oh shit son

XBL:
PSN: ModernLocust
Steam:
ID: SecondClass
IP: Logged

30,022 posts
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
β€”Judge Aaron Satie
β€”β€”Carmen


mojo | Legendary Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: Mojo1965
PSN: Blood__Gulch
Steam: Mojo_Nav
ID: Dr Torso
IP: Logged

3,162 posts
sep11agon's next moderator

sep11agon's 12th member
  I am happy to join with you today in what will go down in history as the greatest demonstration for freedom in the history of our nation.



Five score years ago, a great American, in whose symbolic shadow we stand today, signed the Emancipation Proclamation. This momentous decree came as a great beacon light of hope to millions of Negro slaves who had been seared in the flames of withering injustice. It came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of captivity.

But one hundred years later, the Negro still is not free. One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination. One hundred years later, the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity. One hundred years later, the Negro is still languished in the corners of American society and finds himself in exile in his own land. So we have come here today to dramatize an shameful condition.

In a sense we've come to our nation's Capital to cash a check. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir.

This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

It is obvious today that America has defaulted on this promissory note insofar as her citizens of color are concerned. Instead of honoring this sacred obligation, America has given the Negro people a bad check; a check which has come back marked "insufficient funds."

But we refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt. We refuse to believe that there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation. So we have come to cash this check- a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and the security of justice.

We have also come to this hallowed spot to remind America of the fierce urgency of now. This is no time to engage in the luxury of cooling off or to take the tranquilizing drug of gradualism.

Now is the time to make real the promises of democracy. Now is the time to rise from the dark and desolate valley of segregation to the sunlit path of racial justice. Now is the time to lift our nation from the quicksands of racial injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood. Now is the time to make justice a reality for all of God's children.

It would be fatal for the nation to overlook the urgency of the moment. This sweltering summer of the Negro's legitimate discontent will not pass until there is an invigorating autumn of freedom and equality. Nineteen sixty-three is not an end, but a beginning. Those who hope that the Negro needed to blow off steam and will now be content will have a rude awakening if the nation returns to business as usual. There will be neither rest nor tranquility in America until the Negro is granted his citizenship rights. The whirlwinds of revolt will continue to shake the foundations of our nation until the bright day of justice emerges.

But there is something that I must say to my people who stand on the warm threshold which leads into the palace of justice. In the process of gaining our rightful place we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds. Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred. We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force.

The marvelous new militancy which has engulfed the Negro community must not lead us to a distrust of all white people, for many of our white brothers, as evidenced by their presence here today, have come to realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny. And they have come to realize that their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom. We cannot walk alone.

And as we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall march ahead. We cannot turn back. There are those who are asking the devotees of civil rights, "When will you be satisfied?"

We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro is the victim of the unspeakable horrors of police brutality.

We can never be satisfied as long as our bodies, heavy with the fatigue of travel, cannot gain lodging in the motels of the highways and the hotels of the cities.

We cannot be satisfied as long as the Negro's basic mobility is from a smaller ghetto to a larger one.

We can never be satisfied as long as our chlidren are stripped of their selfhood and robbed of their dignity by signs stating "for whites only."

We cannot be satisfied as long as a Negro in Mississippi cannot vote and a Negro in New York believes he has nothing for which to vote.

No, no, we are not satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream.

I am not unmindful that some of you have come here out of great trials and tribulations. Some of you have come fresh from narrow jail cells. Some of you have come from areas where your quest for freedom left you battered by the storms of persecution and staggered by the winds of police brutality. You have been the veterans of creative suffering. Continue to work with the faith that unearned suffering is redemptive.

Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to South Carolina, go back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana, go back to the slums and ghettos of our northern cities, knowing that somehow this situation can and will be changed. Let us not wallow in the valley of despair.

I say to you today, my friends, so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.

I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident; that all men are created equal."

I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood.

I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a state sweltering with the heat of injustice, sweltering with the heat of oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice.

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

I have a dream today.

I have a dream that one day down in Alabama, with its vicious racists, with its governor having his lips dripping with the words of interposition and nullification, that one day right down in Alabama little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers.

I have a dream today.

I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exhalted, every hill and mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plain, and the crooked places will be made straight, and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together.

This is our hope. This is the faith that I will go back to the South with. With this faith we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope. With this faith we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood.

With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day.

This will be the day when all of God's children will be able to sing with new meaning, "My country 'tis of thee, sweet land of liberty, of thee I sing. Land where my fathers died, land of the Pilgrims' pride, from every mountainside, let freedom ring."

And if America is to be a great nation, this must become true. So let freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire. Let freedom ring from the mighty mountains of New York. Let freedom ring from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania.

Let freedom ring from the snow-capped Rockies of Colorado. Let freedom ring from the curvaceous slopes of California. But not only that; let freedom ring from the Stone Mountain of Georgia. Let freedom ring from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee.

Let freedom ring from every hill and molehill of Mississippi. From every mountainside, let freedom ring.

And when this happens, and when we allow freedom ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God's children, black men and white men, Jews and gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, "Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!"


Ingy | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Ingloriouswho98
IP: Logged

14,554 posts
 
Dumb niggers dude


Kitsune 狐 | Mythic Invincible!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: KitsuneXHunter
Steam: KitsuneOverlord
ID: Kitsunekun
IP: Logged

7,655 posts
 


 
DAS B00T x2
| Cultural Appropriator
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: DAS B00T x2
IP: Logged

37,630 posts
This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
The constitution was written by white landowning men for white landowning men. Everyone else can fuck off.


i am karjala takaisin | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: Niedopalek
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Ember
IP: Logged

9,154 posts
Ember used to be cool and funny

Now he's just gay
bazooper


XBL:
PSN: ModernLocust
Steam:
ID: SecondClass
IP: Logged

30,022 posts
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
β€”Judge Aaron Satie
β€”β€”Carmen
The constitution was written by white landowning men for white landowning men. Everyone else can fuck off.
Not really. There's a reason tyranny of the majority was such a feared concept in the founding fathers' mind. They were looking out for all races, and nearly all of them opposed slavery.


 
DAS B00T x2
| Cultural Appropriator
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: DAS B00T x2
IP: Logged

37,630 posts
This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
The constitution was written by white landowning men for white landowning men. Everyone else can fuck off.
Not really. There's a reason tyranny of the majority was such a feared concept in the founding fathers' mind. They were looking out for all races, and nearly all of them opposed slavery.
Right. That's why women couldn't vote and why counting niggers as three fifths of a person was a compromise.


XBL:
PSN: ModernLocust
Steam:
ID: SecondClass
IP: Logged

30,022 posts
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
β€”Judge Aaron Satie
β€”β€”Carmen
The constitution was written by white landowning men for white landowning men. Everyone else can fuck off.
Not really. There's a reason tyranny of the majority was such a feared concept in the founding fathers' mind. They were looking out for all races, and nearly all of them opposed slavery.
Right. That's why women couldn't vote and why counting niggers as three fifths of a person was a compromise.
Right, because the founding fathers weren't the ones with all of the power. Washington, Madison, Jefferson, Hamilton, Burr, etc all opposed slavery and felt that minorities deserved all the rights of whites. But they didn't comprise all of congress, and the vast majority of congressmen were conservative southerns or southern sympathizers.

Now, all of the founding fathers but Burr were male-focused, that's where you're right. But I'm more talking about race.


Ingy | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Ingloriouswho98
IP: Logged

14,554 posts
 
The constitution was written by white landowning men for white landowning men. Everyone else can fuck off.
Not really. There's a reason tyranny of the majority was such a feared concept in the founding fathers' mind. They were looking out for all races, and nearly all of them opposed slavery.

"Fuck niggers" - George Washington


 
DAS B00T x2
| Cultural Appropriator
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: DAS B00T x2
IP: Logged

37,630 posts
This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
The constitution was written by white landowning men for white landowning men. Everyone else can fuck off.
Not really. There's a reason tyranny of the majority was such a feared concept in the founding fathers' mind. They were looking out for all races, and nearly all of them opposed slavery.
Right. That's why women couldn't vote and why counting niggers as three fifths of a person was a compromise.
Right, because the founding fathers weren't the ones with all of the power. Washington, Madison, Jefferson, Hamilton, Burr, etc all opposed slavery and felt that minorities deserved all the rights of whites. But they didn't comprise all of congress, and the vast majority of congressmen were conservative southerns or southern sympathizers.

Now, all of the founding fathers but Burr were male-focused, that's where you're right. But I'm more talking about race.
You can't be anti-slavery and a slave owner.


XBL:
PSN: ModernLocust
Steam:
ID: SecondClass
IP: Logged

30,022 posts
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
β€”Judge Aaron Satie
β€”β€”Carmen
The constitution was written by white landowning men for white landowning men. Everyone else can fuck off.
Not really. There's a reason tyranny of the majority was such a feared concept in the founding fathers' mind. They were looking out for all races, and nearly all of them opposed slavery.

"Fuck niggers" - George Washington
ROFL xD


XBL:
PSN: ModernLocust
Steam:
ID: SecondClass
IP: Logged

30,022 posts
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
β€”Judge Aaron Satie
β€”β€”Carmen
The constitution was written by white landowning men for white landowning men. Everyone else can fuck off.
Not really. There's a reason tyranny of the majority was such a feared concept in the founding fathers' mind. They were looking out for all races, and nearly all of them opposed slavery.
Right. That's why women couldn't vote and why counting niggers as three fifths of a person was a compromise.
Right, because the founding fathers weren't the ones with all of the power. Washington, Madison, Jefferson, Hamilton, Burr, etc all opposed slavery and felt that minorities deserved all the rights of whites. But they didn't comprise all of congress, and the vast majority of congressmen were conservative southerns or southern sympathizers.

Now, all of the founding fathers but Burr were male-focused, that's where you're right. But I'm more talking about race.
You can't be anti-slavery and a slave owner.
Which is why all of the slaveholding founders eventually released their slaves. Hamilton, Madison, and Burr didn't even have them, anyway.


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
❧
The constitution was written by white landowning men for white landowning men. Everyone else can fuck off.
Not really. There's a reason tyranny of the majority was such a feared concept in the founding fathers' mind. They were looking out for all races, and nearly all of them opposed slavery.
Right. That's why women couldn't vote and why counting niggers as three fifths of a person was a compromise.
Right, because the founding fathers weren't the ones with all of the power. Washington, Madison, Jefferson, Hamilton, Burr, etc all opposed slavery and felt that minorities deserved all the rights of whites. But they didn't comprise all of congress, and the vast majority of congressmen were conservative southerns or southern sympathizers.

Now, all of the founding fathers but Burr were male-focused, that's where you're right. But I'm more talking about race.
You can't be anti-slavery and a slave owner.
Why not?


Ingy | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Ingloriouswho98
IP: Logged

14,554 posts
 
The constitution was written by white landowning men for white landowning men. Everyone else can fuck off.
Not really. There's a reason tyranny of the majority was such a feared concept in the founding fathers' mind. They were looking out for all races, and nearly all of them opposed slavery.
Right. That's why women couldn't vote and why counting niggers as three fifths of a person was a compromise.
Right, because the founding fathers weren't the ones with all of the power. Washington, Madison, Jefferson, Hamilton, Burr, etc all opposed slavery and felt that minorities deserved all the rights of whites. But they didn't comprise all of congress, and the vast majority of congressmen were conservative southerns or southern sympathizers.

Now, all of the founding fathers but Burr were male-focused, that's where you're right. But I'm more talking about race.
You can't be anti-slavery and a slave owner.
Why not?

Because actions actually have consequences and meaning in the real world
Last Edit: November 25, 2016, 03:05:25 PM by Infinitely Arctic


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
❧
The constitution was written by white landowning men for white landowning men. Everyone else can fuck off.
Not really. There's a reason tyranny of the majority was such a feared concept in the founding fathers' mind. They were looking out for all races, and nearly all of them opposed slavery.
Right. That's why women couldn't vote and why counting niggers as three fifths of a person was a compromise.
Right, because the founding fathers weren't the ones with all of the power. Washington, Madison, Jefferson, Hamilton, Burr, etc all opposed slavery and felt that minorities deserved all the rights of whites. But they didn't comprise all of congress, and the vast majority of congressmen were conservative southerns or southern sympathizers.

Now, all of the founding fathers but Burr were male-focused, that's where you're right. But I'm more talking about race.
You can't be anti-slavery and a slave owner.
Why not?
Because actions actually have consequences and meaning in the real world
That doesn't mean you can't be anti-slavery and a slave owner.

It's no logically different than a smoker being anti-smoking, or a meat-eater being pro-vegan.
Last Edit: November 25, 2016, 03:08:50 PM by Verbatim


Ingy | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Ingloriouswho98
IP: Logged

14,554 posts
 
The constitution was written by white landowning men for white landowning men. Everyone else can fuck off.
Not really. There's a reason tyranny of the majority was such a feared concept in the founding fathers' mind. They were looking out for all races, and nearly all of them opposed slavery.
Right. That's why women couldn't vote and why counting niggers as three fifths of a person was a compromise.
Right, because the founding fathers weren't the ones with all of the power. Washington, Madison, Jefferson, Hamilton, Burr, etc all opposed slavery and felt that minorities deserved all the rights of whites. But they didn't comprise all of congress, and the vast majority of congressmen were conservative southerns or southern sympathizers.

Now, all of the founding fathers but Burr were male-focused, that's where you're right. But I'm more talking about race.
You can't be anti-slavery and a slave owner.
Why not?
Because actions actually have consequences and meaning in the real world
That doesn't mean you can't be anti-slavery and a slave owner.

What reason would you have for telling everyone else to give up their slaves while you keep men chained up for yourself 


Ingy | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Ingloriouswho98
IP: Logged

14,554 posts
 
It's no logically different than a smoker being anti-smoking, or a meat-eater being pro-vegan.

Except this is shitty and hypocritical too

The smoker may have a physical addiction but all your other examples literally come down to "because I want to"


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
❧
The constitution was written by white landowning men for white landowning men. Everyone else can fuck off.
Not really. There's a reason tyranny of the majority was such a feared concept in the founding fathers' mind. They were looking out for all races, and nearly all of them opposed slavery.
Right. That's why women couldn't vote and why counting niggers as three fifths of a person was a compromise.
Right, because the founding fathers weren't the ones with all of the power. Washington, Madison, Jefferson, Hamilton, Burr, etc all opposed slavery and felt that minorities deserved all the rights of whites. But they didn't comprise all of congress, and the vast majority of congressmen were conservative southerns or southern sympathizers.

Now, all of the founding fathers but Burr were male-focused, that's where you're right. But I'm more talking about race.
You can't be anti-slavery and a slave owner.
Why not?
Because actions actually have consequences and meaning in the real world
That doesn't mean you can't be anti-slavery and a slave owner.
What reason would you have for telling everyone else to give up their slaves while you keep men chained up for yourself
Maybe you're just a selfish cunt who realizes that you're doing is wrong, but you don't do anything because you're a selfish cunt.


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
❧
Except this is shitty and hypocritical too
No one said it's not hypocritical. Just that there's nothing logically fallacious about being a hypocrite.

Thinking so is a fallacy in itself.


Ingy | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Ingloriouswho98
IP: Logged

14,554 posts
 
Except this is shitty and hypocritical too
No one said it's not hypocritical. Just that there's nothing logically fallacious about being a hypocrite.

Thinking so is a fallacy in itself.

Maybe you're just a selfish cunt who realizes that you're doing is wrong, but you don't do anything because you're a selfish cunt.

So what is your argument right now


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
❧
So what is your argument right now
That it is possible to be anti-slavery while still being a slave owner.

You can still be a selfish cunt and malign yourself for it.
Last Edit: November 25, 2016, 03:18:52 PM by Verbatim


Ingy | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Ingloriouswho98
IP: Logged

14,554 posts
 
So what is your argument right now
That it is possible to be anti-slavery while still being a slave owner.

Compelling


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
❧
So what is your argument right now
That it is possible to be anti-slavery while still being a slave owner.
Compelling
Extremely, if you're capable of thinking logically.


Azendac | Respected Posting Riot
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Azendac
IP: Logged

605 posts
We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried, most people were silent. I remembered the line from the shitlord scripture the Bhagavad Reeeeeeeta; Kek is trying to persuade the prince that he should save his people, and to impress him takes on his frog-headed form, and says, "Now I am become meme, the destroyer of cucks." I suppose we all thought that, one way or another.
The constitution was written by white landowning men for white landowning men. Everyone else can fuck off.
Yeah, fuck off white women, no girls allowed.


Azendac | Respected Posting Riot
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Azendac
IP: Logged

605 posts
We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried, most people were silent. I remembered the line from the shitlord scripture the Bhagavad Reeeeeeeta; Kek is trying to persuade the prince that he should save his people, and to impress him takes on his frog-headed form, and says, "Now I am become meme, the destroyer of cucks." I suppose we all thought that, one way or another.
So what is your argument right now
That it is possible to be anti-slavery while still being a slave owner.

Compelling
Actually it would be like being an insurgent or political dissident in hiding, you only own slaves to keep in line with social norms, while taking actions to abolish it in secrecy.


Ingy | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Ingloriouswho98
IP: Logged

14,554 posts
 
Actually it would be like being an insurgent or political dissident in hiding, you only own slaves to keep in line with social norms, while taking actions to abolish it in secrecy.

You're telling me the Founding Fathers kept slaves because they had the insecurity levels of a 14 year old?


XBL:
PSN: ModernLocust
Steam:
ID: SecondClass
IP: Logged

30,022 posts
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
β€”Judge Aaron Satie
β€”β€”Carmen
Actually it would be like being an insurgent or political dissident in hiding, you only own slaves to keep in line with social norms, while taking actions to abolish it in secrecy.

You're telling me the Founding Fathers kept slaves because they had the insecurity levels of a 14 year old?
Washington and Jefferson had slaves because they both owned farmland. It was an innocuous, expected thing to do at the time. As they progressed as thinkers and philosophers, they realized the institution was wrong, fought against it, and eventually freed their slaves.

Not to mention the majority of founding fathers didn't even own slaves in the first place.

This shouldn't be hard.


Ingy | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Ingloriouswho98
IP: Logged

14,554 posts
 
Actually it would be like being an insurgent or political dissident in hiding, you only own slaves to keep in line with social norms, while taking actions to abolish it in secrecy.

You're telling me the Founding Fathers kept slaves because they had the insecurity levels of a 14 year old?
Washington and Jefferson had slaves because they both owned farmland. It was an innocuous, expected thing to do at the time. As they progressed as thinkers and philosophers, they realized the institution was wrong, fought against it, and eventually freed their slaves.

Not to mention the majority of founding fathers didn't even own slaves in the first place.

This shouldn't be hard.

I'm not doubting the Founding Fathers were good men
I'm just questioning Verbatim's bullshit which turned out to be a misguiding nonpoint as usual


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
❧
Actually it would be like being an insurgent or political dissident in hiding, you only own slaves to keep in line with social norms, while taking actions to abolish it in secrecy.
You're telling me the Founding Fathers kept slaves because they had the insecurity levels of a 14 year old?
No, he's giving you a hypothetical scenario illustrating how you could have a slave owner who wants to abolish slavery. This would require a small degree of critical thinking to come up with and understand, so it's okay that you don't. Because you're a little boy who is incapable of critical thinking.
Last Edit: November 25, 2016, 03:34:16 PM by Verbatim