lol it was kinda obvious tbh
Don't see the point in killing characters if they don't have the integrity to make them stay dead.It's no better than the ending to Twilight.
Don't see the point in killing characters if they don't have the integrity to make them stay dead.
Quote from: Orion on September 15, 2015, 01:26:46 PMDon't see the point in killing characters if they don't have the integrity to make them stay dead.It's no better than the ending to Twilight.Except it serves a purpose in the plot. If Jon is the true warrior of the light, then his death is good. As a member of the Night's Watch, he vowed to father no children, swear no allegiance and never abandon his watch from now until his death. He has died, and, if R+L=J is true, that once again makes him eligible for control of the the Iron Throne, and thus overall the saviour of the realm.GRRM plans things out, he doesn't kill off characters without reason.
It's a pretty widely accepted theory Jon is coming back by warging into Ghost.
Quote from: BaconShelf on September 15, 2015, 02:14:14 PMQuote from: Orion on September 15, 2015, 01:26:46 PMDon't see the point in killing characters if they don't have the integrity to make them stay dead.It's no better than the ending to Twilight.Except it serves a purpose in the plot. If Jon is the true warrior of the light, then his death is good. As a member of the Night's Watch, he vowed to father no children, swear no allegiance and never abandon his watch from now until his death. He has died, and, if R+L=J is true, that once again makes him eligible for control of the the Iron Throne, and thus overall the saviour of the realm.GRRM plans things out, he doesn't kill off characters without reason.Kinda contradicts Martin's themes of realism to have everything wrapped up in a nice little bow like a fairytale though.Not saying that the resurrection of Jon is implausible, but the theory of him swooping in and saving the day just comes off as too sickly sweet to be believable. Remember how we all thought Ned was going to be the protagonist of the series, then subsequently Robb? Yeah.
THIS DOESNT MATTERLITERALLY ONLY ONE THING MATTERSTHAT ONE THING ISCLEGANEBOWL 2016 IS HAPPPENINGH A P P E N I N GAPPENING
Quote from: underground teen memes on September 15, 2015, 03:45:21 PMQuote from: BaconShelf on September 15, 2015, 02:14:14 PMQuote from: Orion on September 15, 2015, 01:26:46 PMDon't see the point in killing characters if they don't have the integrity to make them stay dead.It's no better than the ending to Twilight.Except it serves a purpose in the plot. If Jon is the true warrior of the light, then his death is good. As a member of the Night's Watch, he vowed to father no children, swear no allegiance and never abandon his watch from now until his death. He has died, and, if R+L=J is true, that once again makes him eligible for control of the the Iron Throne, and thus overall the saviour of the realm.GRRM plans things out, he doesn't kill off characters without reason.Kinda contradicts Martin's themes of realism to have everything wrapped up in a nice little bow like a fairytale though.Not saying that the resurrection of Jon is implausible, but the theory of him swooping in and saving the day just comes off as too sickly sweet to be believable. Remember how we all thought Ned was going to be the protagonist of the series, then subsequently Robb? Yeah.The thing is, he still has a story to tell. It's also a fantasy series, it just has some more edge and darkness to it. I'd probably think of it as the "Watchmen" of fantasy books, describing the realism and horrors of war, the politics, etc.