Spoiler Saw Suicide Squad 4/10

MyNameIsCharlie · August 05, 2016, 05:50:23 PM

I hate to say it, but RT is right

The story was meh. A few of the characters are alright.

Hahahaha very funny Zonda · August 05, 2016, 05:59:22 PM

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

MyNameIsCharlie · August 05, 2016, 05:59:53 PM

Quote from: ねこ on August 05, 2016, 05:59:22 PM

Well this thread was disappointing

So was the movie.

XSEAN · August 05, 2016, 06:06:05 PM

Unless I physically go see a movie. I have no opinion on it. I find reviews to be wrong sometimes.

Jono · August 05, 2016, 06:11:46 PM

A score like that is expecting from someone who rides Marvel's dick on this forum

Nick McIntyre · August 05, 2016, 06:14:46 PM

It wasn't as bad as BvS, but it kind of fell flat after the first half of the movie.

And lol Joker wasn't even relevant to the plot, so I don't know why they bothered putting him in.

August 05, 2016, 06:25:11 PM

Animated is better.

YouTube

gats · August 05, 2016, 06:26:30 PM

!DAMAGED!

Mordo · August 05, 2016, 07:19:06 PM

CHARLIE'S WIFE'S BOYFRIEND'S GONNA FREAK

Tyger · August 05, 2016, 07:23:14 PM

Quote from: Nick McIntyre on August 05, 2016, 06:14:46 PM

And lol Joker wasn't even relevant to the plot, so I don't know why they bothered putting him in.

??

maverick · August 05, 2016, 07:30:04 PM

Yeah it's starting to seem less and less like the critics are wrong.

I was supposed to see it tonight but plans fell through. Might just sit this one out.

MyNameIsCharlie · August 05, 2016, 07:45:03 PM

Quote from: Nick McIntyre on August 05, 2016, 06:14:46 PM

It wasn't as bad as BvS, but it kind of fell flat after the first half of the movie.

And lol Joker wasn't even relevant to the plot, so I don't know why they bothered putting him in.

And his scenes were the good ones. They also didn't put much evil in Enchantress. No back story, vile deeds etc...

Ian · August 05, 2016, 07:48:16 PM

[$00.05 has been deposited into your account]

[Financial department of The Walt Disney Company and Marvel affiliates]

Comet · August 06, 2016, 02:05:35 AM

I would have liked the characters introduced differently and all the music playing intermittently made me think i was watching an 80s movie. Meh/10

Cheat · August 06, 2016, 02:16:52 AM

Quote from: Jono on August 05, 2016, 06:11:46 PM

A score like that is expecting from someone who rides Marvel's dick on this forum

I would rate it somewhere between a 4.5 and a 5 out of 10, so IMO he's not wrong. The plot seemed...lost(?) at times and there were too many characters (half of which were stupid and could have been left out). The antagonists were meh and their motivations weren't really believable. Joker seemed to be there because reasons. They could have left him in the flashbacks/backstory of Harley Quinn and the plot would have probably been a lot more focused on the shitty bad guy.

The movie plays like it went through editing hell (which it did). They did play a lot of good music throughout the movie, though (almost too many, actually; the 'cool' parts were made a little less cool since they decided to play iconic songs basically during every scene change).

But yeah, it's better than BvS. I would suggest seeing it if you care at all about the DC Universe these guys are trying to pull off, but it's kind of a crappy movie as a standalone film.

snee0rp · August 06, 2016, 02:33:41 AM

did ur mom freak

Batch · August 06, 2016, 02:46:54 AM

When DC tries to cash in on Marvels capeshit phase and fails miserably

Nick McIntyre · August 06, 2016, 04:29:01 AM

Quote from: Tyger on August 05, 2016, 07:23:14 PM

Quote from: Nick McIntyre on August 05, 2016, 06:14:46 PM
And lol Joker wasn't even relevant to the plot, so I don't know why they bothered putting him in.
??

He wasn't. Like, I would have been fine if he was just in flashback scenes to show his history with Harley, but then they just put him in the main story for a grand total of two minutes...just because. He really doesn't do anything.

Hahahaha very funny Zonda · August 06, 2016, 04:36:10 AM

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

big dog · August 06, 2016, 05:19:23 AM

AH AH AH AH AH

HONKA HONKA

Mattie G Indahouse · August 06, 2016, 05:48:31 AM

Quote from: Jono on August 05, 2016, 06:11:46 PM

A score like that is expecting from someone who rides Marvel's dick on this forum

Did his score trigger you?

A Cheese Potato · August 06, 2016, 09:12:08 AM

I liked it, it's not perfect but I don't think it's the worst movie ever

Verbatim · August 06, 2016, 09:15:23 AM

YouTube

Dietrich Six · August 06, 2016, 09:15:56 AM

DC movies really shouldn't be edited to fit marvels style. The unedited version of bvs was so much better.

Maybe DC should just go the rated R route and distance themselves from the easily digested marvel films. Worked for Deadpool

Ian · August 06, 2016, 09:42:49 AM

>All these Rotten Tomato shills trying to tell DC to give up
>General audience is enjoying the movies
>Only the snobby elitist Marvel dick sucking critics are shilling against it

Maybe if RT and the rest of the Marvel-fanboys didn't trash a genuinely good movie (BvS) DC wouldn't have "dropped the ball" on SS, and I put that into quotations because it's literally only Marvel-fanboys and critics shit talking this movie. Everyone else is enjoying this movie and saying it was good. 75% of the audience likes it on RT, there's just no fucking way there isn't a Marvel bias going on here.

Tyger · August 06, 2016, 09:58:14 AM

Quote from: Dietrich Six on August 06, 2016, 09:15:56 AM

DC movies really shouldn't be edited to fit marvels style. The unedited version of bvs was so much better.

Maybe DC should just go the rated R route and distance themselves from the easily digested marvel films. Worked for Deadpool

do movie ratings really mean anything tho

Dietrich Six · August 06, 2016, 10:03:10 AM

Quote from: Tyger on August 06, 2016, 09:58:14 AM

Quote from: Dietrich Six on August 06, 2016, 09:15:56 AM
DC movies really shouldn't be edited to fit marvels style. The unedited version of bvs was so much better.

Maybe DC should just go the rated R route and distance themselves from the easily digested marvel films. Worked for Deadpool
do movie ratings really mean anything tho

Not too me, no. I'm still going to see it tonight and make up my own mind about it.

I'm referring to past dc attempts. Bvs was a huge let down for me because I was so excited to see batflek and even though I think he played the character well the movie just wasn't interesting.

Tyger · August 06, 2016, 10:05:53 AM

Quote from: Dietrich Six on August 06, 2016, 10:03:10 AM

Quote from: Tyger on August 06, 2016, 09:58:14 AM
Quote from: Dietrich Six on August 06, 2016, 09:15:56 AM
DC movies really shouldn't be edited to fit marvels style. The unedited version of bvs was so much better.

Maybe DC should just go the rated R route and distance themselves from the easily digested marvel films. Worked for Deadpool
do movie ratings really mean anything tho

Not too me, no. I'm still going to see it tonight and make up my own mind about it.

I'm referring to past dc attempts. Bvs was a huge let down for me because I was so excited to see batflek and even though I think he played the character well the movie just wasn't interesting.

I meant R rated and shit

I mean I've seen other R rated movies that were way tamer than SS.

Dietrich Six · August 06, 2016, 10:06:02 AM

Quote from: Ian on August 06, 2016, 09:42:49 AM

>All these Rotten Tomato shills trying to tell DC to give up
>General audience is enjoying the movies
>Only the snobby elitist Marvel dick sucking critics are shilling against it

Maybe if RT and the rest of the Marvel-fanboys didn't trash a genuinely good movie (BvS) DC wouldn't have "dropped the ball" on SS, and I put that into quotations because it's literally only Marvel-fanboys and critics shit talking this movie. Everyone else is enjoying this movie and saying it was good. 75% of the audience likes it on RT, there's just no fucking way there isn't a Marvel bias going on here.

It really has become fashionable to shit on DC movies. BvS really wasn't that good tho.

Even the original version is long and boring with shit character development. I'm really looking forward to a stand alone batflek movie tho.

Dietrich Six · August 06, 2016, 10:09:01 AM

Quote from: Tyger on August 06, 2016, 10:05:53 AM

Quote from: Dietrich Six on August 06, 2016, 10:03:10 AM
Quote from: Tyger on August 06, 2016, 09:58:14 AM
Quote from: Dietrich Six on August 06, 2016, 09:15:56 AM
DC movies really shouldn't be edited to fit marvels style. The unedited version of bvs was so much better.

Maybe DC should just go the rated R route and distance themselves from the easily digested marvel films. Worked for Deadpool
do movie ratings really mean anything tho

Not too me, no. I'm still going to see it tonight and make up my own mind about it.

I'm referring to past dc attempts. Bvs was a huge let down for me because I was so excited to see batflek and even though I think he played the character well the movie just wasn't interesting.

I meant R rated and shit

I mean I've seen other R rated movies that were way tamer than SS.

Oh, the rating doesn't matter until you take into account that it's not a complete movie.

A lot of content was cut from bvs to make it pg13 and you're tying the director's hands as far as content goes. I want the movie as it was intended, not cut up to allow a bigger audience.