Sep7agonians really don't like this guy tbh >.>
You fucking wot.In all seriousness, my theory is that both Smith, and Neo are part of the same being. They are two halves of a whole, which is why I think that when smith got rid of neo by assimilating him, he too was destroyed. Both halves need to exist for one to exist. And one must exist for both to exist. If that makes any sense.
Quote from: Neo on September 12, 2015, 10:57:53 PMYou fucking wot.In all seriousness, my theory is that both Smith, and Neo are part of the same being. They are two halves of a whole, which is why I think that when smith got rid of neo by assimilating him, he too was destroyed. Both halves need to exist for one to exist. And one must exist for both to exist. If that makes any sense.Yin and Yang?
Quote from: Mikasa on September 12, 2015, 11:04:10 PMQuote from: Neo on September 12, 2015, 10:57:53 PMYou fucking wot.In all seriousness, my theory is that both Smith, and Neo are part of the same being. They are two halves of a whole, which is why I think that when smith got rid of neo by assimilating him, he too was destroyed. Both halves need to exist for one to exist. And one must exist for both to exist. If that makes any sense.Yin and Yang?Exactly, for example, let's use the two yin and yang fish from last airbender as an example. So let's say yin is hungry, and yang knows this, but must stop yin at all costs because yin is too hungry and threatens to eat all of the other fish in their pond. As we all know (at least those that have seen the show) the fish can't survive without one another. So yang uses yins hunger to his advantage, and let's yin eat him. Yin is satisfied, for a while, but shortly afterHe dies, because he ate the only being he simply can't thrive without in any way. Neo is yang, Smith is yin. Neo let smith "eat" him. So smith in a way, destroyed himself. Sorry for the quite strange analogy, but its all I could think of to explain my point at the moment, as I am quite tired.