Kinda??That looks dull as hell
Quote from: Imouto on April 15, 2015, 12:07:07 PMKinda??That looks dull as hell Yeah they said they were going off the Joker from The Dark Knight ReturnsSpoilerSo no facial scarring or creepy appearance... Just.... a guy with makeup.
Quote from: Shub-Niggurath on April 15, 2015, 12:11:46 PMQuote from: Imouto on April 15, 2015, 12:07:07 PMKinda??That looks dull as hell Yeah they said they were going off the Joker from The Dark Knight ReturnsSpoilerSo no facial scarring or creepy appearance... Just.... a guy with makeup.Yeah i heard something like that. 'Less serious'
remember when heath ledger's joker was supposed to be a hunk of crap, too?yeah, ill wait until i see the movie to pass judgement.
Heath Ledger's Joker is the best Joker. They should have gone for something similar.
Quote from: Lemön | Queen of Anal on April 15, 2015, 12:26:10 PMHeath Ledger's Joker is the best Joker. They should have gone for something similar.he was the best one but I still feel like it wasn't joker.
Quote from: Raw Sugar on April 15, 2015, 01:39:43 PMQuote from: Lemön | Queen of Anal on April 15, 2015, 12:26:10 PMHeath Ledger's Joker is the best Joker. They should have gone for something similar.he was the best one but I still feel like it wasn't joker.How?
Quote from: Lemön | Queen of Anal on April 15, 2015, 01:40:26 PMQuote from: Raw Sugar on April 15, 2015, 01:39:43 PMQuote from: Lemön | Queen of Anal on April 15, 2015, 12:26:10 PMHeath Ledger's Joker is the best Joker. They should have gone for something similar.he was the best one but I still feel like it wasn't joker.How?because the joker in the comics and cartoons is actually really silly, sinister, random and very very psychotic. I don't feel like Heath ledgers joker was really funny enough. He just seemed like another psycho who liked doing what he was doing. And that's like literally every psycho villain ever. He just didn't feel like that crazy wacky maniac ive read about. What do you think?
Quote from: Raw Sugar on April 15, 2015, 01:45:49 PMQuote from: Lemön | Queen of Anal on April 15, 2015, 01:40:26 PMQuote from: Raw Sugar on April 15, 2015, 01:39:43 PMQuote from: Lemön | Queen of Anal on April 15, 2015, 12:26:10 PMHeath Ledger's Joker is the best Joker. They should have gone for something similar.he was the best one but I still feel like it wasn't joker.How?because the joker in the comics and cartoons is actually really silly, sinister, random and very very psychotic. I don't feel like Heath ledgers joker was really funny enough. He just seemed like another psycho who liked doing what he was doing. And that's like literally every psycho villain ever. He just didn't feel like that crazy wacky maniac ive read about. What do you think?Because TDK trilogy is meant to be mature, gritty and down to earth. The laughing maniac Joker wouldn't have worked as well as the psychopathic Joker we got.
Quote from: Raw Sugar on April 15, 2015, 01:45:49 PMQuote from: Lemön | Queen of Anal on April 15, 2015, 01:40:26 PMQuote from: Raw Sugar on April 15, 2015, 01:39:43 PMQuote from: Lemön | Queen of Anal on April 15, 2015, 12:26:10 PMHeath Ledger's Joker is the best Joker. They should have gone for something similar.he was the best one but I still feel like it wasn't joker.How?because the joker in the comics and cartoons is actually really silly, sinister, random and very very psychotic. I don't feel like Heath ledgers joker was really funny enough. He just seemed like another psycho who liked doing what he was doing. And that's like literally every psycho villain ever. He just didn't feel like that crazy wacky maniac ive read about. What do you think?Yeah, and Batman isn't supposed to have a tank called the 'Tumbler' either. Does that render his status as Batman inert too?Point is, movies deviate from the source material all the time. "NOT MUH JOKER" isn't a valid criticism.