Everyone here must be bored out of their minds dwelling in their mother's basement because literally any post on this forum can be turned into shit flinging idiocy

Quote from: clum clum on October 27, 2016, 10:40:58 PM

Also Loaf your facial features are shit -- you will look like an inbred, deformed alien rat by the time you hit 30.

And what on the godawful fuck is with those tiny lips? What can you fit in there? Breadcrumbs?

you have terrible taste

if I looked like loaf I'd be so happy

Dude has shit genetics and an irredeemably poor facial structure, don't let the thinly veiled feminine guise fool you.

Quote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 10:43:28 PM

Quote from: clum clum on October 27, 2016, 10:40:58 PM

Also Loaf your facial features are shit -- you will look like an inbred, deformed alien rat by the time you hit 30.

And what on the godawful fuck is with those tiny lips? What can you fit in there? Breadcrumbs?

you have terrible taste

if I looked like loaf I'd be so happy

Dude has shit genetics and an irredeemably poor facial structure, don't let the thinly veiled feminine guise fool you.

I hope you're actually cute and not one of those gays who are into hairy fat men

Quote from: Infinitely Arctic on October 27, 2016, 10:55:57 PM

I hope you're actually cute and not one of those gays who are into hairy fat men

I prefer feminine men, and I'd wager I am -- I get positive attention from both men and women in public and my ex rates me about a 7/10. I'd probably be an 8 with some effort.

oh

hi :]

Nice to see sep7agon can still host a bonfire without the use of matches.

If ya want some context Class, while you're right that women can be as strong as men, you're missing stuff. Strength comes naturally for guys. That's not bravado. It's science. Hormones and chemical make-up. Males have a higher drive due to testosterone and their instinctual aggressiveness. They're more prone to harsher things which neccessitates a stronger physiology.

Any body builder is going to be stronger than the average joe. That accounts for either sex. But if you look at averages? An average guy and an average girl? There's an easy to see gap. And what if you look at body builder women? Well, you'll notice some of them don't look so womanly anymore. They look like guys.

And even then, if we're looking at the extremes? I don't think I've ever heard of a woman body builder who could come closs to the levels of strength that Lois Cyr displayed. If you can find me one, then hey, knowledge is cool.

But you can't argue that guys fit the role of strength. If we didn't, we wouldn't need so much testosterone or instinctual aggressiveness.

Quote from: Sαndtrap on October 27, 2016, 11:37:41 PM

Nice to see sep7agon can still host a bonfire without the use of matches.

If ya want some context Class, while you're right that women can be as strong as men, you're missing stuff. Strength comes naturally for guys. That's not bravado. It's science. Hormones and chemical make-up. Males have a higher drive due to testosterone and their instinctual aggressiveness. They're more prone to harsher things which neccessitates a stronger physiology.

Any body builder is going to be stronger than the average joe. That accounts for either sex. But if you look at averages? An average guy and an average girl? There's an easy to see gap. And what if you look at body builder women? Well, you'll notice some of them don't look so womanly anymore. They look like guys.

And even then, if we're looking at the extremes? I don't think I've ever heard of a woman body builder who could come closs to the levels of strength that Lois Cyr displayed. If you can find me one, then hey, knowledge is cool.

But you can't argue that guys fit the role of strength. If we didn't, we wouldn't need so much testosterone or instinctual aggressiveness.

We DONT need testosterone or aggressiveness

a truly moral society is 100% passive all the time

and yeah, obviously the average male is stronger than the average female, the problem is when you conflating physicality with masculinity as if it was a gender exclusive trait

I'd disagree. There's a very fine line that needs to be walked between passiveness and agressiveness.

Too much agression isn't a good thing. Too much passiveness isn't either. No matter where you go on this planet or anywhere else, there will always be something that requires the usage of aggression for the sake of survival. If we had no aggression then we'd be extinct as a species.

Quote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 11:36:51 PM

Quote from: clum clum on October 27, 2016, 10:52:48 PM

Quote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 10:43:28 PM

Quote from: clum clum on October 27, 2016, 10:40:58 PM

Also Loaf your facial features are shit -- you will look like an inbred, deformed alien rat by the time you hit 30.

And what on the godawful fuck is with those tiny lips? What can you fit in there? Breadcrumbs?

you have terrible taste

if I looked like loaf I'd be so happy

Dude has shit genetics and an irredeemably poor facial structure, don't let the thinly veiled feminine guise fool you.

lolno

What an impactful rebuttal.

I mean you're wrong, what else do you want me to say

just from looking at him I can see he has great genetics and an A1 facial structure

Quote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 11:47:07 PM

Quote from: Sαndtrap on October 27, 2016, 11:37:41 PM

Nice to see sep7agon can still host a bonfire without the use of matches.

If ya want some context Class, while you're right that women can be as strong as men, you're missing stuff. Strength comes naturally for guys. That's not bravado. It's science. Hormones and chemical make-up. Males have a higher drive due to testosterone and their instinctual aggressiveness. They're more prone to harsher things which neccessitates a stronger physiology.

Any body builder is going to be stronger than the average joe. That accounts for either sex. But if you look at averages? An average guy and an average girl? There's an easy to see gap. And what if you look at body builder women? Well, you'll notice some of them don't look so womanly anymore. They look like guys.

And even then, if we're looking at the extremes? I don't think I've ever heard of a woman body builder who could come closs to the levels of strength that Lois Cyr displayed. If you can find me one, then hey, knowledge is cool.

But you can't argue that guys fit the role of strength. If we didn't, we wouldn't need so much testosterone or instinctual aggressiveness.

We DONT need testosterone or aggressiveness

a truly moral society is 100% passive all the time

and yeah, obviously the average male is stronger than the average female, the problem is when you conflating physicality with masculinity as if it was a gender exclusive trait

I'd disagree. There's a very fine line that needs to be walked between passiveness and agressiveness.

Too much agression isn't a good thing. Too much passiveness isn't either. No matter where you go on this planet or anywhere else, there will always be something that requires the usage of aggression for the sake of survival. If we had no aggression then we'd be extinct as a species.

wrong

any aggression is bad and even when necessary, you should feel bad about yourself afterward

Quote from: SecondClass on October 28, 2016, 12:16:42 AM

Quote from: Sαndtrap on October 27, 2016, 11:57:05 PM

Quote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 11:47:07 PM

Quote from: Sαndtrap on October 27, 2016, 11:37:41 PM

Nice to see sep7agon can still host a bonfire without the use of matches.

If ya want some context Class, while you're right that women can be as strong as men, you're missing stuff. Strength comes naturally for guys. That's not bravado. It's science. Hormones and chemical make-up. Males have a higher drive due to testosterone and their instinctual aggressiveness. They're more prone to harsher things which neccessitates a stronger physiology.

Any body builder is going to be stronger than the average joe. That accounts for either sex. But if you look at averages? An average guy and an average girl? There's an easy to see gap. And what if you look at body builder women? Well, you'll notice some of them don't look so womanly anymore. They look like guys.

And even then, if we're looking at the extremes? I don't think I've ever heard of a woman body builder who could come closs to the levels of strength that Lois Cyr displayed. If you can find me one, then hey, knowledge is cool.

But you can't argue that guys fit the role of strength. If we didn't, we wouldn't need so much testosterone or instinctual aggressiveness.

We DONT need testosterone or aggressiveness

a truly moral society is 100% passive all the time

and yeah, obviously the average male is stronger than the average female, the problem is when you conflating physicality with masculinity as if it was a gender exclusive trait

I'd disagree. There's a very fine line that needs to be walked between passiveness and agressiveness.

Too much agression isn't a good thing. Too much passiveness isn't either. No matter where you go on this planet or anywhere else, there will always be something that requires the usage of aggression for the sake of survival. If we had no aggression then we'd be extinct as a species.

wrong

any aggression is bad and even when necessary, you should feel bad about yourself afterward

I didn't feel a damn ounce of regret for standing up for a friend of mine when he was getting beaten down into the dirt for his sexual preference. And I feel no need to.

I've had my time to hate myself for who I was. But none of it was reserved for acts of aggression as I never acted without warrent when it was neccessary.

you should've felt bad that it had to come to that

Quote from: SecondClass on October 28, 2016, 12:24:31 AM

Quote from: Sαndtrap on October 28, 2016, 12:21:01 AM

Quote from: SecondClass on October 28, 2016, 12:16:42 AM

Quote from: Sαndtrap on October 27, 2016, 11:57:05 PM

Quote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 11:47:07 PM

Quote from: Sαndtrap on October 27, 2016, 11:37:41 PM

Nice to see sep7agon can still host a bonfire without the use of matches.

If ya want some context Class, while you're right that women can be as strong as men, you're missing stuff. Strength comes naturally for guys. That's not bravado. It's science. Hormones and chemical make-up. Males have a higher drive due to testosterone and their instinctual aggressiveness. They're more prone to harsher things which neccessitates a stronger physiology.

Any body builder is going to be stronger than the average joe. That accounts for either sex. But if you look at averages? An average guy and an average girl? There's an easy to see gap. And what if you look at body builder women? Well, you'll notice some of them don't look so womanly anymore. They look like guys.

And even then, if we're looking at the extremes? I don't think I've ever heard of a woman body builder who could come closs to the levels of strength that Lois Cyr displayed. If you can find me one, then hey, knowledge is cool.

But you can't argue that guys fit the role of strength. If we didn't, we wouldn't need so much testosterone or instinctual aggressiveness.

We DONT need testosterone or aggressiveness

a truly moral society is 100% passive all the time

and yeah, obviously the average male is stronger than the average female, the problem is when you conflating physicality with masculinity as if it was a gender exclusive trait

I'd disagree. There's a very fine line that needs to be walked between passiveness and agressiveness.

Too much agression isn't a good thing. Too much passiveness isn't either. No matter where you go on this planet or anywhere else, there will always be something that requires the usage of aggression for the sake of survival. If we had no aggression then we'd be extinct as a species.

wrong

any aggression is bad and even when necessary, you should feel bad about yourself afterward

I didn't feel a damn ounce of regret for standing up for a friend of mine when he was getting beaten down into the dirt for his sexual preference. And I feel no need to.

I've had my time to hate myself for who I was. But none of it was reserved for acts of aggression as I never acted without warrent when it was neccessary.

you should've felt bad that it had to come to that

No I shouldn't. That's how people create long lasting guilt for themselves. There's no shame in doing what you have to do if you're backed into a corner and out of options you already tried.

toxic mindset but ok

Quote from: Sαndtrap on October 28, 2016, 12:31:58 AM

Quote from: SecondClass on October 28, 2016, 12:24:31 AM

Quote from: Sαndtrap on October 28, 2016, 12:21:01 AM

Quote from: SecondClass on October 28, 2016, 12:16:42 AM

Quote from: Sαndtrap on October 27, 2016, 11:57:05 PM

Quote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 11:47:07 PM

Quote from: Sαndtrap on October 27, 2016, 11:37:41 PM

Nice to see sep7agon can still host a bonfire without the use of matches.

If ya want some context Class, while you're right that women can be as strong as men, you're missing stuff. Strength comes naturally for guys. That's not bravado. It's science. Hormones and chemical make-up. Males have a higher drive due to testosterone and their instinctual aggressiveness. They're more prone to harsher things which neccessitates a stronger physiology.

Any body builder is going to be stronger than the average joe. That accounts for either sex. But if you look at averages? An average guy and an average girl? There's an easy to see gap. And what if you look at body builder women? Well, you'll notice some of them don't look so womanly anymore. They look like guys.

And even then, if we're looking at the extremes? I don't think I've ever heard of a woman body builder who could come closs to the levels of strength that Lois Cyr displayed. If you can find me one, then hey, knowledge is cool.

But you can't argue that guys fit the role of strength. If we didn't, we wouldn't need so much testosterone or instinctual aggressiveness.

We DONT need testosterone or aggressiveness

a truly moral society is 100% passive all the time

and yeah, obviously the average male is stronger than the average female, the problem is when you conflating physicality with masculinity as if it was a gender exclusive trait

I'd disagree. There's a very fine line that needs to be walked between passiveness and agressiveness.

Too much agression isn't a good thing. Too much passiveness isn't either. No matter where you go on this planet or anywhere else, there will always be something that requires the usage of aggression for the sake of survival. If we had no aggression then we'd be extinct as a species.

wrong

any aggression is bad and even when necessary, you should feel bad about yourself afterward

I didn't feel a damn ounce of regret for standing up for a friend of mine when he was getting beaten down into the dirt for his sexual preference. And I feel no need to.

I've had my time to hate myself for who I was. But none of it was reserved for acts of aggression as I never acted without warrent when it was neccessary.

you should've felt bad that it had to come to that

No I shouldn't. That's how people create long lasting guilt for themselves. There's no shame in doing what you have to do if you're backed into a corner and out of options you already tried.

toxic mindset but ok

Apart from drug induced delirium and emotionally rough times in my life have you known me to be outwardly toxic since I've been around here?

Never mind my personal stance, let's ask another question. Why create needless guilt on yourself for things that you couldn't have changed?

any aggression is bad and even when necessary, you should feel bad about yourself afterward

LOL, I have never seen a more sheltered view of the world. You've obviously never been in any situation that necessitates aggression, have you? I don't know what color you painted the idea of aggression in your fucked up mind, but aggression (and furthermore assertiveness) is 100% needed to get by in life and is a thing nobody should be shamed for.

Aggression is a primal force that has been around since near the dawn of life on earth. Where would we be if we stood in fields, passive like sheep all day? The concept that someone should be shamed for such a huge part of the human condition is asinine. Lets shame passiveness while we're at.

Do you even put any thought into the drivel that you post? A human society that is 100% passive doesn't make any sense whatsoever -- do you even know what a human IS outside of daydreams of an idyllic utopia?

Get a fucking grip, you mentally ill, milquetoast piece of trash.
 

This numale mindset is a cancer that must be removed.

Just transition already, you're giving us a bad name.

a truly moral society is 100% passive all the time

Passiveness can be dropped in moments of true necessity

Pick one.

Quote from: Dio on October 28, 2016, 07:34:37 AM

Quote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 11:47:07 PM

a truly moral society is 100% passive all the time

Quote from: SecondClass on October 28, 2016, 01:23:15 AM

Passiveness can be dropped in moments of true necessity

Pick one.

truly moral societies don't exist genius, not in our fucked up world

Not with that attitude they don't.