Change the price of your new hotdog to $0.99 and people will think something is wrong with it. Keep the price where it's at, and then say that most people enjoy the hotdog, and more people are prone to buy it.

If you're dealing with peoples' things, same thing applies. They are convinced because they trust you, but if you offer them money, they will think something is wrong and back out of the deal.

We need to hurry up and evolve past the need for any currency based system. I for one, welcome our machine overlords

That's because they'd do the favor without money, and if you offer them money they think something's wrong.

Yes, we do things for money. Just not everything. Where trust is involved, money muddles things. Where there are price drops in food, less quality is expected.

He gets it

That's because they'd do the favor without money, and if you offer them money they think something's wrong.

Yes, we do things for money. Just not everything. Where trust is involved, money muddles things. Where there are price drops in food, less quality is expected.

Fun-pseudo-science fact(psy):
People are willing to say no to 50 bucks if someone else is the one who splits the money, and gives them less than 50%. By saying no nobody gets anything, but they do it because the other person doesn't deserve it.

In who wants to be a millionaire, a guy asked the crowd what revolves around the Earth, and 56% answered the sun. Then when he got it wrong the audience laughed. They didn't think such a stupid guy deserved the money.

a semicolon should break up two independent clauses; they often combine two related clauses better than a period.

you. i like you.