Das loves girldick
Quote from: Frigid Farts™ on September 01, 2015, 01:22:21 PMThis word is worse than moist.Moist boypussy.Give me your mailing address. I'm sending you a go-pro so you can stream when you fucking kill yourself for that.
This word is worse than moist.Moist boypussy.
I thoroughly enjoy how much this topic tends to trigger everyone.
Quote from: Rocketman287 on September 01, 2015, 01:28:40 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on September 01, 2015, 12:11:20 PMI thoroughly enjoy how much this topic tends to trigger everyone.hardly anyone is triggered thoughno
Quote from: SoporificSlash on September 01, 2015, 12:11:20 PMI thoroughly enjoy how much this topic tends to trigger everyone.hardly anyone is triggered though
Is the duck better than the mantis shrimp?!BIIIEETCH!
Quote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 01:16:20 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 01:12:39 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 01:05:26 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 01:02:50 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 01:01:56 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:56:35 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:49:24 PMQuote from: Frigid Farts™ on September 01, 2015, 12:46:23 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:45:42 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:45:08 PMI'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.Keep drinking the kool aid, buddyHe's right--Titanium oxide--BHT--Sodium benzoate--Acrylamides--AspartameSome chemicals that are universally in almost all GMOs. This doesn't even include extra things they put in certain kinds.How about like, I dunno, genetically engineered crops to provide nutrients to people who would otherwise be malnourished? No chemicals necessary. That's just one application of genetic engineering, though--others include increased resistance to pests, which helps the environment and the consumer by not using pesticides; and increased resistance to droughts, which helps prevent food shortages and keeps farmers in business.I'm 99.9% certain that aspartame is completely safe, but I'll have to look up the other ones when I can be arsed to do that. BF4 time, yo.EDIT: What you should really be concerned about is nanoparticles in food. One effect that we don't know the consequences of (if any) is that they can penetrate the layer of blood that protects your brain. Even though the FDA insists they're completely harmless, there's an utter lack of evidence supporting or debunking that claim.First of all, aspartame is poison. Simple as that.And I'm not talking about the mere idea of genetically modifying food, I'm talking about how it's used in today's American society. Monsanto is the #1 distributor and producer of GMOs, and they put in everything I listed above to their "food".1) Prove it.2) Okay, point taken. Not all GMOs are the devil.Here. This is the article I usually link, since it cites its sources and presents everything very clearly. There are dozens more where that came from, though.>Dr. Joseph Mercola>*wikis*>"Joseph M. Mercola (born 1954) is an alternative medicine proponent">AIDS denialist>is also against vaccinesUm, well the American Cancer Society also seems to think aspartame is harmless, so there's that.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominemWay to completely ignore the facts he brings up in the article by attacking his character. Why don't you wiki the people he cites in the article? Because very few of the things he talks about are his original ideas, just ideas compiled into one article.And WOW. Are you really going to bring up the ACS? May as well get your information from the FDA or WTO meetings, lmao.Fine, I'll try to give it a read. But I'm extremely skeptical. I'll dissect it in bit.What's wrong with the ACS? I mean, I'd sooner trust them than a quack.
Quote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 01:12:39 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 01:05:26 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 01:02:50 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 01:01:56 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:56:35 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:49:24 PMQuote from: Frigid Farts™ on September 01, 2015, 12:46:23 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:45:42 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:45:08 PMI'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.Keep drinking the kool aid, buddyHe's right--Titanium oxide--BHT--Sodium benzoate--Acrylamides--AspartameSome chemicals that are universally in almost all GMOs. This doesn't even include extra things they put in certain kinds.How about like, I dunno, genetically engineered crops to provide nutrients to people who would otherwise be malnourished? No chemicals necessary. That's just one application of genetic engineering, though--others include increased resistance to pests, which helps the environment and the consumer by not using pesticides; and increased resistance to droughts, which helps prevent food shortages and keeps farmers in business.I'm 99.9% certain that aspartame is completely safe, but I'll have to look up the other ones when I can be arsed to do that. BF4 time, yo.EDIT: What you should really be concerned about is nanoparticles in food. One effect that we don't know the consequences of (if any) is that they can penetrate the layer of blood that protects your brain. Even though the FDA insists they're completely harmless, there's an utter lack of evidence supporting or debunking that claim.First of all, aspartame is poison. Simple as that.And I'm not talking about the mere idea of genetically modifying food, I'm talking about how it's used in today's American society. Monsanto is the #1 distributor and producer of GMOs, and they put in everything I listed above to their "food".1) Prove it.2) Okay, point taken. Not all GMOs are the devil.Here. This is the article I usually link, since it cites its sources and presents everything very clearly. There are dozens more where that came from, though.>Dr. Joseph Mercola>*wikis*>"Joseph M. Mercola (born 1954) is an alternative medicine proponent">AIDS denialist>is also against vaccinesUm, well the American Cancer Society also seems to think aspartame is harmless, so there's that.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominemWay to completely ignore the facts he brings up in the article by attacking his character. Why don't you wiki the people he cites in the article? Because very few of the things he talks about are his original ideas, just ideas compiled into one article.And WOW. Are you really going to bring up the ACS? May as well get your information from the FDA or WTO meetings, lmao.
Quote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 01:05:26 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 01:02:50 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 01:01:56 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:56:35 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:49:24 PMQuote from: Frigid Farts™ on September 01, 2015, 12:46:23 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:45:42 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:45:08 PMI'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.Keep drinking the kool aid, buddyHe's right--Titanium oxide--BHT--Sodium benzoate--Acrylamides--AspartameSome chemicals that are universally in almost all GMOs. This doesn't even include extra things they put in certain kinds.How about like, I dunno, genetically engineered crops to provide nutrients to people who would otherwise be malnourished? No chemicals necessary. That's just one application of genetic engineering, though--others include increased resistance to pests, which helps the environment and the consumer by not using pesticides; and increased resistance to droughts, which helps prevent food shortages and keeps farmers in business.I'm 99.9% certain that aspartame is completely safe, but I'll have to look up the other ones when I can be arsed to do that. BF4 time, yo.EDIT: What you should really be concerned about is nanoparticles in food. One effect that we don't know the consequences of (if any) is that they can penetrate the layer of blood that protects your brain. Even though the FDA insists they're completely harmless, there's an utter lack of evidence supporting or debunking that claim.First of all, aspartame is poison. Simple as that.And I'm not talking about the mere idea of genetically modifying food, I'm talking about how it's used in today's American society. Monsanto is the #1 distributor and producer of GMOs, and they put in everything I listed above to their "food".1) Prove it.2) Okay, point taken. Not all GMOs are the devil.Here. This is the article I usually link, since it cites its sources and presents everything very clearly. There are dozens more where that came from, though.>Dr. Joseph Mercola>*wikis*>"Joseph M. Mercola (born 1954) is an alternative medicine proponent">AIDS denialist>is also against vaccinesUm, well the American Cancer Society also seems to think aspartame is harmless, so there's that.
Quote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 01:02:50 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 01:01:56 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:56:35 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:49:24 PMQuote from: Frigid Farts™ on September 01, 2015, 12:46:23 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:45:42 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:45:08 PMI'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.Keep drinking the kool aid, buddyHe's right--Titanium oxide--BHT--Sodium benzoate--Acrylamides--AspartameSome chemicals that are universally in almost all GMOs. This doesn't even include extra things they put in certain kinds.How about like, I dunno, genetically engineered crops to provide nutrients to people who would otherwise be malnourished? No chemicals necessary. That's just one application of genetic engineering, though--others include increased resistance to pests, which helps the environment and the consumer by not using pesticides; and increased resistance to droughts, which helps prevent food shortages and keeps farmers in business.I'm 99.9% certain that aspartame is completely safe, but I'll have to look up the other ones when I can be arsed to do that. BF4 time, yo.EDIT: What you should really be concerned about is nanoparticles in food. One effect that we don't know the consequences of (if any) is that they can penetrate the layer of blood that protects your brain. Even though the FDA insists they're completely harmless, there's an utter lack of evidence supporting or debunking that claim.First of all, aspartame is poison. Simple as that.And I'm not talking about the mere idea of genetically modifying food, I'm talking about how it's used in today's American society. Monsanto is the #1 distributor and producer of GMOs, and they put in everything I listed above to their "food".1) Prove it.2) Okay, point taken. Not all GMOs are the devil.Here. This is the article I usually link, since it cites its sources and presents everything very clearly. There are dozens more where that came from, though.
Quote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 01:01:56 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:56:35 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:49:24 PMQuote from: Frigid Farts™ on September 01, 2015, 12:46:23 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:45:42 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:45:08 PMI'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.Keep drinking the kool aid, buddyHe's right--Titanium oxide--BHT--Sodium benzoate--Acrylamides--AspartameSome chemicals that are universally in almost all GMOs. This doesn't even include extra things they put in certain kinds.How about like, I dunno, genetically engineered crops to provide nutrients to people who would otherwise be malnourished? No chemicals necessary. That's just one application of genetic engineering, though--others include increased resistance to pests, which helps the environment and the consumer by not using pesticides; and increased resistance to droughts, which helps prevent food shortages and keeps farmers in business.I'm 99.9% certain that aspartame is completely safe, but I'll have to look up the other ones when I can be arsed to do that. BF4 time, yo.EDIT: What you should really be concerned about is nanoparticles in food. One effect that we don't know the consequences of (if any) is that they can penetrate the layer of blood that protects your brain. Even though the FDA insists they're completely harmless, there's an utter lack of evidence supporting or debunking that claim.First of all, aspartame is poison. Simple as that.And I'm not talking about the mere idea of genetically modifying food, I'm talking about how it's used in today's American society. Monsanto is the #1 distributor and producer of GMOs, and they put in everything I listed above to their "food".1) Prove it.2) Okay, point taken. Not all GMOs are the devil.
Quote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:56:35 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:49:24 PMQuote from: Frigid Farts™ on September 01, 2015, 12:46:23 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:45:42 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:45:08 PMI'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.Keep drinking the kool aid, buddyHe's right--Titanium oxide--BHT--Sodium benzoate--Acrylamides--AspartameSome chemicals that are universally in almost all GMOs. This doesn't even include extra things they put in certain kinds.How about like, I dunno, genetically engineered crops to provide nutrients to people who would otherwise be malnourished? No chemicals necessary. That's just one application of genetic engineering, though--others include increased resistance to pests, which helps the environment and the consumer by not using pesticides; and increased resistance to droughts, which helps prevent food shortages and keeps farmers in business.I'm 99.9% certain that aspartame is completely safe, but I'll have to look up the other ones when I can be arsed to do that. BF4 time, yo.EDIT: What you should really be concerned about is nanoparticles in food. One effect that we don't know the consequences of (if any) is that they can penetrate the layer of blood that protects your brain. Even though the FDA insists they're completely harmless, there's an utter lack of evidence supporting or debunking that claim.First of all, aspartame is poison. Simple as that.And I'm not talking about the mere idea of genetically modifying food, I'm talking about how it's used in today's American society. Monsanto is the #1 distributor and producer of GMOs, and they put in everything I listed above to their "food".
Quote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:49:24 PMQuote from: Frigid Farts™ on September 01, 2015, 12:46:23 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:45:42 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:45:08 PMI'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.Keep drinking the kool aid, buddyHe's right--Titanium oxide--BHT--Sodium benzoate--Acrylamides--AspartameSome chemicals that are universally in almost all GMOs. This doesn't even include extra things they put in certain kinds.How about like, I dunno, genetically engineered crops to provide nutrients to people who would otherwise be malnourished? No chemicals necessary. That's just one application of genetic engineering, though--others include increased resistance to pests, which helps the environment and the consumer by not using pesticides; and increased resistance to droughts, which helps prevent food shortages and keeps farmers in business.I'm 99.9% certain that aspartame is completely safe, but I'll have to look up the other ones when I can be arsed to do that. BF4 time, yo.EDIT: What you should really be concerned about is nanoparticles in food. One effect that we don't know the consequences of (if any) is that they can penetrate the layer of blood that protects your brain. Even though the FDA insists they're completely harmless, there's an utter lack of evidence supporting or debunking that claim.
Quote from: Frigid Farts™ on September 01, 2015, 12:46:23 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:45:42 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:45:08 PMI'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.Keep drinking the kool aid, buddyHe's right--Titanium oxide--BHT--Sodium benzoate--Acrylamides--AspartameSome chemicals that are universally in almost all GMOs. This doesn't even include extra things they put in certain kinds.
Quote from: SecondClass on September 01, 2015, 12:45:42 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:45:08 PMI'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.Keep drinking the kool aid, buddyHe's right
Quote from: Kupo on September 01, 2015, 12:45:08 PMI'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.Keep drinking the kool aid, buddy
I'm pretty sure there's still not a single piece of empirical evidence that GMOs are harmful in any way.
How can you "just be yourself"when you don't know who you are?
There's nothing morally wrong with [ ]
