So this is what it's like to be Tru or some other leva watching me and Mordo argue
META, END HIS PINEAPPLE ALREADY
Or perhaps you could take the most understandable and logical standpoint which would be neutral.
you have no grounds to make an assumption in any direction.
I didn't call you unintelligent, nor did i make any statement in which I said I was smarter.
I don't come onto a forum, or this one for the matter, to discuss politics or economics.
I have every right to say I'm Catholic
The fact is, I'd be impressed if you actually even read this instead of doing the same work around response.
Also, your calling out a lapse of logic in situation of doubt. There was nothing inherently stupid with my decision, and its odd to see you calling a precaution as a stupid act.
Quote from: BC on July 08, 2015, 04:41:40 PMOr perhaps you could take the most understandable and logical standpoint which would be neutral.. . . Except that's exactly what I did. Assuming ignorance is neutrality. Quoteyou have no grounds to make an assumption in any direction.It's not an "assumption", though. I have no evidence to suggest you're cognizant about politics or economics, hence ignorance is the default position. You can't adopt a position of both non-cognizance and non-ignorance. QuoteI didn't call you unintelligent, nor did i make any statement in which I said I was smarter.You called me an idiot quite a bit. I also didn't claim that you said you were more intelligent. QuoteI don't come onto a forum, or this one for the matter, to discuss politics or economics.Okay? I don't expect you to. The point is that you implied I was unintelligent (y'know, through the words "idiot" and I think "dumb") without I) demonstrating how I lack an understanding of the areas in which I consider myself intelligent or II) demonstrating a clear failure in reasoning. QuoteI have every right to say I'm CatholicYou have a right to claim to be a Catholic, sure, but it's possible that such a claim could be wrong. QuoteThe fact is, I'd be impressed if you actually even read this instead of doing the same work around response.I pretty much always read responses; now who's making rash assumptions on little evidence? QuoteAlso, your calling out a lapse of logic in situation of doubt. There was nothing inherently stupid with my decision, and its odd to see you calling a precaution as a stupid act.I'm not calling the act stupid, I'm calling the failure of reasoning stupid. I'm not saying what you did at the time was a bad thing to do--far from it--I'm saying in our conversation following the act you displayed incredibly poor reasoning skills.
STOP THIS FIGHTING WE ARE NOT ANIMALS WE ARE HUMAN BEINGS.
Quote from: Fedorekd on July 08, 2015, 04:42:39 PMSTOP THIS FIGHTING WE ARE NOT ANIMALS WE ARE HUMAN BEINGS.*beans
Quote from: Atticus on July 08, 2015, 05:09:10 PMQuote from: Fedorekd on July 08, 2015, 04:42:39 PMSTOP THIS FIGHTING WE ARE NOT ANIMALS WE ARE HUMAN BEINGS.*beans