QuotePosting PMs is against the rules regardless of the sender's personal feelings about itNot necessarily true.
Posting PMs is against the rules regardless of the sender's personal feelings about it
QuoteThe release of other user’s personal information, including full names, addresses, social media accounts, images, private messages, etc. without their consent is not tolerated.If the person is given permission then it's ok.
The release of other user’s personal information, including full names, addresses, social media accounts, images, private messages, etc. without their consent is not tolerated.
Quote from: LC on February 17, 2016, 11:08:57 PMQuoteThe release of other user’s personal information, including full names, addresses, social media accounts, images, private messages, etc. without their consent is not tolerated.If the person is given permission then it's ok.Way to cut out an important bit.
I can override staff and I've done it before, but I have to wonder why I'd override a staff member that was enforcing the rules correctly.
Quote from: LC on March 08, 2016, 02:50:07 PMQuote from: LC on February 17, 2016, 11:08:57 PMQuoteThe release of other user’s personal information, including full names, addresses, social media accounts, images, private messages, etc. without their consent is not tolerated.If the person is given permission then it's ok.Way to cut out an important bit.'Not caring' is implicit consent.
Quote from: Kupo & the Two G-strings on March 08, 2016, 02:51:08 PMQuote from: LC on March 08, 2016, 02:50:07 PMQuote from: LC on February 17, 2016, 11:08:57 PMQuoteThe release of other user’s personal information, including full names, addresses, social media accounts, images, private messages, etc. without their consent is not tolerated.If the person is given permission then it's ok.Way to cut out an important bit.'Not caring' is implicit consent.If I recall correctly he said he didn't want them posted in the pm.
Quote from: LC on March 08, 2016, 02:50:07 PMI can override staff and I've done it before, but I have to wonder why I'd override a staff member that was enforcing the rules correctly.Do I need to screencap the Skype convo?
Quote from: Kupo & the Two G-strings on March 08, 2016, 02:53:26 PMQuote from: LC on March 08, 2016, 02:50:07 PMI can override staff and I've done it before, but I have to wonder why I'd override a staff member that was enforcing the rules correctly.Do I need to screencap the Skype convo?Which one? I have lots of skype conversations. I honestly don't remember all of them either. If you're referring to the one where I said yeah, it might be a bit of a grey area because it wasn't explicitly stated that pms count as personal information then yeah I did say that, but you'd also be discounting the fact that you've been explicitly told multiple times that they do and proceeded to post them anyway.
I think you are confusing the order of events there, I was in a bad mood because I'd blacklisted you for two weeks.I had said last time, if you posted the PMs again the ban would be double the previous - which it was.
Hey Kupo, want me to get the lid off that bottle of pills for you?
Quote from: DAS B00T 2016 on March 08, 2016, 03:04:45 PMHey Kupo, want me to get the lid off that bottle of pills for you?I'd prefer a belt.
Quote from: LC on March 08, 2016, 02:58:50 PMQuote from: Kupo & the Two G-strings on March 08, 2016, 02:53:26 PMQuote from: LC on March 08, 2016, 02:50:07 PMI can override staff and I've done it before, but I have to wonder why I'd override a staff member that was enforcing the rules correctly.Do I need to screencap the Skype convo?Which one? I have lots of skype conversations. I honestly don't remember all of them either. If you're referring to the one where I said yeah, it might be a bit of a grey area because it wasn't explicitly stated that pms count as personal information then yeah I did say that, but you'd also be discounting the fact that you've been explicitly told multiple times that they do and proceeded to post them anyway.
I will seriously post a video of myself crying on camera if you post those PMs again. DO NOT do it.
Quote from: Kupo & the Two G-strings on March 08, 2016, 03:01:20 PMQuote from: LC on March 08, 2016, 02:58:50 PMQuote from: Kupo & the Two G-strings on March 08, 2016, 02:53:26 PMQuote from: LC on March 08, 2016, 02:50:07 PMI can override staff and I've done it before, but I have to wonder why I'd override a staff member that was enforcing the rules correctly.Do I need to screencap the Skype convo?Which one? I have lots of skype conversations. I honestly don't remember all of them either. If you're referring to the one where I said yeah, it might be a bit of a grey area because it wasn't explicitly stated that pms count as personal information then yeah I did say that, but you'd also be discounting the fact that you've been explicitly told multiple times that they do and proceeded to post them anyway.There's more to that than your screencap. I believe I also said that there was no reason to afterwards because after Psy's verbal everything calmed down and got back on track. Any more random potshots you want to take?
Oh god, please don't post the PMs again Please don't
Quote from: Verbatim on March 08, 2016, 03:05:27 PMI will seriously post a video of myself crying on camera if you post those PMs again. DO NOT do it.I'm technically not posting these again:http://sep7agon.net/the-flood/wait-so-why-was-kupo-blacklisted/msg1165271/#msg1165271Quote from: LC on March 08, 2016, 03:06:43 PMQuote from: Kupo & the Two G-strings on March 08, 2016, 03:01:20 PMQuote from: LC on March 08, 2016, 02:58:50 PMQuote from: Kupo & the Two G-strings on March 08, 2016, 02:53:26 PMQuote from: LC on March 08, 2016, 02:50:07 PMI can override staff and I've done it before, but I have to wonder why I'd override a staff member that was enforcing the rules correctly.Do I need to screencap the Skype convo?Which one? I have lots of skype conversations. I honestly don't remember all of them either. If you're referring to the one where I said yeah, it might be a bit of a grey area because it wasn't explicitly stated that pms count as personal information then yeah I did say that, but you'd also be discounting the fact that you've been explicitly told multiple times that they do and proceeded to post them anyway.There's more to that than your screencap. I believe I also said that there was no reason to afterwards because after Psy's verbal everything calmed down and got back on track. Any more random potshots you want to take?That's also not what you said on Skype.
Quote from: Mr. Psychologist on March 08, 2016, 02:58:08 PMI think you are confusing the order of events there, I was in a bad mood because I'd blacklisted you for two weeks.I had said last time, if you posted the PMs again the ban would be double the previous - which it was.>.> I didn't know much about the bad mood thing so I guessed
Quote from: Kupo & the Two G-strings on March 08, 2016, 03:03:00 PMQuote from: Mr. Psychologist on March 08, 2016, 02:58:08 PMI think you are confusing the order of events there, I was in a bad mood because I'd blacklisted you for two weeks.I had said last time, if you posted the PMs again the ban would be double the previous - which it was.>.> I didn't know much about the bad mood thing so I guessedYeah, well now you do.It's ridiculous, all of this. You knew exactly what would happen if you posted the PMs but you did it anyway, to then try and make it out as some horrendous mod abuse is beyond me.If someone is breaking the rules, report them for christs sake. The thing is though, you have to bear in mind that if your actions are what's caused someone to respond rudely to you then how are we meant to smack them in the same manner as an unprovoked attack?I'll say it here now for clarity and future reference, if you post the PMs again then it'll be double the last ban as with the previous one and that's about a month.
Quote from: Mr. Psychologist on March 08, 2016, 03:12:17 PMQuote from: Kupo & the Two G-strings on March 08, 2016, 03:03:00 PMQuote from: Mr. Psychologist on March 08, 2016, 02:58:08 PMI think you are confusing the order of events there, I was in a bad mood because I'd blacklisted you for two weeks.I had said last time, if you posted the PMs again the ban would be double the previous - which it was.>.> I didn't know much about the bad mood thing so I guessedYeah, well now you do.It's ridiculous, all of this. You knew exactly what would happen if you posted the PMs but you did it anyway, to then try and make it out as some horrendous mod abuse is beyond me.If someone is breaking the rules, report them for christs sake. The thing is though, you have to bear in mind that if your actions are what's caused someone to respond rudely to you then how are we meant to smack them in the same manner as an unprovoked attack?I'll say it here now for clarity and future reference, if you post the PMs again then it'll be double the last ban as with the previous one and that's about a month.I don't understand this VDF attitude here:QuoteQuotePosting PMs is against the rules regardless of the sender's personal feelings about itNot necessarily true.Consistency was never the staff's strong suit, and I would know firsthand.This whole incident has shown that what Verb's done is not against the rules, which makes reporting a moot point. It doesn't get anything done, which is exactly why you keep giving that excuse.
This isn't VDFIf it were any other member, it would be the same course of action.
Quote from: Mr. Psychologist on March 08, 2016, 03:20:12 PMThis isn't VDFIf it were any other member, it would be the same course of action. That's demonstrably untrue.
Daily reminder that verbal abuse is not a punishable offense
