It's a huge deal. The fact that the next president is as much of a fucking retard as Bush was should be a pretty big deal to people. Guess not.
Quote from: challengerX on July 05, 2016, 07:25:06 PMIt's a huge deal. The fact that the next president is as much of a fucking retard as Bush was should be a pretty big deal to people. Guess not.You get one that's just as dumb or one that's even worse
Bush's administration didn't use it to discuss classified information, though the dangerous precedent is worth criticism, and no administration should be allowed to just delete swaths of emails. All of that correspondence is capable of being preserved for public purview.
Well you see she's running for president, and obviously has the illuminati on her side and won't be charged for her sins. What's wrong with her deleting 22,000 classified emails? Well it's illegal for one thing. Shafty butch she is.
Quote from: Kits on July 06, 2016, 09:34:52 AMWell you see she's running for president, and obviously has the illuminati on her side and won't be charged for her sins. What's wrong with her deleting 22,000 classified emails? Well it's illegal for one thing. Shafty butch she is. So we should arrest Bush? She may be running for President, he was President. He literally deleted 1000 times the emails from a private server then she did.
Quote from: MyNameIsCharlie on July 06, 2016, 10:03:05 AMQuote from: Kits on July 06, 2016, 09:34:52 AMWell you see she's running for president, and obviously has the illuminati on her side and won't be charged for her sins. What's wrong with her deleting 22,000 classified emails? Well it's illegal for one thing. Shafty butch she is. So we should arrest Bush? She may be running for President, he was President. He literally deleted 1000 times the emails from a private server then she did.We should arrest both of them. I don't see why you're trying to make his some sort of a political issue when nobody here is saying what Bush did was ok.
I like how you can never, ever criticize anybody on the Democrat's side (especially if their last name is Clinton) without the people who consider themselves unbiased to the two party system always trying to go back and go "W-Well the Republican's also did it!" This is the now, Bush is so long gone and it's like bitching about what Reagan did as president, the man just sits in his ranch all day and paints. Just because Bush did something bad means that Clinton gets a free pass? No, it doesn't. If the only way you're going to admit to Clinton's wrong doing is throw Bush behind bars with her go ahead, but you're going to look incredibly fucking petty in so doing.
You're doing this too. Look at what you posted. Just leave Bush alone, he isn't President anymore. But let's nail Hillary.
If it's a law, then it applies equally across the board. That's how law works. And you can say because he got away with it she should too. That's call precedent. That's also the way the law works.
If he isn't, then this isn't a serious issue. If this isn't serious, then why are we treating it as such?
"Since one of the most idiotic and common-sense lacking presidents in US history wasn't imprisoned for breaking this law neither should Hillary, it's just not a big deal."
QuoteYou're doing this too. Look at what you posted. Just leave Bush alone, he isn't President anymore. But let's nail Hillary. Hillary is trying to become president, Bush just sits in his house and paints all day. Quote from: MyNameIsCharlie on July 06, 2016, 11:40:09 AMIf it's a law, then it applies equally across the board. That's how law works. And you can say because he got away with it she should too. That's call precedent. That's also the way the law works. If a rapist got away with it and we all know they did it, does that mean the next one should? And the law also says you can't charge someone for the same crime twice. Hillary hasn't been charged, she just had an investigation. QuoteIf he isn't, then this isn't a serious issue. If this isn't serious, then why are we treating it as such? I believe Hurtful Turkey already went over how these two situations are fundamentally different, and as a result, not worthy of comparison. Even if they're similar, comparing instead of looking at the situation on its own, is incredibly petty, and dodging the issue altogether.
And I addressed him. We don't know what he deleted. There were over 2,000,000 emails wiped. If even 1% had something classified, we're talking way more than Hillary's.
And the 1st rapist should stay free when the second is caught? That argument goes both ways. The real answer is BOTH should go to jail, regardless of what they are doing now.
Idiocy has nothing to do with corruption. You can be an idiot and still be an honest man.
So, I still don't get what the big deal is about Hillary' email
