I thought disney axed all the lore upon purchase?
Quote from: Keyu on November 29, 2014, 06:42:24 AMI thought disney axed all the lore upon purchase?Irrelevant
Quote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 06:43:51 AMQuote from: Keyu on November 29, 2014, 06:42:24 AMI thought disney axed all the lore upon purchase?IrrelevantCompletely relevant since it would make the wiki irrelevant >:]
Quote from: Keyu on November 29, 2014, 06:44:59 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 06:43:51 AMQuote from: Keyu on November 29, 2014, 06:42:24 AMI thought disney axed all the lore upon purchase?IrrelevantCompletely relevant since it would make the wiki irrelevant >:]My point is that more impractical saber weapons exist that nobody threw a hissy fit over.
Quote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 06:47:02 AMQuote from: Keyu on November 29, 2014, 06:44:59 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 06:43:51 AMQuote from: Keyu on November 29, 2014, 06:42:24 AMI thought disney axed all the lore upon purchase?IrrelevantCompletely relevant since it would make the wiki irrelevant >:]My point is that more impractical saber weapons exist that nobody threw a hissy fit over.How? They're all practical instead of the claymore version of the lightsaber.
Quote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 06:52:26 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 29, 2014, 06:48:04 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 06:47:02 AMQuote from: Keyu on November 29, 2014, 06:44:59 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 06:43:51 AMQuote from: Keyu on November 29, 2014, 06:42:24 AMI thought disney axed all the lore upon purchase?IrrelevantCompletely relevant since it would make the wiki irrelevant >:]My point is that more impractical saber weapons exist that nobody threw a hissy fit over.How? They're all practical instead of the claymore version of the lightsaber.A lightsaber whip is anything but practical.I disagree.
Quote from: challengerX on November 29, 2014, 06:48:04 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 06:47:02 AMQuote from: Keyu on November 29, 2014, 06:44:59 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 06:43:51 AMQuote from: Keyu on November 29, 2014, 06:42:24 AMI thought disney axed all the lore upon purchase?IrrelevantCompletely relevant since it would make the wiki irrelevant >:]My point is that more impractical saber weapons exist that nobody threw a hissy fit over.How? They're all practical instead of the claymore version of the lightsaber.A lightsaber whip is anything but practical.
Quote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 07:52:23 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 29, 2014, 07:23:28 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 06:52:26 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 29, 2014, 06:48:04 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 06:47:02 AMQuote from: Keyu on November 29, 2014, 06:44:59 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 06:43:51 AMQuote from: Keyu on November 29, 2014, 06:42:24 AMI thought disney axed all the lore upon purchase?IrrelevantCompletely relevant since it would make the wiki irrelevant >:]My point is that more impractical saber weapons exist that nobody threw a hissy fit over.How? They're all practical instead of the claymore version of the lightsaber.A lightsaber whip is anything but practical.I disagree.Even though the chances of accidentally removing a limb is infinitely higher than the claymoresaber from the trailer?The whip is literally the epitome of impractical.Nah there are a lot of uses for it. Makes for a great weapon.
Quote from: challengerX on November 29, 2014, 07:23:28 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 06:52:26 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 29, 2014, 06:48:04 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 06:47:02 AMQuote from: Keyu on November 29, 2014, 06:44:59 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 06:43:51 AMQuote from: Keyu on November 29, 2014, 06:42:24 AMI thought disney axed all the lore upon purchase?IrrelevantCompletely relevant since it would make the wiki irrelevant >:]My point is that more impractical saber weapons exist that nobody threw a hissy fit over.How? They're all practical instead of the claymore version of the lightsaber.A lightsaber whip is anything but practical.I disagree.Even though the chances of accidentally removing a limb is infinitely higher than the claymoresaber from the trailer?The whip is literally the epitome of impractical.
Quote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 07:55:30 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 29, 2014, 07:54:18 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 07:52:23 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 29, 2014, 07:23:28 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 06:52:26 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 29, 2014, 06:48:04 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 06:47:02 AMQuote from: Keyu on November 29, 2014, 06:44:59 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 06:43:51 AMQuote from: Keyu on November 29, 2014, 06:42:24 AMI thought disney axed all the lore upon purchase?IrrelevantCompletely relevant since it would make the wiki irrelevant >:]My point is that more impractical saber weapons exist that nobody threw a hissy fit over.How? They're all practical instead of the claymore version of the lightsaber.A lightsaber whip is anything but practical.I disagree.Even though the chances of accidentally removing a limb is infinitely higher than the claymoresaber from the trailer?The whip is literally the epitome of impractical.Nah there are a lot of uses for it. Makes for a great weapon.But a crossguard is impractical? KYes. If you've ever seen the technique required to use a Claymore, the fact that the hand guard could cut you or get cut off is very impractical. A whip if used properly could slice the shit out of people.
Quote from: challengerX on November 29, 2014, 07:54:18 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 07:52:23 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 29, 2014, 07:23:28 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 06:52:26 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 29, 2014, 06:48:04 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 06:47:02 AMQuote from: Keyu on November 29, 2014, 06:44:59 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 29, 2014, 06:43:51 AMQuote from: Keyu on November 29, 2014, 06:42:24 AMI thought disney axed all the lore upon purchase?IrrelevantCompletely relevant since it would make the wiki irrelevant >:]My point is that more impractical saber weapons exist that nobody threw a hissy fit over.How? They're all practical instead of the claymore version of the lightsaber.A lightsaber whip is anything but practical.I disagree.Even though the chances of accidentally removing a limb is infinitely higher than the claymoresaber from the trailer?The whip is literally the epitome of impractical.Nah there are a lot of uses for it. Makes for a great weapon.But a crossguard is impractical? K
Quote from: BaconShelf on November 29, 2014, 09:02:19 AMIt's not like this is any more practicalYes it is. Not to mention that's Halo and Elites fight a specific way.
It's not like this is any more practical
"The user will hurt themselves more than anyone else"http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Crossguard_lightsaberhttp://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Lightwhiphttp://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Guard_shoto
Eh, Shoto one doesn't look that impractical.