How can you like MLP and not be a tranny?

Cindy | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Cindy
IP: Logged

1,791 posts
 
"tranny" is a slur, fuckheads
Well it's not a very good one
Neither are paki, sandnigger, fagot, jap, or chinaman

And yet, there they are


Coomer | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Ingloriouswho98
IP: Logged

14,552 posts
 
"What is context?"
something that is abused to justify using words that shouldn't ever be used
Quote
One has an obvious level of malice implied, the other obviously does not. Similarly, I say 'nigga' a lot because that's just slang that I use due to growing up in a heavily black area of Houston. I would not, however, say, "yes, well, let's look at these statistics that show the crime levels of whites and niggers in juxtaposition."
there is no logic in using a word that was once intended for malice in a non-malicious context

there's no point

why do it

Why continue giving power to a word that should be dead by now?


 
SecondClass
| Carmen
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: ModernLocust
Steam:
ID: SecondClass
IP: Logged

30,001 posts
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
—Judge Aaron Satie
——Carmen
you can reclaim words, nigga
ugh

well yeah, that's a hypocrisy of cindy's actually

>gets offended by slurs
>uses "nigga" all the time
>is white

you're all fucking idiots
why don't we just recognize that words are fucking words and stop flipping our shit anytime someone spouts a collection of syllables
"I failed my high school history classes and have no idea how language can contribute to dehumanization."
if by failed you mean got a 5 on my US History AP

and anyway, obviously some words have hidden malice behind them, I'm not an idiot. The point is that we shouldn't keep being scared of them and letting them control us. You want to eliminate bigotry? Real change comes with defiance, not following the quo. If people continue to be terrified to use certain words then those words just get more and more powerful.


eggsalad | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: eggsalad
ID: eggsalad
IP: Logged

2,495 posts
 
tbh i never cared about the word tranny
i actually use it casually until i remember some people dont like it


 
Pippen
| Legendary Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: gamer x7 42
PSN:
Steam: Pip(ask for URL)
ID: MrPip42
IP: Logged

6,568 posts
You either die a hero or live long enough to become Mythic..
Let me just say this SecondClass

Do you see it wrong when you see a perfectly feminine woman doing construction work?
What is that called? That woman would be called a strong independent woman from first glance.
A woman would also never get a second glance for watching a boys show like Adventure Time or Regular Show.


HOWEVER.

When a man is seeing as a fashion designer, they are always seen as gay. Even when some aren't. (Yes, a lot of them are openly gay but not all.) These men are also never taken seriously unless with women or other designers/models.
THEN when a man watches a girl's show, they are right away seen as gay, transsexual or not manly.

DO I SEE A BIAS HERE?'


clum clum | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: PM me
Steam: PM me
ID: Numb Digger
IP: Logged

11,461 posts
 
"tranny" is a slur, fuckheads
Well it's not a very good one
Neither are paki, sandnigger, fagot, jap, or chinaman

And yet, there they are

LOL

did you seriously call "faggot" a slur

because it's not any more

tranny and faggot cannot compare to those other words you listed



 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,034 posts
Why continue giving power to a word that should be dead by now?
not a bad point, but it fails to address the question i asked

would it not be preferable to never use the word at all instead of changing its meaning


Cindy | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Cindy
IP: Logged

1,791 posts
 
Except I'm not using it in an offensive way

To ban words like that is to accept their inherent offensiveness so to speak
"Look, I'm not referring to my black, gay friend as, 'that faggot-ass nigger' in an OFFENSIVE way! He just needs to learn to be less thin-skinned! Also, I've never faced any type of prejudice and cannot comment on what it feels like to be treated as a 'lesser' member of society, but I'll pretend that I know anyways so I don't have to be considerate!"


clum clum | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: PM me
Steam: PM me
ID: Numb Digger
IP: Logged

11,461 posts
 
You seriously need to grow thicker skin.


Cindy | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Cindy
IP: Logged

1,791 posts
 
"tranny" is a slur, fuckheads
Well it's not a very good one
Neither are paki, sandnigger, fagot, jap, or chinaman

And yet, there they are

LOL

did you seriously call "faggot" a slur

because it's not any more

tranny and faggot cannot compare to those other words you listed
Please, I'd love to hear how they can't.


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,034 posts
Except I'm not using it in an offensive way

To ban words like that is to accept their inherent offensiveness so to speak
"Look, I'm not referring to my black, gay friend as, 'that faggot-ass nigger' in an OFFENSIVE way! He just needs to learn to be less thin-skinned! Also, I've never faced any type of prejudice and cannot comment on what it feels like to be treated as a 'lesser' member of society, but I'll pretend that I know anyways so I don't have to be considerate!"
"What is context?"

your logic is falling apart on its own ass

just admit that your use of the word "nigger" is childish and stupid and that you probably shouldn't do it
you don't have to stop, but admit that it's not a smart thing to do
Last Edit: December 02, 2015, 09:15:04 PM by Verbatim


clum clum | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: PM me
Steam: PM me
ID: Numb Digger
IP: Logged

11,461 posts
 
Except I'm not using it in an offensive way

To ban words like that is to accept their inherent offensiveness so to speak
"Look, I'm not referring to my black, gay friend as, 'that faggot-ass nigger' in an OFFENSIVE way! He just needs to learn to be less thin-skinned! Also, I've never faced any type of prejudice and cannot comment on what it feels like to be treated as a 'lesser' member of society, but I'll pretend that I know anyways so I don't have to be considerate!"

That's a pretty terrible comparison, lad.


Coomer | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Ingloriouswho98
IP: Logged

14,552 posts
 
Why continue giving power to a word that should be dead by now?
not a bad point, but it fails to address the question i asked

would it not be preferable to never use the word at all instead of changing its meaning

But to do that would be to push it away and not address it at all

What happens in a 1OO years?

Will we continue to "ban" it?
Because that would just be like holding it over their heads for the rest of time


clum clum | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: PM me
Steam: PM me
ID: Numb Digger
IP: Logged

11,461 posts
 
"tranny" is a slur, fuckheads
Well it's not a very good one
Neither are paki, sandnigger, fagot, jap, or chinaman

And yet, there they are

LOL

did you seriously call "faggot" a slur

because it's not any more

tranny and faggot cannot compare to those other words you listed
Please, I'd love to hear how they can't.

Because those other derogatory terms are racist, and are much more stigmatized by our society.


Saleem | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Saleem
IP: Logged

2,483 posts
Sigs fo nigs
This thread isn't long for this world so I might as well throw something in.

On MLP: Ain't got a clue why grown men enjoy a show specifically designed for young girls.

On Trannies: I'm shortening it because I'm too lazy to spell out the whole word, fite me. But isn't it technically a mental abnormality? When diverging from the usual XY and XX chromosomes and basing your gender on your feelings is that not against nature and biology? Sure humans defy nature regularly but we can only go so far before something fucks up royally, and that seems to be starting in the general vicinity of sex and reproduction.

Homosexuals, trans, downies, ect. I don't have anything against their existence and their lives should not be excluded from everyone else's, but I'm certainly not for prolonged promotion of mental disability/abnormalities. Such things most likely will and should slowly breed out of the gene pool.

Spoiler
I'm going to be fucked for this post


Cindy | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Cindy
IP: Logged

1,791 posts
 
Except I'm not using it in an offensive way

To ban words like that is to accept their inherent offensiveness so to speak
"Look, I'm not referring to my black, gay friend as, 'that faggot-ass nigger' in an OFFENSIVE way! He just needs to learn to be less thin-skinned! Also, I've never faced any type of prejudice and cannot comment on what it feels like to be treated as a 'lesser' member of society, but I'll pretend that I know anyways so I don't have to be considerate!"
"What is context?"

your logic is falling apart on its own ass
It's really not

If my gay, black friend was perfectly fine with me calling him "faggot-ass nigger" to his face, then I don't think there'd be a single thing wrong with that. However, even if he was fine with that, referring to him as-such to a third party would still be a terrible thing to do.

And etc etc same for tranny and blah blah blah. My friend can call me tranny all he wants, but I'll fuckin' crack a board over his head if that's how he starts referring to me towards other people.


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,034 posts
But to do that would be to push it away and not address it at all

What happens in a 1OO years?

Will we continue to "ban" it?
Because that would just be like holding it over their heads for the rest of time
so what

we wouldn't need to "ban" it--people would just have the sense not to use it

it's really not a big deal
i don't cry over the fact that it's socially unacceptable to call people niggers


clum clum | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: PM me
Steam: PM me
ID: Numb Digger
IP: Logged

11,461 posts
 
Except I'm not using it in an offensive way

To ban words like that is to accept their inherent offensiveness so to speak
"Look, I'm not referring to my black, gay friend as, 'that faggot-ass nigger' in an OFFENSIVE way! He just needs to learn to be less thin-skinned! Also, I've never faced any type of prejudice and cannot comment on what it feels like to be treated as a 'lesser' member of society, but I'll pretend that I know anyways so I don't have to be considerate!"
"What is context?"

your logic is falling apart on its own ass
It's really not

If my gay, black friend was perfectly fine with me calling him "faggot-ass nigger" to his face, then I don't think there'd be a single thing wrong with that. However, even if he was fine with that, referring to him as-such to a third party would still be a terrible thing to do.

And etc etc same for tranny and blah blah blah. My friend can call me tranny all he wants, but I'll fuckin' crack a board over his head if that's how he starts referring to me towards other people.

Context.


Cindy | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Cindy
IP: Logged

1,791 posts
 
This thread isn't long for this world so I might as well throw something in.

On MLP: Ain't got a clue why grown men enjoy a show specifically designed for young girls.

On Trannies: I'm shortening it because I'm too lazy to spell out the whole word, fite me. But isn't it technically a mental abnormality? When diverging from the usual XY and XX chromosomes and basing your gender on your feelings is that not against nature and biology? Sure humans defy nature regularly but we can only go so far before something fucks up royally, and that seems to be starting in the general vicinity of sex and reproduction.

Homosexuals, trans, downies, ect. I don't have anything against their existence and their lives should not be excluded from everyone else's, but I'm certainly not for prolonged promotion of mental disability/abnormalities. Such things most likely will and should slowly breed out of the gene pool.

Spoiler
I'm going to be fucked for this post
I mean, I could respond do it, but honestly it just sounds like something from the 1950's, so it's not worth the time.


Cindy | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Cindy
IP: Logged

1,791 posts
 
Except I'm not using it in an offensive way

To ban words like that is to accept their inherent offensiveness so to speak
"Look, I'm not referring to my black, gay friend as, 'that faggot-ass nigger' in an OFFENSIVE way! He just needs to learn to be less thin-skinned! Also, I've never faced any type of prejudice and cannot comment on what it feels like to be treated as a 'lesser' member of society, but I'll pretend that I know anyways so I don't have to be considerate!"
"What is context?"

your logic is falling apart on its own ass
It's really not

If my gay, black friend was perfectly fine with me calling him "faggot-ass nigger" to his face, then I don't think there'd be a single thing wrong with that. However, even if he was fine with that, referring to him as-such to a third party would still be a terrible thing to do.

And etc etc same for tranny and blah blah blah. My friend can call me tranny all he wants, but I'll fuckin' crack a board over his head if that's how he starts referring to me towards other people.

Context.
Yes, that's...what I'm talking about.

Are you trying to argue against me by saying the word that is the standpoint of my argument?


 
SecondClass
| Carmen
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: ModernLocust
Steam:
ID: SecondClass
IP: Logged

30,001 posts
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
—Judge Aaron Satie
——Carmen
Let me just say this SecondClass

Do you see it wrong when you see a perfectly feminine woman doing construction work?
What is that called? That woman would be called a strong independent woman from first glance.
A woman would also never get a second glance for watching a boys show like Adventure Time or Regular Show.


HOWEVER.

When a man is seeing as a fashion designer, they are always seen as gay. Even when some aren't. (Yes, a lot of them are openly gay but not all.) These men are also never taken seriously unless with women or other designers/models.
THEN when a man watches a girl's show, they are right away seen as gay, transsexual or not manly.

DO I SEE A BIAS HERE?'
Occupation has no bearing on your gender identity, IMO. I don't see male fashion designers as anything but stylish. No, its how you act and feel that I think determines it more than anything else. Adventure Time and Regular Show aren't boys shows. MLP is a girls show.


clum clum | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: PM me
Steam: PM me
ID: Numb Digger
IP: Logged

11,461 posts
 
Except I'm not using it in an offensive way

To ban words like that is to accept their inherent offensiveness so to speak
"Look, I'm not referring to my black, gay friend as, 'that faggot-ass nigger' in an OFFENSIVE way! He just needs to learn to be less thin-skinned! Also, I've never faced any type of prejudice and cannot comment on what it feels like to be treated as a 'lesser' member of society, but I'll pretend that I know anyways so I don't have to be considerate!"
"What is context?"

your logic is falling apart on its own ass
It's really not

If my gay, black friend was perfectly fine with me calling him "faggot-ass nigger" to his face, then I don't think there'd be a single thing wrong with that. However, even if he was fine with that, referring to him as-such to a third party would still be a terrible thing to do.

And etc etc same for tranny and blah blah blah. My friend can call me tranny all he wants, but I'll fuckin' crack a board over his head if that's how he starts referring to me towards other people.

Context.
Yes, that's...what I'm talking about.

Are you trying to argue against me by saying the word that is the standpoint of my argument?

Well that was redundant.


Cindy | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Cindy
IP: Logged

1,791 posts
 
"tranny" is a slur, fuckheads
Well it's not a very good one
Neither are paki, sandnigger, fagot, jap, or chinaman

And yet, there they are

LOL

did you seriously call "faggot" a slur

because it's not any more

tranny and faggot cannot compare to those other words you listed
Please, I'd love to hear how they can't.

Because those other derogatory terms are racist, and are much more stigmatized by our society.
Yes, probably because racism hasn't been accepted for a very long time. Homophobia has been accepted partially up until very recently, and transphobia is still HEAVILY predominant within society.

"Nigger" wasn't looked at as an evil word in 1920's because black people weren't seen as equals in the 1920's. Similarly, "tranny" is pretty common today because transgender/transsexual individuals are more commonly looked at as freaks and oddities than actual people.


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,034 posts
However, even if he was fine with that, referring to him as-such to a third party would still be a terrible thing to do.
why

what if you're not using it in a negative context

why doesn't context matter when referring to him or her to third parties


Coomer | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Ingloriouswho98
IP: Logged

14,552 posts
 
Except I'm not using it in an offensive way

To ban words like that is to accept their inherent offensiveness so to speak
"Look, I'm not referring to my black, gay friend as, 'that faggot-ass nigger' in an OFFENSIVE way! He just needs to learn to be less thin-skinned! Also, I've never faced any type of prejudice and cannot comment on what it feels like to be treated as a 'lesser' member of society, but I'll pretend that I know anyways so I don't have to be considerate!"

No

I am calling him that because I understand the full implications of that word and I deny it of its power

I too am a minority
I am called gook and made fun of all the time (even on here)
But it's all good because I know no one is actually serious about it
Even then why would I indulge them in their attacks

We've moved on
To keep giving those words the implications they once had is holding us back

To be clear, I'm not telling you to just say it at your leisure
I wouldn't just call someone on the street "my nigga"


 
Pippen
| Legendary Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: gamer x7 42
PSN:
Steam: Pip(ask for URL)
ID: MrPip42
IP: Logged

6,568 posts
You either die a hero or live long enough to become Mythic..
Let me just say this SecondClass

Do you see it wrong when you see a perfectly feminine woman doing construction work?
What is that called? That woman would be called a strong independent woman from first glance.
A woman would also never get a second glance for watching a boys show like Adventure Time or Regular Show.


HOWEVER.

When a man is seeing as a fashion designer, they are always seen as gay. Even when some aren't. (Yes, a lot of them are openly gay but not all.) These men are also never taken seriously unless with women or other designers/models.
THEN when a man watches a girl's show, they are right away seen as gay, transsexual or not manly.

DO I SEE A BIAS HERE?'
Occupation has no bearing on your gender identity, IMO. I don't see male fashion designers as anything but stylish. No, its how you act and feel that I think determines it more than anything else. Adventure Time and Regular Show aren't boys shows. MLP is a girls show.

If we are being technical, MLP is quoted to be a "family show".
 Also Adventure Time and Regular show are obviously meant for boys around the age of 8-12 to enjoy.

And yeah, I like MLP and would like to keep my penis thank you very much.


eggsalad | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: eggsalad
ID: eggsalad
IP: Logged

2,495 posts
 
This thread isn't long for this world so I might as well throw something in.

On MLP: Ain't got a clue why grown men enjoy a show specifically designed for young girls.

On Trannies: I'm shortening it because I'm too lazy to spell out the whole word, fite me. But isn't it technically a mental abnormality? When diverging from the usual XY and XX chromosomes and basing your gender on your feelings is that not against nature and biology? Sure humans defy nature regularly but we can only go so far before something fucks up royally, and that seems to be starting in the general vicinity of sex and reproduction.

Homosexuals, trans, downies, ect. I don't have anything against their existence and their lives should not be excluded from everyone else's, but I'm certainly not for prolonged promotion of mental disability/abnormalities. Such things most likely will and should slowly breed out of the gene pool.

Spoiler
I'm going to be fucked for this post
Homosexual behaviors precede humans by a long shot and I don't think anything's happening to change that. Similarly, dysphoria probably won't either. I don't understand the discomfort people get at the idea that being gender dysphoric is something we shouldn't stigmatize. We know it's a fucking debilitating disorder. That's what transition is, the treatment. "Promoting" it is promoting the idea that someone should be able to treat themselves for the disorder and not go through all of the shit that people have to right now. You don't object to the asthmatic using their inhalers.


eggsalad | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: eggsalad
ID: eggsalad
IP: Logged

2,495 posts
 
Let me just say this SecondClass

Do you see it wrong when you see a perfectly feminine woman doing construction work?
What is that called? That woman would be called a strong independent woman from first glance.
A woman would also never get a second glance for watching a boys show like Adventure Time or Regular Show.


HOWEVER.

When a man is seeing as a fashion designer, they are always seen as gay. Even when some aren't. (Yes, a lot of them are openly gay but not all.) These men are also never taken seriously unless with women or other designers/models.
THEN when a man watches a girl's show, they are right away seen as gay, transsexual or not manly.

DO I SEE A BIAS HERE?'
Occupation has no bearing on your gender identity, IMO. I don't see male fashion designers as anything but stylish. No, its how you act and feel that I think determines it more than anything else. Adventure Time and Regular Show aren't boys shows. MLP is a girls show.
Regular Show most definitely is a boy's show.


clum clum | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: PM me
Steam: PM me
ID: Numb Digger
IP: Logged

11,461 posts
 
"tranny" is a slur, fuckheads
Well it's not a very good one
Neither are paki, sandnigger, fagot, jap, or chinaman

And yet, there they are

LOL

did you seriously call "faggot" a slur

because it's not any more

tranny and faggot cannot compare to those other words you listed
Please, I'd love to hear how they can't.

Because those other derogatory terms are racist, and are much more stigmatized by our society.
Yes, probably because racism hasn't been accepted for a very long time. Homophobia has been accepted partially up until very recently, and transphobia is still HEAVILY predominant within society.

"Nigger" wasn't looked at as an evil word in 1920's because black people weren't seen as equals in the 1920's. Similarly, "tranny" is pretty common today because transgender/transsexual individuals are more commonly looked at as freaks and oddities than actual people.

I'm in the same boat as you though and none of this is an issue for me. It's a matter of you being too sensitive to what assholes think.


Cindy | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Cindy
IP: Logged

1,791 posts
 
However, even if he was fine with that, referring to him as-such to a third party would still be a terrible thing to do.
why

what if you're not using it in a negative context

why doesn't context matter when referring to him or her to third parties
Because that is a more open forum, and promotes racism/sexism/homophobia/transphobia/etc to other people. When you're only speaking to him or a group of individuals that he is comfortable with, then it's simply nothing greater than the usual type of ragging amongst friends taken to a more racey level. Talking in such a manner to another person, however, promotes nothing more than hate and bigotry.

If you call your friend "that idiot over there," it really only says that you have a good relationship and possibly some contempt for that person. If you call him "that faggot over there," it says something a bit more about how you think of any gay people. Saying it only to him says nothing about what you think about gay people as a whole unless you're saying it in an insulting way or if he has told you - rightfully so - that he's not okay with that word being used around him.