Quote from: Tsirist on September 27, 2015, 03:58:50 PMIn your dreams bruh. Any method for serving dynamic content trumps static. Angular ftw.What the fuck is this fool talking about
In your dreams bruh. Any method for serving dynamic content trumps static. Angular ftw.
Quote from: Tsirist on September 27, 2015, 05:00:18 PMQuote from: challengerX on September 27, 2015, 04:58:21 PMQuote from: Tsirist on September 27, 2015, 03:58:50 PMIn your dreams bruh. Any method for serving dynamic content trumps static. Angular ftw.What the fuck is this fool talking abouti mean it's cool just serving it up all at once but tbh i don't like having loads in between for small operations. better to have that done dynamically, y'know? i feel like most people feel this way so i'm not really sure what you're on aboutBitch I'll body slam your operations
Quote from: challengerX on September 27, 2015, 04:58:21 PMQuote from: Tsirist on September 27, 2015, 03:58:50 PMIn your dreams bruh. Any method for serving dynamic content trumps static. Angular ftw.What the fuck is this fool talking abouti mean it's cool just serving it up all at once but tbh i don't like having loads in between for small operations. better to have that done dynamically, y'know? i feel like most people feel this way so i'm not really sure what you're on about