Look, this mindset you guys have is poisonous. We're at where we're at because we keep going. We have comfort we have now we didn't have back a thousand years ago, let alone further back.
Because sapience is a pretty big step, evolutionarily.
I would be against a race culling us for food because we have established rights for ourselves.
Quote from: I slam Islam on December 08, 2015, 07:27:03 PMLook, this mindset you guys have is poisonous. We're at where we're at because we keep going. We have comfort we have now we didn't have back a thousand years ago, let alone further back.Death is ultimate comfort. Natalism is holding us back.
Quote from: DAS FOTZEZERSTÖRER on December 08, 2015, 07:20:20 PMdodgywhat in the name of bear arms are you doing
dodgy
Quote from: DAS FOTZEZERSTÖRER on December 08, 2015, 07:24:43 PMYes, yes it is.What is? The difficulty of comprehension or my scenario being "out there"?
Yes, yes it is.
Yes. Considering less than 1% of humans follow your ideology.
Quote from: Verbatim on December 08, 2015, 07:28:37 PMQuote from: I slam Islam on December 08, 2015, 07:27:03 PMLook, this mindset you guys have is poisonous. We're at where we're at because we keep going. We have comfort we have now we didn't have back a thousand years ago, let alone further back.Death is ultimate comfort. Natalism is holding us back.That's assuming an "ultimate comfort" is unachievable by other means.
Quote from: Essessen on December 08, 2015, 07:25:59 PMI thought I made it pretty clear and addressed your point by saying it doesn't matter who is right, one's alive one's dead. Do I need to say it a fourth time for you to get it?Why doesn't it matter who is right.
I thought I made it pretty clear and addressed your point by saying it doesn't matter who is right, one's alive one's dead. Do I need to say it a fourth time for you to get it?
countless events have shown what under hunting does, it leads to overpopulation, and eventually, mass starvation due to lack of resources.
The majority of people thus far have believed that the most logical path in existence is to build a better future so that future generations will have more, have a better life, and be able to build an even better life for their next generation until bliss is reached.
All of people have never agreed on anything, it's a ginormous leap to assume they would, and especially about such an unpopular belief.
Because you can't complain when you're fucking dead, and the other(s) that lived don't care/believe it was right. Ultimately, whether it was objectively right, if such a thing can even be said, is irrelevant to the outcome.
We're never satisfied until we get perfection, which we'll never be able to achieve.
And there are people far more intelligent than all of us. They all disagree with this ridiculous religion of yours.
Just because people are smarter than I, I'm supposed to bow down and let them think for me? Isn't that an appeal to... something?
authority
Regardless, Galileo was smarter than anyone here, yet he believed in a God. Why don't you? He's smarter than you, surely.
Quote from: Sly Instinct on December 08, 2015, 07:30:41 PMQuote from: Verbatim on December 08, 2015, 07:28:37 PMQuote from: I slam Islam on December 08, 2015, 07:27:03 PMLook, this mindset you guys have is poisonous. We're at where we're at because we keep going. We have comfort we have now we didn't have back a thousand years ago, let alone further back.Death is ultimate comfort. Natalism is holding us back.That's assuming an "ultimate comfort" is unachievable by other means.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonic_treadmillYeah.
Quote from: Essessen on December 08, 2015, 07:30:56 PMThe majority of people thus far have believed that the most logical path in existence is to build a better future so that future generations will have more, have a better life, and be able to build an even better life for their next generation until bliss is reached.Okay, but because of our stupid biology, we're designed to have a happiness ceiling. We're never going to live in eternal bliss -- it's not in our nature.Fuck nature.
QuoteAll of people have never agreed on anything, it's a ginormous leap to assume they would, and especially about such an unpopular belief.I think that's a somewhat ridiculous statement. Yeah, there are contrarians, but it's safe to assume that most people in this world don't believe that blacks are sub-human, for example.
But astronomy is a pseudoscience
and we are far more enlightened than him.
Quoteand we are far more enlightened than him.I'm far more enlightened than you, then.
Can you summarize the main points of it that you believe apply to promoting anti-natalism?