Okay great.Now anybody who has said that they wouldn't is a hypocrite unless they're a vegan.They're literally the same thing.Kill an animal nobody will miss your kid is fed.Kill a person nobody will miss your kid is fed.All of the value in a person's life resides in the impact they have on others.If a person has no impact on others, they're the same as a cow.Glad to say I'm not a hypocrite.
Quote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on July 05, 2015, 03:24:52 PMOkay great.Now anybody who has said that they wouldn't is a hypocrite unless they're a vegan.They're literally the same thing.Kill an animal nobody will miss your kid is fed.Kill a person nobody will miss your kid is fed.All of the value in a person's life resides in the impact they have on others.If a person has no impact on others, they're the same as a cow.Glad to say I'm not a hypocrite.Wait wat
Quote from: Winy on July 05, 2015, 03:23:51 PMQuote from: eggsalad on July 05, 2015, 03:20:37 PMQuote from: Winy on July 05, 2015, 03:13:15 PMQuote from: eggsalad on July 05, 2015, 02:42:11 PMCannot say that I wouldn't, as evil as it is, it would be an interesting experience that would be difficult to pass.What the fuck is wrong with you?I'm naturally curious for unique experiences, and in this situation the consequences that normally bar the act are removed.The consequences that normally bar the act of killing somebody should be the acknowledgment that you are taking a person's life away without their consent. Even ignoring the damage that would be done to relatives and friends, that person is still having their will imposed on in the worst possible way because of "curiosity." Even if it was a painless death, there's no ethically sensible reason to just deprive that person of their own existence.If no person is there to respond to losing those things then what significance do they have?
Quote from: eggsalad on July 05, 2015, 03:20:37 PMQuote from: Winy on July 05, 2015, 03:13:15 PMQuote from: eggsalad on July 05, 2015, 02:42:11 PMCannot say that I wouldn't, as evil as it is, it would be an interesting experience that would be difficult to pass.What the fuck is wrong with you?I'm naturally curious for unique experiences, and in this situation the consequences that normally bar the act are removed.The consequences that normally bar the act of killing somebody should be the acknowledgment that you are taking a person's life away without their consent. Even ignoring the damage that would be done to relatives and friends, that person is still having their will imposed on in the worst possible way because of "curiosity." Even if it was a painless death, there's no ethically sensible reason to just deprive that person of their own existence.
Quote from: Winy on July 05, 2015, 03:13:15 PMQuote from: eggsalad on July 05, 2015, 02:42:11 PMCannot say that I wouldn't, as evil as it is, it would be an interesting experience that would be difficult to pass.What the fuck is wrong with you?I'm naturally curious for unique experiences, and in this situation the consequences that normally bar the act are removed.
Quote from: eggsalad on July 05, 2015, 02:42:11 PMCannot say that I wouldn't, as evil as it is, it would be an interesting experience that would be difficult to pass.What the fuck is wrong with you?
Cannot say that I wouldn't, as evil as it is, it would be an interesting experience that would be difficult to pass.
Quote from: TBlocks on July 05, 2015, 03:26:16 PMQuote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on July 05, 2015, 03:24:52 PMOkay great.Now anybody who has said that they wouldn't is a hypocrite unless they're a vegan.They're literally the same thing.Kill an animal nobody will miss your kid is fed.Kill a person nobody will miss your kid is fed.All of the value in a person's life resides in the impact they have on others.If a person has no impact on others, they're the same as a cow.Glad to say I'm not a hypocrite.Wait watSol is being Sol. An idiot.
Quote from: eggsalad on July 05, 2015, 03:24:50 PMQuote from: Winy on July 05, 2015, 03:23:51 PMQuote from: eggsalad on July 05, 2015, 03:20:37 PMQuote from: Winy on July 05, 2015, 03:13:15 PMQuote from: eggsalad on July 05, 2015, 02:42:11 PMCannot say that I wouldn't, as evil as it is, it would be an interesting experience that would be difficult to pass.What the fuck is wrong with you?I'm naturally curious for unique experiences, and in this situation the consequences that normally bar the act are removed.The consequences that normally bar the act of killing somebody should be the acknowledgment that you are taking a person's life away without their consent. Even ignoring the damage that would be done to relatives and friends, that person is still having their will imposed on in the worst possible way because of "curiosity." Even if it was a painless death, there's no ethically sensible reason to just deprive that person of their own existence.If no person is there to respond to losing those things then what significance do they have?That person has their won desire to live. That's a barrier enough on its own.
Quote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on July 05, 2015, 03:24:52 PMOkay great.Now anybody who has said that they wouldn't is a hypocrite unless they're a vegan.They're literally the same thing.Kill an animal nobody will miss your kid is fed.Kill a person nobody will miss your kid is fed.All of the value in a person's life resides in the impact they have on others.If a person has no impact on others, they're the same as a cow.Glad to say I'm not a hypocrite.Humans are a lot more complex than cows and have a much greater potential in life and range of emotions.
All of the value in a person's life resides in the impact they have on others.
Quote from: Winy on July 05, 2015, 03:28:47 PMQuote from: eggsalad on July 05, 2015, 03:24:50 PMQuote from: Winy on July 05, 2015, 03:23:51 PMQuote from: eggsalad on July 05, 2015, 03:20:37 PMQuote from: Winy on July 05, 2015, 03:13:15 PMQuote from: eggsalad on July 05, 2015, 02:42:11 PMCannot say that I wouldn't, as evil as it is, it would be an interesting experience that would be difficult to pass.What the fuck is wrong with you?I'm naturally curious for unique experiences, and in this situation the consequences that normally bar the act are removed.The consequences that normally bar the act of killing somebody should be the acknowledgment that you are taking a person's life away without their consent. Even ignoring the damage that would be done to relatives and friends, that person is still having their will imposed on in the worst possible way because of "curiosity." Even if it was a painless death, there's no ethically sensible reason to just deprive that person of their own existence.If no person is there to respond to losing those things then what significance do they have?That person has their won desire to live. That's a barrier enough on its own.Which is mostly why I'd prefer they die faster than they can realize that desire is being breached.With that, I wouldn't feel much remose, I'd think.
Okay now that everyone has voiced their opinions, what if I told you it was your kid who would go hungry if this man whose life had no value was not ended?
Quote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on July 05, 2015, 03:24:52 PMAll of the value in a person's life resides in the impact they have on others.Enjoy being wrong.
Quote from: eggsalad on July 05, 2015, 03:31:34 PMQuote from: Winy on July 05, 2015, 03:28:47 PMQuote from: eggsalad on July 05, 2015, 03:24:50 PMQuote from: Winy on July 05, 2015, 03:23:51 PMQuote from: eggsalad on July 05, 2015, 03:20:37 PMQuote from: Winy on July 05, 2015, 03:13:15 PMQuote from: eggsalad on July 05, 2015, 02:42:11 PMCannot say that I wouldn't, as evil as it is, it would be an interesting experience that would be difficult to pass.What the fuck is wrong with you?I'm naturally curious for unique experiences, and in this situation the consequences that normally bar the act are removed.The consequences that normally bar the act of killing somebody should be the acknowledgment that you are taking a person's life away without their consent. Even ignoring the damage that would be done to relatives and friends, that person is still having their will imposed on in the worst possible way because of "curiosity." Even if it was a painless death, there's no ethically sensible reason to just deprive that person of their own existence.If no person is there to respond to losing those things then what significance do they have?That person has their won desire to live. That's a barrier enough on its own.Which is mostly why I'd prefer they die faster than they can realize that desire is being breached.With that, I wouldn't feel much remose, I'd think.I can understand that, but don't sympathize at all with the curiosity to just end someone's life. It would be equally pointless to do it.
All of the value in a person's life resides in the impact they have on others
Quote from: eggsalad on July 05, 2015, 03:24:50 PMQuote from: Winy on July 05, 2015, 03:23:51 PMQuote from: eggsalad on July 05, 2015, 03:20:37 PMQuote from: Winy on July 05, 2015, 03:13:15 PMQuote from: eggsalad on July 05, 2015, 02:42:11 PMCannot say that I wouldn't, as evil as it is, it would be an interesting experience that would be difficult to pass.What the fuck is wrong with you?I'm naturally curious for unique experiences, and in this situation the consequences that normally bar the act are removed.The consequences that normally bar the act of killing somebody should be the acknowledgment that you are taking a person's life away without their consent. Even ignoring the damage that would be done to relatives and friends, that person is still having their will imposed on in the worst possible way because of "curiosity." Even if it was a painless death, there's no ethically sensible reason to just deprive that person of their own existence.If no person is there to respond to losing those things then what significance do they have?love this tree falling in a forest meme
Quote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on July 05, 2015, 03:32:27 PMAll of the value in a person's life resides in the impact they have on otherslolno
Quote from: SecondClass on July 05, 2015, 03:42:36 PMQuote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on July 05, 2015, 03:32:27 PMAll of the value in a person's life resides in the impact they have on otherslolnoOkay, what other value does a person have and why does it matter if whatever you esteem to be value has been lost?
Quote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on July 05, 2015, 03:44:07 PMQuote from: SecondClass on July 05, 2015, 03:42:36 PMQuote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on July 05, 2015, 03:32:27 PMAll of the value in a person's life resides in the impact they have on otherslolnoOkay, what other value does a person have and why does it matter if whatever you esteem to be value has been lost?Self-value is all that matters. There is no numeric scale, there's a switch. If a person wants to live, his life has value. If he doesn't, his life doesn't have value. Simple as that. Other people's opinion on the person has literally no relevance at all.
Quote from: SecondClass on July 05, 2015, 03:46:00 PMQuote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on July 05, 2015, 03:44:07 PMQuote from: SecondClass on July 05, 2015, 03:42:36 PMQuote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on July 05, 2015, 03:32:27 PMAll of the value in a person's life resides in the impact they have on otherslolnoOkay, what other value does a person have and why does it matter if whatever you esteem to be value has been lost?Self-value is all that matters. There is no numeric scale, there's a switch. If a person wants to live, his life has value. If he doesn't, his life doesn't have value. Simple as that. Other people's opinion on the person has literally no relevance at all.Hypothetical situation here :If a mentally disabled man has a chronic illness that causes him to be in immense pain for the entirety of his conscious life, but due to the nature of his psyche, insists that he wants to live instead, is it better to let him remain in torment or to end his life against his will?
Quote from: eggsalad on July 05, 2015, 03:48:08 PMQuote from: SecondClass on July 05, 2015, 03:46:00 PMQuote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on July 05, 2015, 03:44:07 PMQuote from: SecondClass on July 05, 2015, 03:42:36 PMQuote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on July 05, 2015, 03:32:27 PMAll of the value in a person's life resides in the impact they have on otherslolnoOkay, what other value does a person have and why does it matter if whatever you esteem to be value has been lost?Self-value is all that matters. There is no numeric scale, there's a switch. If a person wants to live, his life has value. If he doesn't, his life doesn't have value. Simple as that. Other people's opinion on the person has literally no relevance at all.Hypothetical situation here :If a mentally disabled man has a chronic illness that causes him to be in immense pain for the entirety of his conscious life, but due to the nature of his psyche, insists that he wants to live instead, is it better to let him remain in torment or to end his life against his will?Definitely, definitely, definitely let him live. Choice and consent is all.
Quote from: SecondClass on July 05, 2015, 03:49:14 PMQuote from: eggsalad on July 05, 2015, 03:48:08 PMQuote from: SecondClass on July 05, 2015, 03:46:00 PMQuote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on July 05, 2015, 03:44:07 PMQuote from: SecondClass on July 05, 2015, 03:42:36 PMQuote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on July 05, 2015, 03:32:27 PMAll of the value in a person's life resides in the impact they have on otherslolnoOkay, what other value does a person have and why does it matter if whatever you esteem to be value has been lost?Self-value is all that matters. There is no numeric scale, there's a switch. If a person wants to live, his life has value. If he doesn't, his life doesn't have value. Simple as that. Other people's opinion on the person has literally no relevance at all.Hypothetical situation here :If a mentally disabled man has a chronic illness that causes him to be in immense pain for the entirety of his conscious life, but due to the nature of his psyche, insists that he wants to live instead, is it better to let him remain in torment or to end his life against his will?Definitely, definitely, definitely let him live. Choice and consent is all.Why does what someone wants matter if literally nobody else wants that?
Quote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on July 05, 2015, 03:50:18 PMQuote from: SecondClass on July 05, 2015, 03:49:14 PMQuote from: eggsalad on July 05, 2015, 03:48:08 PMQuote from: SecondClass on July 05, 2015, 03:46:00 PMQuote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on July 05, 2015, 03:44:07 PMQuote from: SecondClass on July 05, 2015, 03:42:36 PMQuote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on July 05, 2015, 03:32:27 PMAll of the value in a person's life resides in the impact they have on otherslolnoOkay, what other value does a person have and why does it matter if whatever you esteem to be value has been lost?Self-value is all that matters. There is no numeric scale, there's a switch. If a person wants to live, his life has value. If he doesn't, his life doesn't have value. Simple as that. Other people's opinion on the person has literally no relevance at all.Hypothetical situation here :If a mentally disabled man has a chronic illness that causes him to be in immense pain for the entirety of his conscious life, but due to the nature of his psyche, insists that he wants to live instead, is it better to let him remain in torment or to end his life against his will?Definitely, definitely, definitely let him live. Choice and consent is all.Why does what someone wants matter if literally nobody else wants that?It doesn't fucking matter whatsoever what other people want. Your life is yours alone.
If there were no repercussions...
