Yeah but did BB really pioneer any filmmaking techniques or anything from a technical standpoint? It was a fantastic show but I don't really think it was revolutionary or anything.
Quote from: BaconShelf on August 04, 2016, 04:25:12 AMYeah but did BB really pioneer any filmmaking techniques or anything from a technical standpoint? It was a fantastic show but I don't really think it was revolutionary or anything.Yes. POV shots from objects was all Gilligan.Not that you need to pioneer anything from a technical standpoint to have a legacy. Look at Pulp Fiction. Literally all the movie did was borrow ideas and themes from other films, yet it's still considered a "classic".
Quote from: SecondClass on August 04, 2016, 12:36:07 PMQuote from: BaconShelf on August 04, 2016, 04:25:12 AMYeah but did BB really pioneer any filmmaking techniques or anything from a technical standpoint? It was a fantastic show but I don't really think it was revolutionary or anything.Yes. POV shots from objects was all Gilligan.Not that you need to pioneer anything from a technical standpoint to have a legacy. Look at Pulp Fiction. Literally all the movie did was borrow ideas and themes from other films, yet it's still considered a "classic".All of Tarantino's films are like that.
Quote from: Vien on August 04, 2016, 12:40:56 PMQuote from: SecondClass on August 04, 2016, 12:36:07 PMQuote from: BaconShelf on August 04, 2016, 04:25:12 AMYeah but did BB really pioneer any filmmaking techniques or anything from a technical standpoint? It was a fantastic show but I don't really think it was revolutionary or anything.Yes. POV shots from objects was all Gilligan.Not that you need to pioneer anything from a technical standpoint to have a legacy. Look at Pulp Fiction. Literally all the movie did was borrow ideas and themes from other films, yet it's still considered a "classic".All of Tarantino's films are like that.I know....None are considered classics but Pulp Fiction. Hence the example.
Quote from: SecondClass on August 04, 2016, 12:42:05 PMQuote from: Vien on August 04, 2016, 12:40:56 PMQuote from: SecondClass on August 04, 2016, 12:36:07 PMQuote from: BaconShelf on August 04, 2016, 04:25:12 AMYeah but did BB really pioneer any filmmaking techniques or anything from a technical standpoint? It was a fantastic show but I don't really think it was revolutionary or anything.Yes. POV shots from objects was all Gilligan.Not that you need to pioneer anything from a technical standpoint to have a legacy. Look at Pulp Fiction. Literally all the movie did was borrow ideas and themes from other films, yet it's still considered a "classic".All of Tarantino's films are like that.I know....None are considered classics but Pulp Fiction. Hence the example.reservoir dogs & kill bill
Quote from: Azumarill on August 04, 2016, 12:44:00 PMQuote from: SecondClass on August 04, 2016, 12:42:05 PMQuote from: Vien on August 04, 2016, 12:40:56 PMQuote from: SecondClass on August 04, 2016, 12:36:07 PMQuote from: BaconShelf on August 04, 2016, 04:25:12 AMYeah but did BB really pioneer any filmmaking techniques or anything from a technical standpoint? It was a fantastic show but I don't really think it was revolutionary or anything.Yes. POV shots from objects was all Gilligan.Not that you need to pioneer anything from a technical standpoint to have a legacy. Look at Pulp Fiction. Literally all the movie did was borrow ideas and themes from other films, yet it's still considered a "classic".All of Tarantino's films are like that.I know....None are considered classics but Pulp Fiction. Hence the example.reservoir dogs & kill billNeither are considered classics in the vein of Citizen Kane or Gone With The Wind
Quote from: SecondClass on August 04, 2016, 12:45:01 PMQuote from: Azumarill on August 04, 2016, 12:44:00 PMQuote from: SecondClass on August 04, 2016, 12:42:05 PMQuote from: Vien on August 04, 2016, 12:40:56 PMQuote from: SecondClass on August 04, 2016, 12:36:07 PMQuote from: BaconShelf on August 04, 2016, 04:25:12 AMYeah but did BB really pioneer any filmmaking techniques or anything from a technical standpoint? It was a fantastic show but I don't really think it was revolutionary or anything.Yes. POV shots from objects was all Gilligan.Not that you need to pioneer anything from a technical standpoint to have a legacy. Look at Pulp Fiction. Literally all the movie did was borrow ideas and themes from other films, yet it's still considered a "classic".All of Tarantino's films are like that.I know....None are considered classics but Pulp Fiction. Hence the example.reservoir dogs & kill billNeither are considered classics in the vein of Citizen Kane or Gone With The Windneither is pulp fiction, they're still classics though.
Quote from: Azumarill on August 04, 2016, 12:44:00 PMQuote from: SecondClass on August 04, 2016, 12:42:05 PMQuote from: Vien on August 04, 2016, 12:40:56 PMQuote from: SecondClass on August 04, 2016, 12:36:07 PMQuote from: BaconShelf on August 04, 2016, 04:25:12 AMYeah but did BB really pioneer any filmmaking techniques or anything from a technical standpoint? It was a fantastic show but I don't really think it was revolutionary or anything.Yes. POV shots from objects was all Gilligan.Not that you need to pioneer anything from a technical standpoint to have a legacy. Look at Pulp Fiction. Literally all the movie did was borrow ideas and themes from other films, yet it's still considered a "classic".All of Tarantino's films are like that.I know....None are considered classics but Pulp Fiction. Hence the example.reservoir dogs & kill billInglorious Bastards maybe
Spoiler Breaking Bad will be remembered like Citizen Kane or Casablanca
