nah
You're wrong.
Holy shit, yes, that reminds me.Okay, so, way back when Star Trek was a thing, it was always noted that a bunch of pedophiles and creepy people that got caught by police were big time Trekkies. And then it hit me.What if this generations version of a Trekkie is a Brony?
If you give me my doggy back, no harm will come to you or your thread.
Hmmmm yes and no.They have somewhat different styles of being badass.Clint Eastwood is like the I'll fuck your ass up because I can kind of badass. Sort of "Chaotic Neutral".Liam Neeson is like the I'll fuck your ass up because I'm a good guy kind of badass. He's more of a "Lawful Good" type of guy.
Nah.
That is like the only time he played a bad guy and IMO Ghul wasn't like a super bad guy
Freyja's tits... if you're telling me that I have to deal with bronies being around for thirty more years then I may just have to go on an ethnic cleansing.
Nahhh
Bronies
No.
No.He's a good actor but none of his films besides maybe Schindler's List have the kind of staying power that the Man With No Name trilogy and Dirty Harry do. He won't be remembered for playing big iconic roles like Eastwood is.I'm not knocking him, I love Neeson, but he's not Clint Eastwood
Ohhhh, I like witty foruming.