Well considering that the bombs are 3O kilotons, that would give a total blast radius of 1O miles [1.5 miles of actual destruction and 8.5 miles of radiation, flames, and fallout] 57,3O8,738 square miles of Earth is land43% of that is inhabited So 24,642,757 square miles is inhabited So about 2,464,275 3O kiloton nukes to create a complete FalloutAbout 2O,OOO nukes exist today which wouldn't be enough to destroy every inch of land but I assume it would be enough to destroy major cities and cause more proximity destruction 55,OOO - 1OO,OOO nukes existed during the Cold War so that is more than enough for FalloutSo yesWith the nukes we have today, if all were detonated, an apocalypse is very possible
Quote from: Ingloriouswho98 on July 16, 2015, 02:52:27 PMWell considering that the bombs are 3O kilotons, that would give a total blast radius of 1O miles [1.5 miles of actual destruction and 8.5 miles of radiation, flames, and fallout] 57,3O8,738 square miles of Earth is land43% of that is inhabited So 24,642,757 square miles is inhabited So about 2,464,275 3O kiloton nukes to create a complete FalloutAbout 2O,OOO nukes exist today which wouldn't be enough to destroy every inch of land but I assume it would be enough to destroy major cities and cause more proximity destruction 55,OOO - 1OO,OOO nukes existed during the Cold War so that is more than enough for FalloutSo yesWith the nukes we have today, if all were detonated, an apocalypse is very possibleWill you please stop using Os for zeros?
Quote from: Jono on July 16, 2015, 02:53:47 PMQuote from: Ingloriouswho98 on July 16, 2015, 02:52:27 PMWell considering that the bombs are 3O kilotons, that would give a total blast radius of 1O miles [1.5 miles of actual destruction and 8.5 miles of radiation, flames, and fallout] 57,3O8,738 square miles of Earth is land43% of that is inhabited So 24,642,757 square miles is inhabited So about 2,464,275 3O kiloton nukes to create a complete FalloutAbout 2O,OOO nukes exist today which wouldn't be enough to destroy every inch of land but I assume it would be enough to destroy major cities and cause more proximity destruction 55,OOO - 1OO,OOO nukes existed during the Cold War so that is more than enough for FalloutSo yesWith the nukes we have today, if all were detonated, an apocalypse is very possibleWill you please stop using Os for zeros?Will you stop being a bitch?
Quote from: Ingloriouswho98 on July 16, 2015, 02:56:03 PMQuote from: Jono on July 16, 2015, 02:53:47 PMQuote from: Ingloriouswho98 on July 16, 2015, 02:52:27 PMWell considering that the bombs are 3O kilotons, that would give a total blast radius of 1O miles [1.5 miles of actual destruction and 8.5 miles of radiation, flames, and fallout] 57,3O8,738 square miles of Earth is land43% of that is inhabited So 24,642,757 square miles is inhabited So about 2,464,275 3O kiloton nukes to create a complete FalloutAbout 2O,OOO nukes exist today which wouldn't be enough to destroy every inch of land but I assume it would be enough to destroy major cities and cause more proximity destruction 55,OOO - 1OO,OOO nukes existed during the Cold War so that is more than enough for FalloutSo yesWith the nukes we have today, if all were detonated, an apocalypse is very possibleWill you please stop using Os for zeros?Will you stop being a bitch?I will once you stop being fucking retarded
SpoilerA realistic Fallout wouldn't be a wasteland for starters.
OP's farts are still more lethal than the tzar bomb.
In fallout the nukes are designed to cause radioactive fallout, while in our world our nukes are designed to cause little to no contamination as possible.
Quote from: Septy on July 16, 2015, 05:12:17 PMIn fallout the nukes are designed to cause radioactive fallout, while in our world our nukes are designed to cause little to no contamination as possible.A nuclear meltdown is worse than an air bursting nuke.Chernobyl recovered and is now an urban jungle.
Quote from: LC on July 16, 2015, 05:17:30 PMQuote from: Septy on July 16, 2015, 05:12:17 PMIn fallout the nukes are designed to cause radioactive fallout, while in our world our nukes are designed to cause little to no contamination as possible.A nuclear meltdown is worse than an air bursting nuke.Chernobyl recovered and is now an urban jungle.Well yes a meltdown is going to release a ton of radioactive waste into the environment. Chernobyl won't be safe for humans for thousands of years.
Quote from: LC on July 16, 2015, 05:17:30 PMQuote from: Septy on July 16, 2015, 05:12:17 PMIn fallout the nukes are designed to cause radioactive fallout, while in our world our nukes are designed to cause little to no contamination as possible.A nuclear meltdown is worse than an air bursting nuke.Chernobyl recovered and is now an urban jungle.You say recovered. but its still radioactive to an extent down there right? Plus, from its history I doubt anyone would want to inhabit that place ever again, leave it to nature.