Quote from: Ásgeirr on June 28, 2018, 10:21:47 AMBoth the MSM and alt media require more than just a grain, youre naive.Its a little more important for the MSM to not fuck up pushing something fake or badly researched out in the first place as the damage is done far wider and quicker. All media should require perfection and abandon of the writers personal biases.But that will never happen and i will continue to not follow any media outlets.My point kind of was that even though they should all be treated with skepticism, the alternative ones should be even more so. The grain part was just the expression. I think I made a pretty good case as to why the alternative media is usually less reliable and you're not giving any real counter arguments. There's no reason to assume they are both equally prone to being bad news. How do you stay informed if you don't follow any media outlets?
Both the MSM and alt media require more than just a grain, youre naive.Its a little more important for the MSM to not fuck up pushing something fake or badly researched out in the first place as the damage is done far wider and quicker. All media should require perfection and abandon of the writers personal biases.But that will never happen and i will continue to not follow any media outlets.
Quote from: Ásgeirr on June 28, 2018, 02:18:27 PMI dont have any real arguments as i find most media reporting to be inane. I fully see why alt media is prone to being less reliable but MSM having more reach and influence should make people wary.I think that's actually another point to bolster my argument. The MSM having more reach and influence should make people more wary but it also means that the people behind them are likely to be more cautious and responsible. The backlash and potential fallout are so much greater for a (published) news outlet with hundreds of thousands of readers/viewers (and they actually have watchdogs and boards that they're held accountable to) that I think it's only logical that they're more careful about spreading misinformation or stories with potentially harmful consequences. News outlets like The Guardian, Reuters and NYT have to carry much more responsibility than some alternative or independent journalist, and I think that shows in their behavior. Still, I get your point. Their reach and influence should be met with wariness. But I think that doesn't detract from my point that people should be more skeptical when it comes to the independent / alternative ones. QuoteIm informed as to whats happening at a surface level because its impossible not to on the internet.That's very strange to me. It almost amounts to deliberate ignorance. Do you not want to know or have you just checked out off all things that don't directly affect your daily life?
I dont have any real arguments as i find most media reporting to be inane. I fully see why alt media is prone to being less reliable but MSM having more reach and influence should make people wary.
Im informed as to whats happening at a surface level because its impossible not to on the internet.