Wait, wouldn't St. Valentine be equivalent of this holiday in comparison of Santa to Christmas?Or in modern times...Chocolate? But that's stealing Easter (and we all know who the mascot for Easter is).
NSFW?YouTube
Quote from: True Waifu God on February 14, 2015, 03:44:54 PMNSFW?YouTubeMODSUMODSUMODSU
Quote from: Epsira on February 14, 2015, 03:44:35 PMWait, wouldn't St. Valentine be equivalent of this holiday in comparison of Santa to Christmas?Or in modern times...Chocolate? But that's stealing Easter (and we all know who the mascot for Easter is).I'm not talking about St. V, but rather V's day and what it stands for.Geez, am I really that unclear? It can be analyzed in many ways and different conclusions will be arrived upon, but you obviously don't want to discuss it that much, and are more likely just talking to yourself while still wanting to influence surroundings.I bet you'd hate to discuss the comparisons.
Quote from: DigitalIzesty on February 14, 2015, 03:48:20 PMQuote from: Epsira on February 14, 2015, 03:44:35 PMWait, wouldn't St. Valentine be equivalent of this holiday in comparison of Santa to Christmas?Or in modern times...Chocolate? But that's stealing Easter (and we all know who the mascot for Easter is).I'm not talking about St. V, but rather V's day and what it stands for.Geez, am I really that unclear? It can be analyzed in many ways and different conclusions will be arrived upon, but you obviously don't want to discuss it that much, and are more likely just talking to yourself while still wanting to influence surroundings.I bet you'd hate to discuss the comparisons.Not necessarily. On consumerism and it's effect on interpersonal relationships I'd be alright talking about it, it's just that I didn't want to open up many wounds last night >.>On a romantic basis and why I think personal affection is doomed we could have a more expansive conversation (because it wouldn't mostly be conjecture on my end).I think you could easily identify with the statement,"Language is a somewhat inefficient means of communication"I thought that since you made the note about Santa and Christmas and reflecting the experience to Easter that you meant the figure representing the holiday. I usually have to get beyond the immediate meaning of your posts to try and understand you better. It's like reading Hemmingway, actually.
Quote from: Epsira on February 14, 2015, 04:00:22 PMQuote from: DigitalIzesty on February 14, 2015, 03:48:20 PMQuote from: Epsira on February 14, 2015, 03:44:35 PMWait, wouldn't St. Valentine be equivalent of this holiday in comparison of Santa to Christmas?Or in modern times...Chocolate? But that's stealing Easter (and we all know who the mascot for Easter is).I'm not talking about St. V, but rather V's day and what it stands for.Geez, am I really that unclear? It can be analyzed in many ways and different conclusions will be arrived upon, but you obviously don't want to discuss it that much, and are more likely just talking to yourself while still wanting to influence surroundings.I bet you'd hate to discuss the comparisons.Not necessarily. On consumerism and it's effect on interpersonal relationships I'd be alright talking about it, it's just that I didn't want to open up many wounds last night >.>On a romantic basis and why I think personal affection is doomed we could have a more expansive conversation (because it wouldn't mostly be conjecture on my end).I think you could easily identify with the statement,"Language is a somewhat inefficient means of communication"I thought that since you made the note about Santa and Christmas and reflecting the experience to Easter that you meant the figure representing the holiday. I usually have to get beyond the immediate meaning of your posts to try and understand you better. It's like reading Hemmingway, actually.I am alien with that statement, so to speak.I was trying to be specific as to say that the day has the same meaning of Santa on Christmas; for kids and not really anything that exists outside of kids' minds.
Quote from: DigitalIzesty on February 14, 2015, 04:04:31 PMQuote from: Epsira on February 14, 2015, 04:00:22 PMQuote from: DigitalIzesty on February 14, 2015, 03:48:20 PMQuote from: Epsira on February 14, 2015, 03:44:35 PMWait, wouldn't St. Valentine be equivalent of this holiday in comparison of Santa to Christmas?Or in modern times...Chocolate? But that's stealing Easter (and we all know who the mascot for Easter is).I'm not talking about St. V, but rather V's day and what it stands for.Geez, am I really that unclear? It can be analyzed in many ways and different conclusions will be arrived upon, but you obviously don't want to discuss it that much, and are more likely just talking to yourself while still wanting to influence surroundings.I bet you'd hate to discuss the comparisons.Not necessarily. On consumerism and it's effect on interpersonal relationships I'd be alright talking about it, it's just that I didn't want to open up many wounds last night >.>On a romantic basis and why I think personal affection is doomed we could have a more expansive conversation (because it wouldn't mostly be conjecture on my end).I think you could easily identify with the statement,"Language is a somewhat inefficient means of communication"I thought that since you made the note about Santa and Christmas and reflecting the experience to Easter that you meant the figure representing the holiday. I usually have to get beyond the immediate meaning of your posts to try and understand you better. It's like reading Hemmingway, actually.I am alien with that statement, so to speak.I was trying to be specific as to say that the day has the same meaning of Santa on Christmas; for kids and not really anything that exists outside of kids' minds.With Hemmingway he utilizes the Iceberg technique, where most of the content in a piece is implicit as opposed to explicitly stated. I wasn't including his style of "athletic prose" in this comparison, though >.>When most people don't really consider a perspective of reality not native to their own, I'd extend that to adults additionally.
Quote from: Epsira on February 14, 2015, 04:10:37 PMQuote from: DigitalIzesty on February 14, 2015, 04:04:31 PMQuote from: Epsira on February 14, 2015, 04:00:22 PMQuote from: DigitalIzesty on February 14, 2015, 03:48:20 PMQuote from: Epsira on February 14, 2015, 03:44:35 PMWait, wouldn't St. Valentine be equivalent of this holiday in comparison of Santa to Christmas?Or in modern times...Chocolate? But that's stealing Easter (and we all know who the mascot for Easter is).I'm not talking about St. V, but rather V's day and what it stands for.Geez, am I really that unclear? It can be analyzed in many ways and different conclusions will be arrived upon, but you obviously don't want to discuss it that much, and are more likely just talking to yourself while still wanting to influence surroundings.I bet you'd hate to discuss the comparisons.Not necessarily. On consumerism and it's effect on interpersonal relationships I'd be alright talking about it, it's just that I didn't want to open up many wounds last night >.>On a romantic basis and why I think personal affection is doomed we could have a more expansive conversation (because it wouldn't mostly be conjecture on my end).I think you could easily identify with the statement,"Language is a somewhat inefficient means of communication"I thought that since you made the note about Santa and Christmas and reflecting the experience to Easter that you meant the figure representing the holiday. I usually have to get beyond the immediate meaning of your posts to try and understand you better. It's like reading Hemmingway, actually.I am alien with that statement, so to speak.I was trying to be specific as to say that the day has the same meaning of Santa on Christmas; for kids and not really anything that exists outside of kids' minds.With Hemmingway he utilizes the Iceberg technique, where most of the content in a piece is implicit as opposed to explicitly stated. I wasn't including his style of "athletic prose" in this comparison, though >.>When most people don't really consider a perspective of reality not native to their own, I'd extend that to adults additionally.You do realize that to view a different reality you'll have to change yours, right?
Quote from: DigitalIzesty on February 14, 2015, 04:15:48 PMQuote from: Epsira on February 14, 2015, 04:10:37 PMQuote from: DigitalIzesty on February 14, 2015, 04:04:31 PMQuote from: Epsira on February 14, 2015, 04:00:22 PMQuote from: DigitalIzesty on February 14, 2015, 03:48:20 PMQuote from: Epsira on February 14, 2015, 03:44:35 PMWait, wouldn't St. Valentine be equivalent of this holiday in comparison of Santa to Christmas?Or in modern times...Chocolate? But that's stealing Easter (and we all know who the mascot for Easter is).I'm not talking about St. V, but rather V's day and what it stands for.Geez, am I really that unclear? It can be analyzed in many ways and different conclusions will be arrived upon, but you obviously don't want to discuss it that much, and are more likely just talking to yourself while still wanting to influence surroundings.I bet you'd hate to discuss the comparisons.Not necessarily. On consumerism and it's effect on interpersonal relationships I'd be alright talking about it, it's just that I didn't want to open up many wounds last night >.>On a romantic basis and why I think personal affection is doomed we could have a more expansive conversation (because it wouldn't mostly be conjecture on my end).I think you could easily identify with the statement,"Language is a somewhat inefficient means of communication"I thought that since you made the note about Santa and Christmas and reflecting the experience to Easter that you meant the figure representing the holiday. I usually have to get beyond the immediate meaning of your posts to try and understand you better. It's like reading Hemmingway, actually.I am alien with that statement, so to speak.I was trying to be specific as to say that the day has the same meaning of Santa on Christmas; for kids and not really anything that exists outside of kids' minds.With Hemmingway he utilizes the Iceberg technique, where most of the content in a piece is implicit as opposed to explicitly stated. I wasn't including his style of "athletic prose" in this comparison, though >.>When most people don't really consider a perspective of reality not native to their own, I'd extend that to adults additionally.You do realize that to view a different reality you'll have to change yours, right?The implication from your post above is that I haven't.Which isn't true. The early stages of my life reversed many notions a majority of the populace holds.
Please stop with the valentine's day posts
