Quote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:45:42 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:45:08 PMI'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.Keep drinking the kool aid, buddyHe's right
Quote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:45:08 PMI'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.Keep drinking the kool aid, buddy
I'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.
Quote from: Frigid Fartsโข on September 01, 2015, 12:46:23 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:45:42 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:45:08 PMI'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.Keep drinking the kool aid, buddyHe's right--Titanium oxide--BHT--Sodium benzoate--Acrylamides--AspartameSome chemicals that are universally in almost all GMOs. This doesn't even include extra things they put in certain kinds.
Quote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:49:24 PMQuote from: Frigid Fartsโข on September 01, 2015, 12:46:23 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:45:42 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:45:08 PMI'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.Keep drinking the kool aid, buddyHe's right--Titanium oxide--BHT--Sodium benzoate--Acrylamides--AspartameSome chemicals that are universally in almost all GMOs. This doesn't even include extra things they put in certain kinds.How about like, I dunno, genetically engineered crops to provide nutrients to people who would otherwise be malnourished? No chemicals necessary. That's just one application of genetic engineering, though--others include increased resistance to pests, which helps the environment and the consumer by not using pesticides; and increased resistance to droughts, which helps prevent food shortages and keeps farmers in business.I'm 99.9% certain that aspartame is completely safe, but I'll have to look up the other ones when I can be arsed to do that. BF4 time, yo.EDIT: What you should really be concerned about is nanoparticles in food. One effect that we don't know the consequences of (if any) is that they can penetrate the layer of blood that protects your brain. Even though the FDA insists they're completely harmless, there's an utter lack of evidence supporting or debunking that claim.
Quote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:56:35 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:49:24 PMQuote from: Frigid Fartsโข on September 01, 2015, 12:46:23 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:45:42 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:45:08 PMI'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.Keep drinking the kool aid, buddyHe's right--Titanium oxide--BHT--Sodium benzoate--Acrylamides--AspartameSome chemicals that are universally in almost all GMOs. This doesn't even include extra things they put in certain kinds.How about like, I dunno, genetically engineered crops to provide nutrients to people who would otherwise be malnourished? No chemicals necessary. That's just one application of genetic engineering, though--others include increased resistance to pests, which helps the environment and the consumer by not using pesticides; and increased resistance to droughts, which helps prevent food shortages and keeps farmers in business.I'm 99.9% certain that aspartame is completely safe, but I'll have to look up the other ones when I can be arsed to do that. BF4 time, yo.EDIT: What you should really be concerned about is nanoparticles in food. One effect that we don't know the consequences of (if any) is that they can penetrate the layer of blood that protects your brain. Even though the FDA insists they're completely harmless, there's an utter lack of evidence supporting or debunking that claim.First of all, aspartame is poison. Simple as that.And I'm not talking about the mere idea of genetically modifying food, I'm talking about how it's used in today's American society. Monsanto is the #1 distributor and producer of GMOs, and they put in everything I listed above to their "food".
Quote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 01:01:56 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:56:35 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:49:24 PMQuote from: Frigid Fartsโข on September 01, 2015, 12:46:23 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:45:42 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:45:08 PMI'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.Keep drinking the kool aid, buddyHe's right--Titanium oxide--BHT--Sodium benzoate--Acrylamides--AspartameSome chemicals that are universally in almost all GMOs. This doesn't even include extra things they put in certain kinds.How about like, I dunno, genetically engineered crops to provide nutrients to people who would otherwise be malnourished? No chemicals necessary. That's just one application of genetic engineering, though--others include increased resistance to pests, which helps the environment and the consumer by not using pesticides; and increased resistance to droughts, which helps prevent food shortages and keeps farmers in business.I'm 99.9% certain that aspartame is completely safe, but I'll have to look up the other ones when I can be arsed to do that. BF4 time, yo.EDIT: What you should really be concerned about is nanoparticles in food. One effect that we don't know the consequences of (if any) is that they can penetrate the layer of blood that protects your brain. Even though the FDA insists they're completely harmless, there's an utter lack of evidence supporting or debunking that claim.First of all, aspartame is poison. Simple as that.And I'm not talking about the mere idea of genetically modifying food, I'm talking about how it's used in today's American society. Monsanto is the #1 distributor and producer of GMOs, and they put in everything I listed above to their "food".1) Prove it.2) Okay, point taken. Not all GMOs are the devil.
People actually still take SecondClass seriously?
Quote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 01:02:50 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 01:01:56 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:56:35 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:49:24 PMQuote from: Frigid Fartsโข on September 01, 2015, 12:46:23 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:45:42 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:45:08 PMI'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.Keep drinking the kool aid, buddyHe's right--Titanium oxide--BHT--Sodium benzoate--Acrylamides--AspartameSome chemicals that are universally in almost all GMOs. This doesn't even include extra things they put in certain kinds.How about like, I dunno, genetically engineered crops to provide nutrients to people who would otherwise be malnourished? No chemicals necessary. That's just one application of genetic engineering, though--others include increased resistance to pests, which helps the environment and the consumer by not using pesticides; and increased resistance to droughts, which helps prevent food shortages and keeps farmers in business.I'm 99.9% certain that aspartame is completely safe, but I'll have to look up the other ones when I can be arsed to do that. BF4 time, yo.EDIT: What you should really be concerned about is nanoparticles in food. One effect that we don't know the consequences of (if any) is that they can penetrate the layer of blood that protects your brain. Even though the FDA insists they're completely harmless, there's an utter lack of evidence supporting or debunking that claim.First of all, aspartame is poison. Simple as that.And I'm not talking about the mere idea of genetically modifying food, I'm talking about how it's used in today's American society. Monsanto is the #1 distributor and producer of GMOs, and they put in everything I listed above to their "food".1) Prove it.2) Okay, point taken. Not all GMOs are the devil.Here. This is the article I usually link, since it cites its sources and presents everything very clearly. There are dozens more where that came from, though.
Quote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 01:05:26 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 01:02:50 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 01:01:56 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:56:35 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:49:24 PMQuote from: Frigid Fartsโข on September 01, 2015, 12:46:23 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:45:42 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:45:08 PMI'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.Keep drinking the kool aid, buddyHe's right--Titanium oxide--BHT--Sodium benzoate--Acrylamides--AspartameSome chemicals that are universally in almost all GMOs. This doesn't even include extra things they put in certain kinds.How about like, I dunno, genetically engineered crops to provide nutrients to people who would otherwise be malnourished? No chemicals necessary. That's just one application of genetic engineering, though--others include increased resistance to pests, which helps the environment and the consumer by not using pesticides; and increased resistance to droughts, which helps prevent food shortages and keeps farmers in business.I'm 99.9% certain that aspartame is completely safe, but I'll have to look up the other ones when I can be arsed to do that. BF4 time, yo.EDIT: What you should really be concerned about is nanoparticles in food. One effect that we don't know the consequences of (if any) is that they can penetrate the layer of blood that protects your brain. Even though the FDA insists they're completely harmless, there's an utter lack of evidence supporting or debunking that claim.First of all, aspartame is poison. Simple as that.And I'm not talking about the mere idea of genetically modifying food, I'm talking about how it's used in today's American society. Monsanto is the #1 distributor and producer of GMOs, and they put in everything I listed above to their "food".1) Prove it.2) Okay, point taken. Not all GMOs are the devil.Here. This is the article I usually link, since it cites its sources and presents everything very clearly. There are dozens more where that came from, though.>Dr. Joseph Mercola>*wikis*>"Joseph M. Mercola (born 1954) is an alternative medicine proponent">AIDS denialist>is also against vaccinesUm, well the American Cancer Society also seems to think aspartame is harmless, so there's that.
According to Ducks Unlimited, waterfowl can see two to three times farther than humans, thanks to powerful muscles that control the curvature of their corneas and lenses.
Ducks and geese donโt see color the way we do. They see reds, greens, yellows, and blues more vibrantlyโthanks to their retinasโplus an extra set of cones allows them to see ultraviolet radiation. This gives them exceptional light sensitivity; as a result, shine and glare are the duck hunterโs enemy. Whether itโs a blued shotgun receiver or a pale, exposed face, waterfowl are adept at spotting unnatural reflection.
Quote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 01:12:39 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 01:05:26 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 01:02:50 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 01:01:56 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:56:35 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:49:24 PMQuote from: Frigid Fartsโข on September 01, 2015, 12:46:23 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:45:42 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:45:08 PMI'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.Keep drinking the kool aid, buddyHe's right--Titanium oxide--BHT--Sodium benzoate--Acrylamides--AspartameSome chemicals that are universally in almost all GMOs. This doesn't even include extra things they put in certain kinds.How about like, I dunno, genetically engineered crops to provide nutrients to people who would otherwise be malnourished? No chemicals necessary. That's just one application of genetic engineering, though--others include increased resistance to pests, which helps the environment and the consumer by not using pesticides; and increased resistance to droughts, which helps prevent food shortages and keeps farmers in business.I'm 99.9% certain that aspartame is completely safe, but I'll have to look up the other ones when I can be arsed to do that. BF4 time, yo.EDIT: What you should really be concerned about is nanoparticles in food. One effect that we don't know the consequences of (if any) is that they can penetrate the layer of blood that protects your brain. Even though the FDA insists they're completely harmless, there's an utter lack of evidence supporting or debunking that claim.First of all, aspartame is poison. Simple as that.And I'm not talking about the mere idea of genetically modifying food, I'm talking about how it's used in today's American society. Monsanto is the #1 distributor and producer of GMOs, and they put in everything I listed above to their "food".1) Prove it.2) Okay, point taken. Not all GMOs are the devil.Here. This is the article I usually link, since it cites its sources and presents everything very clearly. There are dozens more where that came from, though.>Dr. Joseph Mercola>*wikis*>"Joseph M. Mercola (born 1954) is an alternative medicine proponent">AIDS denialist>is also against vaccinesUm, well the American Cancer Society also seems to think aspartame is harmless, so there's that.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominemWay to completely ignore the facts he brings up in the article by attacking his character. Why don't you wiki the people he cites in the article? Because very few of the things he talks about are his original ideas, just ideas compiled into one article.And WOW. Are you really going to bring up the ACS? May as well get your information from the FDA or WTO meetings, lmao.
That word really needs to die.
This word is worse than moist.Moist boypussy.
Quote from: GAIUS DASSIUS B00TSAR on September 01, 2015, 01:21:22 PMThat word really needs to die.but it's something you like
Quote from: Frigid Fartsโข on September 01, 2015, 01:22:21 PMThis word is worse than moist.Moist boypussy.dont tease me jesu
Quote from: guts on September 01, 2015, 01:21:52 PMQuote from: GAIUS DASSIUS B00TSAR on September 01, 2015, 01:21:22 PMThat word really needs to die.but it's something you likeNo. Why don't you and Kiyo go jihad some building in Belfast?
Quote from: guts on September 01, 2015, 01:22:46 PMQuote from: Frigid Fartsโข on September 01, 2015, 01:22:21 PMThis word is worse than moist.Moist boypussy.dont tease me jesuHot, moist boypussy
insurgency is pretty much always justified
There's nothing morally wrong with [ ]
