talk shit to people, on the condition you take it too.Yes. But people need to know when they're crossing the line between talking shit and harassing
Are we going to have a place where the moderation is relaxed? Like you can talk shit to people, on the condition you take it too.
Quote from: MattyFez on July 29, 2014, 10:02:09 AMQuote from: SoporificSlash on July 29, 2014, 09:57:59 AMQuote from: MattyFez on July 29, 2014, 07:25:34 AMAre we going to have a place where the moderation is relaxed? Like you can talk shit to people, on the condition you take it too.Yes. But people need to know when they're crossing the line between talking shit and harassingThen why don't we have my proposed idea from the other site where we make everyone anonymous?Yeah that's not the best idea. Trust me.
Quote from: SoporificSlash on July 29, 2014, 09:57:59 AMQuote from: MattyFez on July 29, 2014, 07:25:34 AMAre we going to have a place where the moderation is relaxed? Like you can talk shit to people, on the condition you take it too.Yes. But people need to know when they're crossing the line between talking shit and harassingThen why don't we have my proposed idea from the other site where we make everyone anonymous?
Quote from: MattyFez on July 29, 2014, 10:08:25 AMQuote from: SoporificSlash on July 29, 2014, 10:07:51 AMQuote from: MattyFez on July 29, 2014, 10:02:09 AMQuote from: SoporificSlash on July 29, 2014, 09:57:59 AMQuote from: MattyFez on July 29, 2014, 07:25:34 AMAre we going to have a place where the moderation is relaxed? Like you can talk shit to people, on the condition you take it too.Yes. But people need to know when they're crossing the line between talking shit and harassingThen why don't we have my proposed idea from the other site where we make everyone anonymous?Yeah that's not the best idea. Trust me.What's wrong with a castrated version of /b/?Also you better approve of the ice cream idea the other guy hadIce cream cost money you know. I'll have to instate a premium membership on this site.
Quote from: SoporificSlash on July 29, 2014, 10:07:51 AMQuote from: MattyFez on July 29, 2014, 10:02:09 AMQuote from: SoporificSlash on July 29, 2014, 09:57:59 AMQuote from: MattyFez on July 29, 2014, 07:25:34 AMAre we going to have a place where the moderation is relaxed? Like you can talk shit to people, on the condition you take it too.Yes. But people need to know when they're crossing the line between talking shit and harassingThen why don't we have my proposed idea from the other site where we make everyone anonymous?Yeah that's not the best idea. Trust me.What's wrong with a castrated version of /b/?Also you better approve of the ice cream idea the other guy had
I believe mods should allow some degree of rough housing, and let there be a definite line to have to cross for a member to be banned.
Quote from: DemonicChronic on July 29, 2014, 10:39:04 AMI believe mods should allow some degree of rough housing, and let there be a definite line to have to cross for a member to be banned. This seems like a tricky concept, to allow rough housing but to also have a definite line. I don't think you really can have a definite line - in my opinion it should be the mod who decides when to step in and end it. There may be a line, but it would vary from mod to mod.
Quote from: Zizzy on July 29, 2014, 10:43:01 AMQuote from: DemonicChronic on July 29, 2014, 10:39:04 AMI believe mods should allow some degree of rough housing, and let there be a definite line to have to cross for a member to be banned. This seems like a tricky concept, to allow rough housing but to also have a definite line. I don't think you really can have a definite line - in my opinion it should be the mod who decides when to step in and end it. There may be a line, but it would vary from mod to mod.No you can't have one absolutely. But you can have one that at lest a majority can look at and say, "yep, that nigga crossed the line right there."
Quote from: Zizzy on July 29, 2014, 10:43:01 AMQuote from: DemonicChronic on July 29, 2014, 10:39:04 AMI believe mods should allow some degree of rough housing, and let there be a definite line to have to cross for a member to be banned. This seems like a tricky concept, to allow rough housing but to also have a definite line. I don't think you really can have a definite line - in my opinion it should be the mod who decides when to step in and end it. There may be a line, but it would vary from mod to mod.If I see something I believe is crossing the line or someone tells me that someone is crossing the line I'll give that person 1 verbal warning that they've crossed the line and need to stop it. If they continue further persecutions will take place.