Quote from:  on August 27, 2015, 06:11:53 PM

Quote from: GAIUS DASSIUS B00TSAR on August 27, 2015, 06:10:17 PM

Quote from:  on August 27, 2015, 06:06:14 PM

Quote from: GAIUS DASSIUS B00TSAR on August 27, 2015, 05:52:47 PM

Quote from: HurtfulTurkey on August 27, 2015, 05:51:55 PM

Quote from: GAIUS DASSIUS B00TSAR on August 27, 2015, 05:46:08 PM

There are no bisexual women

Que?

There are no bisexual women.

Only porn stars and attention whores.

But yellow snake guy.

Spoiler

You you calling a Texas, you beaver loving syrup drinker?

If it's full of hookers and attention whores.

Maybe.

WHat?

Woah holy shit I just realized how fucked up your sentence was. No wonder you're asking what. No reply given to "You you calling a Texas, you beaver loving syrup drinker?" would make any sense anyway.

What?

Quote from:  on August 27, 2015, 06:07:12 PM

Quote from: Loaf on August 27, 2015, 06:05:29 PM

Quote from:  on August 27, 2015, 06:00:09 PM

Quote from: Loaf on August 27, 2015, 05:56:41 PM

Fuck you for calling everything that is lgbt related "tumblr".

I support the folks who support folks, man. But I can smell it. That new acronym is gonna be abused like hell from the afformentioned hoards of couch potato justice fighters.

I really couldn't care less about what people think of the so called social justice warriors. If you don't like them so much then don't go to places where they hang out. They're pretty hard to find. If you started a tumblr of your own and made it entirely nazi themed, you probably wouldn't even find that much resistance within the tumblr website itself. Not saying that you would, I am just giving an example. I have never seen any actual problem with the so called social justice warriors. To me it just seems like people are very resistant to the idea of people sticking up for others. Even if you don't like the way that they're sticking up for others because they're making things out to be worse than they are, then just let them. You have no reason to get upset because people are sticking up for others, if you had someone say something you don't agree with just ignore them. They are not negatively impacting your life in any way.

I never said I was upset.

Yeah, you fucking did. Check your OP. Don't fucking be a hypocrite.

*Hippo crate*

Quote from:  on August 27, 2015, 06:16:20 PM

Quote from: GAIUS DASSIUS B00TSAR on August 27, 2015, 06:12:28 PM

Quote from:  on August 27, 2015, 06:11:53 PM

Quote from: GAIUS DASSIUS B00TSAR on August 27, 2015, 06:10:17 PM

Quote from:  on August 27, 2015, 06:06:14 PM

Quote from: GAIUS DASSIUS B00TSAR on August 27, 2015, 05:52:47 PM

Quote from: HurtfulTurkey on August 27, 2015, 05:51:55 PM

Quote from: GAIUS DASSIUS B00TSAR on August 27, 2015, 05:46:08 PM

There are no bisexual women

Que?

There are no bisexual women.

Only porn stars and attention whores.

But yellow snake guy.

Spoiler

You you calling a Texas, you beaver loving syrup drinker?

If it's full of hookers and attention whores.

Maybe.

WHat?

Woah holy shit I just realized how fucked up your sentence was. No wonder you're asking what. No reply given to "You you calling a Texas, you beaver loving syrup drinker?" would make any sense anyway.

What?

Oh

Let me fix that.

WHO you calling a Texas, you beaver loving, Molson brewing, maple syrup drinking, America's Hat man?

Apparently hoes and whores, that's who.

Hoes and whores ain't nothing but bitches and Texas.

Oh for crying out loud.

They really should focus more on sexual inequalities rather than arguing over what the acronym should be. This constant bickering over what the terms should be and general small-time shit is why people are slow to take the legitimate movement seriously.

Oh for crying out loud.

They really should focus more on sexual inequalities rather than arguing over what the acronym should be. This constant bickering over what the terms should be and general small-time shit is why people are slow to take the legitimate movement seriously.

I guess they've a history of making a fuss over petty shit don't they?

Quote from: SuperIrish on August 27, 2015, 06:27:43 PM

Oh for crying out loud.

They really should focus more on sexual inequalities rather than arguing over what the acronym should be. This constant bickering over what the terms should be and general small-time shit is why people are slow to take the legitimate movement seriously.

I guess they've a history of making a fuss over petty shit don't they?

Kill yourself.

Quote from:  on August 27, 2015, 06:34:48 PM

Quote from: SuperIrish on August 27, 2015, 06:27:43 PM

Oh for crying out loud.

They really should focus more on sexual inequalities rather than arguing over what the acronym should be. This constant bickering over what the terms should be and general small-time shit is why people are slow to take the legitimate movement seriously.

I guess they've a history of making a fuss over petty shit don't they?

Kill yourself.

You know, trying to defend a group's reputation or image in a hostile manner never works out right?

That's part of the reason why so many view feminists as feminazis.

The rabid retards of the bunch slander the image by being little caustic bundles of hate.

And second, I never explicitely stated that I was upset in any way. But that new term? It's going be abused. That's what people have done with it before. The whole social justice warrior, feminist, tumblr movements, LGBT community, whatever.

I'm not saying that some of them don't actually their effort into, ya know, being productive. But a lot of their communities are bogged down by truly stupid people who hurt the image more and damage the reputation in their actions which are equally as ludicrous.

The new title? Fine.

But watch people in the communities abuse it. Wave it around like a weapon and try to cram it down other people's throats.

Quote from: SuperIrish on August 27, 2015, 06:27:43 PM

Oh for crying out loud.

They really should focus more on sexual inequalities rather than arguing over what the acronym should be. This constant bickering over what the terms should be and general small-time shit is why people are slow to take the legitimate movement seriously.

I guess they've a history of making a fuss over petty shit don't they?

This is wider thing in general, the whole thing just irritates me at times. Loaf has a point which I concede though. Some do a good job, some do a shit "job".

So why did they lump them together? Is it's they can support all "abnormal" sexual preferences? If so what about the otherkin? How long until they add an "oh" to that acronym?

Otherkin isn't a sexual preference, it's a disease.

Quote from: Kitsunekun on August 27, 2015, 06:41:05 PM

So why did they lump them together? Is it's they can support all "abnormal" sexual preferences? If so what about the otherkin? How long until they add an "oh" to that acronym?

Otherkin isn't a sexual preference, it's a disease.

Imma just skip whole deal here and cut to the chase.

Right as I don my fedora and black trench coat.

Humanity is a disease. Problem solved.

Quote from: GAIUS DASSIUS B00TSAR on August 27, 2015, 06:42:11 PM

Quote from: Kitsunekun on August 27, 2015, 06:41:05 PM

So why did they lump them together? Is it's they can support all "abnormal" sexual preferences? If so what about the otherkin? How long until they add an "oh" to that acronym?

Otherkin isn't a sexual preference, it's a disease.

I would like to agree since there are some apparent mental issues with otherkin identity; however I can't help but think how that sounds exactly like what some would say about the LBTQIA+...

Spoiler

otherkin rub me the wrong way, but as long as they're not interfering with my life I don't care if they identify as a sexual toaster. 

Because the gay community is rife with people in possession of personality disorders who make it a joke for everyone else.
The trans community has it even worse.

Quote from: Kitsunekun on August 27, 2015, 06:47:44 PM

Quote from: GAIUS DASSIUS B00TSAR on August 27, 2015, 06:42:11 PM

Quote from: Kitsunekun on August 27, 2015, 06:41:05 PM

So why did they lump them together? Is it's they can support all "abnormal" sexual preferences? If so what about the otherkin? How long until they add an "oh" to that acronym?

Otherkin isn't a sexual preference, it's a disease.

I would like to agree since there are some apparent mental issues with otherkin identity; however I can't help but think how that sounds exactly like what some would say about the LBTQIA+...

Spoiler

otherkin rub me the wrong way, but as long as they're not interfering with my life I don't care if they identify as a sexual toaster. 

Because the gay community is rife with people in possession of personality disorders who make it a joke for everyone else.
The trans community has it even worse.

A few bad eggs spoils the batter I suppose. I've never had an issues with anyone with a different sexual orientation than my own except for ignorant straight people who think that others can change their sexual orientation. That's when I ask can you make yourself eat and truly enjoy a dish that you hate? I don't think so.

Quote from: Loaf on August 27, 2015, 06:35:43 PM

Quote from:  on August 27, 2015, 06:34:48 PM

Quote from: SuperIrish on August 27, 2015, 06:27:43 PM

Oh for crying out loud.

They really should focus more on sexual inequalities rather than arguing over what the acronym should be. This constant bickering over what the terms should be and general small-time shit is why people are slow to take the legitimate movement seriously.

I guess they've a history of making a fuss over petty shit don't they?

Kill yourself.

You know, trying to defend a group's reputation or image in a hostile manner never works out right?

That's part of the reason why so many view feminists as feminazis.

The rabid retards of the bunch slander the image by being little caustic bundles of hate.

And second, I never explicitely stated that I was upset in any way. But that new term? It's going be abused. That's what people have done with it before. The whole social justice warrior, feminist, tumblr movements, LGBT community, whatever.

I'm not saying that some of them don't actually their effort into, ya know, being productive. But a lot of their communities are bogged down by truly stupid people who hurt the image more and damage the reputation in their actions which are equally as ludicrous.

The new title? Fine.

But watch people in the communities abuse it. Wave it around like a weapon and try to cram it down other people's throats.

Yeah well if you have a problem with people "cramming gay issues down your throat" you are part of the problem. exit humanity.

Quote from:  on August 27, 2015, 06:38:58 PM

Quote from: Loaf on August 27, 2015, 06:35:43 PM

Quote from:  on August 27, 2015, 06:34:48 PM

Quote from: SuperIrish on August 27, 2015, 06:27:43 PM

Oh for crying out loud.

They really should focus more on sexual inequalities rather than arguing over what the acronym should be. This constant bickering over what the terms should be and general small-time shit is why people are slow to take the legitimate movement seriously.

I guess they've a history of making a fuss over petty shit don't they?

Kill yourself.

You know, trying to defend a group's reputation or image in a hostile manner never works out right?

That's part of the reason why so many view feminists as feminazis.

The rabid retards of the bunch slander the image by being little caustic bundles of hate.

And second, I never explicitely stated that I was upset in any way. But that new term? It's going be abused. That's what people have done with it before. The whole social justice warrior, feminist, tumblr movements, LGBT community, whatever.

I'm not saying that some of them don't actually their effort into, ya know, being productive. But a lot of their communities are bogged down by truly stupid people who hurt the image more and damage the reputation in their actions which are equally as ludicrous.

The new title? Fine.

But watch people in the communities abuse it. Wave it around like a weapon and try to cram it down other people's throats.

Yeah well if you have a problem with people "cramming gay issues down your throat" you are part of the problem. exit humanity.

If ya could stop putting words in my mouth that'd be greeeeeeeeat.

I have a problem, when somebody asks me along the lines of, "What's your stance on x sexuality, gender, bla bla" and I say, "I don't care, they can do what they want."

And for some inadvertant reason, this sets off a fucking explosive in some people who then proceed to bite my fucking head off because I stated that I didn't care about the titles or stances or preferences of those people.

Like, we're on the same fucking side here. Stop trying to force a categorization onto everybody and torching people who don't care about the categories. Because it's not about the fucking categories. It's about the people.

Who should be left alone to just be, and do themselves without having to announce shit or pick some fucking side.

If you're gay, you're gay. You don't have to fucking announce it and separate yourself from a crowd. Straight people don't proudly proclaim, "I'm straight!" wherever they go and find reasons to be offended.

That's what I'm saying.

Those labels are abused and weaponised. And used as tools for the toxic elements in the communities to find excuses to bitch and moan over truly worthless and trivial things.

But by all means, "Exit humanity" is about the biggest compliment you could've given because frankly, we're a fucking retarded species.

I'd be happy to.