Verb isn't angry, he's typing like a plebeian.
Quote from: Prime Meridia on January 15, 2015, 07:35:02 PMVerb isn't angry, he's typing like a plebeian.no no, it's because i'm saying "fuck" a lotthat means i'm angry, duh
You did make a contribution. One post and a whole thread
Quote from: Sprungli on January 15, 2015, 07:36:07 PMYou did make a contribution. One post and a whole threadneither of which count as contributions because they do not expand on the topic
Which, of course, tells everyone the exact opposite.
-blam!-
Quote from: ifarted69 on January 15, 2015, 07:37:20 PM-blam!-But there's no expletive filter on this site... is there?
Quote from: Verbatim on January 15, 2015, 07:21:34 PM...except i never use dictionary definitions as counter-argumentseverbecause i know they're arbitraryI'd say a dictionary definition of a word is as far from being subject to one's discretion or opinion as possible. Quite simply you are spouting bullshit
...except i never use dictionary definitions as counter-argumentseverbecause i know they're arbitrary
Quote from: Kupo on January 15, 2015, 07:39:21 PMQuote from: ifarted69 on January 15, 2015, 07:37:20 PM-blam!-But there's no expletive filter on this site... is there?Fuck no
Again you seem to be choosing your own definitions to suit your argument. This just shows how pathetic your case is and why everyone has disagreed
Quote from: Sprungli on January 15, 2015, 07:29:44 PMQuote from: Verbatim on January 15, 2015, 07:21:34 PM...except i never use dictionary definitions as counter-argumentseverbecause i know they're arbitraryI'd say a dictionary definition of a word is as far from being subject to one's discretion or opinion as possible. Quite simply you are spouting bullshitAsk yourself this question whenever you're in an argument and that argument is not explicitly about language and diction.Am I arguing about concepts, or am I arguing about definitions?If you are ever doing the latter, it's time to stop posting.
Quote from: Sprungli on January 15, 2015, 07:40:26 PMAgain you seem to be choosing your own definitions to suit your argument. This just shows how pathetic your case is and why everyone has disagreednope, not everyoneand refer to baha's excellent post on the nature of definitionsyou seem to suck webster's cock and act like the dictionary is law
Quote from: Kupo on January 15, 2015, 07:39:21 PMQuote from: ifarted69 on January 15, 2015, 07:37:20 PM-blam!-But there's no expletive filter on this site... is there?you have to use the filter bypass thingy but I dont know howso dont curse
Tell that to him, I use a definition, a fact-and he tries to dispute it.
the one true God is Doctor Doom and we should all be worshiping him.
Tell that to him, I use a definition, a fact-and he tries to dispute it. And then he does it again. Is there a reason that you are siding with him?
Quote from: Sprungli on January 15, 2015, 07:42:46 PMTell that to him, I use a definition, a fact-and he tries to dispute it.because i'm not using the fucking words in same way that you're using themyou seem to think "care" means "think about"which is fucking retarded, and not the way i'm using the word
+100 post thread about how much you don't care.I'm not sure who you think you're convincing.
"I totally don't care! In fact, I have to let everyone know that I don't care! It's mandatory that I remind them that I don't care at all about their thread that I'm replying in right now! And if anybody responds I'll tell them again about how I couldn't possibly care less! That'll show 'em!"
Quote from: Naoto on January 15, 2015, 07:44:24 PM+100 post thread about how much you don't care.I'm not sure who you think you're convincing.he really cares I just know he does
Quote from: Sprungli on January 15, 2015, 07:42:46 PMTell that to him, I use a definition, a fact-and he tries to dispute it. And then he does it again. Is there a reason that you are siding with him?By using the word differently than verb uses it you are talking past him. You may very well present a valid position that in no way contradicts verb's position. But then don't pretend you've proven him wrong.
Then would you care to elaborate on your mysterious, personalised meaning of the word?
Quote from: Baha on January 15, 2015, 07:46:44 PMQuote from: Sprungli on January 15, 2015, 07:42:46 PMTell that to him, I use a definition, a fact-and he tries to dispute it. And then he does it again. Is there a reason that you are siding with him?By using the word differently than verb uses it you are talking past him. You may very well present a valid position that in no way contradicts verb's position. But then don't pretend you've proven him wrong.If he is unwilling to use the standard definition required to adequately communicate then I am unwilling to consider his position on the matter, if you were to attempt to do what he is doing in a debate you'd be ignored.
Quote from: Sprungli on January 15, 2015, 07:47:29 PMThen would you care to elaborate on your mysterious, personalised meaning of the word?i shouldn't have toit should be obviousand i've explained it a million times alreadysomeone makes a topic talking about their dayi don't give a FUCK about how this person's day wenti don't find it interesting at all, and if anything, letting this person know that i don't care just might influence them to stop postingso i say, "i don't care about how your day went, dude"so let's check what i care about here[X] i care to respond[X] i care about whether he continues to update us about his day[] i care about his dayyou're trying to say that i care about his daywhythat's stupid
Quote from: Sprungli on January 15, 2015, 07:49:48 PMQuote from: Baha on January 15, 2015, 07:46:44 PMQuote from: Sprungli on January 15, 2015, 07:42:46 PMTell that to him, I use a definition, a fact-and he tries to dispute it. And then he does it again. Is there a reason that you are siding with him?By using the word differently than verb uses it you are talking past him. You may very well present a valid position that in no way contradicts verb's position. But then don't pretend you've proven him wrong.If he is unwilling to use the standard definition required to adequately communicate then I am unwilling to consider his position on the matter, if you were to attempt to do what he is doing in a debate you'd be ignored.Then you think when verb replies "I don't care" to a thread, that he is using the term incorrectly. You don't think he actually secretly cares but doesn't want to admit it. Why didn't you say so in the first place? (That is, you're not arguing about concepts, you're arguing about words)That is a valid position to hold. But that said,SpoilerI don't careif you think he's using the word incorrectly.
(☠) "you cared enough to respond"
