Quote from: Lord Starch on August 24, 2015, 11:47:51 PMQuote from: rc on August 24, 2015, 10:44:33 PMQuote from: Lord Starch on August 24, 2015, 09:32:06 PMQuote from: rc on August 24, 2015, 08:51:04 PMthis shit is so stupid, stopNope. http://library.fora.tv/2012/10/14/Stuart_Armstrong_How_Were_Predicting_AIokaythis shit is still fucking stupid, stopSmall minds can't comprehend a paradigm shift.rc is one of the smartest users here
Quote from: rc on August 24, 2015, 10:44:33 PMQuote from: Lord Starch on August 24, 2015, 09:32:06 PMQuote from: rc on August 24, 2015, 08:51:04 PMthis shit is so stupid, stopNope. http://library.fora.tv/2012/10/14/Stuart_Armstrong_How_Were_Predicting_AIokaythis shit is still fucking stupid, stopSmall minds can't comprehend a paradigm shift.
Quote from: Lord Starch on August 24, 2015, 09:32:06 PMQuote from: rc on August 24, 2015, 08:51:04 PMthis shit is so stupid, stopNope. http://library.fora.tv/2012/10/14/Stuart_Armstrong_How_Were_Predicting_AIokaythis shit is still fucking stupid, stop
Quote from: rc on August 24, 2015, 08:51:04 PMthis shit is so stupid, stopNope. http://library.fora.tv/2012/10/14/Stuart_Armstrong_How_Were_Predicting_AI
this shit is so stupid, stop
Quote from: Kitsunekun on August 24, 2015, 08:50:26 PMYesss legal bot hookers!!!nostop it
Yesss legal bot hookers!!!
Holy shit you're retarded "hey guys I read something off a wikipedia page I'm smart right?"
Quote from: Lord Starch on August 25, 2015, 12:08:02 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:22:56 AMHoly shit you're retarded "hey guys I read something off a wikipedia page I'm smart right?"Who cares where the info came from, (which is more than just Wikipedia). It's not about being smart, it's about sharing information that apparently some of you didn't know. Stop being childish.information that's incorrect and based off of pure speculation, poor speculation at that.
Quote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:22:56 AMHoly shit you're retarded "hey guys I read something off a wikipedia page I'm smart right?"Who cares where the info came from, (which is more than just Wikipedia). It's not about being smart, it's about sharing information that apparently some of you didn't know. Stop being childish.
Quote from: Lord Starch on August 25, 2015, 12:45:43 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 12:25:40 PMQuote from: Lord Starch on August 25, 2015, 12:08:02 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:22:56 AMHoly shit you're retarded "hey guys I read something off a wikipedia page I'm smart right?"Who cares where the info came from, (which is more than just Wikipedia). It's not about being smart, it's about sharing information that apparently some of you didn't know. Stop being childish.information that's incorrect and based off of pure speculation, poor speculation at that.You can't call it incorrect information when you've literally put no effort into disputing their claims or even researching the topic. I'll take their analysis over yours.>haven't researched the topicLOLman i took a college course over AI theory and read Godel, Escher, Bach which contains the leading theory of how AGIs could be made.
Quote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 12:25:40 PMQuote from: Lord Starch on August 25, 2015, 12:08:02 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:22:56 AMHoly shit you're retarded "hey guys I read something off a wikipedia page I'm smart right?"Who cares where the info came from, (which is more than just Wikipedia). It's not about being smart, it's about sharing information that apparently some of you didn't know. Stop being childish.information that's incorrect and based off of pure speculation, poor speculation at that.You can't call it incorrect information when you've literally put no effort into disputing their claims or even researching the topic. I'll take their analysis over yours.
Chakas is already 50 though
Quote from: Lord Starch on August 25, 2015, 01:42:24 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 12:56:44 PMQuote from: Lord Starch on August 25, 2015, 12:45:43 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 12:25:40 PMQuote from: Lord Starch on August 25, 2015, 12:08:02 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:22:56 AMHoly shit you're retarded "hey guys I read something off a wikipedia page I'm smart right?"Who cares where the info came from, (which is more than just Wikipedia). It's not about being smart, it's about sharing information that apparently some of you didn't know. Stop being childish.information that's incorrect and based off of pure speculation, poor speculation at that.You can't call it incorrect information when you've literally put no effort into disputing their claims or even researching the topic. I'll take their analysis over yours.>haven't researched the topicLOLman i took a college course over AI theory and read Godel, Escher, Bach which contains the leading theory of how AGIs could be made.Yet you still argue against expert opinion and analysis? Something ain't right then.no credible expert opinion will predict the technological singularity happening in 2040 or anywhere near that. Optimism has no place in science.
Quote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 12:56:44 PMQuote from: Lord Starch on August 25, 2015, 12:45:43 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 12:25:40 PMQuote from: Lord Starch on August 25, 2015, 12:08:02 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:22:56 AMHoly shit you're retarded "hey guys I read something off a wikipedia page I'm smart right?"Who cares where the info came from, (which is more than just Wikipedia). It's not about being smart, it's about sharing information that apparently some of you didn't know. Stop being childish.information that's incorrect and based off of pure speculation, poor speculation at that.You can't call it incorrect information when you've literally put no effort into disputing their claims or even researching the topic. I'll take their analysis over yours.>haven't researched the topicLOLman i took a college course over AI theory and read Godel, Escher, Bach which contains the leading theory of how AGIs could be made.Yet you still argue against expert opinion and analysis? Something ain't right then.
Quote from: on August 25, 2015, 02:12:43 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 02:07:50 PMQuote from: Lord Starch on August 25, 2015, 01:42:24 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 12:56:44 PMQuote from: Lord Starch on August 25, 2015, 12:45:43 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 12:25:40 PMQuote from: Lord Starch on August 25, 2015, 12:08:02 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:22:56 AMHoly shit you're retarded "hey guys I read something off a wikipedia page I'm smart right?"Who cares where the info came from, (which is more than just Wikipedia). It's not about being smart, it's about sharing information that apparently some of you didn't know. Stop being childish.information that's incorrect and based off of pure speculation, poor speculation at that.You can't call it incorrect information when you've literally put no effort into disputing their claims or even researching the topic. I'll take their analysis over yours.>haven't researched the topicLOLman i took a college course over AI theory and read Godel, Escher, Bach which contains the leading theory of how AGIs could be made.Yet you still argue against expert opinion and analysis? Something ain't right then.no credible expert opinion will predict the technological singularity happening in 2040 or anywhere near that. Optimism has no place in science.If an inventor who wasn't optimistic about trying to create something then they'd have never passed the hurdles required to reach their end result.scientists 50 years ago were also optimistic we would have flying cars by now. Look how that turned out. If you're going to study in the field of science you need to be a realist, not an optimist.
Quote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 02:07:50 PMQuote from: Lord Starch on August 25, 2015, 01:42:24 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 12:56:44 PMQuote from: Lord Starch on August 25, 2015, 12:45:43 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 12:25:40 PMQuote from: Lord Starch on August 25, 2015, 12:08:02 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:22:56 AMHoly shit you're retarded "hey guys I read something off a wikipedia page I'm smart right?"Who cares where the info came from, (which is more than just Wikipedia). It's not about being smart, it's about sharing information that apparently some of you didn't know. Stop being childish.information that's incorrect and based off of pure speculation, poor speculation at that.You can't call it incorrect information when you've literally put no effort into disputing their claims or even researching the topic. I'll take their analysis over yours.>haven't researched the topicLOLman i took a college course over AI theory and read Godel, Escher, Bach which contains the leading theory of how AGIs could be made.Yet you still argue against expert opinion and analysis? Something ain't right then.no credible expert opinion will predict the technological singularity happening in 2040 or anywhere near that. Optimism has no place in science.If an inventor who wasn't optimistic about trying to create something then they'd have never passed the hurdles required to reach their end result.
Quote from: Lord Starch on August 25, 2015, 12:45:43 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 12:25:40 PMQuote from: Lord Starch on August 25, 2015, 12:08:02 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:22:56 AMHoly shit you're retarded "hey guys I read something off a wikipedia page I'm smart right?"Who cares where the info came from, (which is more than just Wikipedia). It's not about being smart, it's about sharing information that apparently some of you didn't know. Stop being childish.information that's incorrect and based off of pure speculation, poor speculation at that.You can't call it incorrect information when you've literally put no effort into disputing their claims or even researching the topic. I'll take their analysis over yours.As opposed to your effort that consists of skim reading something online and then posting it on a backwater Internet forum?Just stop.
Moore's Law isn't really about technological progress, it's about the efficiency of components. Eventually (and soon) we'll reach a point where we can't make processors any smaller; that point isn't singularity.Singularity will be more of a biological evolution than a technological one. We'll have the technology to reach it far before we actually understand the human brain and how (or if) AI is achievable.