Quote from: Camnator on May 01, 2015, 05:00:48 AMQuote from: Flee on May 01, 2015, 04:59:37 AMQuote from: Camnator on May 01, 2015, 04:57:45 AMQuote from: Flee on May 01, 2015, 04:56:16 AMChallenger wasn't banned for outing anyone. He was banned for his posts in Serious. As it clearly states in the rules, moderation is stricter in the Serious board. It's the board for proper debates and civil discussions on certain serious topics, so the treshold for bullshit and personal attacks is lower there. If you look at the rules, you'll see that every severe warning you receive in Serious gets marked with a tag. If you have one of those tagged warnings in your recent history and break the rules again, you're getting an instant ban. I'm not the one who banned him but looking at Challenger's history, it's pretty clear he already had several prior tagged warnings and bans. Either way, I believe his ban wears off later today.Yet, I still see personal insults thrown around in serious a lot. Two of which were directed at me in my short time being back.Did you report them?One of them, though, is that really even crucial? Given the low activity moderation should be a breeze.While activity sometimes drops, this place still has an average of 2400+ posts a day. That's 2400 posts for 7 mods, all with busy schedules, personal lives and differing time zones. We catch a lot, but not everything. So if you think something breaks the rules, then you should definitely report it.
Quote from: Flee on May 01, 2015, 04:59:37 AMQuote from: Camnator on May 01, 2015, 04:57:45 AMQuote from: Flee on May 01, 2015, 04:56:16 AMChallenger wasn't banned for outing anyone. He was banned for his posts in Serious. As it clearly states in the rules, moderation is stricter in the Serious board. It's the board for proper debates and civil discussions on certain serious topics, so the treshold for bullshit and personal attacks is lower there. If you look at the rules, you'll see that every severe warning you receive in Serious gets marked with a tag. If you have one of those tagged warnings in your recent history and break the rules again, you're getting an instant ban. I'm not the one who banned him but looking at Challenger's history, it's pretty clear he already had several prior tagged warnings and bans. Either way, I believe his ban wears off later today.Yet, I still see personal insults thrown around in serious a lot. Two of which were directed at me in my short time being back.Did you report them?One of them, though, is that really even crucial? Given the low activity moderation should be a breeze.
Quote from: Camnator on May 01, 2015, 04:57:45 AMQuote from: Flee on May 01, 2015, 04:56:16 AMChallenger wasn't banned for outing anyone. He was banned for his posts in Serious. As it clearly states in the rules, moderation is stricter in the Serious board. It's the board for proper debates and civil discussions on certain serious topics, so the treshold for bullshit and personal attacks is lower there. If you look at the rules, you'll see that every severe warning you receive in Serious gets marked with a tag. If you have one of those tagged warnings in your recent history and break the rules again, you're getting an instant ban. I'm not the one who banned him but looking at Challenger's history, it's pretty clear he already had several prior tagged warnings and bans. Either way, I believe his ban wears off later today.Yet, I still see personal insults thrown around in serious a lot. Two of which were directed at me in my short time being back.Did you report them?
Quote from: Flee on May 01, 2015, 04:56:16 AMChallenger wasn't banned for outing anyone. He was banned for his posts in Serious. As it clearly states in the rules, moderation is stricter in the Serious board. It's the board for proper debates and civil discussions on certain serious topics, so the treshold for bullshit and personal attacks is lower there. If you look at the rules, you'll see that every severe warning you receive in Serious gets marked with a tag. If you have one of those tagged warnings in your recent history and break the rules again, you're getting an instant ban. I'm not the one who banned him but looking at Challenger's history, it's pretty clear he already had several prior tagged warnings and bans. Either way, I believe his ban wears off later today.Yet, I still see personal insults thrown around in serious a lot. Two of which were directed at me in my short time being back.
Challenger wasn't banned for outing anyone. He was banned for his posts in Serious. As it clearly states in the rules, moderation is stricter in the Serious board. It's the board for proper debates and civil discussions on certain serious topics, so the treshold for bullshit and personal attacks is lower there. If you look at the rules, you'll see that every severe warning you receive in Serious gets marked with a tag. If you have one of those tagged warnings in your recent history and break the rules again, you're getting an instant ban. I'm not the one who banned him but looking at Challenger's history, it's pretty clear he already had several prior tagged warnings and bans. Either way, I believe his ban wears off later today.
Quote from: Byrne on May 01, 2015, 05:13:39 AMQuote from: Flee on May 01, 2015, 05:10:04 AMQuote from: Camnator on May 01, 2015, 05:00:48 AMQuote from: Flee on May 01, 2015, 04:59:37 AMQuote from: Camnator on May 01, 2015, 04:57:45 AMQuote from: Flee on May 01, 2015, 04:56:16 AMChallenger wasn't banned for outing anyone. He was banned for his posts in Serious. As it clearly states in the rules, moderation is stricter in the Serious board. It's the board for proper debates and civil discussions on certain serious topics, so the treshold for bullshit and personal attacks is lower there. If you look at the rules, you'll see that every severe warning you receive in Serious gets marked with a tag. If you have one of those tagged warnings in your recent history and break the rules again, you're getting an instant ban. I'm not the one who banned him but looking at Challenger's history, it's pretty clear he already had several prior tagged warnings and bans. Either way, I believe his ban wears off later today.Yet, I still see personal insults thrown around in serious a lot. Two of which were directed at me in my short time being back.Did you report them?One of them, though, is that really even crucial? Given the low activity moderation should be a breeze.While activity sometimes drops, this place still has an average of 2400+ posts a day. That's 2400 posts for 7 mods, all with busy schedules, personal lives and differing time zones. We catch a lot, but not everything. So if you think something breaks the rules, then you should definitely report it.Then bring in another mod, this is why you needed an active member as part of the staff.But of course, popularity over activity, gotta be friends with Cheat first.It doesn't help to have dead weight on the staff either.Or just jerkoffs like Yu.
Quote from: Flee on May 01, 2015, 05:10:04 AMQuote from: Camnator on May 01, 2015, 05:00:48 AMQuote from: Flee on May 01, 2015, 04:59:37 AMQuote from: Camnator on May 01, 2015, 04:57:45 AMQuote from: Flee on May 01, 2015, 04:56:16 AMChallenger wasn't banned for outing anyone. He was banned for his posts in Serious. As it clearly states in the rules, moderation is stricter in the Serious board. It's the board for proper debates and civil discussions on certain serious topics, so the treshold for bullshit and personal attacks is lower there. If you look at the rules, you'll see that every severe warning you receive in Serious gets marked with a tag. If you have one of those tagged warnings in your recent history and break the rules again, you're getting an instant ban. I'm not the one who banned him but looking at Challenger's history, it's pretty clear he already had several prior tagged warnings and bans. Either way, I believe his ban wears off later today.Yet, I still see personal insults thrown around in serious a lot. Two of which were directed at me in my short time being back.Did you report them?One of them, though, is that really even crucial? Given the low activity moderation should be a breeze.While activity sometimes drops, this place still has an average of 2400+ posts a day. That's 2400 posts for 7 mods, all with busy schedules, personal lives and differing time zones. We catch a lot, but not everything. So if you think something breaks the rules, then you should definitely report it.Then bring in another mod, this is why you needed an active member as part of the staff.But of course, popularity over activity, gotta be friends with Cheat first.It doesn't help to have dead weight on the staff either.
Quote from: Byrne on May 01, 2015, 05:16:23 AMQuote from: Camnator on May 01, 2015, 05:15:30 AMQuote from: Byrne on May 01, 2015, 05:13:39 AMQuote from: Flee on May 01, 2015, 05:10:04 AMQuote from: Camnator on May 01, 2015, 05:00:48 AMQuote from: Flee on May 01, 2015, 04:59:37 AMQuote from: Camnator on May 01, 2015, 04:57:45 AMQuote from: Flee on May 01, 2015, 04:56:16 AMChallenger wasn't banned for outing anyone. He was banned for his posts in Serious. As it clearly states in the rules, moderation is stricter in the Serious board. It's the board for proper debates and civil discussions on certain serious topics, so the treshold for bullshit and personal attacks is lower there. If you look at the rules, you'll see that every severe warning you receive in Serious gets marked with a tag. If you have one of those tagged warnings in your recent history and break the rules again, you're getting an instant ban. I'm not the one who banned him but looking at Challenger's history, it's pretty clear he already had several prior tagged warnings and bans. Either way, I believe his ban wears off later today.Yet, I still see personal insults thrown around in serious a lot. Two of which were directed at me in my short time being back.Did you report them?One of them, though, is that really even crucial? Given the low activity moderation should be a breeze.While activity sometimes drops, this place still has an average of 2400+ posts a day. That's 2400 posts for 7 mods, all with busy schedules, personal lives and differing time zones. We catch a lot, but not everything. So if you think something breaks the rules, then you should definitely report it.Then bring in another mod, this is why you needed an active member as part of the staff.But of course, popularity over activity, gotta be friends with Cheat first.It doesn't help to have dead weight on the staff either.Or just jerkoffs like Yu. Actually, Yu is one of the more active mods when he's around.Relatively proactive.That may be, but he's still a jerkoff.
Quote from: Camnator on May 01, 2015, 05:15:30 AMQuote from: Byrne on May 01, 2015, 05:13:39 AMQuote from: Flee on May 01, 2015, 05:10:04 AMQuote from: Camnator on May 01, 2015, 05:00:48 AMQuote from: Flee on May 01, 2015, 04:59:37 AMQuote from: Camnator on May 01, 2015, 04:57:45 AMQuote from: Flee on May 01, 2015, 04:56:16 AMChallenger wasn't banned for outing anyone. He was banned for his posts in Serious. As it clearly states in the rules, moderation is stricter in the Serious board. It's the board for proper debates and civil discussions on certain serious topics, so the treshold for bullshit and personal attacks is lower there. If you look at the rules, you'll see that every severe warning you receive in Serious gets marked with a tag. If you have one of those tagged warnings in your recent history and break the rules again, you're getting an instant ban. I'm not the one who banned him but looking at Challenger's history, it's pretty clear he already had several prior tagged warnings and bans. Either way, I believe his ban wears off later today.Yet, I still see personal insults thrown around in serious a lot. Two of which were directed at me in my short time being back.Did you report them?One of them, though, is that really even crucial? Given the low activity moderation should be a breeze.While activity sometimes drops, this place still has an average of 2400+ posts a day. That's 2400 posts for 7 mods, all with busy schedules, personal lives and differing time zones. We catch a lot, but not everything. So if you think something breaks the rules, then you should definitely report it.Then bring in another mod, this is why you needed an active member as part of the staff.But of course, popularity over activity, gotta be friends with Cheat first.It doesn't help to have dead weight on the staff either.Or just jerkoffs like Yu. Actually, Yu is one of the more active mods when he's around.Relatively proactive.
Quote from: Byrne on May 01, 2015, 05:13:39 AMQuote from: Flee on May 01, 2015, 05:10:04 AMQuote from: Camnator on May 01, 2015, 05:00:48 AMQuote from: Flee on May 01, 2015, 04:59:37 AMQuote from: Camnator on May 01, 2015, 04:57:45 AMQuote from: Flee on May 01, 2015, 04:56:16 AMChallenger wasn't banned for outing anyone. He was banned for his posts in Serious. As it clearly states in the rules, moderation is stricter in the Serious board. It's the board for proper debates and civil discussions on certain serious topics, so the treshold for bullshit and personal attacks is lower there. If you look at the rules, you'll see that every severe warning you receive in Serious gets marked with a tag. If you have one of those tagged warnings in your recent history and break the rules again, you're getting an instant ban. I'm not the one who banned him but looking at Challenger's history, it's pretty clear he already had several prior tagged warnings and bans. Either way, I believe his ban wears off later today.Yet, I still see personal insults thrown around in serious a lot. Two of which were directed at me in my short time being back.Did you report them?One of them, though, is that really even crucial? Given the low activity moderation should be a breeze.While activity sometimes drops, this place still has an average of 2400+ posts a day. That's 2400 posts for 7 mods, all with busy schedules, personal lives and differing time zones. We catch a lot, but not everything. So if you think something breaks the rules, then you should definitely report it.Then bring in another mod, this is why you needed an active member as part of the staff.But of course, popularity over activity, gotta be friends with Cheat first.It doesn't help to have dead weight on the staff either.Comet is actually surprisingly active. Doesn't post that much, but is lurking almost constantly and contributes to the mod chat a ton.
Quote from: Magos Domina on May 01, 2015, 04:26:05 AMQuote from: guts on May 01, 2015, 03:55:05 AMkeep him bannedless iranians = better quality forum He's not even a proper iranian though lol his dad or something like pussied out and fled for the states.Proper Iranians being Islamic pseudo Arabs ruining Iran. Fuck outta here. And my dad didn't flee from anywhere. Not sure why you think that, but I'm guessing Comms is being Kinder and you're his Noelle, from all the like spam you give each other.
Quote from: guts on May 01, 2015, 03:55:05 AMkeep him bannedless iranians = better quality forum He's not even a proper iranian though lol his dad or something like pussied out and fled for the states.
keep him bannedless iranians = better quality forum
HOW THE FUCK MUCH LONGER IS CHALLENGER BANNED FOR
