What area of the world would you nuke?

MyNameIsCharlie · December 04, 2015, 07:59:53 PM

And I don't mean one little one. I mean nuked so badly that it'll be 100 years before bacteria could live there

challengerX · December 04, 2015, 08:03:09 PM

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

R o c k e t · December 04, 2015, 08:04:34 PM

inb4israel

inb4middleeast

Azumarill · December 04, 2015, 08:06:23 PM

the USA. specifically, wherever atallmidget lives.

Loaf · December 04, 2015, 08:08:54 PM

The middle east.

Winy · December 04, 2015, 08:09:04 PM

The South.

All of it.

DAS B00T x2 · December 04, 2015, 08:16:52 PM

France.

Coomer · December 04, 2015, 08:25:54 PM

Quote from: challengerX on December 04, 2015, 08:03:09 PM

Japan

3rd time's the charm

You'll be making tentacle porn a reality

Jim · December 04, 2015, 08:33:51 PM

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

December 04, 2015, 08:36:02 PM

none of it

Batch · December 04, 2015, 09:44:56 PM

Middle east duh.

Not like you can make a barren wasteland filled with sand any worse though

Solonoid · December 04, 2015, 09:49:25 PM

Israel.

Kiwicake · December 04, 2015, 09:52:42 PM

Quote from: Batch on December 04, 2015, 09:44:56 PM

Middle east duh.

Not like you can make a barren wasteland filled with sand any worse though

Sounds like a good reason to nuke Australia too

Solonoid · December 04, 2015, 09:54:29 PM

Quote from: Batch on December 04, 2015, 09:44:56 PM

Middle east duh.

Not like you can make a barren wasteland filled with sand any worse though

Actually, for the most part its a beautiful and green part of the world.

Verbatim · December 04, 2015, 09:58:00 PM

japan, obviously

but like, the entire country

however that would work

i'd find a way

Cindy · December 04, 2015, 09:58:58 PM

Quote from: Fruitcake on December 04, 2015, 09:52:42 PM

Quote from: Batch on December 04, 2015, 09:44:56 PM
Middle east duh.

Not like you can make a barren wasteland filled with sand any worse though
Sounds like a good reason to nuke Australia too

Fun fact: The Australian desert is the only known location of a nuclear warhead ever being detonated without government clearance

Kiwicake · December 04, 2015, 09:59:40 PM

Quote from: Verbatim on December 04, 2015, 09:58:00 PM

japan, obviously

but like, the entire country

however that would work

i'd find a way

You have 6,852 islands to nuke

Good luck have fun

Verbatim · December 04, 2015, 10:02:13 PM

Quote from: Fruitcake on December 04, 2015, 09:59:40 PM

Quote from: Verbatim on December 04, 2015, 09:58:00 PM
japan, obviously

but like, the entire country

however that would work

i'd find a way
You have 6,852 islands to nuke

Good luck have fun

i'm talking, like, every square inch

so that's about 9.24 trillion nukes, squared
if i did my math right

Kiwicake · December 04, 2015, 10:06:29 PM

Quote from: Verbatim on December 04, 2015, 10:02:13 PM

Quote from: Fruitcake on December 04, 2015, 09:59:40 PM
Quote from: Verbatim on December 04, 2015, 09:58:00 PM
japan, obviously

but like, the entire country

however that would work

i'd find a way
You have 6,852 islands to nuke

Good luck have fun
i'm talking, like, every square inch

so that's 9.24 quadrillion nukes, squared
if i did my math right

That doesn't sound quite right...

Even trillions sounds way too high, but I guess if you're literally talking every square inch then I guess that might make more sense

eggsalad · December 04, 2015, 10:07:25 PM

isreal tbh
solves a lot of shit

Cindy · December 04, 2015, 10:08:11 PM

Quote from: eggsalad on December 04, 2015, 10:07:25 PM

isreal tbh
solves a lot of shit

Get off my board, goy

Hahahaha very funny Zonda · December 04, 2015, 10:12:07 PM

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

Verbatim · December 04, 2015, 10:12:15 PM

Quote from: Fruitcake on December 04, 2015, 10:06:29 PM

That doesn't sound quite right...

yeah i fucked it up

it would actually be 9.24 billion squared, only

this is why i'm retaking math

i'll just make it 9.24 quadrillion for good measure

Mmmmm Napalm · December 04, 2015, 10:16:39 PM

Sweden or Japan

i am karjala takaisin · December 04, 2015, 10:17:59 PM

Quote from: Verbatim on December 04, 2015, 10:02:13 PM

Quote from: Fruitcake on December 04, 2015, 09:59:40 PM
Quote from: Verbatim on December 04, 2015, 09:58:00 PM
japan, obviously

but like, the entire country

however that would work

i'd find a way
You have 6,852 islands to nuke

Good luck have fun
i'm talking, like, every square inch

so that's about 9.24 trillion nukes, squared
if i did my math right

assuming they're the same size as the fat man bomb dropped on nagasaki, then each bomb could cover a patch of land 7680 square inches in size

which means you would only need to drop 1,282,250,000 bombs to literally nuke every square inch in japan

..i think that's how it works

MyNameIsCharlie · December 04, 2015, 10:18:22 PM

Quote from: Cindo on December 04, 2015, 09:58:58 PM

Quote from: Fruitcake on December 04, 2015, 09:52:42 PM
Quote from: Batch on December 04, 2015, 09:44:56 PM
Middle east duh.

Not like you can make a barren wasteland filled with sand any worse though
Sounds like a good reason to nuke Australia too
Fun fact: The Australian desert is the only known location of a nuclear warhead ever being detonated without government clearance

I thought it was decided that it was seismic and not that Japanese cult

Verbatim · December 04, 2015, 10:22:51 PM

Quote from: Scrotal Lozenge on December 04, 2015, 10:17:59 PM

assuming they're the same size as the fat man bomb dropped on nagasaki, then each bomb could cover a patch of land 7680 square inches in size

which means you would only need to drop 1,282,250,000 bombs to literally nuke every square inch in japan

..i think that's how it works

good point

N/A · December 04, 2015, 10:23:04 PM

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

Kiwicake · December 04, 2015, 10:25:15 PM

Quote from: Scrotal Lozenge on December 04, 2015, 10:17:59 PM

Quote from: Verbatim on December 04, 2015, 10:02:13 PM
Quote from: Fruitcake on December 04, 2015, 09:59:40 PM
Quote from: Verbatim on December 04, 2015, 09:58:00 PM
japan, obviously

but like, the entire country

however that would work

i'd find a way
You have 6,852 islands to nuke

Good luck have fun
i'm talking, like, every square inch

so that's about 9.24 trillion nukes, squared
if i did my math right
assuming they're the same size as the fat man bomb dropped on nagasaki, then each bomb could cover a patch of land 7680 square inches in size

which means you would only need to drop 1,282,250,000 bombs to literally nuke every square inch in japan

..i think that's how it works

Let's just use Tsar Bombs, 50 megatons of destruction, which is around 1,400 times more powerful than the combined power of Little Boy and Fat Man

Thun · December 04, 2015, 10:30:13 PM

Central America