Quote from: Meta Cognition on January 12, 2015, 01:29:15 PM>pascal's wager >ever being a legitimate fucking argumentyour logical fallacy is: appeal to logic
>pascal's wager >ever being a legitimate fucking argument
Because if there's a god focusing specifically on that tiny little fucking dot that we live on, and punishing the billions on that tiny little spec of sand for not believing in him.Then he's a fucking asshole who doesn't deserve shit.
Quote from: Sandtrap on January 12, 2015, 01:36:58 PMBecause if there's a god focusing specifically on that tiny little fucking dot that we live on, and punishing the billions on that tiny little spec of sand for not believing in him.Then he's a fucking asshole who doesn't deserve shit.
Quote from: Meta Cognition on January 12, 2015, 01:29:15 PM>pascal's wager >ever being a legitimate fucking argumentIn a hypothetical world where there is only one religion it would be.
Religion > Edgy