Quote from: Batch on December 04, 2015, 09:44:56 PMMiddle east duh.Not like you can make a barren wasteland filled with sand any worse thoughSounds like a good reason to nuke Australia too
Middle east duh.Not like you can make a barren wasteland filled with sand any worse though
Bungle
Quote from: T6 on December 04, 2015, 10:35:43 PMBunglerightthats itlets goyou and meright now
Quote from: Fruitcake on December 04, 2015, 11:08:45 PMQuote from: T6 on December 04, 2015, 10:35:43 PMBunglerightthats itlets goyou and meright nowpoke your butt-a-roo
Quote from: Cindo on December 04, 2015, 09:58:58 PMQuote from: Fruitcake on December 04, 2015, 09:52:42 PMQuote from: Batch on December 04, 2015, 09:44:56 PMMiddle east duh.Not like you can make a barren wasteland filled with sand any worse thoughSounds like a good reason to nuke Australia tooFun fact: The Australian desert is the only known location of a nuclear warhead ever being detonated without government clearanceI thought it was decided that it was seismic and not that Japanese cult
Quote from: Fruitcake on December 04, 2015, 09:52:42 PMQuote from: Batch on December 04, 2015, 09:44:56 PMMiddle east duh.Not like you can make a barren wasteland filled with sand any worse thoughSounds like a good reason to nuke Australia tooFun fact: The Australian desert is the only known location of a nuclear warhead ever being detonated without government clearance
japan, obviouslybut like, the entire countryhowever that would worki'd find a way
Says the in house Nintendo shill.
Quote from: Santa Sol on December 04, 2015, 11:52:26 PMSays the in house Nintendo shill.that would be catzilla, actuallyi'm literally the furthest thing from a "nintendo shill"especially considering the real nintendo shills here have accused me of hating nintendo in the past
*as he defends the Virtual Boy*
Quote from: Santa Sol on December 04, 2015, 11:57:22 PM*as he defends the Virtual Boy*all i said was that it's not nearly as bad as everyone makes it out to bebecause it's not
The South. All of it.
Quote from: Scrotal Lozenge on December 04, 2015, 10:17:59 PMassuming they're the same size as the fat man bomb dropped on nagasaki, then each bomb could cover a patch of land 7680 square inches in sizewhich means you would only need to drop 1,282,250,000 bombs to literally nuke every square inch in japan..i think that's how it worksgood point
assuming they're the same size as the fat man bomb dropped on nagasaki, then each bomb could cover a patch of land 7680 square inches in sizewhich means you would only need to drop 1,282,250,000 bombs to literally nuke every square inch in japan..i think that's how it works
Quote from: Decimator Omega on December 05, 2015, 03:36:16 AMWherever those ISIS fucks are hiding.You're back?
Wherever those ISIS fucks are hiding.
Massachusetts
Quote from: Jule Bjørn on December 05, 2015, 01:05:43 AMMassachusettsIs it because we're better than everyone else?
What area of the world would you nuke?
