I don't like this meme.
Quote from: Dietrich Six on December 06, 2018, 08:12:35 AMLol it was 60 degrees this morning in South Florida.Global warming my ass.Science BTFO once again. Checkmate, atheists.
Lol it was 60 degrees this morning in South Florida.Global warming my ass.
Quote from: Flee on December 06, 2018, 09:38:50 AMQuote from: Dietrich Six on December 06, 2018, 08:12:35 AMLol it was 60 degrees this morning in South Florida.Global warming my ass.Science BTFO once again. Checkmate, atheists.Excuse me, but explain snow
WTF, how come South Florida gets 60 degrees, but I have to freeze my ass off in 41 degrees while working here in Central? Quote from: Dietrich Six on December 06, 2018, 08:12:35 AMLol it was 60 degrees this morning in South Florida.Global warming my ass.
>41 degrees>"freezing my ass off"LMAO
Pestilent Northerners, turn off the cold NOW. Quote from: Jono on December 06, 2018, 04:00:36 PM>41 degrees>"freezing my ass off"LMAO
idk if people are serious or not ITT, but its no longer called global warming. Its called global climate change. Hence the changing climate you are seeing.Some parts get warmer, some get colder. Some get more severe weather - like if town X used to get a hurricane once every five years, it now can get two or three in one year - every year.Moscow did not have snow a few years back in winter! Only at the very end of December it got a bit snowy.Antarctica is getting memed on and so is Greenland.
Quote from: FatherlyNick on December 17, 2018, 09:47:41 AMYouTubeRead comments for instant regret.SpoilerRead any of my posts for instant regret while you're at it.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle#Reception_and_criticismShit "documentary" that has been rebutted and torn to shreds by numerous papers and institutions and has received complaints from several of the people it featured for blatantly misrepresenting their views and research. Among the "experts" whose opinions it relies on are a former professor paid by oil companies who in the past argued against the link between smoking and lung cancer, an entomologist who the UK Parliament itself has issued a statement criticizing him for using inaccurate, outdated and misleading research at a council, and a British tory whose organization lost its status as a charity because it repeatedly spread "factually inaccurate information without a legitimate evidence base" that was directly contradicted by things as simple as satelite pictures.The film also received official complaints from the UK's media regulator for being so utterly shit and unreliable that it shouldn't be shown on publicly owned channels. Also, what's up with all these climate change skepticism posts by you? (you can put that one in your video)
YouTubeRead comments for instant regret.SpoilerRead any of my posts for instant regret while you're at it.
Quote from: FatherlyNick on December 19, 2018, 12:06:04 PMQuote from: Flee on December 18, 2018, 04:39:04 PMQuote from: FatherlyNick on December 17, 2018, 09:47:41 AMYouTubeRead comments for instant regret.SpoilerRead any of my posts for instant regret while you're at it.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle#Reception_and_criticismShit "documentary" that has been rebutted and torn to shreds by numerous papers and institutions and has received complaints from several of the people it featured for blatantly misrepresenting their views and research. Among the "experts" whose opinions it relies on are a former professor paid by oil companies who in the past argued against the link between smoking and lung cancer, an entomologist who the UK Parliament itself has issued a statement criticizing him for using inaccurate, outdated and misleading research at a council, and a British tory whose organization lost its status as a charity because it repeatedly spread "factually inaccurate information without a legitimate evidence base" that was directly contradicted by things as simple as satelite pictures.The film also received official complaints from the UK's media regulator for being so utterly shit and unreliable that it shouldn't be shown on publicly owned channels. Also, what's up with all these climate change skepticism posts by you? (you can put that one in your video)Just to see what people here have to say. I was convinced that this was basically accepted and people only argue with it as a meme.”I was just pretending to be retarded”
Quote from: Flee on December 18, 2018, 04:39:04 PMQuote from: FatherlyNick on December 17, 2018, 09:47:41 AMYouTubeRead comments for instant regret.SpoilerRead any of my posts for instant regret while you're at it.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle#Reception_and_criticismShit "documentary" that has been rebutted and torn to shreds by numerous papers and institutions and has received complaints from several of the people it featured for blatantly misrepresenting their views and research. Among the "experts" whose opinions it relies on are a former professor paid by oil companies who in the past argued against the link between smoking and lung cancer, an entomologist who the UK Parliament itself has issued a statement criticizing him for using inaccurate, outdated and misleading research at a council, and a British tory whose organization lost its status as a charity because it repeatedly spread "factually inaccurate information without a legitimate evidence base" that was directly contradicted by things as simple as satelite pictures.The film also received official complaints from the UK's media regulator for being so utterly shit and unreliable that it shouldn't be shown on publicly owned channels. Also, what's up with all these climate change skepticism posts by you? (you can put that one in your video)Just to see what people here have to say. I was convinced that this was basically accepted and people only argue with it as a meme.
Quote from: Genghis Khan on December 19, 2018, 12:32:32 PMQuote from: challengerX on December 19, 2018, 12:20:31 PMQuote from: FatherlyNick on December 19, 2018, 12:06:04 PMQuote from: Flee on December 18, 2018, 04:39:04 PMQuote from: FatherlyNick on December 17, 2018, 09:47:41 AMYouTubeRead comments for instant regret.SpoilerRead any of my posts for instant regret while you're at it.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle#Reception_and_criticismShit "documentary" that has been rebutted and torn to shreds by numerous papers and institutions and has received complaints from several of the people it featured for blatantly misrepresenting their views and research. Among the "experts" whose opinions it relies on are a former professor paid by oil companies who in the past argued against the link between smoking and lung cancer, an entomologist who the UK Parliament itself has issued a statement criticizing him for using inaccurate, outdated and misleading research at a council, and a British tory whose organization lost its status as a charity because it repeatedly spread "factually inaccurate information without a legitimate evidence base" that was directly contradicted by things as simple as satelite pictures.The film also received official complaints from the UK's media regulator for being so utterly shit and unreliable that it shouldn't be shown on publicly owned channels. Also, what's up with all these climate change skepticism posts by you? (you can put that one in your video)Just to see what people here have to say. I was convinced that this was basically accepted and people only argue with it as a meme.”I was just pretending to be retarded”Is Trump trolling or being genuine?
Quote from: challengerX on December 19, 2018, 12:20:31 PMQuote from: FatherlyNick on December 19, 2018, 12:06:04 PMQuote from: Flee on December 18, 2018, 04:39:04 PMQuote from: FatherlyNick on December 17, 2018, 09:47:41 AMYouTubeRead comments for instant regret.SpoilerRead any of my posts for instant regret while you're at it.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle#Reception_and_criticismShit "documentary" that has been rebutted and torn to shreds by numerous papers and institutions and has received complaints from several of the people it featured for blatantly misrepresenting their views and research. Among the "experts" whose opinions it relies on are a former professor paid by oil companies who in the past argued against the link between smoking and lung cancer, an entomologist who the UK Parliament itself has issued a statement criticizing him for using inaccurate, outdated and misleading research at a council, and a British tory whose organization lost its status as a charity because it repeatedly spread "factually inaccurate information without a legitimate evidence base" that was directly contradicted by things as simple as satelite pictures.The film also received official complaints from the UK's media regulator for being so utterly shit and unreliable that it shouldn't be shown on publicly owned channels. Also, what's up with all these climate change skepticism posts by you? (you can put that one in your video)Just to see what people here have to say. I was convinced that this was basically accepted and people only argue with it as a meme.”I was just pretending to be retarded”Is Trump trolling or being genuine?
Seventh International Conference on Climate Change - Earth is cooling!
