Quote from: BC on February 01, 2016, 02:38:22 AM common senseDoesn't exist in the real world.
common sense
Quote from: BC on February 01, 2016, 02:39:57 AMQuote from: Luciana on February 01, 2016, 02:38:35 AMI will say as a mod for only like... what, a month now?That I've seen a lot of reports are people acting like babbies rather than actual offenses. Of course there are real ones worthy of actually taking action with (to which I've messed up once or twice), but yeah.But would you say you genuinely messed up or that it could have gone both ways (meaning there was logic behind your decision)As in I'm still learning my way about a few things.
Quote from: Luciana on February 01, 2016, 02:38:35 AMI will say as a mod for only like... what, a month now?That I've seen a lot of reports are people acting like babbies rather than actual offenses. Of course there are real ones worthy of actually taking action with (to which I've messed up once or twice), but yeah.But would you say you genuinely messed up or that it could have gone both ways (meaning there was logic behind your decision)
I will say as a mod for only like... what, a month now?That I've seen a lot of reports are people acting like babbies rather than actual offenses. Of course there are real ones worthy of actually taking action with (to which I've messed up once or twice), but yeah.
Quote from: Luciana on February 01, 2016, 02:40:41 AMQuote from: BC on February 01, 2016, 02:39:57 AMQuote from: Luciana on February 01, 2016, 02:38:35 AMI will say as a mod for only like... what, a month now?That I've seen a lot of reports are people acting like babbies rather than actual offenses. Of course there are real ones worthy of actually taking action with (to which I've messed up once or twice), but yeah.But would you say you genuinely messed up or that it could have gone both ways (meaning there was logic behind your decision)As in I'm still learning my way about a few things.Which is a valid excuse, to a certain extent obviously. And if things were fixed quickly I don't see why it would be made a big deal.
Quote from: BC on February 01, 2016, 02:42:10 AMQuote from: Luciana on February 01, 2016, 02:40:41 AMQuote from: BC on February 01, 2016, 02:39:57 AMQuote from: Luciana on February 01, 2016, 02:38:35 AMI will say as a mod for only like... what, a month now?That I've seen a lot of reports are people acting like babbies rather than actual offenses. Of course there are real ones worthy of actually taking action with (to which I've messed up once or twice), but yeah.But would you say you genuinely messed up or that it could have gone both ways (meaning there was logic behind your decision)As in I'm still learning my way about a few things.Which is a valid excuse, to a certain extent obviously. And if things were fixed quickly I don't see why it would be made a big deal.I was actually the one who reversed both instances because I was contacted about them. It certainly helps when the person is polite about the matter too.
If I got banned for no reason and then unbanned because it was a mistake, I wouldn't be upset.
Quote from: LC on February 01, 2016, 02:34:31 AMunsolicited I disagree.And that was the first case of it happening. I didn't see anything in the rules.
unsolicited
Sexual/Shock/Gore images and videos must remain in Anarchy only.
Quote from: LC on February 01, 2016, 02:30:07 AMQuote from: BC on February 01, 2016, 02:25:57 AMQuote from: LC on February 01, 2016, 02:24:36 AMAre we talking instances real mod bias? Cause I've seen/heard about some weird theories and other shit out there.There have been some cases of bias or inconsistency that I've had to clear up or reverse in the past though. It's less of a problem now than it was earlier on in my opinion.I mean in general, like shady decisions that are clearly more towards certain users, or even overall. Like a mod banning someone for saying something they personally were offended by. Or a mod screwing over another member.I don't think anyone has been banned over something that a mod has been personally offended by. The first and third have happened though. Kiyo being the example of someone who screwed over another member. The first happening a few times over the course of this websites history, but calling them shady would be outright false.Ok by personally offended by I mean for something that wasn't against the rules. No Das, you pming people loli porn doesn't count.I know Kiyo was crazy, and that's the only person in which I understood why everyone lost their shit. But I always see more claims of outright "wrong decisions" made by mods. I'm incredibly non partial to a lot of people on here, especially those I like, and I've found it really hard to really say there has been anything done wrong outside of Kiyo
Quote from: BC on February 01, 2016, 02:25:57 AMQuote from: LC on February 01, 2016, 02:24:36 AMAre we talking instances real mod bias? Cause I've seen/heard about some weird theories and other shit out there.There have been some cases of bias or inconsistency that I've had to clear up or reverse in the past though. It's less of a problem now than it was earlier on in my opinion.I mean in general, like shady decisions that are clearly more towards certain users, or even overall. Like a mod banning someone for saying something they personally were offended by. Or a mod screwing over another member.I don't think anyone has been banned over something that a mod has been personally offended by. The first and third have happened though. Kiyo being the example of someone who screwed over another member. The first happening a few times over the course of this websites history, but calling them shady would be outright false.Ok by personally offended by I mean for something that wasn't against the rules. No Das, you pming people loli porn doesn't count.
Quote from: LC on February 01, 2016, 02:24:36 AMAre we talking instances real mod bias? Cause I've seen/heard about some weird theories and other shit out there.There have been some cases of bias or inconsistency that I've had to clear up or reverse in the past though. It's less of a problem now than it was earlier on in my opinion.I mean in general, like shady decisions that are clearly more towards certain users, or even overall. Like a mod banning someone for saying something they personally were offended by. Or a mod screwing over another member.
Are we talking instances real mod bias? Cause I've seen/heard about some weird theories and other shit out there.There have been some cases of bias or inconsistency that I've had to clear up or reverse in the past though. It's less of a problem now than it was earlier on in my opinion.
Quote from: BC on February 01, 2016, 02:34:24 AMQuote from: LC on February 01, 2016, 02:30:07 AMQuote from: BC on February 01, 2016, 02:25:57 AMQuote from: LC on February 01, 2016, 02:24:36 AMAre we talking instances real mod bias? Cause I've seen/heard about some weird theories and other shit out there.There have been some cases of bias or inconsistency that I've had to clear up or reverse in the past though. It's less of a problem now than it was earlier on in my opinion.I mean in general, like shady decisions that are clearly more towards certain users, or even overall. Like a mod banning someone for saying something they personally were offended by. Or a mod screwing over another member.I don't think anyone has been banned over something that a mod has been personally offended by. The first and third have happened though. Kiyo being the example of someone who screwed over another member. The first happening a few times over the course of this websites history, but calling them shady would be outright false.Ok by personally offended by I mean for something that wasn't against the rules. No Das, you pming people loli porn doesn't count.I know Kiyo was crazy, and that's the only person in which I understood why everyone lost their shit. But I always see more claims of outright "wrong decisions" made by mods. I'm incredibly non partial to a lot of people on here, especially those I like, and I've found it really hard to really say there has been anything done wrong outside of KiyoWell there actually have been a few made by mods in the past. Sometimes threads are locked that shouldn't be, sometimes people are warned that shouldn't be. There's even been an couple instances where someone was banned who shouldn't have been. Completely removing bias from people is outright impossible, however people don't always intentionally act upon their biases. For example we've had times where mod(s) were inconsistent when it came to locking threads. They may not have been actively searching out threads made by a specific group of users to lock, but they ended up leaving threads open of the same type that were made by other users. This was something that was brought to our attention by a couple members speaking up about it.
Quote from: BUILD DAS WALL on February 01, 2016, 02:37:15 AMQuote from: LC on February 01, 2016, 02:34:31 AMunsolicited I disagree.And that was the first case of it happening. I didn't see anything in the rules.QuoteSexual/Shock/Gore images and videos must remain in Anarchy only.Das, we've banned people before for this. You aren't the first one and you probably won't be the last either.Granted we won't know about these unless someone reports them. Which is why I'm saying unsolicited, cause if they were solicited neither side would report it.
Don't see this "mod bias"
