Lel. They ended up spoiling the movie big time by revealing too much. At first we think it's going to be BM VS SM and then it turns out it's a team up against Doom and all of a sudden Wonder Women comes out of nowhere. The trailer should have ended when Doom fired that beam at Batman. Also why is this even called Batman VS Superman when their fight isn't the the plot for the movie? They go from fighting each other to teaming up to take out somebody else.
Jesse Eisenberg's dialogue is really my only problem right now. "BOYssss!" "I love it! I love bringing people together.""Wow! That is a firm grip, you do not want to pick a fight with this person!""The greatest gladiator match in the history of the world!""...vs. Bat of Gotham!"No one talks like that. No one. Everything else is either good or passable, IMO. THe imagery is perfect. All 3 of the Holy Trinity look AMAZING. They all embody their character more than any of Marvel's (except maybe Bucky, but w/e.)I'm kind of indifferent about Doomsday... I mean, I would've preferred him NOT be in this movie, but if it's done right, I don't really care. Doomsday is a crap villain anyways.
the one true God is Doctor Doom and we should all be worshiping him.
I liked eisenberg
That...looks astonishingly stupid.I can appreciate new takes on old characters but Eisenberg sounds like Lex Luthor by way of the fucking Toyman. He sounds like he downed a gallon of Red Bull before coming to work.Also I'd prefer if they removed Wonder Tits and Doomzarro to focus on the conflict the movie is named after, but that's not going to happen.
Quote from: J'onn J'onzz on December 03, 2015, 11:59:04 AMThat...looks astonishingly stupid.I can appreciate new takes on old characters but Eisenberg sounds like Lex Luthor by way of the fucking Toyman. He sounds like he downed a gallon of Red Bull before coming to work.Also I'd prefer if they removed Wonder Tits and Doomzarro to focus on the conflict the movie is named after, but that's not going to happen.this movie was never going to be about supes and bats trading blows for 2 1/2 hours. it's called dawn of justice because its the birth of the justice league. making a birth of JL movie without wonder woman would be fucking retarded.
Quote from: Azumarill on December 03, 2015, 12:04:45 PMQuote from: J'onn J'onzz on December 03, 2015, 11:59:04 AMThat...looks astonishingly stupid.I can appreciate new takes on old characters but Eisenberg sounds like Lex Luthor by way of the fucking Toyman. He sounds like he downed a gallon of Red Bull before coming to work.Also I'd prefer if they removed Wonder Tits and Doomzarro to focus on the conflict the movie is named after, but that's not going to happen.this movie was never going to be about supes and bats trading blows for 2 1/2 hours. it's called dawn of justice because its the birth of the justice league. making a birth of JL movie without wonder woman would be fucking retarded.It's called Batman versus Superman before anything else. That's the main drawing point. That's what everyone is going to see it for. Wonder Woman and Ninjaturtlesday should not be part of that equation. Maybe they could appear in the stinger or something to set them up for the next movie.
its batman v. superman, not batman vs superman. theres an important, distinct difference between the two. v. is used in a court of law- in this context, it means that their conflict is more ideological. batman doesnt know if humanity can hold god (supes) accountable and he doesnt necessarily trust that god is doing/will do the right thing.
its batman v. superman, not batman vs superman. theres an important, distinct difference between the two. v. is used in a court of law- in this context, it means that their conflict is more ideological.
Kind of feels like the Bats vs. Supes stuff is going to be done in the first act and it'll just be baby Justice League vs. Doomsday for the rest of the movie.And Jessie Eisenberg...fuck, man. Quote from: Azumarill on December 03, 2015, 12:17:41 PMits batman v. superman, not batman vs superman. theres an important, distinct difference between the two. v. is used in a court of law- in this context, it means that their conflict is more ideological. Nah, there's no difference. It used to be 'vs.' until the 90s and the terminology was changed to 'v.' (for instance, Roe v. Wade was originally Roe vs. Wade). In all cases, 'vs.' means exactly the same thing as 'v.'
Spoiled the whole fucking plot, Jesus.
Quote from: J'onn J'onzz on December 03, 2015, 12:16:37 PMQuote from: Azumarill on December 03, 2015, 12:04:45 PMQuote from: J'onn J'onzz on December 03, 2015, 11:59:04 AMThat...looks astonishingly stupid.I can appreciate new takes on old characters but Eisenberg sounds like Lex Luthor by way of the fucking Toyman. He sounds like he downed a gallon of Red Bull before coming to work.Also I'd prefer if they removed Wonder Tits and Doomzarro to focus on the conflict the movie is named after, but that's not going to happen.this movie was never going to be about supes and bats trading blows for 2 1/2 hours. it's called dawn of justice because its the birth of the justice league. making a birth of JL movie without wonder woman would be fucking retarded.It's called Batman versus Superman before anything else. That's the main drawing point. That's what everyone is going to see it for. Wonder Woman and Ninjaturtlesday should not be part of that equation. Maybe they could appear in the stinger or something to set them up for the next movie.Quote from: Azumarill on December 03, 2015, 11:56:16 AMits batman v. superman, not batman vs superman. theres an important, distinct difference between the two. v. is used in a court of law- in this context, it means that their conflict is more ideological. batman doesnt know if humanity can hold god (supes) accountable and he doesnt necessarily trust that god is doing/will do the right thing.
Quote from: #TurkeyLivesMatter on December 03, 2015, 12:18:16 PMKind of feels like the Bats vs. Supes stuff is going to be done in the first act and it'll just be baby Justice League vs. Doomsday for the rest of the movie.And Jessie Eisenberg...fuck, man. Quote from: Azumarill on December 03, 2015, 12:17:41 PMits batman v. superman, not batman vs superman. theres an important, distinct difference between the two. v. is used in a court of law- in this context, it means that their conflict is more ideological. Nah, there's no difference. It used to be 'vs.' until the 90s and the terminology was changed to 'v.' (for instance, Roe v. Wade was originally Roe vs. Wade). In all cases, 'vs.' means exactly the same thing as 'v.'but ever since that change, v is pretty much only used in court of law, and it isnt even pronounced as "versus." i think the choice to use v instead of vs is deliberate and has a direct connection with the more significant accountability conflict going on.
Quote from: Azumarill on December 03, 2015, 12:26:59 PMQuote from: #TurkeyLivesMatter on December 03, 2015, 12:18:16 PMKind of feels like the Bats vs. Supes stuff is going to be done in the first act and it'll just be baby Justice League vs. Doomsday for the rest of the movie.And Jessie Eisenberg...fuck, man. Quote from: Azumarill on December 03, 2015, 12:17:41 PMits batman v. superman, not batman vs superman. theres an important, distinct difference between the two. v. is used in a court of law- in this context, it means that their conflict is more ideological. Nah, there's no difference. It used to be 'vs.' until the 90s and the terminology was changed to 'v.' (for instance, Roe v. Wade was originally Roe vs. Wade). In all cases, 'vs.' means exactly the same thing as 'v.'but ever since that change, v is pretty much only used in court of law, and it isnt even pronounced as "versus." i think the choice to use v instead of vs is deliberate and has a direct connection with the more significant accountability conflict going on.I think you're reading too much into it. 'v.' is properly pronounced as 'versus', but 'vee' is a shorthand.
Quote from: Winy on December 03, 2015, 12:28:11 PMSpoiled the whole fucking plot, Jesus.we already knew literally everything in this trailer except for the parademons.
Quote from: Azumarill on December 03, 2015, 12:29:40 PMQuote from: Winy on December 03, 2015, 12:28:11 PMSpoiled the whole fucking plot, Jesus.we already knew literally everything in this trailer except for the parademons.I didn't.
Quote from: Winy on December 03, 2015, 12:41:10 PMQuote from: Azumarill on December 03, 2015, 12:29:40 PMQuote from: Winy on December 03, 2015, 12:28:11 PMSpoiled the whole fucking plot, Jesus.we already knew literally everything in this trailer except for the parademons.I didn't.all the information to figure this stuff out was freely available to the public. if you didnt care enough to have learned these things already, why whine about it when they make it a little more overt in a trailer?
Quote from: Azumarill on December 03, 2015, 12:44:07 PMQuote from: Winy on December 03, 2015, 12:41:10 PMQuote from: Azumarill on December 03, 2015, 12:29:40 PMQuote from: Winy on December 03, 2015, 12:28:11 PMSpoiled the whole fucking plot, Jesus.we already knew literally everything in this trailer except for the parademons.I didn't.all the information to figure this stuff out was freely available to the public. if you didnt care enough to have learned these things already, why whine about it when they make it a little more overt in a trailer?Because I believe that ruining the plot of a film is a bad idea and makes it less enjoyable. Don't really care if they did it before this, they shouldn't have done it at all.
Quote from: Winy on December 03, 2015, 12:45:46 PMQuote from: Azumarill on December 03, 2015, 12:44:07 PMQuote from: Winy on December 03, 2015, 12:41:10 PMQuote from: Azumarill on December 03, 2015, 12:29:40 PMQuote from: Winy on December 03, 2015, 12:28:11 PMSpoiled the whole fucking plot, Jesus.we already knew literally everything in this trailer except for the parademons.I didn't.all the information to figure this stuff out was freely available to the public. if you didnt care enough to have learned these things already, why whine about it when they make it a little more overt in a trailer?Because I believe that ruining the plot of a film is a bad idea and makes it less enjoyable. Don't really care if they did it before this, they shouldn't have done it at all.spoiling plot elements in trailers has been the industry standard for a very long time. if you really cared enough to not get spoiled you should have just gone dark and not watched all the trailers after the initial teaser.
New Batman vs Superman trailer just came out
