Quote from: Verbatim on October 27, 2016, 10:46:42 PMThe bottom half of Loaf's face looks shrunk.
The bottom half of Loaf's face looks shrunk.
Quote from: Dietrich Six on October 27, 2016, 10:49:42 PMQuote from: Verbatim on October 27, 2016, 10:46:42 PMThe bottom half of Loaf's face looks shrunk.PFFFFFFFTHTHTHTHTHTH
Quote from: clum clum on October 27, 2016, 10:40:58 PMAlso Loaf your facial features are shit -- you will look like an inbred, deformed alien rat by the time you hit 30.And what on the godawful fuck is with those tiny lips? What can you fit in there? Breadcrumbs?you have terrible tasteif I looked like loaf I'd be so happy
Also Loaf your facial features are shit -- you will look like an inbred, deformed alien rat by the time you hit 30.And what on the godawful fuck is with those tiny lips? What can you fit in there? Breadcrumbs?
Quote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 10:43:28 PMQuote from: clum clum on October 27, 2016, 10:40:58 PMAlso Loaf your facial features are shit -- you will look like an inbred, deformed alien rat by the time you hit 30.And what on the godawful fuck is with those tiny lips? What can you fit in there? Breadcrumbs?you have terrible tasteif I looked like loaf I'd be so happyDude has shit genetics and an irredeemably poor facial structure, don't let the thinly veiled feminine guise fool you.
I hope you're actually cute and not one of those gays who are into hairy fat men
Quote from: Infinitely Arctic on October 27, 2016, 10:55:57 PMI hope you're actually cute and not one of those gays who are into hairy fat menI prefer feminine men, and I'd wager I am -- I get positive attention from both men and women in public and my ex rates me about a 7/10. I'd probably be an 8 with some effort.
Nice to see sep7agon can still host a bonfire without the use of matches.If ya want some context Class, while you're right that women can be as strong as men, you're missing stuff. Strength comes naturally for guys. That's not bravado. It's science. Hormones and chemical make-up. Males have a higher drive due to testosterone and their instinctual aggressiveness. They're more prone to harsher things which neccessitates a stronger physiology.Any body builder is going to be stronger than the average joe. That accounts for either sex. But if you look at averages? An average guy and an average girl? There's an easy to see gap. And what if you look at body builder women? Well, you'll notice some of them don't look so womanly anymore. They look like guys.And even then, if we're looking at the extremes? I don't think I've ever heard of a woman body builder who could come closs to the levels of strength that Lois Cyr displayed. If you can find me one, then hey, knowledge is cool.But you can't argue that guys fit the role of strength. If we didn't, we wouldn't need so much testosterone or instinctual aggressiveness.
Quote from: SΞ±ndtrap on October 27, 2016, 11:37:41 PMNice to see sep7agon can still host a bonfire without the use of matches.If ya want some context Class, while you're right that women can be as strong as men, you're missing stuff. Strength comes naturally for guys. That's not bravado. It's science. Hormones and chemical make-up. Males have a higher drive due to testosterone and their instinctual aggressiveness. They're more prone to harsher things which neccessitates a stronger physiology.Any body builder is going to be stronger than the average joe. That accounts for either sex. But if you look at averages? An average guy and an average girl? There's an easy to see gap. And what if you look at body builder women? Well, you'll notice some of them don't look so womanly anymore. They look like guys.And even then, if we're looking at the extremes? I don't think I've ever heard of a woman body builder who could come closs to the levels of strength that Lois Cyr displayed. If you can find me one, then hey, knowledge is cool.But you can't argue that guys fit the role of strength. If we didn't, we wouldn't need so much testosterone or instinctual aggressiveness.We DONT need testosterone or aggressivenessa truly moral society is 100% passive all the timeand yeah, obviously the average male is stronger than the average female, the problem is when you conflating physicality with masculinity as if it was a gender exclusive trait
Quote from: clum clum on October 27, 2016, 10:52:48 PMQuote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 10:43:28 PMQuote from: clum clum on October 27, 2016, 10:40:58 PMAlso Loaf your facial features are shit -- you will look like an inbred, deformed alien rat by the time you hit 30.And what on the godawful fuck is with those tiny lips? What can you fit in there? Breadcrumbs?you have terrible tasteif I looked like loaf I'd be so happyDude has shit genetics and an irredeemably poor facial structure, don't let the thinly veiled feminine guise fool you.lolno
Quote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 11:36:51 PMQuote from: clum clum on October 27, 2016, 10:52:48 PMQuote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 10:43:28 PMQuote from: clum clum on October 27, 2016, 10:40:58 PMAlso Loaf your facial features are shit -- you will look like an inbred, deformed alien rat by the time you hit 30.And what on the godawful fuck is with those tiny lips? What can you fit in there? Breadcrumbs?you have terrible tasteif I looked like loaf I'd be so happyDude has shit genetics and an irredeemably poor facial structure, don't let the thinly veiled feminine guise fool you.lolnoWhat an impactful rebuttal.
Quote from: clum clum on October 28, 2016, 12:08:05 AMQuote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 11:36:51 PMQuote from: clum clum on October 27, 2016, 10:52:48 PMQuote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 10:43:28 PMQuote from: clum clum on October 27, 2016, 10:40:58 PMAlso Loaf your facial features are shit -- you will look like an inbred, deformed alien rat by the time you hit 30.And what on the godawful fuck is with those tiny lips? What can you fit in there? Breadcrumbs?you have terrible tasteif I looked like loaf I'd be so happyDude has shit genetics and an irredeemably poor facial structure, don't let the thinly veiled feminine guise fool you.lolnoWhat an impactful rebuttal.I mean you're wrong, what else do you want me to sayjust from looking at him I can see he has great genetics and an A1 facial structure
Quote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 11:47:07 PMQuote from: SΞ±ndtrap on October 27, 2016, 11:37:41 PMNice to see sep7agon can still host a bonfire without the use of matches.If ya want some context Class, while you're right that women can be as strong as men, you're missing stuff. Strength comes naturally for guys. That's not bravado. It's science. Hormones and chemical make-up. Males have a higher drive due to testosterone and their instinctual aggressiveness. They're more prone to harsher things which neccessitates a stronger physiology.Any body builder is going to be stronger than the average joe. That accounts for either sex. But if you look at averages? An average guy and an average girl? There's an easy to see gap. And what if you look at body builder women? Well, you'll notice some of them don't look so womanly anymore. They look like guys.And even then, if we're looking at the extremes? I don't think I've ever heard of a woman body builder who could come closs to the levels of strength that Lois Cyr displayed. If you can find me one, then hey, knowledge is cool.But you can't argue that guys fit the role of strength. If we didn't, we wouldn't need so much testosterone or instinctual aggressiveness.We DONT need testosterone or aggressivenessa truly moral society is 100% passive all the timeand yeah, obviously the average male is stronger than the average female, the problem is when you conflating physicality with masculinity as if it was a gender exclusive traitI'd disagree. There's a very fine line that needs to be walked between passiveness and agressiveness.Too much agression isn't a good thing. Too much passiveness isn't either. No matter where you go on this planet or anywhere else, there will always be something that requires the usage of aggression for the sake of survival. If we had no aggression then we'd be extinct as a species.
Quote from: SΞ±ndtrap on October 27, 2016, 11:57:05 PMQuote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 11:47:07 PMQuote from: SΞ±ndtrap on October 27, 2016, 11:37:41 PMNice to see sep7agon can still host a bonfire without the use of matches.If ya want some context Class, while you're right that women can be as strong as men, you're missing stuff. Strength comes naturally for guys. That's not bravado. It's science. Hormones and chemical make-up. Males have a higher drive due to testosterone and their instinctual aggressiveness. They're more prone to harsher things which neccessitates a stronger physiology.Any body builder is going to be stronger than the average joe. That accounts for either sex. But if you look at averages? An average guy and an average girl? There's an easy to see gap. And what if you look at body builder women? Well, you'll notice some of them don't look so womanly anymore. They look like guys.And even then, if we're looking at the extremes? I don't think I've ever heard of a woman body builder who could come closs to the levels of strength that Lois Cyr displayed. If you can find me one, then hey, knowledge is cool.But you can't argue that guys fit the role of strength. If we didn't, we wouldn't need so much testosterone or instinctual aggressiveness.We DONT need testosterone or aggressivenessa truly moral society is 100% passive all the timeand yeah, obviously the average male is stronger than the average female, the problem is when you conflating physicality with masculinity as if it was a gender exclusive traitI'd disagree. There's a very fine line that needs to be walked between passiveness and agressiveness.Too much agression isn't a good thing. Too much passiveness isn't either. No matter where you go on this planet or anywhere else, there will always be something that requires the usage of aggression for the sake of survival. If we had no aggression then we'd be extinct as a species.wrongany aggression is bad and even when necessary, you should feel bad about yourself afterward
Quote from: SecondClass on October 28, 2016, 12:16:42 AMQuote from: SΞ±ndtrap on October 27, 2016, 11:57:05 PMQuote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 11:47:07 PMQuote from: SΞ±ndtrap on October 27, 2016, 11:37:41 PMNice to see sep7agon can still host a bonfire without the use of matches.If ya want some context Class, while you're right that women can be as strong as men, you're missing stuff. Strength comes naturally for guys. That's not bravado. It's science. Hormones and chemical make-up. Males have a higher drive due to testosterone and their instinctual aggressiveness. They're more prone to harsher things which neccessitates a stronger physiology.Any body builder is going to be stronger than the average joe. That accounts for either sex. But if you look at averages? An average guy and an average girl? There's an easy to see gap. And what if you look at body builder women? Well, you'll notice some of them don't look so womanly anymore. They look like guys.And even then, if we're looking at the extremes? I don't think I've ever heard of a woman body builder who could come closs to the levels of strength that Lois Cyr displayed. If you can find me one, then hey, knowledge is cool.But you can't argue that guys fit the role of strength. If we didn't, we wouldn't need so much testosterone or instinctual aggressiveness.We DONT need testosterone or aggressivenessa truly moral society is 100% passive all the timeand yeah, obviously the average male is stronger than the average female, the problem is when you conflating physicality with masculinity as if it was a gender exclusive traitI'd disagree. There's a very fine line that needs to be walked between passiveness and agressiveness.Too much agression isn't a good thing. Too much passiveness isn't either. No matter where you go on this planet or anywhere else, there will always be something that requires the usage of aggression for the sake of survival. If we had no aggression then we'd be extinct as a species.wrongany aggression is bad and even when necessary, you should feel bad about yourself afterwardI didn't feel a damn ounce of regret for standing up for a friend of mine when he was getting beaten down into the dirt for his sexual preference. And I feel no need to.I've had my time to hate myself for who I was. But none of it was reserved for acts of aggression as I never acted without warrent when it was neccessary.
Quote from: SΞ±ndtrap on October 28, 2016, 12:21:01 AMQuote from: SecondClass on October 28, 2016, 12:16:42 AMQuote from: SΞ±ndtrap on October 27, 2016, 11:57:05 PMQuote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 11:47:07 PMQuote from: SΞ±ndtrap on October 27, 2016, 11:37:41 PMNice to see sep7agon can still host a bonfire without the use of matches.If ya want some context Class, while you're right that women can be as strong as men, you're missing stuff. Strength comes naturally for guys. That's not bravado. It's science. Hormones and chemical make-up. Males have a higher drive due to testosterone and their instinctual aggressiveness. They're more prone to harsher things which neccessitates a stronger physiology.Any body builder is going to be stronger than the average joe. That accounts for either sex. But if you look at averages? An average guy and an average girl? There's an easy to see gap. And what if you look at body builder women? Well, you'll notice some of them don't look so womanly anymore. They look like guys.And even then, if we're looking at the extremes? I don't think I've ever heard of a woman body builder who could come closs to the levels of strength that Lois Cyr displayed. If you can find me one, then hey, knowledge is cool.But you can't argue that guys fit the role of strength. If we didn't, we wouldn't need so much testosterone or instinctual aggressiveness.We DONT need testosterone or aggressivenessa truly moral society is 100% passive all the timeand yeah, obviously the average male is stronger than the average female, the problem is when you conflating physicality with masculinity as if it was a gender exclusive traitI'd disagree. There's a very fine line that needs to be walked between passiveness and agressiveness.Too much agression isn't a good thing. Too much passiveness isn't either. No matter where you go on this planet or anywhere else, there will always be something that requires the usage of aggression for the sake of survival. If we had no aggression then we'd be extinct as a species.wrongany aggression is bad and even when necessary, you should feel bad about yourself afterwardI didn't feel a damn ounce of regret for standing up for a friend of mine when he was getting beaten down into the dirt for his sexual preference. And I feel no need to.I've had my time to hate myself for who I was. But none of it was reserved for acts of aggression as I never acted without warrent when it was neccessary.you should've felt bad that it had to come to that
Quote from: SecondClass on October 28, 2016, 12:24:31 AMQuote from: SΞ±ndtrap on October 28, 2016, 12:21:01 AMQuote from: SecondClass on October 28, 2016, 12:16:42 AMQuote from: SΞ±ndtrap on October 27, 2016, 11:57:05 PMQuote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 11:47:07 PMQuote from: SΞ±ndtrap on October 27, 2016, 11:37:41 PMNice to see sep7agon can still host a bonfire without the use of matches.If ya want some context Class, while you're right that women can be as strong as men, you're missing stuff. Strength comes naturally for guys. That's not bravado. It's science. Hormones and chemical make-up. Males have a higher drive due to testosterone and their instinctual aggressiveness. They're more prone to harsher things which neccessitates a stronger physiology.Any body builder is going to be stronger than the average joe. That accounts for either sex. But if you look at averages? An average guy and an average girl? There's an easy to see gap. And what if you look at body builder women? Well, you'll notice some of them don't look so womanly anymore. They look like guys.And even then, if we're looking at the extremes? I don't think I've ever heard of a woman body builder who could come closs to the levels of strength that Lois Cyr displayed. If you can find me one, then hey, knowledge is cool.But you can't argue that guys fit the role of strength. If we didn't, we wouldn't need so much testosterone or instinctual aggressiveness.We DONT need testosterone or aggressivenessa truly moral society is 100% passive all the timeand yeah, obviously the average male is stronger than the average female, the problem is when you conflating physicality with masculinity as if it was a gender exclusive traitI'd disagree. There's a very fine line that needs to be walked between passiveness and agressiveness.Too much agression isn't a good thing. Too much passiveness isn't either. No matter where you go on this planet or anywhere else, there will always be something that requires the usage of aggression for the sake of survival. If we had no aggression then we'd be extinct as a species.wrongany aggression is bad and even when necessary, you should feel bad about yourself afterwardI didn't feel a damn ounce of regret for standing up for a friend of mine when he was getting beaten down into the dirt for his sexual preference. And I feel no need to.I've had my time to hate myself for who I was. But none of it was reserved for acts of aggression as I never acted without warrent when it was neccessary.you should've felt bad that it had to come to thatNo I shouldn't. That's how people create long lasting guilt for themselves. There's no shame in doing what you have to do if you're backed into a corner and out of options you already tried.
Quote from: SecondClass on October 28, 2016, 12:10:58 AMQuote from: clum clum on October 28, 2016, 12:08:05 AMQuote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 11:36:51 PMQuote from: clum clum on October 27, 2016, 10:52:48 PMQuote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 10:43:28 PMQuote from: clum clum on October 27, 2016, 10:40:58 PMAlso Loaf your facial features are shit -- you will look like an inbred, deformed alien rat by the time you hit 30.And what on the godawful fuck is with those tiny lips? What can you fit in there? Breadcrumbs?you have terrible tasteif I looked like loaf I'd be so happyDude has shit genetics and an irredeemably poor facial structure, don't let the thinly veiled feminine guise fool you.lolnoWhat an impactful rebuttal.I mean you're wrong, what else do you want me to sayjust from looking at him I can see he has great genetics and an A1 facial structureI see you're living in opposite world.
Quote from: SΞ±ndtrap on October 28, 2016, 12:31:58 AMQuote from: SecondClass on October 28, 2016, 12:24:31 AMQuote from: SΞ±ndtrap on October 28, 2016, 12:21:01 AMQuote from: SecondClass on October 28, 2016, 12:16:42 AMQuote from: SΞ±ndtrap on October 27, 2016, 11:57:05 PMQuote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 11:47:07 PMQuote from: SΞ±ndtrap on October 27, 2016, 11:37:41 PMNice to see sep7agon can still host a bonfire without the use of matches.If ya want some context Class, while you're right that women can be as strong as men, you're missing stuff. Strength comes naturally for guys. That's not bravado. It's science. Hormones and chemical make-up. Males have a higher drive due to testosterone and their instinctual aggressiveness. They're more prone to harsher things which neccessitates a stronger physiology.Any body builder is going to be stronger than the average joe. That accounts for either sex. But if you look at averages? An average guy and an average girl? There's an easy to see gap. And what if you look at body builder women? Well, you'll notice some of them don't look so womanly anymore. They look like guys.And even then, if we're looking at the extremes? I don't think I've ever heard of a woman body builder who could come closs to the levels of strength that Lois Cyr displayed. If you can find me one, then hey, knowledge is cool.But you can't argue that guys fit the role of strength. If we didn't, we wouldn't need so much testosterone or instinctual aggressiveness.We DONT need testosterone or aggressivenessa truly moral society is 100% passive all the timeand yeah, obviously the average male is stronger than the average female, the problem is when you conflating physicality with masculinity as if it was a gender exclusive traitI'd disagree. There's a very fine line that needs to be walked between passiveness and agressiveness.Too much agression isn't a good thing. Too much passiveness isn't either. No matter where you go on this planet or anywhere else, there will always be something that requires the usage of aggression for the sake of survival. If we had no aggression then we'd be extinct as a species.wrongany aggression is bad and even when necessary, you should feel bad about yourself afterwardI didn't feel a damn ounce of regret for standing up for a friend of mine when he was getting beaten down into the dirt for his sexual preference. And I feel no need to.I've had my time to hate myself for who I was. But none of it was reserved for acts of aggression as I never acted without warrent when it was neccessary.you should've felt bad that it had to come to thatNo I shouldn't. That's how people create long lasting guilt for themselves. There's no shame in doing what you have to do if you're backed into a corner and out of options you already tried.toxic mindset but ok
any aggression is bad and even when necessary, you should feel bad about yourself afterward
Quote from: SecondClass on October 28, 2016, 12:16:42 AMany aggression is bad and even when necessary, you should feel bad about yourself afterwardLOL, I have never seen a more sheltered view of the world. You've obviously never been in any situation that necessitates aggression, have you? I don't know what color you painted the idea of aggression in your fucked up mind, but aggression (and furthermore assertiveness) is 100% needed to get by in life and is a thing nobody should be shamed for. Aggression is a primal force that has been around since near the dawn of life on earth. Where would we be if we stood in fields, passive like sheep all day? The concept that someone should be shamed for such a huge part of the human condition is asinine. Lets shame passiveness while we're at. Do you even put any thought into the drivel that you post? A human society that is 100% passive doesn't make any sense whatsoever -- do you even know what a human IS outside of daydreams of an idyllic utopia? Get a fucking grip, you mentally ill, milquetoast piece of trash.
This numale mindset is a cancer that must be removed.Just transition already, you're giving us a bad name.
the one true God is Doctor Doom and we should all be worshiping him.
a truly moral society is 100% passive all the time
Passiveness can be dropped in moments of true necessity
Quote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 11:47:07 PMa truly moral society is 100% passive all the timeQuote from: SecondClass on October 28, 2016, 01:23:15 AMPassiveness can be dropped in moments of true necessityPick one.
Quote from: Dio on October 28, 2016, 07:34:37 AMQuote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 11:47:07 PMa truly moral society is 100% passive all the timeQuote from: SecondClass on October 28, 2016, 01:23:15 AMPassiveness can be dropped in moments of true necessityPick one.truly moral societies don't exist genius, not in our fucked up world